Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 06/03/2008 View Mon 06/02/2008 View Sun 06/01/2008 View Sat 05/31/2008 View Fri 05/30/2008 View Thu 05/29/2008 View Wed 05/28/2008
1
2008-06-03 India-Pakistan
Terrorists now swear by 'qattal'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2008-06-03 16:23|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 It's always our fault.

"Attacking the West for arming Mujahideens in Afghanistan in late 1970s"

We should have left these dirtbags to the Soviets.
Posted by AlanC 2008-06-03 16:53||   2008-06-03 16:53|| Front Page Top

#2 The funny thing is, they've already had experience with an "EU kind of set-up". It was called the British Raj.

I guess they shouldn't of kicked the British out.

Posted by Frozen Al 2008-06-03 17:03||   2008-06-03 17:03|| Front Page Top

#3 Yes. Giving sophisticated weaponry to sub-human savages is never a good idea. See: GAZA
Posted by Scooter McGruder 2008-06-03 17:05||   2008-06-03 17:05|| Front Page Top

#4 The senior leader said what is now happening in the name of terrorism is nothing but proxy war. "Today two countries don't fight with each other. Terrorists are trained and are being sent out by establishments to wage proxy war with each other," he claimed.

i think of iran,pakistan and saudi when i read this!
Posted by Paul 2008-06-03 17:07||   2008-06-03 17:07|| Front Page Top

#5 Today two countries don't fight with each other. Terrorists are trained and are being sent out by establishments to wage proxy war with each other...

Proof we need to stop fighting proxy wars with these 7th century loving goat raping animals.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2008-06-03 17:20||   2008-06-03 17:20|| Front Page Top

#6 I guess they shouldn't of kicked the British out.

If the British had left 20 years before, there would have been no partition
Posted by john frum 2008-06-03 17:26||   2008-06-03 17:26|| Front Page Top

#7 If the British had left 20 years before, there would have been no partition

Or if they had left five years later, since both the main forces pushing partition, Gandhi and Jinnah, would have been dead. That said, both Indian sides got what they wanted despite the best efforts of every Viceroy until Mountbatten. All that vain, pompous, lying lefty jerk wanted was out and he didn't care what it took--or who it hurt--to get Britain there. Wavell has my sympathy and admiration, Mountbatten nothing but my contemptuous disdain.
Posted by Thaimble Scourge of the Pixies4707 2008-06-03 18:25||   2008-06-03 18:25|| Front Page Top

#8 Isn't qattal the mutant leader on the two mooned mars in Total Recall?
Posted by swksvolFF 2008-06-03 21:53||   2008-06-03 21:53|| Front Page Top

#9 "Lies with the West ... Should arm the peace-loving people with education and strength" > HMMMMM, unless I'm missing something it appears Baber is informally ASKING THE US-WEST TO FORMALLY TAKE OVER + GOVERN THE REGION, or in altern SET-UP A PRO-WESTERN SECULAR, ANTI-ISLAMIST ORGANIZED REGIONAL BLOC = FEDERATION???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-06-03 22:07||   2008-06-03 22:07|| Front Page Top

23:48 Harcourt Jush7795
23:43 USN,Ret. (from home)
23:42 steven
23:31 crosspatch
23:29 crosspatch
23:25 Spike Uniter
23:24 ed
23:24 Spike Hupereger1977
23:16 ed
23:13 ed
23:10 KBK
22:38 JosephMendiola
22:37 Frank G
22:37 ed
22:26 JosephMendiola
22:25 Cromert
22:21 rjschwarz
22:19 rjschwarz
22:18 phil_b
22:17 DarthVader
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:09 KBK
22:09 Rambler in California
22:07 CrazyFool









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com