Article

2008-06-02 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Scientists reveal dangers of older fathers

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gorb 2008-06-02 01:42|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 Kish mir in tuches.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2008-06-02 08:07|| 2008-06-02 08:07|| Front Page Top

#2 From what data I have seen, the body just isn't designed to really have kids after 35. Risks for everything go up and it just isn't worth pressing your luck.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2008-06-02 08:20|| 2008-06-02 08:20|| Front Page Top

#3 More than 75,000 babies in Britain are born to fathers aged 40 and over each year, or more than one in 10 of all births.

Now tie this to the other news data point that implies the fastest growing portion of the UK pop is muzzie. The question begged, but will never be addressed by the controllers of information [ie MSM], is there a relationship between the two items. Since they didn't give real hard numbers on accident versus genetic issues [and even then genetics may be related to geographical point of origin and multi generational transmission imported] are we dealing with just more junk science?

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-06-02 10:04|| 2008-06-02 10:04|| Front Page Top

#4 Life is a sexually-transmitted, 100% terminal condition...

Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek 2008-06-02 11:32|| 2008-06-02 11:32|| Front Page Top

23:45 www
23:36 Abdominal Snowman
23:34 Barbara Skolaut
23:31 Grunter
23:29 George Smiley
23:25 George Smiley
23:24 USN,Ret. (from home)
23:22 George Smiley
23:19 George Smiley
23:17 Gladys
23:12 Slats Slatch7489
23:01 Procopius2k
22:55 www
22:48 JosephMendiola
22:43 Frank G
22:41 Deadeye Spating2038
22:28 OldSpook
22:28 Frank G
22:24 JosephMendiola
22:23 Redneck Jim
22:16 OldSpook
22:15 OldSpook
22:13 OldSpook
22:13 Muggsy Gling