Article

2007-10-07 Home Front: Politix

Congress Vows to Override Bush Veto on Child Health Care

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2007-10-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 When Hillary gets elected we'll all have a government run health system as good as Canada or Britain! ... oh, wait! ...

Posted by DMFD 2007-10-07 00:09|| 2007-10-07 00:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Who is pushing for real health insurance - with a $1000 deductible (O.K.. $500 if you're "poor").

Are we worried about 'catastrophic illnesses destroying families' or about getting the government (meaning me) to buy everything down to vitamins for poor folks and illegal aliens?

Posted by Bobby 2007-10-07 07:29|| 2007-10-07 07:29|| Front Page Top

#3 Bobby,

Real Health insurance would have a deductible of $3,000 for a family of four ($750 per person). It would also allow higher premiums for life style choices, smoking, weight, and homosexuality for example, just like car insurance costs more for a 19 year old male driving a Corvette.

You can get something close with an HSA.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-10-07 08:28|| 2007-10-07 08:28|| Front Page Top

#4 Here's the problem: SCIP is supposed to help poor uninsured kids, but the Dems have designed something that give free health care (paid by me) to wealthy insured adults. Oh here's another problem -- what about anchor babies?

Posted by regular joe 2007-10-07 09:38|| 2007-10-07 09:38|| Front Page Top

#5 "The Poor", "The Children". It used to be in the name of "God", "The People", "The State". The goal was and remains POWER over other people. The terms change, those seeking power, never do. To include the disaster they all seem to visit upon everyone else.

Posted by Procopius2k 2007-10-07 09:54|| 2007-10-07 09:54|| Front Page Top

#6 80,000 a year in income and 25 years old. HArdly a "Poor Children's" program anymore?

Posted by OldSpook 2007-10-07 16:51|| 2007-10-07 16:51|| Front Page Top

#7 An interesting story about the poster boy for SCHIP that the Dem's put up against Bush in their weekly radio address...turns out his family's not so poor after all.

H/T Instapundit.

Posted by mjh">mjh 2007-10-07 19:57|| 2007-10-07 19:57|| Front Page Top

#8 See also WND.com > THE COMMIES ARE COMING! Essentially little or no difference btwn Dems and Commie Party, ergo a vote for the Dems is indir a vote for Communism. * Lets not forget that DIALECTICISM > can also be ascribed or premised manipulation of any and all sides including that in direct and indirect opposition. HENCE, FASCISM > LIMITED COMMUNISM = WELL-MEANING BUT DEFECTIVE/ERRORPRONE COMMUNISM; COMMUNISM = DITTO LIMITED CAPITALISM; NATIONALISM = LIMITED GLOBALISM, ........
...................@etc. WOT > War agz Fascism = ergo WAR FOR COMMUNISM.Maionstream. Amers must look very closely at the -Isms and Personages behind the various political platforms/agendas.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-10-07 20:38|| 2007-10-07 20:38|| Front Page Top

23:40 Mike N
23:35 gorb
23:25 Mike N.
22:31 JosephMendiola
22:24 JosephMendiola
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:13 JosephMendiola
22:07 Victor Emmanuel Unomoting3635
22:06 SteveS
21:59 SteveS
21:52 Frank G
21:40 trailing wife
21:23 trailing wife
21:21 mcsegeek1
21:18 JosephMendiola
21:17 mcsegeek1
21:15 Pappy
20:59 Phinater Thraviger
20:45 Eric Jablow
20:38 JosephMendiola
20:34 Bright Pebbles
20:31 Silentbrick
20:28 JosephMendiola