Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/29/2004 View Thu 10/28/2004 View Wed 10/27/2004 View Tue 10/26/2004 View Mon 10/25/2004 View Sun 10/24/2004 View Sat 10/23/2004
1
2004-10-29 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia completes work on Bushehr reactor in Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-29 2:20:30 AM|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Nice little arrangement we've got going here: the Russians sell nuclear plants and explosives and then we blow up anything that doesn't get trucked away. Keeps the Russian nuclear engineers out of trouble. Only problem is that the Russian's customers are never around long enough to pay their bills.
Posted by Tom 2004-10-29 8:00:02 AM||   2004-10-29 8:00:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm thinking they wanted cash up front on this one.
Posted by Steve  2004-10-29 8:46:32 AM||   2004-10-29 8:46:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Easy solution here. What's Russia's price? $5B? Done.
Posted by lex 2004-10-29 12:08:00 PM||   2004-10-29 12:08:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Maybe the solution to nuclear proliferation is for one or two of the offending sites to disappear in a mushroom cloud pour encourager les autres. A nuclear cluebat might get the attention of rogue states who wish to be considered one of the big boys.
Posted by RWV 2004-10-29 1:55:26 PM||   2004-10-29 1:55:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 RWV is right.

We've reached a stage where some tyrants need to experience "serious consequences" on a very large scale. For the sake of our own survival.

I suggest mushroom in Tehran and Mecca.
Posted by Kalle (kafir forever) 2004-10-29 3:35:06 PM|| [http://radio.weblogs.com/0103811/categories/currentEvents/]  2004-10-29 3:35:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Airstrike in 5,4,3,2....

Or maybe, as RWV has pointed out, some 'nuclear accident' occurs with anyone who considers themselves to be a big boy now...
Posted by Tony (UK) 2004-10-29 4:21:11 PM||   2004-10-29 4:21:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 I don't believe there will any attacks. Air strikes won't destroy all nuclear facilities because they are not all known. In addition, the US Army is not large enough to ensure an clear victory over a mountainous country of 70 million. An invasion could end up as a struggle of attrition, in which the mullahs will have the advantage.

Europe will have to again get used to living under the threat of nuclear missiles. But unlike the Soviets, the Iranians have the explicit goal of converting or killing you all.
Posted by ed 2004-10-29 4:35:02 PM||   2004-10-29 4:35:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Ed, you don't have to destroy them all. You only have to send a message that there are consequences to actions and that threats have a price. Deterrence works if both sides believe that the consequence is certain. I can't imagine the government of a country like Iran continuing in power if it precipitates a nuclear strike.
Posted by RWV 2004-10-29 4:59:05 PM||   2004-10-29 4:59:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 RWV,
If we are going to attack the king, make damn sure we kill him dead. If the regime is not overthrown and they are still able to make nuclear weapons, then all we've done is unite a nuclear armed nation. Remember, getting nuclear weapons is popular with Iranians. The mullahs know this.
Posted by ed 2004-10-29 5:04:38 PM||   2004-10-29 5:04:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Think ball bearings. Think WW-II and Schweinfurt. Think Strategic...

You only have to take out one link, in toto, to stop the assembly line. And I still believe that we could and should be coordinating with the Persian people the overthrow of the Mad Mullahs. Then they can run their own country - and I believe they are infinitely capable of doing so, unlike the Arabs, and we need only provide key support. Think Decap by Air America - the real one. Think SF limited Ops. My $0.02.
Posted by .com 2004-10-29 5:06:30 PM||   2004-10-29 5:06:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Schweinfurt as in Black Thursday?
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-29 5:09:20 PM||   2004-10-29 5:09:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Yep. Hard times until the fighter cover was there. They were the Real Deal and saved our asses. Just because it was bad, doesn't mean it wasn't the correct strategy. Wanna tango on that? Lol!

Current day reality check: You don't fear a Black Thursday over Iran, do you? Lol!
Posted by .com 2004-10-29 5:14:00 PM||   2004-10-29 5:14:00 PM|| Front Page Top

03:31 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:21 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:30 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:26 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:36 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:33 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:39 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:42 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:41 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:48 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:43 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:08 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:07 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:03 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:03 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:01 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:56 Grumpy Uncle Sam
03:49 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:10 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:16 Grumpy Uncle Sam
04:14 Grumpy Uncle Sam
08:30 rkb
08:24 Shipman
01:23 Asedwich









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com