Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/30/2004 View Tue 06/29/2004 View Mon 06/28/2004 View Sun 06/27/2004 View Sat 06/26/2004 View Fri 06/25/2004 View Thu 06/24/2004
1
2004-06-30 Home Front: WoT
Fears of a July 4 terrorist attack
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-06-30 11:16:19 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Couple of thoughts. First, they have to warn us "just in case" just like they have to keep the color code elevated. If they say all is well and we actually get hit they'll be in big dog-doo. Second, how many warnings have we had, time and time again. Sure Al Queda might be fogging up the system with false warnings, but they also might simply be redirecting so we look here while they attack there. Third, an attack on US soil will jump Bush's ratings through the roof.

My prediction, no attacks in the US, at least until after the election. I expect the Olympics, probably a truck bomb somewhere in Athens where the media can get to with ease. Probably a hotel far enough away from the festivities to allow for some sloppier security but close enough for the worlds media to get to with ease so that a smoking column can appear on all broadcasts around the globe.
Posted by yank  2004-06-30 11:56:29 AM|| [politicaljunky.blogspot.com]  2004-06-30 11:56:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Alright, let's start a pool. What method will the osamanauts use this time ?
1. Planes
2. Bombing a crowded place
3. Bombing infrastructure
4. Poison/chem/bio weapon
5. Other
Posted by Crikey 2004-06-30 12:27:47 PM||   2004-06-30 12:27:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Yank I disagree: an attack on US soil will jump Bush's ratings through the roof.

An attack just before the election will allow the partisan media to begin to formulate a narritave based on the following myth: The liberation of Iraq was a distration from The War on Terror. Once they have a lead to further shape the narrative they can draw freely (as they already do) from the LLL. You can bet that the above the fold feeders (within days of an attack) will all scream: Bush Failed.
Posted by Dragon Fly  2004-06-30 12:32:52 PM||   2004-06-30 12:32:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 They might scream that (depending upon what/where was attacked) but I don't think it will resonate with the people just as attempts to blame American foreign policy for 9/11 had zero effect on the public. Americans tend to rally around the President after an attack and most Americans tend to blame the attackers for the attack.
Posted by yank  2004-06-30 12:48:52 PM|| [politicaljunky.blogspot.com]  2004-06-30 12:48:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I agree with: Americans tend to rally around the President after an attack...

But this part is tenuous given the tone of the left: Most Americans tend to blame the attackers for the attack...
Posted by Dragon Fly  2004-06-30 12:51:21 PM||   2004-06-30 12:51:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Be that as it may, I'll be out on the Capitol Mall come July 4. (Look for me on PBS... I'll wave. ;) )

I'll be looking for dropped backpacks and people muttering as I go. If I find one, I'll let the Cap Police know and continue on my way.

While July 4 is a date packed with meaning for us, haven't the Osamanauts been more interested in picking dates with meaning for them?
Posted by eLarson 2004-06-30 2:10:11 PM||   2004-06-30 2:10:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 eLarson is right regarding the dates IMHO. Still, if there is an attack, let's hope it will be more in the lines of the 4th july el al shooting than anything else.
Posted by Anonymous5089 2004-06-30 2:39:38 PM||   2004-06-30 2:39:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 If there's a succesful attack on the 4th, the date will have meaning for us both. I expect it will go down as the big nackba, the nackba where no choice was given, just orders.
Posted by Shipman 2004-06-30 3:24:28 PM||   2004-06-30 3:24:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 "But this part is tenuous given the tone of the left: Most Americans tend to blame the attackers for the attack..."
The far-left would side against Bush even if he cured cancer and aids and found an environmental friendly alternative to oil. Its best to ignore them. Its the center-left and center in general that concerns me, and attacks on the President after a terrorist attack will cause the left to lose credibility all around.
Posted by yank  2004-06-30 3:52:35 PM|| [politicaljunky.blogspot.com]  2004-06-30 3:52:35 PM|| Front Page Top

12:10 AnonymousAuthor
00:42 Anonymous5889
11:13 jibril
23:41 John
12:58 Anonymous5563
09:59 jibril
01:02 Anonymous5563
14:46 Balima Bingo
23:49 jibril
13:58 badanov
13:44 Balima Bingo
02:55 Anonymous5563
23:07 jawa
23:02 jawa
22:51 jibril
03:44 Anonymous5563
12:44 jibril
01:19 Anonymous5563
18:42 Anonymous5581
12:46 ed
12:33 jibril
10:44 Anonymous5563
17:45 Diane
09:19 jibril









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com