Article

2004-06-10 Iraq-Jordan

Saddamâs victims warn USA about âenemiesâ posing as allies

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by rex 2004-06-10 4:48:08 PM|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 And by the headline I thought this was another article about France...

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-06-10 6:32:02 PM|| 2004-06-10 6:32:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 But really not surprising...

Posted by mmurray821 2004-06-10 6:48:49 PM|| 2004-06-10 6:48:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 This is just more of the media harping on their 'why isn't everythng perfect' theme. Given the frequent references to 'intelligence tips' I must assume there is a mechanism to report this kind of information to the coalition authorities. I suggest the 'victims' use it.

Posted by Phil B 2004-06-10 7:01:25 PM|| 2004-06-10 7:01:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I must assume there is a mechanism to report this kind of information to the coalition authorities. I suggest the 'victims' use it.
I assume the victims-there's no need to put the word in parentheses, it's fact- have warned coalition troops, but they see no change in US policy. I suggest you should read the whole article -I cut & pasted only a bit.

This is just more of the media harping on their 'why isn't everythng perfect' theme.
This article appeared in the Washington Times, which we know is a WH friendly media source. For that reason, I suspect there's little spin involved in this article. Advice is not carping, it's advice and should not be dismissed because it's not cheerleading.

Posted by rex 2004-06-10 7:20:31 PM|| 2004-06-10 7:20:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 And where are all the polygrah tests, in the hiring proceedure? If they refuse, don't consider; if they do submit and it "pings" inacurate...voila!!

Posted by smn 2004-06-10 8:37:31 PM|| 2004-06-10 8:37:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Polygraph tests are a superstition. They're like cold reading - both methods rely on sharp, perceptive operators. There's a reason they're not accepted as evidence in court in any sane jurisdiction.

Posted by Mitch H. 2004-06-11 7:57:56 AM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/] 2004-06-11 7:57:56 AM|| Front Page Top

01:57 Mark Espinola
01:22 Silentbrick
01:19 Mark Espinola
08:19 Howard UK
07:57 Mitch H.
04:18 Howard UK
00:39 Super Hose
00:24 Super Hose
23:56 painterdave
23:47 Rafael
23:35 OldSpook
23:32 Alaska Paul
23:32 Infidel Bob
23:26 Alaska Paul
23:18 RWV
23:09 RWV
23:05 Zenster
23:00 RWV
22:55 Mike Sylwester
22:52 Mike Sylwester
22:51 RWV
22:49 Bomb-a-rama
22:46 Alaska Paul
22:41 tu3031