Article

2004-02-16

More on the role of the Iranian al-Qaeda

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2004-02-16 1:18:58 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 In yesterdays article on the Board of Directors, Garzon said "This council has, on some issues, maintained positions critical of Osama bin Laden". Does that make the rumor of Bin Ladin being in Iran less likely, or does it mean that his lieutenants are now following their own agenda?

Posted by Paul Moloney 2004-2-16 1:35:47 AM|| 2004-2-16 1:35:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Unclear, which is why I'm looking around to get a full transcript of what all Garzon said. Though Saif al-Adel and Junior (Saad) both have extremely strong ties to bin Laden, so I'd be surprised if they've decided to implement their own agenda unless there's been some kind of a coup.

Posted by Dan Darling 2004-2-16 1:41:26 AM|| [http://www.regnumcrucis.blogspot.com] 2004-2-16 1:41:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Or, if Osama's worm food. Then they'd be free to pursue their own agendas.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-2-16 8:47:09 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2004-2-16 8:47:09 AM|| Front Page Top

01:31 M. Simon
12:05 Ptah
08:09 Raptor
01:43 JFM
00:16 SON OF TOLUI
00:09 B
22:57 whitecollar redneck
22:54 Pappy
22:45 phil_b
22:45 Ed Becerra
22:44 .com
22:41 .com
22:38 GK
22:37 Jennie Taliaferro
22:34 Frank G
22:32 Frank G
22:24 4thInfVet
22:20 dataman1
22:18 Hyper
22:16 dataman1
22:14 Pappy
22:09 Paul Moloney
22:08 Scott
22:08 Tony (UK)