Article

2003-12-03 Home Front

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2003-12-03 12:37:09 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Anyone know if these are the same rules and procedures used at Nuremberg? It would be interesting to see the Guardian argue itself into proclaiming the Nazi war crimes trials were invalid.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2003-12-3 8:25:57 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2003-12-3 8:25:57 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 These are not "disenfranchised" punks who knocked over a 7-11. The lawyers need to get a grip or fugg off. The fact that they were not shot where they stood over there in Wackiland is because we wanted to drain every phreakin' last drop of intel from them, first. What happens to the worthless leftover husk of these failed killer jihadis should not be confused with what should happen to honorable men.

Posted by .com 2003-12-3 9:05:07 AM|| 2003-12-3 9:05:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 "Archaic rules dating from the 1940's"
Seems to me, that's the last time we had a major war that we actually captured "illegal combattants" and held them prisoner. If that's the last time the rules NEEDED to be used, what's 'archaic' about that? The Guardian is brown and smelly.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-12-3 11:47:27 AM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-12-3 11:47:27 AM|| Front Page Top

19:31 Pastor Lee Wasson
04:11 SK
00:37 CrazyFool
23:43 possecommietaters
23:19 whatmoderatemuslim
23:14 Robert Crawford
22:38 whydoessuhaliveinparis?
22:35 Hyper
22:29 Catfish N. Cod
22:28 Catfish N. Cod
22:08 Catfish N. Cod
22:01 Old Patriot
21:58 Catfish N. Cod
21:57 Super Hose
21:46 Catfish N. Cod
21:43 Super Hose
21:42 tu3031
21:41 Super Hose
21:25 Dan Darling
21:25 babsthelimousineliberal
21:24 Super Hose
21:22 john
21:21 Rawsnacks
21:21 Super Hose