Article

2003-07-15 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Bulldog 2003-07-15 4:58:38 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I think that to say the storming of the Bastille was meaningless because no revolutionary was actually in there is like saying that a certain tea shipment being thrown overboard in a certain English colony was also unimportant... From what I gather both actions had more symbolic meaning than actual, but that doesn't make either action meaningless.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-7-15 6:05:38 AM|| 2003-7-15 6:05:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 "...to say the storming of the Bastille was meaningless..."

To say bollox is your trademark, Aris. Where is the word "meaningless" in my comment?

Posted by Bulldog 2003-7-15 6:40:24 AM|| 2003-7-15 6:40:24 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Where did I say that you used the word "meaningless"?

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-7-15 7:15:04 AM|| 2003-7-15 7:15:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Bulldog The circular logic that Aris uses places his head firmly up his rectum far enough to see daylight.

dorf

Posted by Anonymous 2003-7-15 8:14:58 AM|| 2003-7-15 8:14:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Thank you for your contribution, anonymous idiot. It's not circular reasoning to say that I never accused someone of what he's accusing me of accusing him.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-7-15 8:54:10 AM|| 2003-7-15 8:54:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Well then Aris, who did "say the storming of the Bastille was meaningless", if not me? The Dutch Finance Minister? An invisible commentator whose posts only you can read? Or were you conversing with yourself, hypothesising on the error of judgement of anyone who should be foolish enough to consider the storming of the Bastille "meaningless"?

Posted by Bulldog 2003-7-15 9:15:05 AM|| 2003-7-15 9:15:05 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Dude. You made a disparaging comment about the storming of Bastille. I agreed with the facts you mentioned, that there was nobody really worth freeing in there, but indicated that nonetheless we can't say the event was meaningless. You didn't indicate whether you thought it meaningless or not, and I didn't say you said it. Each of us made a rather heavy implication on whether we considered it meaningful or not, of course. :-)

Should I have added a "however" in there, as in "I think that to say *however*" ?? Consider it added, if you're gonna be that nitpicky. :-)

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-7-15 9:25:43 AM|| 2003-7-15 9:25:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 In short my sentence corresponds "It'd be however wrong to say that..." instead of "You were wrong to say that..."

Happier now?

And it's spelled bollocks, I think.

Posted by Aris Katsaris 2003-7-15 9:28:11 AM|| 2003-7-15 9:28:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Yes, Aris, your spelling is spot on, but I try to limit my cursing for the sake of sensitive souls and internet censorbots.

Making a disparaging coment about something does not indicate you think it's meaningless. I don't suppose George Mallory believed ascending Everest to be a meaningless exercise when he responded "because it's there" to the question "why do you want to climb it". Storming of the Bastille was important symbolically; its immediate effect wasn't as glorious or triumphal as one might at first believe. I pointed out one of its overlooked or ignored aspects, which, being disparaging towards the French, is topical. ;) Read too much from between the lines and you'll forget the text itself.

Posted by Bulldog 2003-7-15 10:05:35 AM|| 2003-7-15 10:05:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Hello? Bastille Day is a side note. Who cares?

The point is that France wants a ticket to ride.

"From out of the west, with clattering hooves and a cry of 'Hi-Yo, Welfare! Away!'"

Posted by mojo 2003-7-15 10:19:46 AM|| 2003-7-15 10:19:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Well, at least the French threw out the Royal parasites--England is still supporting that bunch of inbred Germans

Posted by Not Mike Moore 2003-7-15 12:06:02 PM|| 2003-7-15 12:06:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Aris, Bulldog, and all: Let's grow up a bit and stop insulting each other. Civil, well-reasoned discourse is the goal. You're going to need to be making a PayPal donations soon -- you're costing Fred a lot of traffic for little value!

Meanwhile, the point is that the EU made a budget rule and France and other members are breaking it. What does it mean that the EU's second biggest economy violates the rules and then calls for a softening of the rules? Is France declaring independence from the EU? Or just abiding by the rules only when it suits?

Posted by Tom 2003-7-15 12:16:10 PM|| 2003-7-15 12:16:10 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Not meaningless - reprehensible.

Because not only was no actual liberation performed, but the governor of the Bastille was murdered after surrendering. A significant portent of things to come.

Posted by buwaya 2003-7-15 12:40:37 PM|| 2003-7-15 12:40:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 What you all seem to ignore is that France can want a lot of things... but it won't get them. No country (not even the Germans who could need a more flexible stability pact as well) have supported the French. And as the saying goes: "Pacta Sunt Servanda." So much for France "dominating" the EU.

Posted by True German Ally 2003-7-15 2:36:44 PM|| 2003-7-15 2:36:44 PM|| Front Page Top

12:17 Anonymous4803
09:37 raptor
04:31 R. McLeod
00:54 Rafael
00:10 Mark IV
23:24 True German Ally
23:18 Bomb-a-rama
22:42 Alaska Paul
22:32 Fred
22:31 Alaska Paul
22:26 Dexter M. Duck
22:09 Fred
21:43 Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)
21:02 Watcher
20:52 Charles
19:44 Bulldog
19:42 Bulldog
19:30 Cyber Sarge
19:23 Ri'Neref
19:21 Cyber Sarge
19:11 Paul Moloney
18:28 Brian
18:03 Yosemite Sam
17:45 Douglas De Bono