Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 11/20/2017 View Sun 11/19/2017 View Sat 11/18/2017 View Fri 11/17/2017 View Thu 11/16/2017 View Wed 11/15/2017 View Tue 11/14/2017
1
2017-11-20 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
The world turned upside down: New York Times says "What if Ken Starr Was Right?"
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Herb McCoy7309 2017-11-20 00:00|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 Gee, it isn't even April.
Posted by S. Those9453 2017-11-20 00:07||   2017-11-20 00:07|| Front Page Top

#2 if Gore had become Pres in 98, W probably would not have been elected in 2000 then Obama might not have been elected in 2008 and ditto for trump in 2016

alt history
Posted by lord garth 2017-11-20 00:46||   2017-11-20 00:46|| Front Page Top

#3 Times readers having an apoplectic fit

Unless it results in mass Seppuku, I could care less.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-11-20 03:46||   2017-11-20 03:46|| Front Page Top

#4 "What if Ken Starr was right?"

Why did the left wing press not do due diligence back then? Was the left wing agenda more important than anything else?

I'm wondering what the upcoming mini-series, Waco is going to look like? Another snow job or factual.
Posted by JohnQC 2017-11-20 09:57||   2017-11-20 09:57|| Front Page Top

#5 Should have prefaced comment with a "Not a What if question."
Posted by JohnQC 2017-11-20 09:58||   2017-11-20 09:58|| Front Page Top

#6 Why did the left wing press not do due diligence back then?

They did. They just couldn't find anything on Bob Dole.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-11-20 10:18||   2017-11-20 10:18|| Front Page Top

#7 Clinton was not impeached for fooling around with Monica. He was impeached for perjury, among other charges.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia  2017-11-20 10:33||   2017-11-20 10:33|| Front Page Top

#8 Judge Moore has not been known for lying (or fooling around) despite what Gloria A. says.
Posted by JohnQC 2017-11-20 12:12||   2017-11-20 12:12|| Front Page Top

#9 After Perez cleared out a lot of Bernie and Pocahontas professional staff at the DNC, a lot of dems/progs saw the groundwork for yet another hildabeest run. This is about gutting that before it gets any kind of legs, and telegraphing its ok for the stories to come out. Watching Clinton Inc, circle the wagons and shriek with coded threats about their much-feared dirty stories library, many are just laying low. But there are far too many bodies for even the Queen of Darkness to silence, and I think the crumbling of the Foundation takes away the candy store to buy off those that really know the dirt.
Posted by NoMoreBS 2017-11-20 20:16||   2017-11-20 20:16|| Front Page Top

#10 Why did the left wing press not do due diligence back then?
The way I remember it a number of Dems sat out that year certain that Bush the Elder was going to win. By the time the economy started to stumble it was too late.

Clinton (like Obama after him) ran as a test and somehow got traction. Then once the Dems actually won an election they thought they couldn't win they just rallied around their guy no matter what was said.
Posted by rjschwarz 2017-11-20 22:50||   2017-11-20 22:50|| Front Page Top

23:51 newc
23:42 CrazyFool
23:35 Seeking cure for ignorance
23:08 JohnQC
22:50 rjschwarz
22:45 rjschwarz
22:41 3dc
21:26 Chavins Crirt6390
21:26 Besoeker
20:59 Anguper Hupomosing9418
20:44 Anomalous Sources
20:21 Anomalous Sources
20:21 CrazyFool
20:16 Zenobia Floger6220
20:16 NoMoreBS
19:58 Sloluting and Tenille8977
19:47 Hupeting Sforza8196
19:40 Glenmore
19:38 Skidmark
19:30 Rex Mundi
19:29 Anomalous Sources
19:26 Flerens Bourbon8982
19:23 TopRev
19:20 TopRev









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com