Article

2018-10-18 -Lurid Crime Tales-

State Department provided 'clearly false' statements to derail requests for Clinton docs, 'shocked' federal judge says

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Skidmark 2018-10-18 07:29|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 ....lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Would those 'home brew' communiques be the ones containing the Soetoro discussions and instructions? Just asking.

Posted by Besoeker 2018-10-18 08:30|| 2018-10-18 08:30|| Front Page Top

#2 Omarosa claims Trump knew about the hack of Hillary Clinton's emails before they were leaked

Posted by Skidmark 2018-10-18 09:37|| 2018-10-18 09:37|| Front Page Top

#3 So what? Trump predicts most everything before it happens.

Posted by gorb 2018-10-18 10:11|| 2018-10-18 10:11|| Front Page Top

#4 Until they start jailing people for making false statements to a Federal judge (good guess would be 3 - 6 months), this will keep happening.

Posted by Raj 2018-10-18 10:57|| 2018-10-18 10:57|| Front Page Top

#5 Until I see some arrests, this means nothing, because the press will do its best to ignore it and bury it.

Posted by Boss Spoper5850 2018-10-18 11:37|| 2018-10-18 11:37|| Front Page Top

#6 Our "best men" are working on this issue.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2018-10-18 12:47|| 2018-10-18 12:47|| Front Page Top

#7 The way things are going I didn't think they had any of them left.

Posted by gorb 2018-10-18 13:08|| 2018-10-18 13:08|| Front Page Top

#8 Part of draining the swamp would include putting such folks up on charges or firing them without pension.

Posted by rjschwarz 2018-10-18 15:54|| 2018-10-18 15:54|| Front Page Top

#9 Step #1: Permanently revoke their security clearances.

Posted by Besoeker 2018-10-18 17:30|| 2018-10-18 17:30|| Front Page Top

#10 Contempt of the court can land one in jail for 179 days at the discretion of the judge. One or two examples would do wonders for compliance.

Posted by Procopius2k 2018-10-18 17:58|| 2018-10-18 17:58|| Front Page Top

23:24 Lone Ranger
22:48 trailing wife
22:44 trailing wife
20:50 swksvolFF
20:47 charger
20:27 Frank G
20:23 Frank G
20:20 Frank G
20:10 Zenobia Floger6220
19:49 swksvolFF
19:35 Airandee
18:40 M. Murcek
18:24 gorb
18:23 gorb
18:16 gorb
18:08 swksvolFF
17:58 Procopius2k
17:57 swksvolFF
17:56 swksvolFF
17:49 swksvolFF
17:46 rjschwarz
17:43 rjschwarz
17:30 Besoeker
16:02 Procopius2k