Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/16/2003 View Wed 10/15/2003 View Tue 10/14/2003 View Mon 10/13/2003 View Sun 10/12/2003 View Sat 10/11/2003 View Fri 10/10/2003
1
2003-10-16 Middle East
Joseph’s tomb torched
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Atrus 2003-10-16 9:24:48 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 a Jewish/Christian holy site? Take out the Temple Mount....payback's a bitch
Posted by Frank G  2003-10-16 9:43:56 AM||   2003-10-16 9:43:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Aren't these clowns supposed to like "Yusuf" too as the father of a prophet? I think al-Majaharoon in the UK issued a fatwa against some playwright who wrote a nasty play about Jesus, Mary and Joseph. No consistency with these dopes.
Posted by OminousWhatever 2003-10-16 10:17:19 AM||   2003-10-16 10:17:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I just wonder. What are the odds 'Allah' wanted the Al-Aqsa mosque was built on top of the old Jewish temple? I mean, didn't muslims have another place to build? Surely, the religion of peace wouldn't have desecrated the holiest shrine of another religion, right?
Posted by Sorge  2003-10-16 10:17:51 AM|| [http://www.forgottenfronts.com/]  2003-10-16 10:17:51 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 different joseph. Joseph the son of jacob, wearer of coat of many colors, dreamer of dreams,grain administrator for pharoah in Egypt. NOT Joseph of Bethlehem, husband of Mary (who was presumably named for the above Joseph)
Posted by liberalhawk 2003-10-16 10:57:28 AM||   2003-10-16 10:57:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Sorge - there was no Jewish temple standing on the mount when the muslims got there - the romans had burnt it in 69 AD, and then built a temple to Jupiter on the site. IIRC, the Christians (after Constantine) built a church there.
Posted by liberalhawk 2003-10-16 10:59:07 AM||   2003-10-16 10:59:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 "Deceased" is a state, is it not?
Posted by BH  2003-10-16 11:01:23 AM||   2003-10-16 11:01:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 So the Muslims tore down one of the holiest churchest in the world to build the Temple Mount mosque?

So far Islam has pissed off every major religion in the world ( Buhdism, Christianity, Judiasm, ect. ) and they're still wondering why they're at the bottom of the food chain?
Posted by Charles  2003-10-16 12:40:01 PM||   2003-10-16 12:40:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Charles,
Don't forget the Hindus for sheer number.
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2003-10-16 4:54:18 PM||   2003-10-16 4:54:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 liberalhawk-
Thanks, should have thought that through and read more closely.

In reality it would be impossible, but if Jewish Settlers would start venerating Arafat's compound, maybe the Paleos would burn it down? At least start venerating Saeb Erekat's car, but only while he's in it.
Posted by OminousWhatever 2003-10-16 5:11:23 PM||   2003-10-16 5:11:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Actually, there are a few Hindus who believe the Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple, stolen and "repurposed" into a Muslim tomb. The evidence I've seen is pretty convincing, but I'm no expert.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2003-10-16 7:23:14 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2003-10-16 7:23:14 PM|| Front Page Top

11:45 NO MOLESTER
10:22 B
23:08 RonnieRaygun
23:00 RonnieRaygun
22:57 RonnieRaygun
22:53 RonnieRaygun
22:47 RonnieRaygun
22:45 RonnieRaygun
22:44 Robert Crawford
22:42 Not Mike Moore
22:40 Charles
22:37 Not Mike Moore
22:35 Charles
22:29 Charles
22:29 GregJ
22:20 g wiz
22:14 Super Hose
22:07 LC FOTSGreg
22:05 Super Hose
21:43 Igs
21:41 Anonymous
21:39 JDB
21:34 LGJ
21:31 Igs









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com