Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 01/24/2006 View Mon 01/23/2006 View Sun 01/22/2006 View Sat 01/21/2006 View Fri 01/20/2006 View Thu 01/19/2006 View Wed 01/18/2006
1
2006-01-24 India-Pakistan
U.S. Raid Part Of Bid To Nail Iran On Nuclear Issue
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2006-01-24 08:09|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This is just ISI bullsh*t. While questioning Khan would be great, I don't know that he could add all that much about the current situation in Iran. We know they're developing weapons, but we may not know exactly where, and I doubt Khan does either (but I'd wager the ISI has a good idea). A decent chance to get Ayman easily justifies the missle strike.
Posted by Spot">Spot  2006-01-24 08:38||   2006-01-24 08:38|| Front Page Top

#2 Getting Khan on record with respect to testifying that Iran has specific interest in developing nuclear weapons (and not just electrical power) would be very useful in persuading the UNSC to begin sanctions. Notwithstanding inaction by the UN (a redundancy, if ever there was one), Khan's testimony would still give American interests one more button on the coat for taking military action against Iran.

More than anything, Khan needs to be put through the wringer for his proliferation activities. Anything that can pry this "national hero" out of the ISI's hands is a good demonstration of power over that intensely corrupt organization.
Posted by Zenster 2006-01-24 13:59||   2006-01-24 13:59|| Front Page Top

#3 Zenster, puhlease! Is there anyone who doesn't believe Iran is seeking nuclear weapons? And would knowing it is so for a metaphysical fact change the Chinese or Russian vetoes of sanctions? If we take pre-emptive action, we'll be reviled by the same folks who did so in Iraq, regardless of the facts pre- or post-operation.

As to Kahn, leave him to the historians.
Posted by Shereque Glogum4908 2006-01-24 14:05||   2006-01-24 14:05|| Front Page Top

23:48 Fred
23:42 3dc
23:40 2b
23:35 Alaska Paul
23:17 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
23:11 Desert Blondie
23:09 3dc
23:05 Desert Blondie
23:02 Desert Blondie
23:00 Desert Blondie
23:00 3dc
22:47 Master of Obvious
22:40 Steve White
22:36 ex-lib
22:35 Frank G
22:33 ex-lib
22:33 mmurray821
22:32 ex-lib
22:31 Penguin
22:30 ex-lib
22:23 ex-lib
22:14 Omavilet Glereper9991
22:09 Snump Flaviper5941
22:07 Mike









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com