[Dawn] The United States needs to further a reconciliation process in the Pak-Afghan region which is led by both key players, Afghanistan and Pakistain, says Senator John F. I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry. Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, the Senate's current foreign policy expert, filling the vacated wingtips of Joe Biden... The senator, who heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the main foreign policy-making body in the US Congress, also urged Washington to re-establish a relationship with Islamabad which would go beyond the Afghan crisis.
In a policy statement on the floor of the Senate, Mr Kerry noted that "there is increasing anxiety in Pakistain about how the war ends in Afghanistan and what implications this will have for regional stability".
The US senator also noted that "many on both sides are questioning the value and meaning of strategic partnership".
Acknowledging that it would be difficult to rebuild this partnership, he said: "The truth is we have a lot of work to do to rebuild a productive relationship. Despite our many frustrations and setbacks, we still have more to gain by finding common ground."
The senator noted that Pakistain faced major challenges today, including an economic and fiscal crisis, a growing insurgency within its borders and cities, and chronic energy shortages.Explaining why the US needs to help Pakistain overcome these challenges, Senator Kerry said: "Whether it is finding a political solution in Afghanistan, reducing militancy, supporting democracy and civil society, or promoting economic and development reforms, the basic fact is that our interests do converge."
Both countries, however, now faced the challenge of finding ways to act together in common purpose, when and where possible, he added.
"For instance, on Afghanistan, we need to make our goals and strategy absolutely clear. Pakistain has a constructive role to play in forging a durable political settlement that will bring an end to this war," he said.
"And while we have often been frustrated by the divergence of policies on Afghanistan, it remains important that we work together to further a reconciliation process that is Pakistain-Afghan led and supported by the region's key players."
Warning against recklessness and political brinkmanship, he said: "This is a time for us to be careful, to be thoughtful, and to proceed deliberately but determinately -- as I believe we are -- to strengthen our relationship and confront our common challenges."
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
Warning against recklessness and political brinkmanship, he said: "This is a time for us to be careful, to be thoughtful, and to proceed deliberately but determinately
Yes, sane people generally find a bit of humility when their asses are being handed to them.
[An Nahar] The U.S. military has no plans to alter its troop drawdown timetable in Afghanistan despite a week of deadly unrest over the burning of the Koran at an American base, the Pentagon said Monday.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta ...current SecDef, previously Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Panetta served as President Bill Clinton's White House Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997 and was a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1977 to 1993.... and top U.S. military officer General Martin Dempsey both "believe that the fundamentals of our strategy remain sound," front man George Little told news hounds.
The United States will stick to its plan for a gradual troop drawdown and has an "unwavering" commitment to hand over to Afghan cops by the end of 2014 as agreed by the NATO ...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Originally it was a mutual defense pact directed against an expansionist Soviet Union. In later years it evolved into a mechanism for picking the American pocket while criticizing the cut of the American pants... alliance, Little said.
Attacks on U.S. and coalition troops and violent protests were "regrettable" but had not jeopardized "strong" ties between American and Afghan forces, he said.
"We're not going to let the events of the past week, which are regrettable and unfortunate and tragic, influence the long-horizon view that we're taking with respect to our partnership with Afghanistan and to our enduring work there," Little said.
Another military front man, Captain John Kirby, acknowledged tensions had flared over the burning of the Islamic holy book at the Bagram airbase and after two U.S. officers were bumped off inside the interior ministry.
But he said the scale of protests had begun to decline and that U.S. troops were still operating successfully alongside Afghan forces.
"These events -- they're troubling, they're worrisome, they've got everybody's attention. And yes, tension is high here in Kabul right now," Kirby said by video link from the Afghan capital.
"But across the country writ large ... the mission continues and we're seeing the protest activity decline."
The United States has repeatedly apologized for the Koran burning ...One of the basic tenets of Islam is that once a Koran has been printed it is expected to last for all time, no matter how old, ratty, and smelly other, lesser holy books may become. Should it actually become necessary to put a Koran out of its misery there is a ritual that includes extensive charivari, featuring long drawn-wailing and head bonking, ritual wife beating, and the sacrifice of dozens of women's noses and pubic lips. When the actual disposal has been completed there is a prescribed period of celebratory gun sex with the expectation of a minimum of two hundred casualties. Should actual infidels dispose of a Koran, Islamic custom calls for three weeks of rioting and a minimum of three dozen dead, which is a holdover from the days of Moloch worship... at an incinerator and insisted it was a mistake and not intentional.
The incident has set off seven successive days of protest and violence, with the corpse count estimated at about 40.
The United Nations ...aka the Oyster Bay Chowder and Marching Society... announced that it was pulling its international staff out of their base in the northern Afghan province of Kunduz after it came under attack Saturday by demonstrators.
The commander of NATO's International Security Assistance Force, U.S. General John Allen, withdrew all staff out of Afghan ministries at the weekend when two U.S. advisers were rubbed out in the interior ministry, apparently by an Afghan colleague.
There had been no decision yet on when coalition advisers would return to their posts at government offices, Kirby said.
Allen "is not ready right now to have the advisers go back," he said. "But this is temporary."
The general had advised his commanders to be "vigilant" given recent events but "he also made it clear that operations must continue," Kirby said.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Taliban
In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate
Following the insulting and shameful act of burning Quran in Bagram airbase that injured the religious sentiments of the Islamic world and particularly of the Afghan Muslim nation, two delegations comprising of representatives from government, the National Council of Ulemma and the National Assembly were assigned and dispatched to investigate the circumstances and causes that have led to the inhumane incident.
The delegations, while deeply touched by the religious sentiments shown by the Afghan Muslim and Mujahid nation, inform our citizens of the following:
1. In view of the particular security situation in the country, we call on all our Muslim citizens of Afghanistan to exercise self-restraint and extra vigilance in dealing with the issue and avoid resorting to protests and demonstrations that may provide ground for the enemy to take advantage of the situation.
2. After the shameful incident by the US soldiers stationed in Bagram, senior NATO and American officials expressed their deep apologies to the Muslim nation of Afghanistan and assured that such incidents will not happen again.
3. NATO officials promised to meet Afghan nation's demand of bringing to justice, through an open trial, those responsible for the incident and it was agreed that the perpetrators of the crime be brought to justice as soon as possible. Should this NOT be entirely a fabrication by the government of the Sharia Abomination Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, bring all Westerners out of Afghanistan now! If this causes chaos, ruin and devastation in Afghanistan, that would be an additional benefit. Afghanistan became dangerous when the Taliban regime stabilized.
4. The assigned delegations demand from the government of Afghanistan to take over from the Americans the authority of the Bagram prison so no such incidents can recur and calls on the US government to fully and comprehensively cooperate to this end.
5. The delegations also want from the Afghan government to formally praise those brave Afghan army soldiers and all others who showed feelings against the disrespectful act by preventing more religious books and Quran copies from burning, so that the pure Muslim sentiments of our honored Mujahid nation can remain alive. This article was published in English by the Afghan government, so it may not be entirely for domestic consumption.
Reading this piece one could get the impression that this was part of an instrument of surrender (the US being the party surrendering.)
This is the reward for Western restraint and mercy after 9/11. Bush broke with historical precedent to spare the Afghans great suffering. Here's the punishment for that good deed.
Obama should know that if there is such a trial there will be protests in this country. If he wants to hand the Republicans an issue that will certainly defeat him in November he couldn't pick a better issue than this.
We let these people forget that we conquered them. We let them forget why we conquered them. It was their holy Quran that inspired the attacks that were launched on 9/11 from Afghanistan soil. We should have burned every copy of it in that whole country and made them apologize to us. We should have punished them, all of them, let them know exactly why we were doing it and let the whole world know that this is what happens if they attack the United States.
This incident angers me more than anything that has happened since 9/11. What makes it even worse is our mealy mouthed president who actually bows down to these bastards when he should be telling them to fuck off and die, literally and publicly.
But if he can't or won't do that then get all of our people out of there before we lose any more of them. It is rapidly degenerating into an untenable situation and it isn't worth it. We have not won the hearts and minds, we have lost them. The logistics are not sustainable. If we're not going to kill them all we need to get out, but only after letting them know that if they ever attack us again we will kill them all.
"...several hundred clerics issued a statement Sunday saying they would call for a jihad against the U.S. if those responsible for the alleged desecration were not handed over to an Islamic country for punishment within three days."
Less than 4 years after an attack on the scale of Pearl Harbor these clerics, residing in defeated and occupied Afghanistan, could threaten the US with impunity.
Rather than swiftly bringing these people to justice (either by shipping them to Guantanamo, or by trying them for war crimes and punishing them.) the occupation apologized, and thereby affirmed the legitimacy of the Afghan's behavior.
Bush wasn't criticized for this for whatever reason, even though the choice between the integrity of a copy of the Koran and human lives saved because a terrorist was made to talk (at the cost of a desecrated Koran) should be trivial.
I suppose it depends on how you describe "failure". If you describe it in terms of the amount of drugs coming into the US or the amount of US drug many flowing across the border, it hasn't been a "success" at all.
If you define it in terms of the growth of an agency's budget, it has been a great success.
"Her" walls? Ya mean "Janet From Another Planet" actually has walls?
Heaven help us all. Almighty G+D will stand by and protect Israel. Thanks to Pharaoh's regime, chronic falsehoods and dithering, Our once-dominant USA has no such guarantee. That's serious shit in the End Times. AMF, girls&boys!
After being deported from Kenya last week, controversial Canadian Muslim instigator preacher Bilal Philips nonetheless delivered his planned speech to Nairobis biggest mosque on Saturday via Skype.
Philips said, "I advised against any violent demonstrations which may cost the loss of lives over this minor issue. I further advised the Muslim community to take the necessary steps to combat Islamophobia."
A Jamaican-born Muslim convert, Mr. Philips was expelled from Germany last year for allegedly advocating the killing of homosexuals. Britain and Australia have also banned him from their countries and the U.S. has named him as a suspected terrorist co-conspirator.
Last Wednesday, hours after arriving in Nairobi for a speaking tour, he was expelled to Qatar, where he resides. Kenyan newspapers said he was not wanted because he had links with "terror circles" and might poison young minds with his preaching.
However, in an email, Mr. Philips said what happened was the result of a "simple standard Kenyan immigration policy which states that whoever has been barred entry to any country would not be allow entry into Kenya. Consequently, since my passport bore a stamp indicating that I was barred entry into the U.K. in 2010, they declined giving me a visit visa."
He claimed his online lecture was well attended.
He said, "I also reminded the community that malpractices and unwarranted violence on the part of Muslims have also contributed to the global stigmatizing of Muslims and Islam. Thus, proper knowledge of authentic Islamic teachings was necessary to combat these deviations and to put Muslims back in a position to contribute positively to the world community."
Despite being banned from an increasing number of countries uncomfortable with his Wahhabi preaching, Philips continues to speak in his adopted home, Canada. Last year, he addressed two Toronto mosques whose former worshippers have joined al-Qaeda-linked terrorist groups such as Al-Shabab.
Coca Cola converted to Islam a year or two back apparently, but not the other beverages, well not yet, says Khalid* laughing. Shezan is manufactured by Ahmadis so we can neither sell the beverage nor their jams, and Pepsi is still a Jewish drink, so it is banned.
Khalid*, a canteen salesman at the new campus of Punjab University (PU) is referring to the unofficial ban on select beverages at the university campus by the the Islami Jamiat-e-Talba (IJT) an ongoing protest that was formulated after the publishing of controversial Danish caricatures of the Prophet in 2005.
The IJT, the student wing of the Jamat-e-Islami is known to interfere in the management of not just students affairs at Punjab University but the faculty as well. One duty the IJT assumes as its own is to control what is sold, where and to whom. Their control of such matters ensures that even while discussing regulations forced by the IJT on canteens, Khalid was scared of being seen speaking to this scribe or being overheard commenting against the IJT.
[An Nahar] Bulldozers razed to the ground on Monday the infamous three-story home in Pakistain where the late Osama bin Laden ... who was laid out deader than a mackerel... lived for at least five years until he was killed by U.S. special forces last May.
Only the wall of the compound remained intact, obscuring the debris of the house in the garrison town of Abbottabad ... A pleasant city located only 30 convenient miles from Islamabad. The city is noted for its nice weather and good schools. It is the site of Pakistain's military academy, which was within comfortable walking distance of the residence of the late Osama bin Laden.... where the al-Qaeda chief hid with his three wives and nine children, 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the capital.
Officials were reluctant for the site to become a shrine and the house was pulled down two months before the first anniversary of the secret U.S. Navy SEAL raid that has been described as the Pakistain army's biggest humiliation.
The fact that bin Laden lived so long just a mile from the country's premier military academy exposed the powerful military to charges of complicity or incompetence and dealt a massive blow to Pakistain-U.S. relations.
"The demolition has been completed, the three-story building was razed to the ground," a security official told Agence La Belle France Presse.
"We have been ordered to be deployed here until further instructions. The outer wall will remain intact for the moment and we don't know the plan for the future. First we will remove the debris."
Bulldozers began the demolition work late Saturday in Abbottabad's Bilal Town, which was propelled from a quiet suburb to international notoriety after the al-Qaeda leader was killed on May 2.
The debris from the flattened house was invisible from street level, hidden behind the 18-foot-high boundary wall of the compound.
But from the rooftops of surrounding houses, heaps of bricks, concrete slabs, twisted steel, broken wooden doors, a brown steel gate and two black plastic water tanks could be seen alongside two parked bulldozers.
"We found nothing in the building. Everything had already been taken away by the investigation experts," the security official told Agence La Belle France Presse.
The compound has been closely guarded by Pak security officials since the decisive U.S. operation. Foreign journalists in particular have been heavily restricted from visiting the site and local journalists from coming too close.
Hundreds of people visited after bin Laden's killing, provoking concern that it could become a shrine to Islamist gunnies in a country where attacks blamed on the Taliban and al-Qaeda have killed thousands in recent years.
The Americans buried bin Laden's body at sea, determined that no grave act as a memorial to the criminal mastermind of the September 11 attacks.
A provincial government official said the hideout had been destroyed because "the structure had become weak and cracks had appeared" following the U.S. raid, posing a risk to people who continued to visit out of curiosity.
"Moreover, since people used to come to the site in large numbers the authorities had to make special security arrangements, thereby incurring unnecessary expenditure," he said, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity.
He said no decision had been taken on the future of the site.
Many people living in the neighborhood want a girls' school erected on the bin Laden plot -- providing the local community with something they lack and a slap in the face for Islamist gunnies opposed to girls' education.
"It will be the best message to the world because gunnies are against girls' education," said Mohammad Siddique, who watched the bulldozers smash through the brick and concrete.
It is not the first time that Pakistain has faced a tricky decision about what to do with a particularly sensitive site.
The then-military ruler, Zia ul Haq ...the creepy-looking former dictator of Pakistain. Zia was an Islamic nutball who imposed his nutballery on the rest of the country with the enthusiastic assistance of the nation's religious parties, which are populated by various other nutballs. He was appointed Chief of Army Staff in 1976 by Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, whom he hanged when he seized power. His time in office was a period of repression, with hundreds of thousands of political rivals, minorities, and journalists executed or tortured, including senior general officers convicted in coup-d'ètat plots, who would normally be above the law. As part of his alliance with the religious parties, his government helped run the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan, providing safe havens, American equipiment, Saudi money, and Pak handlers to selected mujaheddin. Zia died along with several of his top generals and admirals and the then United States Ambassador to Pakistain Arnold Lewis Raphel when he was assassinated in a suspicious air crash near Bahawalpur in 1988... , demolished the central jail in the garrison city of Rawalpindi where former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto ...9th PM of Pakistain from 1973 to 1977, and 4th President of Pakistain from 1971 to 1973. He was the founder of the Pakistain Peoples Party (PPP). His eldest daughter, Benazir Bhutto, would also serve as hereditary PM. In a coup led by General Zia-ul-Haq, Bhutto was removed from office and was executed in 1979 for authorizing the murder of a political opponent... was hanged in 1979, and the prison moved to a suburb.
Bhutto's Pakistain People's Party tried to build a monument to his last days, but the work was stopped and a subsequent government converted the site into a public park named after Pakistain's founding father Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
"By demolishing this compound they want to remove Osama's name from Abbottabad history but you can't delete history," said Pak journalist and an expert on militancy, Rahimullah Yusufzai.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: al-Qaeda
No doubt that house was built with Western aid via Perv & Co.
If you know what's good for you, you won't get between a camera or an open microphone, and Balthasar
The celebrated Spanish human rights investigator Baltasar Garzón escaped a second conviction for abuse of his powers on Monday when the supreme court declared him not guilty in a case involving his investigation of crimes committed under the Franco dictatorship.
The decision came too late to save Garzón's career as an investigating magistrate as the the supreme court had already disbarred him in a separate case for wiretapping conversations between defence lawyers and their clients in a corruption investigation involving the prime minister, Mariano Rajoy's People's party.
Israeli officials say they won't warn the US if they decide to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, according to one US intelligence official familiar with the discussions.
The pronouncement, delivered in a series of private, top-level conversations, sets a tense tone ahead of meetings in the coming days at the White House and Capitol Hill.
Israeli officials said that if they eventually decide a strike is necessary, they would keep the Americans in the dark to decrease the likelihood that the US would be held responsible for failing to stop Israel's potential attack.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The US has been working with the Israelis for months to persuade them that an attack would be only a temporary setback to Iran's nuclear program.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak delivered the message to top-level US visitors to the country, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the White House national security adviser and the director of national intelligence, and top US legislators, all trying to close the trust gap between Israel and the US over how to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Netanyahu delivered the same message to all the Americans who have travelled to Israel for talks, the US official said.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment, and the Pentagon and Office of Director of National Intelligence declined to comment, as did the Israeli Embassy.
Yup too many leaks. The NYTs would jump on this in a NY minute after receiving it from the administration. If past history is an indicator, the Israelis took out the Syrian and Iraqi capability without forewarning.
#5 We didn't inform Pakistan before hitting Obsama. Posted by: Nimble Spemble
1.) No compound guards or PAK personal security element for UBL at time of attack.
2.) No PAK radar alert upon INFIL/EXFIL.
3.) Unobstructed air corridor where normally even drones are quickly identified and reported.
4.) No PAK Air Force quick reaction force (QRF), nobody even flying within the general vicinty.
5.) Token PAK outrage and dismissals.
6.) Recent visit (week before the operation) by General Petreaus.
7.) Little or very muted PAK and Saudi outrage over burial at sea.
8.) No administration blanket apologies over violation of PAK airspace.
9.) No access to the UBL compound by the PAK public.
10.) Demolition by bulldozer of UBL compound.
You cannot doubt that the collection assets are focused on the Israeli sites that will be needed for the massed airstrike and other attack assets. Logistical loadout of armaments, fuel, tankers, maintenance, follow-on forces, SOF, the heightened Israeli ADA radars, movement of main ground forces, mobilization notifications, all of this is undoubtedly being assessed, baselined and followed. we used to do this to the USSR and had a very clear nuber of events that set DEFCON triggers. I am sure that this President is doing that to our former ally Israel.
Sad to see but likely, and I would not put it past Obama to make the call to Bibby just bfore launch telling him to stand down or know that WE will alert the Persians. That is how far we have devolved under this very Manchurian Candidate.
Tragic to see us turn on a former ally, betray our forces in Afghanistan, and watch as the "Arab Spring" turned into the fundamentalist Islam re-making of the entire Middle East, with the regional war, with nukes, that it will bring. Obumble has destabilized the region that much with his clueless tampering, betrayal of old allies, encouragement of the Muslim Brotherhood and naivete.
I would not put it past Obama to make the call to Bibby just bfore launch telling him to stand down or know that WE will alert the Persians.
First someone would need to inform him, in a clear and timely fashion. Does anyone else suppose there might be a . . . snag . . . in information flow? I've never known anyone in uniform who wasn't itching to see the Mad Mullahs get the ass-kicking they so richly deserve. They don't really care who does it, and couldn't stand to see a beautifully choreographed op ruined because of that dumbfuck sitz-pinkler temporarily occupying the CINC slot.
'Tis a moot point, as Iran has times already said any unilateral Israeli attack(s) will deemed the same as a US-approved/supported milaction, justifying Iranian military andor terror response agz both.
The entire set of six questions is based on false assumptions.
Once Iran has the bomb it will not need a direct confrontation with the US. All they will need is summggle one small nuke into New York city using an anonimous terrorist, denying anyconnection to it and squeeze bambi's balls as hard as they can.
Suddenly small terrorist groups will wield tactical nukes. Such a situation will bring the US to it's knees both morally and economically.
As for Israel, our "hundreds of nuclear bombs" will not help us if the Mullahs suceed in planting two nukes in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem/ we will never be able to survive such a scenario.
We (Israel) cannot afford such a threat.
The monkey (Ahmadinagad) expressly said that he is willing to sacrifice most of Iran's population in order to anyhilate Israel. I believe him !!!!!
Israel will attack with or without US help. It is inevitable !!
the US under Bambi's direction is fucking it's friends and allies and encoraging it's enemies in a consistent manner.
By the time the American public wakes up it is going to be too late.
Posted by: Elder of Zion ||
02/28/2012 4:29 Comments ||
One question in return.
Would you stick to your opinion if we assured you that we have a team emplaced whose job is to kill your entire family in the event of Iranian nuclear attack on Israel?
Q. ... how are we factoring in and addressing the uncertainty of intelligence on Irans nuclear program?
Israeli intelligence is much better - and they have more at stake.
Q. What are the views of the Iranian people in regards to a potential war and the current sanctions regime? Is this current path helping us win or lose hearts and minds in Iran?
I think the Iranian protests of a few years ago is a fair indication. Too bad Obumbles voted 'present' again.
Q. What are the forces behind Irans nuclear program? Could one factor be a desire for a nuclear deterrence due to a sense of insecurity and threat? If so, how can we affect Irans sense of need for a nuclear deterrence? Does the increasingly bellicose and confrontational approach of the West actually increase Tehrans desire for nuclear deterrence?
One - it is not *our* fault and Two - we can remove their capabilities and, if we are lucky, the existence of their dictators.
Q. The U.S. has thousands of nuclear weapons. Israel has hundreds. Iran currently has a mighty arsenal of zero nuclear weapons. The U.S. has successfully deterred Iran for more than three decades. Why are we assuming that suddenly, deterrence will not work with Iran anymore?
Because Iran has stated, in no uncertain terms, that they will use their nuclear weapons to wipe Israel off the map and then the 'Great Satan'.
Q. The U.S. military leadership does not believe Israel has an effective military option when it comes to unilaterally destroying Iran's nuclear sites. A tense exchange is currently playing out in public between the Netanyahu government and the U.S. military, with Israeli officials accusing Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey of having "served Iran's interests." What lies behind the starkly diverging views of the Netanyahu government and the U.S. military on Iran?
A bumbling, incompetent, and basically foolish President of the United States.
Q. According to the Congressional Research Service, total war-related funding for Iraq has exceeded $800 billion -- an average of approximately $100 billion per year. With these numbers in mind -- and at a time of over 8 percent unemployment and unprecedented government bailouts -- how will we pay for a war with Iran?
Simple - we don't do any 'Nation Building' after we do our 'Nation Destroying". Afghanistan shows that it simply doesn't work in those situations.
Imagine you are a cop on a crowded street. You see a man who is apparently insane who is waving a pistol. You pull your own pistol, take aim at him and tell him to drop his. He refuses. You don't know if his pistol is loaded or not. You don't know if he will fire it or not. But it doesn't matter. You have no choice. You cannot take the chance. You have to shoot him before anyone else gets killed.
#7 reminds me of a scene from 1960's = 1980's OLIVER STONE'S "PLATOON" > "JUNIOR" = "...Free your Mind, your Ass will follow - simple"!
* INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > NATIONAL SECURITY:POSSIBLE STRIKE ON IRAN WILL STRENGTHEN MULLAH REGIME.
* WAFF > WOULD IT BE SO BAD IFF IRAN GETS NUCLEAR WEAPONS?
* TOPIX > THE DAY IRAN TESTS THE BOMB.
By most accounts, the symbolic greater threat from a Nuclear-armed Iran stems notsomuch from Iran = a sovereign nuclear Nation-State, but the PROLIFERATION + PROPAGATION OF MILITARY NUCTECHS TO HIGHLY DECENTRALIZED, CONTROLLED OR "AUTONOMOUS/INDEPENDENT", MILTERR GROUPS.
As per post-Cold War, OWG-NWO "Bipolar",
"Tripolar, or "Multipolar" World, "ARAB SPRING" ISLAMIST GOVTS-STATES WANT THEIR OWN NUCPROGS AS THE COLD WAR "NUCLEAR HEIRARCHY" NO LONGER SUFFICES.
No NucWeaps = NO SHIA OR SUNNI "CALIPHATE" PAR OR SUPERIOR TO ANY + ALL NON-ISLAM.
THE ISLAMISTS WANT NUKES, + AREN'T TAKING "NO" FOR AN ANSWER.
49 Pan and I have been discussing this MM Iranian nuclear weapons stuff for quite a while now, and this is what we have concluded so far.
It appears from our distant view that Iran is not persuing a plutonium bomb. To have some serious throw weight in a nuclear weapon you need a plutionium implosion device to keep the payload on long range missiles down.
Iran seems to be going with U235 separation by centrifuges in a big way. There are a number of underground centrifuge locations, so it is hard to take them all out.
The question then is what kind of a bomb is Iran trying to build?
Iranians want something adequate, not necessarily sophisticated, so a gun-type U235 weapon would be relatively easy to make.
We used to make these types that would fit in an artillery shell. Yield would be in tons to hundreds of tons. They are relatively simple but they are dangerous, especially with inshallah safing
These weapons could be mounted on a missile and sent for a considerable distance.
If the yield is not that high, it is still a bomb. Though inefficient or even a fizzle, it can contaminate a sizeable area with something that has a half life of 107,000 years.
Even a mass of U235 exploded over a target will make things uninhabitable.
The MMs make a crummy U235 bomb and the MSM will generate hysteria, making the propaganda victory that Iran's lack of advanced technology cannot achieve on its own.
The way we see how to deal with this is to either decapitate the regime, or make working on these projects life threatening, from the janitor to the scientist. Dinner Jacket becomes toxic and people avoid him because the employees are being targeted for killing if they work for DJ.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
02/28/2012 20:22 Comments ||
The MMs make a crummy U235 bomb and the MSM will generate hysteria, making the propaganda victory that Iran's lack of advanced technology cannot achieve on its own
And thus provide Iran with something to point at, as they continue their campaign to be a 'playah' in the region.
I wonder if nutjob just pretends to believe the Twelfth Imam thing in order to make the mullocracy believe he is fit for the job. The mullahs are driving this one. The mullahs are nuts. They will use it. They just have to know that they, the Norks, Syria, and maybe Pakistain will disappear off the map if anything bad happens to the US or Israel.
[An Nahar] La Belle France on Monday lambasted Iran for its continued pursuit of "sensitive" nuclear activities and its "uncooperative attitude" after a critical report from the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
The ineffective International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Friday it had "major differences" with Iran and expressed "serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program."
French foreign ministry front man Romain Nadal said the report "stresses Iran's ongoing sensitive activities, in violation of (U.N.) Security Council and IAEA board of governors' resolutions and without any credible civilian purpose."
"We strongly condemn the continuation of these sensitive activities and ask Iran to cooperate immediately with the IAEA and the international community," Nadal said.
"We strongly deplore Iran's uncooperative attitude, which contradicts the intentions shown in the February 15 letter from (chief nuclear negotiator Saeed) Jalili," to EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, Nadal said.
The European Union ...the successor to the Holy Roman Empire, only without the Hapsburgs and the nifty uniforms and the dancing... 's top diplomat represents the permanent five U.N. Security Council members -- the United States, Russia, China, La Belle France and Britannia -- plus Germany in talks with Iran.
The Iranian letter said Tehran was ready to resume stalled nuclear talks at the "earliest" opportunity as long as the six powers respect its right to peaceful atomic energy.
The last round of talks was held in January 2011 in Istanbul.
Diplomats to the Vienna-based IAEA are discussing what action the 35-member IAEA board will take at its next regular meeting from March 5.
It could pass a resolution condemning Iran and reporting the Islamic republic to the U.N. Security Council, which has already passed four rounds of sanctions calling on Tehran to stop uranium enrichment.
Another resolution would depend on Russia and China which have so far been more lenient on Iran that their Western counterparts.
Iran denies seeking atomic weapons and insists its nuclear program is for purely civilian purposes.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Iran
[An Nahar] Beijing on Monday hit back at Hillary Clinton ... sometimes described as The Heroine of Tuzla and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Al Haig ... over her criticism of China and Russia's stance on Syria, calling the U.S. Secretary of State's comments unacceptable.
Clinton said Friday that the international community must work to change the positions of Moscow and Beijing, which have faced intense criticism for vetoing two U.N. resolutions condemning the Syrian regime.
"It is quite distressing to see two permanent members of the Security Council using their veto when people are being murdered," she said.
"It is despicable and I ask whose side are they on? They are clearly not on the side of the Syrian people."
Asked for China's response to the comments, foreign ministry front man Hong Lei said Beijing "cannot accept that at all," and criticized the international community for trying to "impose a so-called solution" on the Syrian people.
China, which has a long-held policy of non-interference in other countries' affairs, has repeatedly defended its veto and says it is "willing to play a constructive role with all sides for the peaceful resolution of the Syrian crisis."
China and Russia last week boycotted a "Friends of Syria" meeting of more than 60 foreign ministers gathered to seek an end to the 11 months of bloodshed in which rights groups say more than 7,600 people have died.
Both countries have frustrated efforts to rein in the regime of Bashir al-Assad, including by vetoing two U.S. Security Council resolutions.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Syria
Calling it that is accepting it ergo it's not unacceptable.
Posted by: Water Modem ||
02/28/2012 9:54 Comments ||
[An Nahar] Progressive Socialist Party leader MP Walid Wally Jumblat ... Druze politician, head of the Progressive Socialist Party, who's been on every side in Leb at least four times. He'll sell you his friends for a dollar, but family comes higher because of shipping and handling... has slammed the referendum held in Syria on a new constitution for the revolt-hit country, noting that a Yemen-style solution was the best to resolve the crisis.
"Wretched are those days when constitutional theatricals are being held over the remains of bodies and amid the roar of cannons and the sound of bullets," Jumblat said in a weekly column in his party's al-Anbaa newspaper to be published Tuesday.
Syrians voted Sunday on a new constitution amid opposition calls for a boycott and new violence. Almost 90 percent of voters approved the new constitution, with a turnout of 57.4 percent of eligible voters, the interior minister announced on Monday.
Drawn up by a committee of 29 people appointed by Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad, Trampler of Homs... the new charter dropped the highly controversial Article 8 in the old charter, which stated that the ruling Baath Party was "the head of state and society," but left huge powers in Assad's hands.
"Wretched are those days when a citizen heads to so-called polling stations, although results are predetermined, while another citizen heads to death for demanding basic rights such as freedom, democracy and pluralism, and the daily toll of deaders nears 100!" Jumblat added.
He noted that "the regime's refusal of a Yemen-style political transition will complicate things further," stressing "the importance of a precise implementation of the terms of the Arab initiative, which resembles the Gulf initiative on Yemen and allows a far-reaching change in Syria."
Jumblat also criticized the "Friends of Syria" international conference held on Sunday in Tunisia, which discussed several ways to help the opponents of the Assad regime but put off a decision on sending a joint Arab League ...an organization of Arabic-speaking states with 22 member countries and four observers. The League tries to achieve Arab consensus on issues, which usually leaves them doing nothing but a bit of grimacing and mustache cursing... -U.N. peacekeeping force.
"It did not meet the aspirations of the Syrian people and the Syrian opposition," Jumblat said, calling on all the factions of the opposition to "unite their efforts."
Commenting on the remarkable shift in Hamas, always the voice of sweet reason,' stance on the Syrian regime, Jumblat hailed "Hamas Movement's historic stance," noting that "its support for the Syrian people proves that it understands the meaning of sacrificing for the sake of freedom."
Gazoo's Hamas premier Ismail Haniya on Friday hailed the "heroic" Syrian struggle for democracy during a rally in Cairo, in the first expression of support of the uprising by a Hamas leader.
"I salute all the people of the Arab Spring, or rather the Islamic Winter," Haniya told thousands of cheering people during the demonstration of support for Paleostinians and Syrians at Cairo's Al-Azhar mosque.
"I salute the heroic Syrian people, who are striving for freedom, democracy and reform," he added.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Syria
"Wretched are those days when constitutional theatricals are being held over the remains of bodies and amid the roar of cannons and the sound of bullets," Jumblat said, quoting Orson Welsh Shakespeare, William's rightly less-successful younger brother.
La Belle France said on Monday that it wants to see the Syrian regime dragged before an international court of justice, as Qatar announced it was in favor of delivering arms to rebels battling the Syrian government.
French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, speaking during a break in talks between EU foreign ministers, said he would plead for legal action during a visit later Monday in Geneva, where he will attend the United Nations ...an international organization whose stated aims of facilitating interational security involves making sure that nobody with live ammo is offended unless it's a civilized country... Human Rights Council.
"I will say this afternoon in Geneva that I hope to see the international community reflect on the conditions of a referral to the ICC," he said.
"This is a difficult dossier," he said, adding that as Syria was not a party to the Rome convention establishing the International Criminal Court ... where Milosevich died of old age before being convicted ... , the ICC could not initiate action itself.
Juppe said it would be up to the U.N. Security Council to refer the matter.
"So we will have to continue thinking and gathering elements that would enable a referral," he added.
Meanwhile, ...back at the scene of the crime, Lieutenant Queeg had an idea: there was a simple way to tell whether Manetti had been the triggerman -- just look at his shoes!... Qatar's prime minister said he was in favor of delivering arms to the Syrian opposition that is battling Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad Trampler of Homs... 's regime.
"We should do whatever necessary to help them, including giving them weapons to defend themselves," Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem al-Thani said during an official visit to Norway.
"This uprising in Syria now (has lasted) one year. For 10 months, it was peaceful: nobody was carrying weapons, nobody was doing anything. And Bashar continued killing them," he told a news conference.
"So I think they're right to defend themselves by weapons and I think we should help these people by all means," he added.
More than 7,600 people have been killed in violence across Syria since anti-regime protests erupted in March 2011, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Syria
[An Nahar] Russia on Monday slammed as "one-sided" last week's Friends of Syria meeting in Tunis that condemned Damascus ...Capital of the last remaining Baathist regime in the world... for its crackdown and vowed further sanctions against the Syrian regime.
"The meeting that was held in Tunis was clearly one-sided... It is clear to us that this meeting did not help create conditions that would stimulate all sides to seek a political solution," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told news hounds.
Russia boycotted the Tunis meeting after arguing that its Arab and Western participants were unfairly blaming one side of an "internal conflict" for violence that the opposition estimates has claimed more than 7,600 lives.
Moscow has infuriated the West by refusing to single out Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad One of the last of the old-fashioned hereditary iron-fisted fascist dictators... 's regime over the deadly crisis and its assertion that both government forces and the opposition bear equal responsibility for the violence.
U.S. Secretary Hillary Clinton ... sometimes described as For a good time at 3 a.m. call Hillary and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another John Jay ... on Friday called Russia's position "distressing".
Lavrov was not asked about Clinton's comments and did not volunteer any response of his own.
But he stressed that it the West's obligation to use its good standing with the Syrian opposition to call "on everyone who is shooting there to halt (the violence) as soon as possible."
He also welcomed the constitutional referendum that Assad staged on Sunday amid the bloodshed as "an important step" and "movement toward democratization".
Posted by: Fred ||
02/28/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Syria
GENEVA The UNs top human rights body will call Tuesday for Syria to end all attacks on civilians and allow aid groups unhindered access to the city of Homs and other beleaguered areas, diplomats said Monday.
A draft UN Human Rights Council resolution condemns widespread and systematic violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms by the Syrian authorities, saying they have worsened the humanitarian situation in the country. The resolution says the regimes use of heavy artillery and tanks to attack civilian areas has contributed to the deaths of thousands of people since March.
That's what heavy artillery and tanks usually do to unarmed civilians...
Western diplomats said opponents of a hard line on Syria, such as Russia, are likely to vote against the resolution when the 47-nation council holds an urgent meeting Tuesday.
The task of the council is to express the disgust of the entire world at the odious crimes that the Syrian state is committing against its people, Alain Juppe, the French foreign minister, said at the opening of the Geneva bodys four-week session, which was dominated by the issue of Syria.
We cannot remain silent in the face of the violence and the barbarity of the repression, the massacre of civilians, the bombing of towns, the torture of children, and wounded people being killed in hospital, he said.
Juppe called for countries to prepare to submit a complaint against Syria to the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
Paging Carla del Ponte to the mauve courtesy phone...
The day will come when the civilian and military authorities in Syria, in particular Pencilneck President Assad himself, will need to answer for their actions, he said.
Calls for Syria to be referred to the ICC will not be included in Tuesdays resolution, but may be revisited by the council next month.
A panel of UN experts issued a report last week concluding that Syrian government officials were responsible for crimes against humanity committed by security forces against opposition members. The crimes included shelling civilians, executing deserters and torturing detainees. Some opposition groups, too, had committed gross abuses, it said. The panel has compiled a confidential list of top-level Syrian officials who could face prosecution over the atrocities.
Britains Foreign Office minister Jeremy Browne also called for those responsible for serious crimes in Syria to be held to account. But he refrained from calling outright for ICC referral.
The mechanism by which that happens can be discussed in time, but we are absolutely certain that it should happen, Browne told The Associated Press. He acknowledged that sending Syria to the Hague tribunal was certainly an option though.
Russia, which has previously used its Security Council veto to block action against Syria, would likely veto ICC referral as well. On Monday, Russia, Iran and Cuba were the only countries to openly object to the rights councils plan to hold an urgent human rights meeting Tuesday on Syria. Russia later relented, but maintained its opposition to any resolution condemning Syrias leadership.
I think the Russians are putting themselves on the wrong side of history, Browne told the AP. Hundreds of people are being killed in places like Homs. Do they (Russia) feel morally comfortable with that? What are they proposing to do about it?
Iran has always been the proud patron of Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite militia. But now, the Islamic Republic is making overtures towards the Lebanese Army as well. Recent statements emanating from Tehran and Beirut demonstrate a strategic convergence between the Lebanese Army and Hezbollah when it comes to Israel.
Lebanese Defense Minister Fayez Ghosn met in Tehran on Sunday with senior Iranian officials, including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi and Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi. Vahidi pledged Iranian support for the Lebanese Army, announcing that strengthening the Lebanese Army was one of the strategic policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Lebanon should have a powerful army to defend its interests in the region, he was quoted by Irans Fars News Agency as saying.
Vahidi was quite explicit in stating that Iran viewed Hezbollah and the Lebanese army as two complementary forces, not two antagonistic ones.
Today, the resistance in Lebanon is not unique to a certain group or denomination, he told the Tehran Times on Monday. The army and resistance [Hezbollah] are two wings by which Lebanon is flying toward development, progress, and stability.
Straight to the thirteenth century. BC, if they mess with the Israelis any time soon.
Minister Ghosn, whose Marada movement is allied with Hezbollah, hailed the Iranian aid, confirming the close coordination between the Shiite militia and the army.
Right now, there is complete coordination between army and the resistance, Ghosn told Lebanons English-language Daily Star Monday. He then proceeded to warn Israel against any foolishness, such as attacking Lebanon.
This was not the first bellicose statement made by a Lebanese security official toward Israel in the last few days. Last Wednesday, the chief of Lebanons armed forces, Jean Qahwaji, ordered his senior officers to remain on high alert in confronting the historic enemy of the nation, the Israeli enemy, which violates Lebanese sovereignty on a daily basis, according to the armys official website.
The United States has provided over $720 million in funding to the Lebanese Army since 2006, but Congress withheld $100 million in October 2010 following a border incident in which a Lebanese sniper shot and killed an Israeli reserves officer. At the time, Iran offered to fill the funding void left by the United States, the Reuters news agency reported.
Some American politicians continue to worry about the strategic alliance between Hezbollah and the Lebanese state against Israel. As Hezbollahs victory in the national elections last March became apparent, Congressman Steve Chabot of Ohio, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia, said the United States should stop funding the Lebanese Army if Hezbollah was included in the government.
But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defended the annual American allocation of $100 million to the Lebanese army, saying the army was professional and nonsectarian and that it contributed to security along the Israeli-Lebanese border.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.