Hi there, !
Today Sat 03/06/2004 Fri 03/05/2004 Thu 03/04/2004 Wed 03/03/2004 Tue 03/02/2004 Mon 03/01/2004 Sun 02/29/2004 Archives
Rantburg
533290 articles and 1860698 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 63 articles and 336 comments as of 13:31.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area:                    
3 Hamas helizapped
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 1: WoT Operations
4 00:00 ClareLopez [1] 
1 00:00 CrazyFool [1] 
2 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [] 
1 00:00 Hyper [1] 
1 00:00 Frank G [] 
2 00:00 Hyper [2] 
1 00:00 Frank G [1] 
21 00:00 Valentine [5] 
8 00:00 SON OF TOLUI [] 
2 00:00 Frank G [4] 
6 00:00 Frank G [] 
5 00:00 Super Hose [10] 
7 00:00 Anonymous2U [] 
6 00:00 Anonymous2U [1] 
1 00:00 Frank G [1] 
2 00:00 Korora [] 
4 00:00 john [1] 
10 00:00 Minutus [] 
2 00:00 .com [] 
10 00:00 Old Patriot [5] 
3 00:00 Shipman [] 
1 00:00 Carl in N.H [] 
12 00:00 Mike Kozlowski [1] 
4 00:00 cosmic muffin [] 
12 00:00 B [] 
12 00:00 Mike Sylwester [1] 
6 00:00 Matt [] 
7 00:00 CrazyFool [1] 
11 00:00 Super Hose [] 
3 00:00 SON OF TOLUI [] 
15 00:00 Alaska Paul [10] 
9 00:00 .com [] 
13 00:00 Classic_Liberal [2] 
5 00:00 .com [] 
6 00:00 Cheddarhead [1] 
4 00:00 A Jackson [] 
1 00:00 Steve [1] 
2 00:00 KerryIsSoVery [1] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
11 00:00 van Buskirk [] 
0 [] 
5 00:00 CrazyFool [] 
2 00:00 Abdelaziz Belkhadem [] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
0 [1] 
5 00:00 Paul Moloney [1] 
11 00:00 rkb [] 
2 00:00 Dave [1] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 B [] 
11 00:00 liberalhawk [] 
4 00:00 Anonymous1424 [] 
1 00:00 B [1] 
3 00:00 Phil Fraering [] 
4 00:00 Anonymous [] 
0 [] 
11 00:00 Shipman [] 
7 00:00 gimpy [] 
28 00:00 Super Hose [4] 
5 00:00 mojo [] 
2 00:00 Spot [1] 
How Tiny Swiss Cellphone Chips Helped Track Global Terror Web
The terrorism investigation code-named Mont Blanc began almost by accident in April 2002, when authorities intercepted a cellphone call that lasted less than a minute and involved not a single word of conversation.

Investigators, suspicious that the call was a signal between terrorists, followed the trail first to one terror suspect, then to others, and eventually to terror cells on three continents.

What tied them together was a computer chip smaller than a fingernail. But before the investigation wound down in recent weeks, its global net caught dozens of suspected Qaeda members and disrupted at least three planned attacks in Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, according to counterterrorism and intelligence officials in Europe and the United States.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 10:47:48 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This was a terrific article. Thanks a lot for pointing it out.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 03/03/2004 23:02 Comments || Top||

#2  This was a terrific article. Thanks a lot for pointing it out.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 03/03/2004 23:02 Comments || Top||

#3  You're welcome.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 23:43 Comments || Top||

#4  Sounds like a great article...how do I access the Rantburg link to the whole piece so I can read all of it? thanks.
Posted by: ClareLopez || 03/18/2004 9:40 Comments || Top||


Japanese movie monster Godzilla to bid farewell to 50-year-old film series
GODZIRRA!!!!!
Japan’s favourite monster Godzilla will bid farewell to the big screen in December with the release of "Final Wars" marking the 50th anniversary of the giant lizard’s movie debut, its distributor said.
In the latest movie, Godzilla will be pitted against more than 10 popular monsters that appeared in past episodes. The film is scheduled for release in Japan on December 11, Toho Co. Ltd. said.
Sounds like one of those "Very Special" episodes...
The upcoming movie, the 28th in the series which started in 1954, "will compile the fruits of 50 years’ work and put an end to the series," Toho marketing official Yukihiko Mochida said.
The monsters will go on the rampage in New York, Paris, Shanghai and Sydney in the star-studded Final Wars, which will also feature the new, strongest-ever "Monster X," he said. Monster X? Must be a Nation of Islam guy.
But Toho does not rule out the possibility of Godzilla’s resurrection in the future. "Since Godzilla is our eternal asset, it may come back when a totally new generation of directors emerge or a brand-new film-making method is found to create a whole new world," Mochida said. Yeah, maybe somebody can figure out new and innovative ways to film stomping and melting toy tanks.
Like many a human actor, Godzilla taken a rest from screen roles twice in the past. He first disappeared from theatres in 1975 when the film industry was overwhelmed by the popularity of television.
"Godzilla: The Exile Years." Next on Biography...
Godzilla also "died" in 1995 before Hollywood launched a computer-generated version of the creature in 1998. The 120-million-dollar digital Godzilla proved to be a box-office flop.
"Godzilla: Box Office Poison". Next on E! True Hollywood Story.
The series has drawn a total of 98.3 million viewers in Japan alone. Godzilla’s genesis was topical at the time. In the orginal 1954 film he rose out of a roiling sea and swam to Japan after being awakened by US atomic hydrogen bomb test at Bikini Atoll in the South Pacific in March 1954.
Was this Bush’s, chainey’s, or Halliburton’s fault? Anybody?
Posted by: tu3031 || 03/03/2004 10:23:52 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sniff... I am going to miss the big guy!
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 23:51 Comments || Top||


Iran, Syria Sign Memorandum on Military Cooperation
From Geostrategy-Direct, subscription req’d.
Syria needs some more ClueBats to point it in the right direction.

Iran and Syria plan to expand their defense and security cooperation. Syria can sure pick a winner, why Iran?
The two countries have established a joint committee to review areas of cooperation in the field of defense, military and security. Iranian sources said the focus would be on defense research and development and on industrial projects. Like peaceful uses of enriched U235?
The panel was established during the two-day visit by Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani to Damascus, which ended on Feb. 26. During the visit, Syrian President Bashar Assad expressed his intention to increase defense cooperation with Iran as part of efforts to protect against foreign threats to both nations.
Since both are becoming "island nations" after Afghanistan and Iraq.
Iranian sources said Assad wants to bolster defense industrial cooperation between Damascus and Teheran. They said Shamkhani, responsible for Iran’s defense industry and arms exports, toured Syrian weapons facilities to examine areas of potential cooperation. Syria sought to develop its defense industry in 2002 with help from the then-Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein and began producing and exporting surface-to-surface tactical rockets. Which will make them a target of the US and Israel.
Iranian sources said Iran and Syria signed a memorandum of understanding on military cooperation. They did not provide details.
Western diplomatic sources said that over the last two years, Iran sent several delegations to Syria to discuss weapons sales and joint industrial projects. Iran and Syria have cooperated in the development and production of Scud-based missiles. Iran has offered Damascus help in cruise missile and solid-fuel missile development as well as upgrades for Soviet-origin ground platforms. Again, having these around will make Israel angry. They will not like it when Israel is angry.
Shamkhani’s visit came amid a deadlock in Syria’s efforts to obtain military platforms from Russia, such as tanks, aircraft and the S-300 long-range anti-aircraft system. The diplomatic sources said the chief obstacle to a Russian-Syrian arms deal has been Moscow’s refusal to agree to a long-term Syrian repayment plan. Damascus owes Moscow about $11 billion in debts accrued to the former Soviet Union. There is the real reason for cooperation. Syria never paid back Moscow, even when it was merrily selling Sammy’s gift oil for big profits. Syria is a bad credit risk. So they will go and tap Iran for awhile.
During his visit, Shamkhani called Syria a major element in Iran’s strategic depth. We need to shallow up that depth a bit. The defense minister said Teheran’s relations with Damascus form part of Iran’s national security policy. because they are running out of friends.
The official Iranian news agency, IRNA, reported that defense research and development as well as industrial cooperation were to have been the leading issues on the agenda during Shamkhani’s visit to Syria. The agency did not specify these areas or cite current defense cooperation between Damascus and Teheran. The Syrian news agency said Shamkhani’s meetings with Assad included a discussion on military cooperation.
Iran has reported sales of its military systems to 42 countries. Teheran has been marketing artillery systems, airborne radar, unmanned air vehicles and a range of rockets and missiles.
If we can neutralize Syria, then Iran is isolated, and Israel gets a breather. Ein-al-Hellhole will wither on the vine when its terrorist funding dries up. Maybe Syria, NORK, and Libya should get together and compare notes.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 9:58:58 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Syria can sure pick a winner, why Iran?"
Unlike NK - they had cash up front?
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 22:14 Comments || Top||

#2 
Iran and Syria plan to expand their defense and security cooperation.
Great! Now we can take out 2 for the price of 1.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 03/03/2004 22:33 Comments || Top||


Criticism of David Kay’s Conclusion About WMD in Iraq
An essay, titled "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in Belmont Club commented about an American Thinker article, referenced recently here in Rantburg, by Douglas Hanson, criticizing inspector David Kay’s conlusion that Iraq had no WMD during the recent period. The essay points out that the acquisition of WMD no longer requires a major scientific or industrial infrastructure. The essay’s conclusion:
The key problem to finding Iraqi WMDs comes from the underlying assumptions about how large a national WMD program had to be. In the classic Cold War model, any WMD program was assumed to be very large, a copy of the Manhattan Project. Following from that assumption, the tools used to detect these programs were overhead imaging, environmental sampling and debriefing technical personnel. These tools did an excellent job at finding centrifuges, reactors, weapons storage facilities and their associated delivery platforms. But the rollup of the A. Q. Khan network, the "Johnny Appleseed" of nuclear proliferation, in the New Yorker’s felicitous phrase, showed the world another model, and in the context of Iraq, the more likely model of WMD development. In this model, the only relevant WMD manufacturing facility is a pile of cash. Everything, including possibly the fissile material, was potentially for sale from A. Q. Khan’s worldwide network. ...

Therefore the lower size bound of an Iraqi WMD program was no facilities at all. An Iraqi WMD program only had to be as big as Al Qaeda’s. Saddam may have simply decided it was cheaper to buy a weapon or near-final components instead of building them from scratch. The assumptions about the character of Iraq’s possible WMD programs bear directly on the failure of prewar Allied intelligence to characterize and describe the program accurately. If the relevant model was not a cheap version of the Manhattan Project but rather the A. Q. Khan commodity model, it would have misled the analysts seriously and caused them to overlook the one alarming corollary. Every WMD component in the A. Q. Khan manufacturing chain had a tradeable value. In that universe, nuclear, chemical and biological weapons are not merely instruments of state power but fungible financial assets. Saddam would have looked at a nuke or bioweapon not simply as a lethal device but as an investment. Dr. David Kay’s findings may not mean that Saddam destroyed or hid his weapons before the war. It may merely mean that he sold them.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 03/03/2004 9:51:05 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Say, how much WMD can I get for $3.50? Hmmm. Well then, how much can I get for $1,500,000,000?
Posted by: Hyper || 03/03/2004 23:26 Comments || Top||


Jihad council calls for polls boycott
Kashmir’s main militant alliance, United Jihad Council (UJC) chairman Syed Salahudin, on Tuesday called on Kashmiris to boycott upcoming Indian parliamentary elections. “History won’t forget or forgive those who yield to force or greed and participate in the elections,” he said. Mr Salahudin is also the supreme commander of dominant militant group Hizbul Mujahideen, which is among a dozen militant groups that form the UJC. Asserting that elections under Indian rule are no solution to the Kashmir problem, Mr Salahudin appealed to Kashmiris to abstain from voting in the poll, which will be held in four phases from April 20. “I am hopeful my people will show regard to martyrs’ blood and keep distance from Indian puppets and their associates,” Mr Salahudin said. He said Kashmiris were “fighting for their liberation and not for gaining petty favours”.
Posted by: Fred || 03/03/2004 21:06 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  “History won’t forget or forgive those who yield to force or greed and participate in the elections,”

"we're making a list, checking it twice..."
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:08 Comments || Top||


Mega Muslim conclave to promote harmony
The chief Imam of Makkah is expected to join a mega Muslim conclave in India this month aimed at clearing misunderstandings about Islam and boosting communal harmony. The Delhi-based Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadees Hind is organising the three-day seminar in Pakud district of Jharkhand from March 13. Around one million people are expected to participate. Participants would include around 150 religious scholars from India and eight other countries. Invites have been sent to Hindu and Christian leaders as well. “The world has grave misunderstandings about Islam. We need to send out the real message of Holy Quran to people,” said Asgar Ali Mahdi Salfi, general secretary of the organisation.
I'll question my understanding of Islam when they hold a similar gathering in Mecca, not before...
Salfi blamed the media for a great deal of the wrong notions about Islam. He said even a large section of Muslims in the country was not aware of the teachings of the Holy Quran. “They read the Quran every day but do not understand its real meaning.” He felt this was mostly because of the poor understanding of Arabic terms used in the holy book. “To be a good citizen you need to be a God-fearing, religious man,” Salfi said. “Apart from religious issues, we plan to deliberate on the major issues facing mankind today.”
Like how to define terrorism so it doesn't involve turbans...
According to Salfi, his organisation helps provide education to poor people and tribals in Pakud. “We have chosen Pakud district for our seminar due to its backwardness and the Muslim majority population there,” said Salfi. “Through our discussions we plan to raise awareness about the state of that region and work for helping the people there.” The Pakud conference would be Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadees Hind’s 28th all-India conference, being organised after 10 years.
Posted by: Fred || 03/03/2004 20:55 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  a mega Muslim conclave????


Will they have MONSTER trucks????
I love GraveDigger™, and I think it would appeal to this enclave
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:10 Comments || Top||

#2  And in related news, swine squeal, "Don't eat us; bacon and pork chops come from other pigs"...
Posted by: Hyper || 03/03/2004 23:32 Comments || Top||


Islamist alliance facing further divisions
The once formidable Islamist Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal alliance is seeing fissures grow over issues like the expansion of the North Western Frontier Province cabinet, joining the federal government, and action against elements involved in razing a mosque in the NWFP province, insiders have informed. The central leadership had earlier agreed to give representation to all components in the NWFP government by taking one minister each from the four remaining parties – Samiul Haq’s Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam, Jamiat-e-Ulema Pakistan, the defunct Islami Tehrik and the Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith. So far only Fazlur Rehman’s Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam and the Jamaat e-Islami have representation in the provincial cabinet.
Only the big dogs are getting fed...
But the formula could not be agreed upon as the JUI-F, which already had eight ministers, including the chief minister in the 15-man provincial cabinet, demanded four more slots. On the other hand, Maulana Samiul Haq’s JUI-S is reportedly demanding the MMA to either join the federal government ranks as a whole or at least allow its National Assembly members - Maulana Hamidul Haq and Maulana Abdul Aziz Shah - to accept slots in the cabinet being offered by the Zafarullah Jamali administration. Shah, it is learnt, is especially interested in joining the federal cabinet to compete with NWFP Chief Minister Akram Durrani of the rival JUI-F, as they belong to the same constituency. The MJAH has sought action against the JUI-F activists allegedly involved in razing a mosque in Butgram, NWFP, and its reconstruction. It is also critical of the alleged partiality of the NWFP government in the incident. The MMA Supreme Council meeting scheduled for March 5 in Islamabad will prove a stormy one if the JUI-S and the MJAH agreed to attend it. So far both the components are declining to participate in the session, demanding prior guarantees for acceptance of their demands.
Seems like everything they do is "stormy," doesn't it? Y'think that might be part of the problem?
Posted by: Fred || 03/03/2004 20:50 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  it's congenital with being a combination of "Islamic" and "holy"
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 20:57 Comments || Top||


OUTRAGE: Michigan teacher must cover cost of substitute while on military duty
EFL
A Michigan school district told a teacher activated for military duty that he must cover the cost of a substitute during part of his absence and give the district some of his military pay. Barry Bernhardt, a middle school science teacher and a National Guard reservist for at least a decade, started serving two weeks of active duty in Italy on Monday, the day of the school board meeting. During the 10 days Bernhardt will be gone from the classroom, he will use two personal days and two compensation days during his time off. For the remaining six days, Bernhardt must pay the district $74 per day for the substitute teacher filling in for him and turn over the $78 in salary that he will receive each day from the National Guard, The Grand Rapids Press reported.
Where the hell's my pitchfork? Are the tumbrels out of the shop yet?
Posted by: Dragon Fly || 03/03/2004 6:42:11 PM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Time for a fresh American Revolution. It's self-apparent that subversive idiots have taken over the education system. This ranks as one of the most offensive and egregious examples I've ever seen. Perhaps he should've said he was attending an socialism ashram in SF - they probably would've covered his (non-existent) RT airfare.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 18:57 Comments || Top||

#2  Outrageous. Absolutely outrageous. The superintendant of schools should be publically caned, and the entire school board force to wear dunce caps, everywhere, for a year.

Bastards.
Posted by: Dave D. || 03/03/2004 19:02 Comments || Top||

#3  That Supe is one major league @$$h@t. I don't know what the signal was, but across the country, the socialists are in full and open revolt. This needs to get ugly and quick.
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 03/03/2004 19:16 Comments || Top||

#4  WTF! Is this Supe on another planet? Can you say recall?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) || 03/03/2004 19:25 Comments || Top||

#5  I wonder if the Superintendant of Schools is a Democrat.
Posted by: Dave D. || 03/03/2004 19:36 Comments || Top||

#6  I become angry just reading this article. This is an example of thinly veiled contempt for the military.
Posted by: Mark || 03/03/2004 19:46 Comments || Top||

#7  This is an example of thinly veiled contempt for the military.

Thinly?
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 19:59 Comments || Top||

#8  The first thing to do is to see what State and Federal laws are regarding military service vis a vis the employer and his responsibility. If the school dist is violating it, then get the meanest lawyer, or DA, whichever is applicable and go after the Supt. He needs a serious legal cluebat to get his priorities and responsibilities back into proper trim.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 20:15 Comments || Top||

#9  I'd suggest a comment to: gsims@khps.org

try and keep the profanity out
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 20:45 Comments || Top||

#10  I am getting seriously, seriously tired of this anti-American Leftist crap.

They flaunt their disobedience of the laws and don't even hide their sabotage of this country.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats || 03/03/2004 20:46 Comments || Top||

#11  I am not trying to justify what has been presented.

But, what has been presented does not apear to make sense or be the whole story. This is the Associated Press regurgitating what was originally reported by one of the ace reporters at the Grand Rapids Press. Somehow, I expect there will be a folow up that reconciles the lead paragraph above with the folowing from the end of the story:

In the end, the teacher will receive $573 more than he would have after the two-week military leave, Gillette said. Bernhardt will give the district only six days' worth of his military pay, and he also will receive a military housing allowance.

When compared to employees of private companies, the district is doing what it should to protect Bernhardt's financial stability, Gillette said.

"It's a fact that he's not losing money, that he's making money. Whatever way you look at it, he's still making money," he said.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 21:07 Comments || Top||

#12  I personally think this is atrocious. I do, however, think it may be based on what his contract says. I teach at a community college and a few years ago when I was at a conference I had to have someone else come in to cover the class while gone. I paid the instructor the rate for an adjunct instructor for the days she taught. The school didn't pay anything as I'm contracted to teach those classes.

The part that upsets me and I wonder if it is legal is the part where he has to give them money from his reservist pay. If he were willing to pay for the substitute then what is the extra money about? He's not going to be away for the entire month so how can it be for benefits? And most insurance is covered by a monthly basis. So what exactly is the $78 based on?
Posted by: AF Lady || 03/03/2004 21:12 Comments || Top||

#13  Mr. Davis -"Gray"? It's not the actual $ burden faced by the teacher, it's the attitude and lack of patriotic fervor (oooohhh McCarthyism!!!!) in the face of a known enemy that pisses us off. These people live free to be pinheads, by the actions...(insert Nicholson speech from A Few Good Men)
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:14 Comments || Top||

#14  I teach at a community college and a few years ago when I was at a conference I had to have someone else come in to cover the class while gone.

You can't tell the difference between going to a conference and military service?
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 03/03/2004 21:24 Comments || Top||

#15  There's probably some more to this story. This is like the big outrages when pay is deducted for meals eaten by wounded, hospitalized soldiers. I assume that this teacher's pay has been adjusted by a regulation and not by anybody's opinion about the Iraq war.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 03/03/2004 21:56 Comments || Top||

#16  Well, folks, now that we have all been stirred up like hornets (myself included) we will just have to wait for the rest of the facts. *sigh*
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 22:07 Comments || Top||

#17  Frank G,

Please don't blow my cover. Thanks. My only point is that I doubt we have the whole story. Grand Rapids isn't Detroit or Ann Arbour. I doubt a pinhead like these folks appear to be would last very long there. Let's get the full story or recognize that our fulmination is for our own satisfaction only.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 22:09 Comments || Top||

#18  Robert Crawford: You can't tell the difference between going to a conference and military service?

I imagine I would as I'm a veteran. I think the whole thing is atrocious but I was trying to explain why at least he might have to pay for a substitute and giving an example. If I were in the reserves today I would still have to pay for that substitute. I may not like it but if my contract indicated that then I'm stuck unless the school were willing to forego that requirement due to military service. I would also have to use any accumulated leave time for the days absent. I think the part that upsets me the most but would like to see an explanation is why he must pay them money from his reservist pay. That doesn't make any sense at all.
Posted by: AF Lady || 03/03/2004 22:25 Comments || Top||

#19  Disgusting.
Robert Crawford-
AF Lady is right about the contracts. In our district, even when it is a supposed "school event" (such as Model UN, some band trips etc.) the teacher is required to pay for a sub themselves, which often raises the price of the extra curricular. Of course, this is never used on the sports teams...

-S-
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 23:34 Comments || Top||

#20  I'm not an expert, but I WAS a reservist for four years, and I've never, ever heard anything like this. I think someone has a problem, and it needs to be taken up with the state Adjutant General. If this person is in the National Guard, as the article indicates, the Adjutant General is responsible for the "safety and well-being" of all Guard members. I was always paid the difference between my civilian pay and my military pay, never have I had to pay to pull an active duty tour.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/03/2004 23:47 Comments || Top||

#21  Mr. Davis, it is indeed illegal by federal law namely the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. § 4301. No employer may unnecessarily place fines, fees or dues or cause any retribution to fall upon employees called up for service.
Posted by: Valentine || 03/04/2004 0:08 Comments || Top||


The Mind of George Soros
Meet the Esperanto enthusiast who wants to save the world from President Bush.
by Joshua Muravchick, Wall Street Journal.
Also appears in the March issue of Commentary. EFL and to emphasize the juicy parts.
"I have made rejection of the Bush doctrine the central project of my life," announced George Soros in January. "I am determined to do what I can," he added, to assure that President Bush is not re-elected. Coming from someone else, such statements might be written off as delusional, but Mr. Soros is a man with a record of achieving outsized goals. A financier who began with a stake of a few thousand dollars, he traded and speculated his way to a fortune of many billions, making him one of the world’s richest men. . . . Mr. Soros has declared his intent to devote similar energy and single-mindedness to his new "project." . . . According to reports last November, Mr. Soros had already pledged $18 million to three liberal anti-Bush groups of this kind, announcing that "If necessary, I would give more." As he sees it, "America, under Bush, is a danger to the world. And I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is." . . .
A recent ruling by the Federal Election Commission (discussed in entertaining detail here) may invalidate those donations, but we digress . . . . To paraphrase: Soros was born in Hungary in 1930. His father was Jewish, his mother Catholic. The family escaped Hungary in 1944 when the Horthy government was overthrown and the Germans and their Hungarian fascist allies began rounding up the Jews of Hungary for extermination. The Soros family ended up in London; George later moved to the U.S. and made a fortune in international finance.
As late as the early 1980s, Mr. Soros was telling interviewers that he did not believe in philanthropy, [but charitable activities] eventually became his main passion. Turning over the management of his investment funds to deputies, he threw himself into charitable work with the same zeal he had once devoted to trading. His gifts made a big impact in the countries in Eastern Europe in transition from communism. In some of them, his largesse apparently exceeded the aid received from the U.S. government.
But then he gave in to the dark side . . .
Nevertheless, it is neither for his charitable work nor for his financial wizardry that Mr. Soros wishes most to be recognized. Rather, it is for his intellectual accomplishments. From early on, as he would have it, he fully expected to become another Keynes or Einstein. At the London School of Economics, he studied economics but was fascinated by philosophy. He was especially taken with the work of the Anglo-Austrian philosopher Karl Popper, who was then on the LSE faculty and served, at least formally, as the young refugee’s adviser. Mr. Soros likes to say that Popper’s ideas about the "open society" and the fallibility of human knowledge have been the starting point for his own philosophical contributions. These begin with the theory of "reflexivity"--his term for the notion that in human affairs, unlike in the world of inanimate nature, the observer is himself part of the universe that he is attempting to observe; thus, the very act of observation may influence the reality being analyzed.
Werner Heisenberg, call your copyright lawyer!
This insight has been, in turn, the basis for Mr. Soros’s theory of history, which revolves around "boom-bust cycles." When a social enterprise of some kind--a business, a movement, a nation--is doing well, Mr. Soros argues, this creates a bandwagon effect that leads inevitably to overvaluation or overreaching, producing an artificial "bubble" that must eventually burst. Alas, for all his aspirations, Mr. Soros has met with disappointment as a philosopher. He spent three years weaving his ideas into a book titled "The Burden of Consciousness" but left it unfinished when, as he confessed to his biographer, he himself could not understand on the morrow what he had written the day before. In lieu of that volume, he has presented excursuses on reflexivity in most of the half-dozen books he has published. These passages have repeatedly evoked exasperation from reviewers, who have found the idea both obscure and commonplace. But Mr. Soros has shrugged off these criticisms, commenting that his theory is "not yet properly understood." . . .
"If you were smarter, you’d agree with me!"
Nor, indeed, is it easy to detect the influence of Mr. Soros’s philosophy on his philanthropic activism. One might assume that an understanding of "reflexivity"--that is, our supposed inability to stand apart from social phenomena and judge them in a dispassionate light--would demand a certain modesty in the rendering of practical judgments. But Mr. Soros has never hesitated to advocate sweeping change or to pursue grand political strategies, serenely confident in his own ability to discern the needed remedies for the ills of dozens of different societies and indeed for the world as a whole.
A wealthy megalomaniac devotes himself to reforming the whole world along the lines of his crackpot utopian vision . . . where have I seen that before?
I think I first saw it in a Superman comic, when I was about eight, but it might have been earlier...
At some point in the late 1990s, after years of devoting himself to the former Communist world, Mr. Soros decided that his attention was required in America. His first major venture into domestic issues was in support of the campaign to decriminalize drugs. He credits the poet Allen Ginsberg, an apostle of sexual and chemical liberation whom he befriended in the 1980s, with having turned him on alerted him to the injustice of American drug laws. . . . In line with such thinking, Mr. Soros has not only made possible various state ballot initiatives to legalize "medical" marijuana, but he has advocated such "reforms" as "making heroin and certain other illicit drugs available on prescription to registered drug addicts." No less outré have been Mr. Soros’s many pronouncements since the late 1990’s on the state of the American and global economies. "Capitalism is coming apart at the seams," he declared at the time of the Asian financial debacle. Decrying the rise of what he called "laissez-faire ideology," Mr. Soros painted a picture at once apocalyptic and unoriginal:
[standard "mobilization against globalization" rhetoric omitted]
And what remedies did Mr. Soros suggest? As a first step, the creation of an international central bank; in the long run, nothing less than a transformation of how the world itself is governed. "To stabilize and regulate a truly global economy," he wrote, "we need some global system of political decision-making." Though it was neither "feasible nor desirable" to "abolish the existence of states," Mr. Soros conceded, nevertheless "the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions." . . . A world of globalized economics, he insisted, required something akin to globalized government.
Stunningly unoriginal, that.
Given this set of predilections, it is not hard to see how Soros would have been driven to paroxysms of frustration by the notoriously "unilateralist" Bush administration and the war in Iraq. As he explains in his new book, "The Bubble of American Supremacy," the United States has now fallen into "the hands of a group of extremists" whom he identifies as "neoconservatives" or "social Darwinists" and who espouse an "ideology of American supremacy."
". . . and black helicopters . . . and fluoridated water . . . and UFOs . . . ."
The only element missing from the "master plan" they hatched well before arriving in office in 2001 was a suitable pretext for action. For them, according to Mr. Soros, the attacks of 9/11 were therefore a godsend. "Communism used to serve as the enemy; now terrorism can fill the role."
". . . but I have an answer . . . or is that A.N.S.W.E.R.?"
As an alternative to the arrogance of American supremacy secured by means of military power, Mr. Soros proposes the "Soros doctrine." Through the good agency of the United Nations and our own foreign-aid efforts, he writes, we need to answer our enemies not with force of arms but with "preventive action of a constructive nature."
Is he writing speeches for John Kerry and Dennis Kucinich, or do all lemmings "great" minds just think alike?
What explains this surpassing faith in the efficacy of international governance and institutions, especially in light of the record of such institutions in recent years, not to say over the past century? Here one can only speculate,
Was it the drugs he got from Ginsburg?
but at least part of the answer would seem to lie in biography. It is surely not incidental that Mr. Soros’s father was a devotee of Esperanto, with its grandiose and naive strategy for overcoming the fraught nationalist divisions of Europe. . . . No less pertinent in this connection is Mr. Soros’s problematic relationship to his own Jewishness. Though he often claims authority for his views by invoking his experience under the Nazis--he confided to the Washington Post that some of the things President Bush says "remind . . . me of the Germans"--he is strikingly aloof from his Jewish origins. None of his vast philanthropy has been directed toward Israel, and his coldness toward the Jewish state has on occasion shaded into outright hostility: in a speech last May to the Yivo Institute for Jewish Research, Mr. Soros likened the behavior of Israel to that of the Nazis, invoking some psychological jargon about victims becoming victimizers. It is not only Israel that Mr. Soros abjures but Jewish charities in general, an attitude he attributes to his observations of the Judenrat, or Jewish council, that the Nazis created in Budapest, for which he worked as a courier, and by a rather weird experience with the Jewish Board of Guardians during his years in London. If blaming Jewish organizations--or Israel--for the works of the Nazis is hard to fathom, his attitude toward the Board of Guardians is no more explicable. It seems he appealed to it for financial support after breaking a leg, but the board arranged instead for him to receive a British government stipend. When he wrote an aggrieved letter deploring this as a tawdry way for "one Jew [to] treat . . . another in need," the board backed down and provided him with a cash allowance for the duration of his recovery. Later, he would confess insouciantly to his biographer the reason he had been so angry: He had already arranged to receive the government payment and had hidden this fact from the board in the hope of receiving duplicate benefits. It was, he said, "a double-dip," and one that "solved all my financial problems."
Great Wharks!
More remarkable still in this connection is Mr. Soros’s frequent comment that 1944 was "the best year of my life." It is easy to see how a boy of 14 might have been "excited" by the "adventure" of evading the Nazis with an assumed identity, as he says he was. But 70% of Mr. Soros’s fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings, were annihilated in that year. They were dying and disappearing all around him, and their numbers no doubt included many whom he knew personally. Yet he gives no sign that this put any damper on his elation, either at the time or indeed in retrospect.
Essay question (5pts): Compare and contrast George Soros and Raoul Wallenberg. Whose reaction to the deportation of Hungarian Jews was more admirable, and why?
"My Jewishness [does] not express itself in a sense of tribal loyalty," Mr. Soros explains. About this he is certainly correct. "I [take] pride in being . . . an outsider who [is] capable of seeing the other point of view." About this he is correct as well, if by "other" we understand "adversary." In any event, this flight from Jewish particularism into a willed universalism is itself a familiar reflex, if not a full-fledged syndrome, among many Jews in the modern era, one of whom, a Yiddish-speaking philologist, was sufficiently inspired by it to invent Esperanto. In Mr. Soros, it has been taken to a startling extreme. Cold as he is toward the Jewish people, Mr. Soros is not much warmer toward his adopted country. "I had never quite become an American," he once said. Now he complains that today’s America "is not the America I chose as my home," as if, by turning conservative and electing George W. Bush as President, the country has failed to live up to him. The egotism of the remark is revealing. Mr. Soros has admitted to having "carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble." Having made his mark, he now seems to give them free rein. He told one interviewer that he had "godlike, messianic ideas," and another that he sometimes thought of himself as "superhuman." To still a third he explained that his "goal is to become the conscience of the world."
My God! He thinks he’s Dennis Kucinich!
This self-imagined messiah has now come to save the world from the America of George W. Bush and its war against terrorism. He is convinced that this is an unjustified war, contrived in response to events (the attacks of 9/11) that "should have been treated as crimes against humanity . . . requir[ing] police work, not military action."
Ever notice that you never see George Soros and John F. Kerry in the same place at the same time?
To say the least, it is a strange idea, and an even stranger role, for one who owes not only his immense fortune but also his freedom and even his life to America, and in particular to its willingness to confront those who have committed crimes against humanity with enough military force to defeat and stop them.
Were Mr. Soros to succeed in his quest, the Wahabbis would likely not treat him with gratitude. Is Mr. Soros smart enough to notice this?
Posted by: Mike || 03/03/2004 5:37:03 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Absolutely great post, Mike! This article, in a very clear manner, describes why I always derisively refer to Soro's delusion of being an American. This, by far, is the most dangerous twit in the LLL. Only the Wahhabis and Nayef are more directly dangerous to the security of the West, in general, and the US, in particular. A singular destructive and devisive idiot savante. His arrogance and self-delusion that he's an intellectual are only exceeded by his obvious schizophrenia, exemplified by his characteristic self-hatred and contradictory beliefs. I am, in contrast, only conflicted by whether or not he should be assassinated. And, for those who can't or won't admit to having similar feelings about certain people, bite me! ;->
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 18:06 Comments || Top||

#2  .com,

So I guess you don't like him, do you? ;-)
Posted by: Mike || 03/03/2004 18:13 Comments || Top||

#3  In case anyone here thinks Soros is somehow a protege of Karl Popper, he is not.

Karl Popper is MVHO the most important thinker of the twentieth century and is still very influential is some right wing and Libertarian circles.

Karl Popper's great insight was that science and liberal democracy are driven by essentially the same mechanisms of disputing and questioning issues, inquiry and intellectual speculation. Both work because they encourage dissent and diversity of views.

Hence my occasional railing against the uniformity of opinion in the mainstream media which I consider profoundly illiberal (in the European meaning of the word).

Everyone should read the Open Society and Its Enemies and then Conjectures and Refutations.
Posted by: phil_b || 03/03/2004 18:46 Comments || Top||

#4  but left it unfinished when, as he confessed to his biographer, he himself could not understand on the morrow what he had written the day before.
I must confess a certain sympathy, as everyone at RB knows... I've been there.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 19:39 Comments || Top||

#5  Why doesn't this guy devote his energy and resources to pushing his Open Society in the Middle East the same way he did in Eastern Europe and the Caucuses?

Why not donate money to liberal democratic opposition groups and organize free press and radio stations in the region of the world that needs them the most?!
Posted by: Tokyo Taro || 03/03/2004 19:55 Comments || Top||

#6  Tokyo Taro - Because he's not interested in other people's freedom, except their "freedom" to do what he says. He knows what's best for everybody, and if they don't agree, he'll just spend money until they're crushed under his heel.

I'm with .com, except not so conflicted.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 03/03/2004 20:30 Comments || Top||

#7  It demonstrates the power and reach of a free economy in a republican democracy when a certified idiot and pedantic asshole, who can't remember what he meant in a direct quote the day before, rises to this level of affluence, arrogance, and condescension. I stand vindicated....
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:07 Comments || Top||

#8  karl popper's theories lead straight to the moral and ethical relativism of the deconstructionist pomo homos derrida and foucault--totally against a natural rights strausian perspective that most on this board would adhere too--we really can't know anything for sure has no application in the practical world--this pseudo atomist mishagas is highly dangerous and leads to the fallacy of cultural relativism which is anathema to real world action based on a hierarchy of [relatively] absolute values--if you can't know everything for sure you can take a really really good guess based on probability--i.e. that the sun will rise tomorrow morning--he wants to fight a war with miranda warnings--he wants to play checkers while his opponent plays football- a really dangerous man who is only listened to because he made a couple of bucks--resurrect hayek, von mises and strauss to kick his self hating jewish double dipping ass
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI || 03/04/2004 4:31 Comments || Top||


Haiti rebels ’to lay down arms’
1000 US marines make a persuasive case
The leader of Haiti’s rebel movement, Guy Philippe, says he has told his fighters to lay down their arms. His move came as US marines sent to restore order after President Jean-Bertrand Aristide fled at the weekend stepped up their presence. The Bush administration on Tuesday told the rebels to disarm and go home.

Meanwhile, aid agencies are beginning to bring in urgent supplies to Haiti. Thousands of people are in need of food and water in parts of the country. "Now there are foreign troops promising to protect the Haitian people... we will lay down our arms," Mr Philippe told a news conference in Port-au-Prince. His comments are an abrupt change from Tuesday when he said he would take charge of Haiti’s military and threatened to arrest the prime minister, saying he had a "moral duty" to ensure peace. Those comments brought a swift rebuke from Washington which said the rebels had no place in the political process.

More than 1,000 US troops are in Haiti as part of an international force authorised by the United Nations, which is expected to grow to about 5,000. US marines are securing key sites including the airport, port and presidential palace, but their mission has now expanded "to protect Haitians from reprisal attacks", according to Staff Sergeant Timothy Edwards. But in a sign of continuing insecurity, a gun battle broke out on Wednesday in a Port-au-Prince slum between rebels and gangs loyal to Mr Aristide, the Associated Press reported.

Aid workers are also warning that security must be restored to allow the distribution of urgently needed supplies. A plane chartered by the UN children’s agency (Unicef) arrived on Wednesday, bringing 30 tons of medical supplies. "There are areas we haven’t been able to access for months," said Unicef spokeswoman Marixie Mercado, initially because of floods and then because of the political turmoil. The situation is said to be particularly bad in the north, where the rebels have held sway for several weeks. Oxfam calculates at least 80,000 people in Port-de-Paix and 60,000 in Cap Haitien have no access to clean water.

The reverberations of Mr Aristide’s departure are continuing with the Caribbean Community (Caricom) calling for an independent international inquiry into how he left Haiti. Mr Aristide, now in exile in the Central African Republic (CAR), has accused the US of forcing him to leave Haiti - a charge denied by the Bush administration. CAR officials say Mr Aristide was only told his destination some 45 minutes before his plane landed in the capital, Bangui, and that he was accompanied by 60 US marines.
That can't be true, I've seen Aristide on TV and no way would it take more than one Marine on each elbow to escort him on the plane.
They have said they will meet Mr Aristide in the coming days to discuss whether he wants to remain there or go into exile elsewhere. Correspondents say the CAR authorities are worried that Mr Aristide could cause diplomatic and political problems.
he’s already at it!

I fear that wretchedly poor Haiti will be a mess for a long time to come
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 5:14:41 PM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Top Ten Reasons why we need Haiti:

10. Guantanamo is too small and we are expanding.
9. The Navy is looking for a new test range.
8. Mel needs a place to film Le Passion part Deux.
7. Martha plans a Port au Prince makeover.
6. Chainey needs a place to hide from Muck4doo.
5. Honest, they have WMD wierd mangled dialect.
4. Jacko's new theme park, Voodooland.
3. Part of Axis of ah, whatever!
2. Port au Prince renamed Halliburtonville.

and the number #1 reason we need Haiti:

1. The only place a french looking senator, who btw served in Vietnam could ever get elected president!
Posted by: john || 03/03/2004 20:05 Comments || Top||

#2  OK , John, I bow to your reason, except Chainey's secure hiding place at Halliburton/Kellogg-Root is well known and still secure from Muck and his "short-bus" ninjas
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:17 Comments || Top||


More honors for the White Mouse
we need more like her!
Nancy Wake, the 91-year old Special Operations Executive agent known as "White Mouse", has been awarded the Order of Australia. Neil Tweedie reports

Nancy Wake seemed almost weighed down by the enormous glittering insignia placed around her neck. The Order of Australia is a big thing, in every sense. But Miss Wake, 91 and confined to a wheelchair, was not fazed. How could she be as the holder already of the George Medal and three Croix de Guerre - two with palm and one with star. And the Medaille de la Resistance. And the American Medal of Freedom. And the insignia of a Chevalier of the Legion d’Honneur. Few, if any, women have been decorated so highly for their exploits during the Second World War. Miss Wake was one of the bravest and most resourceful of that extraordinary band of men and women who made up the Special Operations Executive, the SOE, created to wage war in Nazi-occupied Europe. Yesterday she was belatedly recognised by the land of her upbringing when, during a ceremony at Australia House in central London, she was made a Companion of the Order of Australia. The honour was bestowed by the Governor-General, Major General Michael Jeffery, who is visiting Britain. "I feel very honoured," she said. "I hope I am worth it."

Miss Wake is one of those people who it is hard to believe exist outside the realms of fiction. At the age of 28 she was helping Allied soldiers and airmen to escape captivity, and by 32 was leading members of the French Resistance, the Maquis, as a member of SOE. She parachuted into occupied France, was machinegunned by a German aircraft while escaping in a car, cycled 270 miles in three days through numerous enemy checkpoints with vital radio codes, and killed a German guard with her bare hands while sabotaging a factory. The Gestapo put her at the top of their Most Wanted list and nicknamed her the White Mouse for her unfailing ability to slip through their hands.

Present were some of the scores of servicemen she helped to escape. Air Chief Marshal Sir Lewis Hodges met Miss Wake after his bomber was shot down over France. Interned in supposedly neutral Vichy France, he was helped by her to cross the Pyrenees into Spain. "She paved the way by organising the escape," he said. "I remember I was sitting in a bar - the French let us go for a drink even though we were interned - and there were some Germans there. Nancy came in and heard me and said ’you must be British’. The Germans were not very happy." Sonya d’Artois, the daughter of an RAF officer, undertook her SOE training with Miss Wake and was also parachuted into France. She said of her lifelong friend: "Nancy was and is a very astute, very gutsy lady. She was very feminine, but as tough as any man. I’m not sure they make them like that now."

Miss Wake was born in New Zealand but moved to Australia at the age of two. Endowed with an inexhaustible appetite for adventure, she travelled to Britain and trained as a journalist. In 1939 she married her first husband, a Frenchman named Henri Fiocca. He was 14 years her senior. He would later die under torture, refusing to disclose his wife’s whereabouts to the Germans. Miss Wake began her wartime career as an ambulance driver in France, before fleeing to Vichy following the Fall of France in 1940. By September she was helping soldiers and airmen to return to Britain, feeding them and acting as a courier. The Gestapo began to suspect her and she fled over the Pyrenees. Terrible weather forced her return to France and she was arrested and interrogated by the police. Amazingly, she was released and finally made her way to Britain via Gibraltar. She was accepted into SOE and parachuted into France before D-Day to help co-ordinate attacks on German lines of communication.

Miss Wake married after the war but had no children. She divided the post-war years between Australia and Britain, finally taking up residence in the Stafford Hotel in Mayfair, an old SOE haunt. Her money ran out, but still she stayed on, imbibing gin and tonic at the seat reserved for her in the bar. The management were too polite to ask her to leave. She now lives in the Royal Star and Garter home for ex-servicemen in Richmond, west London, helped by a carer paid for by the Australian government. A French comrade said of her: "She is the most feminine woman I know - until the fighting starts. Then, she is like five men."
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 4:34:46 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Very cool story - the Aussie Mata Hari. Thx rkb!
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:44 Comments || Top||

#2  Very, very cool. I'm not at all certain but I believe my wife's mother may have been in France for awhile during the occupation and I know she did work for Donovan and OSS. She died before I married her magnificent daughter.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 16:57 Comments || Top||

#3  Fabulous story! We do need more like her. In fact we've probably got some. We just won't hear about them until after they retire...
Posted by: Kathy K || 03/03/2004 17:07 Comments || Top||

#4  There's a book coming out about the activities of the OSS during the war that is based on interviews and recently declassified mission reports. Can't recall the auther's name, though.
Posted by: Tibor || 03/03/2004 17:25 Comments || Top||

#5  I want a girl like that for my daughter-in-law.
Posted by: Mike || 03/03/2004 18:04 Comments || Top||

#6  excellent, RKB!
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:19 Comments || Top||


Wright guilty of murder
A jury has found Susan Wright, a former topless dancer and mother of two, guilty of murder for tying her husband to a bed and stabbing him 193 times, then burying him in their back yard. Prosecutors contended that Wright, 27, killed her husband, Jeffrey, in the couple’s northwest Harris County home last year in a scheme to benefit from his $200,000 life insurance policy. Wright maintained that she was acting in self-defense against a husband who had abused her for years. On the night of Jan. 13, 2003, she testified, he raped and beat her after she confronted him about his cocaine problem. When he grabbed a butcher knife from the nightstand, she said, she wrestled it away and defended herself.
EFL. 193 times! Think she was serious?
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 4:27:55 PM || Comments || Link || [10 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I keep my butcher knives in the nightstand, too! Wow. Great minds think alike, I guess. Bet her arm got tired... and she prolly needed a new mattress, too. So when did she tie him to the bed - after she had stabbed him 40 or 50 times? Not quite sure I have the timeline thingy down here.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:36 Comments || Top||

#2  Go for a major blood vessel else someone's got to count the wounds... and that's a time/money consuming task for your coroner.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 16:59 Comments || Top||

#3  You're right, Ship - she should've sought expert advice. She's only getting $1036 plus change per jab so, IMHO, she certainly earned her payday! Assuming her Farah Fawcett defense works out, that is.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 17:11 Comments || Top||

#4  "unfortunately, the jury deliberated only a short time, and suggested that her attorney be executed as well for concocting such a weak storyline..."
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:21 Comments || Top||

#5  Actually, I find her defense compelling. If she just wanted the money she could have just spiked his blow. Usually, only abuse will generate that level of anger unless this is a new type of Tae Bo. A criminal mastermind probably wouldn't plan to change the bedroom into a slaughterhouse - makes it hard to clean up the evidence, and nobody likes to have to paint the ceilings. Like .com, though, I wondering about the need to hog-tie a corpse to the bed. I expect that she had been so beaten up over the years that it took quite a bit of bravery kill him and she waited until his intoxication allowed her to tie him up before the fun began. I feel bad that this happened, but I have no plans to add an abusive cokehead to my prayer list. I wonder if Oprah will feature this lady's story.
Posted by: Super Hose || 03/03/2004 22:08 Comments || Top||


Missiles Hit Baghdad Phone Exchange
Three rockets struck a major telephone exchange Wednesday, knocking out international phone connections for much of the country only days after the system was put back in service, officials said. One Iraqi worker was killed and another injured. Qassim Hadi, an undersecretary with Iraq’s Communication Ministry, said the attack happened just after 7:30 a.m. local time at an exchange in the Mansour district west of the Tigris river. The rockets damaged one of six exchanges that are housed in trailers, said Iraqi police Brig. Gen. Samer Saadoun. There were no arrests, but police were searching for the attacker.

Hadi said thousands of people with phone service weren’t able to make international calls. Domestic calls did not appear to be affected. He said the exchange would be repaired, but didn’t have a timeframe. Twelve new telephone exchanges in Baghdad were set up last month, replacing the ones destroyed in the U.S.-led invasion, enabling the Iraqi Telephone and Post Co. provide service for 240,000 lines in and around Baghdad. An estimated 280,000 lines remained out of service, but that was not related to Wednesday’s attack. A call seeking comment from ITPC by The Associated Press wasn’t able to go through. The new switches were installed by the ITPC and Bechtel, through its subcontractor Lucent Technologies, while Globecomm installed an international gateway that will permit long-distance phone calls.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 4:25:54 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  hmmm..knocking out communications? Makes me wonder about Monsoor's comment that the pilgrimage(sp?) was a "trial run" by Iran. Should I worry?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 16:30 Comments || Top||

#2  Al Asshats, Inc. musta read all the positive comments on RB. Henceforth, any good stuff happening in Irak should be kept quiet - don't tell any of the major news outlets lest they shout it from the rooftops and ballyhoo CA progress! Shhhhh. Mumm's the word.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:31 Comments || Top||

#3  hmm..perhaps I should have actually read the entire article before I posted my comment above.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 16:33 Comments || Top||

#4  Iraq's phone system is updated to the benefit of the population and Baath/Al Qaida sympathizers proceed to knock it out almost immediately? If the perpetrators are caught, they should be executed on the spot. This is no longer "resistance" to occupation. These twats are waging war on the Iraqi public, and this should be made nice and clear in the Iraqi media.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 17:02 Comments || Top||

#5  bush needs to put politics aside, forget what the eurotrash think or say or any whinning by kerry and put some serious presure on the syrian border. presure that will not end as long as attacks continue in iraq - i would go as far as to say bring the sf forces out into the open in syria and do some serious damage - publically.
Posted by: Dan || 03/03/2004 17:02 Comments || Top||

#6  When enough Iraqis get sick of this shit and start really looking for and fingering (and killing!) the bad guys and the locations of their weapons, it will taper off.

A lot of Iraqis know where these assholes are coming from, and where they're hiding out. Saddam ain't coming back, guys - start ratting out your jihadist buddies before they kill you, too.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 03/03/2004 18:15 Comments || Top||

#7  So That's why Lucent's up. Contracting work.
Posted by: Anonymous2U || 03/03/2004 23:47 Comments || Top||


Fed Says Economy Continuing to Expand
right on schedule ... the investment - oriented tax cuts are working
Factories hummed and consumers kept cash registers busy in the first two months of this year, fresh evidence that the economic recovery is moving ahead, according to a Federal Reserve report released Wednesday. "Economic activity continued to expand in January and February," the Fed said in its latest survey of business conditions around the country. However, on the jobs front, "employment has been growing slowly in most Federal Reserve districts," the report said.
not surprising. 2 reasons: first, jobs result from investment (takes time) and second, there have been some real structural changes in industries due to information technologies
Factory activity rose in 11 of the 12 regional Fed districts, good news for America’s manufacturers, who were hardest hit by the 2001 recession and have struggled mightily to get back on firm footing. In the Fed’s Cleveland region factory activity didn’t go up, but rather held steady, the Fed survey said. Consumer spending on general merchandise rose in most of the Fed’s regions except for St. Louis, which reported a slight decline. Strong or strengthening sales were reported for the New York, Richmond and the Dallas regions. Sales growth was moderate in the Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Minneapolis, Kansas City and San Francisco districts. Retailers in Cleveland said sales met or exceeded expectations. In the Atlanta region, sales moderated a bit in February but were up from the same month a year ago, the Fed said. However, it said that nearly all regions reported slower auto sales in January and February compared to a year ago. Activity in the service sector also expanded in January and February. Boston and St. Louis, for instance, saw stronger demand for information technology services.

The report, dubbed the Beige Book for the color of its cover, will be used as a basis for discussion when central bank policy-makers meet on March 16. Most economists expect the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee to hold rates steady at a 45-year low of 1 percent at that meeting. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on Tuesday said that extra-low short-term interest rates eventually will have to go up. He gave no clue when. Since last June, the Fed’s main lever to influence economic activity, called the federal funds rate, has been at 1 percent. Near rock-bottom short-term interest rates have helped motivate consumers and businesses to spend and invest, an important factor to lift economic growth. Some economists believe the Fed will start to push up rates this year. Others don’t believe higher rates will come until 2005.
Posted by: anon MBA || 03/03/2004 4:24:33 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Oh no! Kerry & Donks, Inc. will have even more hissy fits! Prolly propose a batch of new porky Jobs Bills to fix this. Where will it end? It's a financial quagmire, I tell ya. Per the phenomenon noted by RC on RB, expect the looneyMBA's to come out of the woodwork, now. Sigh. But thanks for posting anonMBA - some of us aren't loonies. :-)
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:42 Comments || Top||

#2  Where's NMM?
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:24 Comments || Top||

#3  The only potential issue is jobs. Jobs will make a comeback but only slowly and surely like the past 2-3 months. The reason: Expected interest rate increases.

Companies will continue to be cautious in this type of environment.
Posted by: Daniel King || 03/03/2004 17:28 Comments || Top||

#4  Economy is expanding? Haliburton! No blood for ..ummm
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 03/03/2004 18:40 Comments || Top||

#5  ummmm Jobs? Rex? LOL
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:37 Comments || Top||

#6  Friday could be very, very interesting. The jobs number could blow a lot of people away.

Start reading Howard Veit, econopundit and the carnival of the capitalists.
Posted by: Anonymous2U || 03/03/2004 23:41 Comments || Top||


What took them so long!?
Hat tip LGF
The Swiss government on Wednesday pardoned a 79-year-old woman who was convicted of smuggling Jewish refugees into Switzerland during World War II.
’Bout time.
Aimee Stitelmann is the first person to benefit from a new law that pardons anyone imprisoned or fined for helping Jews get into Switzerland during the war. The law does not allow for compensation to be paid. Between 1942 and 1945, Stitelmann helped 15 refugees cross the border secretly from France to Switzerland to escape the Nazis. She would slip into France and return the refugees to Switzerland across an unguarded stretch of the border or by train with false papers.
At great personal risk.
Stitelmann was sentenced to 15 days imprisonment in 1945 for violating Switzerland’s border laws. Another 27 requests are pending under the law, said lawmaker Francoise Saudan, who heads the parliamentary commission that considers pardons.
27? That few?
Some 300,000 people were sheltered in Switzerland between 1938 and 1945, but many thousands more were turned away at the border. Helping rejected refugees to enter the country was a criminal offense. The Swiss government has already apologized to Jews for its World War II policies.
The Swiss have insisted on total neutrality for the past few centuries. But is that such a good idea?
Posted by: Korora || 03/03/2004 4:12:18 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I bow to their moral superiority.... facing the wrong way
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 21:38 Comments || Top||


Marriage Ties PKK into Knots
Most people would look upon a wedding as being a happy occasion; not so among members of the outlawed terrorist organization, the Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK).
As you can tell, this is a Turkish paper.
The marriages of Osman Ocalan, brother of the terrorist network’s leader, Abdullah Ocalan, and one other high ranking PKK supporter added to the growing amount of discord among members of the PKK.
And now, today’s episode of "The Young and The Ruthless"
Osman Ocalan married with a 20-year old Iranian female terrorist.
He first saw her on the rifle range, her lips the color of blood, breasts like two RPG rounds. Their eyes met....
Ocalan refused to heed his brother’s warnings against marrying.
"Women will just tear your heart out, fry it up and make you eat it. You’re young, why get married now? Wait until you’ve matured and then find yourself a nice 12 year old."
He also did not pay any attention to the objections against the marriage coming from the body of the organization.
"Yeah, what your brudder said."
The marriages took place on Qandil Mountain, which the PKK has been using as a base for some time.
And a lovely time was had by all, no reports on how many bystanders were wounded.
After the younger Ocalan got married, one of the executives of the organization, Nizamettin Tas, married a terrorist named Dilan.
Seems like they got sex more on their minds than overthrowing Turkey. Murat will be pleased.
These two marriages stirred up PKK. The marriage of Tas especially caused some militants to remark that the revolutionary dream is over in the organization, which bans marriage.
This fits Fred’s contention that happy people in love tend to put kiddy seats in the minivan instead of C4.
In a meeting with his lawyers, leader Abullah Ocalan, who is currently imprisoned on the island of Imrali, defended his stance that the marriage turns people into slaves.
Now there speaks a bitter man with a ex-wife or two. There’s also a rumor that Osman has given up the family business:
Minister of Internal Affairs, Abdulkadir Aksu, stated yesterday that the Ministry did not receive any information about a surrender to American troops by Osman Ocalan, one of the leaders of the terrorist organization, the Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK), but said there has been disintegration within the organization. Aksu said: "These rumors have been circulating for a few days. However, we have not yet received any information. There is news about it in the media. Due to the homecoming law, anger has been induced in the organization and the result has been some disintegration."
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 4:03:29 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Ah, great story! Love conquers all. It is so inspiring. *sighs, smiles, rolls eyes*
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 16:09 Comments || Top||

#2  If this article doesn't retrieve Murat I don't know what will.
Posted by: Korora || 03/03/2004 16:33 Comments || Top||


Syria may give up WMD to cement political ties to EU
Even if Israel considers the removal of WMD we are ready for a just and comprehensive and lasting peace and to remove WMD under the supervision of UN." Syrian Foreign Minister Farouq al-Shara told a news conference with his visiting Czech counterpart Cyril Svoboda. Syria said on it was hopeful that a long-planned economic and political partnership pact with the European Union might be signed soon despite differences over weapons of mass destruction.
please, EU, protect us against our common enemy the US
The EU had been expected to initial the deal by the end of 2003, but Britain, Germany and The Netherlands have been seeking a greater Syrian commitment against WMD, EU diplomats say. "After the remarks of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, we became more optimistic that a deal will be signed as soon as possible," al-Shara said.
Posted by: anon || 03/03/2004 3:29:54 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Compliance monitoring by the UN will certainly make me feel all warm and fuzzy. Mebbe Blix can augment his country estate in Provence, complete with lifetime supply of Belgian chocolates and Russian caviar, with, uh, um, hmmm... WTF can Syria offer him in exchange for a favorable WMD report? A bunker in Beirut?
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:07 Comments || Top||

#2  I'm sure that Syria is hurting. Sammy's spigot dried up. They have overpumped their oil fields, despite the best advice, so their production is down. They are running out of friends, except for France, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. So they are like the NORKS visit to Libya---got a hit from the ClueBat, fired a few neurons and are starting to see the handwriting on the wall. As long as Britain keeps an eye on the deal, this chain of events could turn into a good thing.

Syria still needs to unload themselves of scum like Hezb'allah before they can really exit the gutter. Unfortunately, the powers that be are still Ba'athists. Too many old guard types imbedded in the govt.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 16:32 Comments || Top||

#3  hmm..I just must be a really cynical person. I was thinking that it was a very clever move on their part. The Eurotrashweenies and the UN lost their really good contracts when Sadaam found our boot up his hind end and I'm sure they would not mind a few good oil contracts from Syria, which will be in a willing mood no matter how overpumped they are.

And now we can start the whole Iraq charade all over again. Syria will agree to comply, the UN will say they are making progress and the Eurotrash squealing like stuck pigs when we try to go in and continue the fight on the war on terror. I'm disappointed in Blair.

Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 18:05 Comments || Top||

#4  The play for Syria is the diplomatic bragging rights the EU might be able to waive over The Cowboy in Washington. "See how our nuanced multilateral process works?"

Anything they can do to embarass GW is bonus points to Herman MunsterKerry, redeemable when he gets elected. "See how our nuanced multilateral process works?"

Ironic in that the play would not even exist if were not for the current American tour de force in Iraq.
Posted by: john || 03/03/2004 19:10 Comments || Top||


Iranian defector reports pro-U.S. sentiment in Iran military
From Geostrategy-Direct, subscription req’d. We report, you decide, bring salt shaker for contingency....
A former commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has defected to Azerbaijan. Col. Bakharali Bagiryan arrived in Baku last week and disclosed that Iran’s military is infused with pro-U.S. sentiment. "I came to Azerbaijan 40 days ago and was registered with the Azerbaijani representative office of the UNHCR as a political émigré," Bagiryan said at the Baku Press Club Feb. 23. Bagiryan said many Iranian military troops would like to defect. "In Iran, the military are not issued with passports, which deprives them of the opportunity to leave the country legally.
I am sure that they can find someone that will make any type of passport that they would require. Everyone else in the area does not seem to have any problems.
I have been sent to Azerbaijan in the capacity of a representative of those who want cardinal changes in Iran’s state structure." The IRGC are Islamic shock troops and are Teheran’s key liaison with international terrorist groups, such as Lebanese Hizbullah. Bagiryan said some 40 percent of servicemen in the Iranian army think as he does and are "waiting for the arrival of America in Iran."

"The strengthening of the U.S. position in the region causes optimism among many Iranian servicemen and they secretly support the operation in Iraq. I think that many of them would back a similar U.S. operation in Iran," the colonel said. Bagiryan said Teheran’s claim that the Iranian army fully supports the government is groundless. He said he intended to stay in Azerbaijan and help those fighting for the national interests of southern Azerbaijan. His remarks appeared in the Baku newspaper Turan, an independent, non-governmental news agency close to the People’s Front of Azerbaijan.
It would be interesting to get some other independent sources of this. At least two more would be nice to see if this situation is true and exploitable.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 2:34:23 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  seems to me that if America and allies can tip the Iranian military balence of power in favour of the reformists then Iran could be on for a change of goverment, or a huge war. Be real nice to see a bloodless take over by reformists but somehow i doubt it, anyway it'd probably be good in the short term but in the very long term perhaps not so due to the fact that any hardliners left behind will no doubt blame America for it and carry out terror campaigns on both America and the reformists now in power. My solution is a mass bombardment using Trident missiles, it'll keep them quiet for a few centurys
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:45 Comments || Top||

#2  "...but in the very long term perhaps not so due to the fact that any hardliners left behind will no doubt blame America for it..."

America will be blamed regardless. While we are at it Mecca and Medina would be good targets along with Damascus.
Posted by: dataman1 || 03/03/2004 15:05 Comments || Top||

#3  "help those fighting for the for the national interests of southern Azerbaijan" -- I assume that by "southern Azerbaijan" he means NW Iran (up to 20 million Iranians speak Azeri as their first language). If this is evidence of Azeri nationalism in Iran, it is news to me.

Jon Shep -- your solution is not good. A substantial majority of young Iranians seem to be pro-US. With regime change, Iran could again become our strongest ally in this region.
Posted by: closet neo-con || 03/03/2004 15:06 Comments || Top||

#4  agreed it could become a very strong ally but there will always be that extra large threat the Iranian hardliners take with them where ever they go what ever century it may be. My point is basically it could be too risky not to Nuke Boom them, i'm not advocating doing it for no reason but i'm sure they'll fall into that trap soon enough if they already havn't started the fall with thier nuclear weapons games
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 15:16 Comments || Top||

#5  I believe the Black Hats & Thugs are prime for tipping over -- and I believe it can be done without anything like invasion or booming. They're ripe. Mmmmm. Tasty SF Ops with TLAMs-&-cruise-missiles-On-Demand, y'know - that new Just-In-Time inventory management system that everyone is raving about, coordinated with local contacts would create the opportunity for the populace to do it themselves. Of course, we would maintain an independent menu of Nuke Facility Shutdown appetizers. Yummm.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:18 Comments || Top||

#6  At least two more would be nice to see if this situation is true and exploitable.

This can be done without having to look to sources. All GWB needs to do is to make it clear that if the Iranian public decides they have had enough of the mullahs and want to end their rule, the U.S. will support them in whatever way we can. Subsequently, if the ruling mullah class tries to clamp down on unrest, the citizenry just might not be as cowed as they would be if American support for their goals were uncertain.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 17:17 Comments || Top||

#7  If this is true I hope it happens soon.
Why do I suspect that the far left is cringing at the thought of Bush being able to take credit (at least in part) if the religous wackos in Iran are overthrown.
Posted by: Lurks Often || 03/03/2004 17:35 Comments || Top||

#8  AP: Central Asian and Southern Caucasian Freedom of Expression Network (CASCFEN) has an independent, well written article on this event and situation.
Posted by: GK || 03/03/2004 17:51 Comments || Top||

#9  GK - Whoa! That's very interesting... His rank / position / privileged status certainly lends substance to the reports... Thx!

Heh, tick tock Mullahfuckas!
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 19:09 Comments || Top||

#10  There are Iranian Azerbaijanis who have organized to join divided Azerbaijan. The first Iranian Azerbaijani I met in Europe was a former Navy officer under both the Shah and the mullahs who had fought in the Iraq War. He was active in such an organization even before the breakup of the USSR. That's why the mullahs have worked hard to keep the (Former Soviet) Republic of Azerbaijan weak and ineffective. They supported Armenia during the Nagorno-Karabakh War and there was unrest in Tabriz in 1992 when the Iranian Azerbaijanis found out about it (the mullahs had controlled news of the war quite strictly).
Posted by: Minutus || 03/04/2004 22:17 Comments || Top||


fashion show is the cure
Fashion models sashayed beside the controversial barrier Israel is building inside the West Bank Wednesday to encourage Israeli and Palestinian women to work together for peace. "As women, we are trying to cross boundaries many times a day," said CEO Sybil Goldfiner, CEO of the feminist Israeli fashion house Comme-il-faut, which turned the construction site for the wall on Jerusalem’s fringes into a catwalk. "We offer a suggestion, or the hope, that women from both sides who bring life into this world will unify to stop this killing that has gone on for too long."
"Mahmoud, I just saw the loveliest outfit at the fashion show at the security fence. I've decided not to blow myself up on a bus!"
The models, garbed in vivid summer outfits, were from Slovenia, Russia, Poland, France and Israel. Goldfiner said she tried in vain to recruit Palestinian models. Israel restricts entry of Palestinians, citing security.
"Fatimah wears a sequined boom belt with a matching headscarf..."
Goldfiner said the stark juxtaposition of the gray eight-meter-(27-foot) barrier and the orange, blue and pink frocks worn by the models aimed to shock 15,000 catalog customers into reflecting on the current reality. "We wanted to bring the picture of normality -- fashion, color, optimism -- and put it next to the abnormality of the wall with its despair and grayness. This combination of normal and abnormal is the picture of reality in Israel."
Perhaps they could use the aisle of a burned-out bus as a runway?
Israel says that the wire-and-concrete network of barriers that loops into the West Bank is necessary to keep out suicide bombers, who have killed scores of Israelis in its cities and towns in the past three years of violence. Palestinians call the barrier a grab of occupied land to deny them a viable state because it often diverges well into the West Bank to take in Jewish settlements. The legality of the barrier is currently under the scrutiny of the World Court in The Hague.
So's one of the buses...
As make-up artists sprayed and primped models and photographers snapped away, Palestinian carpenter Ibrahim Karesh’s wife was preparing lunch for them on the other side of the barrier, in the West Bank village of al-Ayzariah. "This is very important so that the whole world sees how Israelis and Palestinians can live together and it is governments that put up fences," said Karesh of the project.
The fact that Paleos don't have a government could be part of the problem...
He said the barrier, under construction 50 meters (165 feet) from his yard, posed difficulties for his house-run carpentry business, which depends on Jerusalem clientele. "I see the fence and I get angry. Why, why on earth did they put this here? It isn’t going to help anyway."
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 2:11:53 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I'm gonna write a letter or something to one of these lpant machinery companies to see if they can design me a gigantic tracked automatic fence building machine, imagine a giant 500 ton 100 foot tall monster crawling along crushing all the stone throwers in front of it and building a big fuckin wall behind.
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:31 Comments || Top||

#2  It should be obvious to the whole world that the most down-to-Earth rational people around are those in the Fashion industry. Yup. Everyone knows that the simple juxtaposition of color can make all the difference. It did. I am moved. Thx mucky. Where are those Kleenex when you need them... *sniff sniff*
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:23 Comments || Top||


Why don’t they just put on Smashing Pumpkins & turn up the volume?
They’d play Barry Minlow on a 24 hr loop, but it’s against the Geneve Conventions ....
U.S. soldiers in Iraq have new gear for dispersing hostile crowds and warding off potential enemy combatants. It blasts earsplitting noise in a directed beam. The equipment, called a Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD, is a so-called "non-lethal weapon" developed after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole off Yemen as a way to keep operators of small boats from approaching U.S. warships. The devices have been used on some U.S. ships since last summer as part of a suite of protection devices. Now, the Army and Marines have added this auditory barrage dispenser to their arms ensembles. Troops in Fallujah, a center of insurgency west of Baghdad, and other areas of central Iraq in particular often deal with crowds in which lethal foes intermingle with non-hostile civilians.

The developer of the LRAD, American Technology Corp. of San Diego, recently got a $1.1 million contract from the U.S. Marine Corps to buy the gadgets for units deployed to Iraq. The Army also sent LRADs to Iraq to test on vehicles. Some of the Iraq-bound devices will be used by members of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force and the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, both recently deployed to the western province of Al Anbar, a largely barren, predominantly Sunni Muslim area. Though not officially part of the military’s Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, the 45-pound, dish-shaped device belongs to a developing arsenal of technologies intended not to kill but to deter. Another such weapon, expected to be tested in the field soon, is the Active Denial System. It seeks to repel enemies with a painful energy beam.

Carl Gruenler, vice president of military and government operations for American Technology Corp., said LRADs are "in the beginnings of being used in Baghdad," though he said he lacked "initial feedback" on how they are working. Dubbed "The Sound of Force Protection" in a company brochure, the devices can broadcast sound files containing warning messages. Or they can be used with electronic translating devices for what amounts to "narrowcasting." If crowds or potential foes don’t respond to the verbal messages, the sonic weapon, which measures 33 inches in diameter, can direct a high-pitched, piercing tone with a tight beam. Neither the LRAD’s operators or others in the immediate area are affected. The devices "place distance between the Marine and their threat, giving him/her more time to sort out a measured and appropriate response," Lt. Col. Susan Noel, force protection officer for the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, said in an ATC statement announcing the contract.

Gruenler compares the LRAD’s shrill tone to that of smoke detectors, only much louder. It can be as loud as about 150 decibels; smoke detectors are in the 80 to 90 decibel range. "Inside 100 yards, you definitely don’t want to be there," said Gruenler, adding that the device is recommended for a range of 300 yards or less. Hearing experts say sound that loud and of that high a frequency -- about 2,100 to 3,100 hertz -- could be dangerous if someone were exposed to it long enough. "That’s a sensitive region for developing hearing loss," said Richard Salvi, director of the Center for Hearing and Deafness at the University at Buffalo. "The longer the duration, the more serious it is." Gruenler concedes that permanent hearing damage is possible if someone were exposed to the sound for lengthy periods. But he said the high-pitched tone is intended to only be used for a few seconds at a time.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 1:48:19 PM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  i wonder if it act like the brown noise.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 13:50 Comments || Top||

#2  sounds like a seriously modified sky satilite dish, a really top system by the 'sound' of it. Anyone know if the 'Active Denial System' the article spoke about is the device that uses microwave beams to heat up peoples skin in the beam area, kinda like being slowly cooked in the microwave - that can't be to nice.
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:11 Comments || Top||

#3  Finally, i have been reading articles about this technology since 1985, i had given up hope that those things would ever come online.
Posted by: Evert Visser || 03/03/2004 15:08 Comments || Top||

#4  I can see this being useful against crowds, but not so effective against a small boat manned by whacky jihadis with ear protectors.

I wonder if it works better than the Phalanx CIWS which emits ear-splitting beams of 20mm projectiles?
Posted by: SteveS || 03/03/2004 15:47 Comments || Top||

#5  Dr. Bose joins the war effort?
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:29 Comments || Top||

#6  Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, International Jihadi Solidarity Council (okay, I made that up) releasing a statement condemning this in 5...4...3..2...

Posted by: Carl in N.H || 03/03/2004 18:36 Comments || Top||

#7  Actually Steve, if this technology works as advertised, no amount of hearing protection will prevent you from being disabled. The NYT Magazine had a story about six months ago on this product and it's inventor Woody Norris in which it explained that military variant can output a sound that is so devastating and concentrated that even with hearing protection your BONES will vibrate to the point of disability (temporary).

That's why the Navy was so interested because it could knock out guys in a boat, no matter how hard they try to protect their ears, without killing innocent sailors or destroying the boat.

http://www.woodynorris.com/Articles/NewYorkTimesMagazine.htm

For the moment, though, HSS is unfinished business. As night must follow day, there are Defense Department applications. Norris and A.T.C. have been busy honing something called High Intensity Directed Acoustics (HIDA, in house jargon). It is directional sound -- an offshoot of HSS -- but one that never, ever transmits Handel or waterfall sounds. Although the technology thus far has been routinely referred to as a "nonlethal weapon," the Pentagon now prefers to stress the friendlier-sounding "hailing intruders" function.

In reality, HIDA is both warning and weapon. If used from a battleship, it can ward off stray crafts at 500 yards with a pinpointed verbal warning. Should the offending vessel continue to within 200 yards, the stern warnings are replaced by 120-decibel sounds that are as physically disabling as shrapnel. Certain noises, projected at the right pitch, can incapacitate even a stone-deaf terrorist; the bones in your head are brutalized by a tone's full effect whether you're clutching the sides of your skull in agony or not. "Besides," Norris says, laughing darkly, "grabbing your ears is as good as a pair of handcuffs."
Posted by: RMcLeod || 03/03/2004 19:47 Comments || Top||

#8  Certain noises, projected at the right pitch, can incapacitate even a stone-deaf terrorist; the bones in your head are brutalized by a tone's full effect whether you're clutching the sides of your skull in agony or not.

What? What? Oma Gooma Again? What? No really you'll like it, there's nothing funnier that McArthurs farewell speech, yes it's vinyl.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 20:01 Comments || Top||

#9  Been there, kinda, sorta. Used to have an office at RAF Alconbury that was about 50 yards from the run-up taxiway. We used to get F-111s visiting, two-three times a month, practicing aircraft dispersals. Having a pair of F-111s run up 50 yards away is a significant part of the reason I currently have a 65dB tinnitus problem in the 6KHz range.

Noise can actually kill you, if you get the right frequency at the right sound level. Of course, it'd take something like 200dB+ at a very high pitch to do it, but it's possible. If everybody's rolling on the ground clutching their ears, they can't very well shoot you, can they? Consider another application: attach motion sensors to very LOUD sound systems along the border. The Border Patrol could then just drive along, picking up the whimpering, cringing intruders and hustling them back across the border. You'd end up with a large number of deaf people after awhile (the auditory nerve can only take so much), but it would end your illegal alien problem.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/04/2004 0:03 Comments || Top||

#10  Been there, kinda, sorta. Used to have an office at RAF Alconbury that was about 50 yards from the run-up taxiway. We used to get F-111s visiting, two-three times a month, practicing aircraft dispersals. Having a pair of F-111s run up 50 yards away is a significant part of the reason I currently have a 65dB tinnitus problem in the 6KHz range.

Noise can actually kill you, if you get the right frequency at the right sound level. Of course, it'd take something like 200dB+ at a very high pitch to do it, but it's possible. If everybody's rolling on the ground clutching their ears, they can't very well shoot you, can they? Consider another application: attach motion sensors to very LOUD sound systems along the border. The Border Patrol could then just drive along, picking up the whimpering, cringing intruders and hustling them back across the border. You'd end up with a large number of deaf people after awhile (the auditory nerve can only take so much), but it would end your illegal alien problem.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/04/2004 0:04 Comments || Top||


arabia to get new books
Saudi Arabia’s Education Ministry has recalled one million notebooks from schools around the kingdom because they contain mistakes including references to the "Persian Gulf," al-Watan newspaper said Wednesday. Arab states call it the "Arabian Gulf."
just who gulf is it anyway.
A map in the notebooks also inaccurately represented Saudi Arabia’s southern border with Yemen, a source of decades of dispute between the two countries which signed a border treaty in 2000, the paper said. It said a senior ministry official had told the agency which produced the books to halt distribution, withdraw those already handed out and explain how it would rectify the errors.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 1:46:15 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Must have had help from the US NEA in preparing the study guides. (They're the same ones who gave Dan Quayle the card with the word P-o-t-a-t-o-e on it.)
Posted by: GK || 03/03/2004 15:50 Comments || Top||

#2  Hmmm. I wonder if the maps show Israel... I think I already know the answer, heh... Everyone here knows that all maps produced by Arab countries have a fuzzy kinda blank spot where Israel is, right? No detail is too trivial, especially if pointless and self-defeating, for these guys. And, BTW mucky, it's MY Gulf. Mine!
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:50 Comments || Top||

#3  M4D We all no it's really chainneys gulf. it's were the prisian glut came from back in 84


(How's that folks... still missing the cadence. Lucky?)
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:03 Comments || Top||


California police, U.S. troops help equip Iraqi counterparts
I’ve been following this story -- and what a way to support those brave IP police -- they are on the front-line and keep fighting and more keep joining.
By Seth Robson, Stars and Stripes
American police officers and U.S. soldiers delivered hundreds of bulletproof vests and other equipment last week to Iraqi police in Diyala Province, north of Baghdad. The police officers from Fresno and Madera, Calif., who brought the donated equipment to Diyala police headquarters were accompanied by soldiers from the 4th Infantry Division’s 588th Engineers Task Force. The Iraqi lawmen smiled as they unpacked dozens of boxes containing 300 bulletproof vests, 125 two-way radios with chargers and batteries, 250 helmets and various other items. Soon, they were trying on vests and helmets and getting on-the-spot lessons on using riot sticks from their American counterparts.

Detective Michael Harris of the Fresno Police Department, who helped collect the gear, said the 5-year-old bulletproof vests are past their use-by date but work perfectly. If they had not been donated to Iraq, the Californian police departments would have to pay for their destruction, he said. “I’m going to collect bulletproof vests all over the U.S. and ship them to Iraq. I’m going to shoot for 100,000,” Harris said.

Given the number of attacks on police stations in Iraq, the Iraqi police officers are going to need the vests and helmets. Shortly before the California police officers arrived, an improvised explosive device detonated under a police car only a few hundred meters from the Diyala Police Headquarters, killing an officer on his lunch break. In October, a suicide car bomber hit the Baqouba police station in Diyala, killing four people and wounding 38. A short while later, another car bomber hit the Khan Bini Saad police station in Diyala, killing seven and wounding 26. The tattered flag from the Khan Bini Saad station is on display at the Diyala police headquarters alongside portraits of some of the officers killed in the line of duty last year. There are 4,000 police in Diyala Province.

Staff Sgt. Kenneth Carlson of the 649th Military Police Company, a native of Fresno, has worked with the Diyala police since last May and helped organize the donated gear. Gen. Waleed Khalid, commander of the Diyala police, said Carlson taught his men the ABCs of investigation. Khalid said his officers had to learn to investigate terrorism from scratch. Under Saddam Hussein, intelligence and security agencies were responsible for anti-terrorist investigations with police concentrating on homicide inquiries, he said. “I hope we will stay on track and you will hear good news about us when you go home to the USA,” he told the California police and the soldiers. After meeting and talking to the Iraqi police, Harris said they appeared committed to success. “From what I have seen they are up to the challenge of putting a democracy in place,” he said. “This will be a free country and probably a superpower of the Middle East.”
Posted by: Sherry || 03/03/2004 1:38:57 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Hmmm. Any military Rantburgers care to comment on what happens when the bullet proof vests make their way into the hands of the jihadis ? Harder targets for us, or not really an issue ?

Posted by: Carl in N.H || 03/03/2004 18:37 Comments || Top||


Weapons of mass condoms
Rubbers of mass destruction? Regime change in a lubricated sheath?
The United States was trying to remove Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe from power with millions of condoms as weapons, state radio in Zimbabwe said on Wednesday. It said President George Bush’s regime was behind the "rebranding" of prophylactics that carry a bright red and yellow sticker advertising "revolutionary condoms" and a message urging Zimbabweans to "get up, stand up!"

A bulletin said condoms carrying a sticker with "an oppositional political message" were being distributed throughout Zimbabwe "in what appears to be collusion between opposition groups and a United States-based condom manufacturer." The radio said the appearance of the redecorated condom packets was "not surprising, since the United States government has made it clear it is working toward changing of the regime in Zimbabwe, using, among other things, the media." The sticker also bears the name of a non-violent underground group of activists with the name and motto, "Enough!", an appeal to Zimbabweans to stop tolerating abuse by Mugabe’s government. The motto appears in graffiti, and is also the name of a news sheet secretly distributed.

The words on the condom are from a composition by reggae legend Bob Marley who sang, "Get up, stand up, stand up for your rights, get up, stand up, don’t give up the fight." He performed the song in front of Mugabe and thousands of ecstatic Zimbabweans at the country’s independence celebrations in 1980. Recipients of the news sheet two weeks ago found the "revolutionary condom" inside. No comment could be obtained from the United States embassy, but an activist who asked not to be named said: "the Americans had nothing to do with it." He said "a few hundred" condoms had been bought, and locally printed stickers had been glued on before handing them out.

The bulletin linked the "revolutionary" condoms to Population Services International, a Washington-based non-profit organisation working for child and maternal health HIV prevention. PSI provides condoms for aid programmes in Zimbabwe, but by far the biggest provider is the United States Agency for International Development with a budget this year of $8.5m that will provide 89 million American-manufactured condoms to Zimbabwean couples. "If the Americans had wanted to achieve regime change in Zimbabwe, they could have used something more forceful than condoms," said a Western diplomat. "They must have saved the lives of thousands of Zimbabweans. It’s a weird mind that sees the condom programme as a way of overthrowing Mugabe."
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 1:24:07 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Get up, stand up", huh?


Marley woulda loved it.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 13:25 Comments || Top||

#2  Gives new meaning to the term 'Trojan Horse'.....
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 13:29 Comments || Top||

#3  Bush lied, Condoms leak.

my bad
Posted by: john || 03/03/2004 14:26 Comments || Top||

#4  Ouch for the ladies of Zimbabwe if the opposition tacked stickers on to the condoms. Hopefully peeling the stickers off won't damage the condoms.
Posted by: OminousWhatever || 03/03/2004 15:20 Comments || Top||

#5  Using a condom is one way to avoid ending up with a "burning spear"
Posted by: M. Murcek || 03/03/2004 15:23 Comments || Top||

#6  Re#3,John.

Condoms leak.Bush lied,babies cried.

Condoms are good for preventing sexually transmitted diseases.As a form of birth control,well,I've never quite trusted them after my Dad told me during our"Talk",that he was wearing one the night I was conceived.
Posted by: Stephen || 03/03/2004 15:27 Comments || Top||

#7  er, i was going to comment but i think it best not to this time. have a good life stephen and may all your news be a good news.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 15:40 Comments || Top||

#8  God I hope the CIA's behind this.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:07 Comments || Top||

#9  CIA = Condom Imprecation Agency?
Posted by: Old Grouch || 03/03/2004 17:19 Comments || Top||

#10  ...of a non-violent underground group of activists with the name and motto, "Enough!",

The rascal wrappers were obviously unridged.
Posted by: Super Hose || 03/03/2004 22:17 Comments || Top||

#11  There Bob goes again, always poking holes in the good life for Zimbabweans. I think I'll put a curse on him so his next ten break on him.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/03/2004 23:31 Comments || Top||

#12  ...One thing nobody here seems to have asked....

...Who the F**K READS a condom?

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 03/03/2004 23:56 Comments || Top||


Israeli Troops Kill West Bank Militant ; Arafat gives on Direct Deposit
EFL and News
Israeli troops killed a Palestinian militant in an arrest raid Wednesday, and a Palestinian demonstrator wounded by soldiers last week in a clash over Israel’s West Bank separation barrier died in a hospital. He was the third man to die from army shots fired at the fence confrontation.
"riot"?
In Wednesday’s raid, soldiers shot dead a member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, a violent group linked to Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement, in the Tulkarem refugee camp shortly after sunrise, residents said. The army said the man, armed with an assault rifle, was approaching troops, who opened fire and killed him.
Cause=>Effect lesson? Paleos are congenitally incapable of getting this, it seems
In Ramallah, doctors at the main hospital reported the death of a man shot and wounded in last Thursday’s protests at Bidou, northwest of Jerusalem. Amid growing fears of anarchy and the financial collapse of his administration, Arafat on Tuesday accepted a key administrative reform, removing an obstacle in the way of vital foreign aid, his prime minister, Ahmed Qureia, said.
heh heh...prying his arthritic bloody hands off the payroll pursestrings
After months of delay, Arafat agreed that members of security forces would be paid directly, replacing the system of handing bundles of cash to commanders for distribution — an invitation to corruption. Foreign donors were balking at additional aid unless the reform was implemented.
Step right up then, and throw the rest of your euros down the rathole!
Qureia was due to meet a key regional U.N. official Wednesday, but aides to the Palestinian premier said they did not expect substantive discussion on the funding issue.
why?
Israel and the United States have been pressing the Palestinians to consolidate more than a dozen overlapping and competing security forces and wrest control from Arafat, but to no avail.
oh....that
The 2004 Palestinian budget, approved in January, projected a 50 percent deficit of $800 million, underlining the critical role of foreign aid. The Palestinian economy has been decimated by more than three years of Mideast violence.
jeez, what’s the problem? Suha has that much in her panty drawer!
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 12:05:53 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  After months of delay, Arafat agreed that members of security forces would be paid directly, replacing the system of handing bundles of cash to commanders for distribution — an invitation to corruption. Foreign donors were balking at additional aid unless the reform was implemented.

When one's ears are twisted hard enough, the things that are possible are amazing. On the other hand, Arafart is still running the show, so...
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 12:25 Comments || Top||

#2  Never. mention. Suha. Arafats. panties. again.
Posted by: BH || 03/03/2004 13:29 Comments || Top||

#3  BH - my apologies ;-)
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 15:37 Comments || Top||

#4  What's all this ME financial dustup stuff about? Don't the Palestynyuns already have a piece of the West Bank?
Posted by: cosmic muffin || 03/03/2004 16:27 Comments || Top||


Germany: Turkey far from approval to join the EU
So Turkey gave in to French threats, refused US permission to enter Iraq from the north (which would have allowed us to control the Sunni triangle and strongly reduce potential organization and attacks there) -- and is getting zilch except vague promises in return. Wish I could say I was sorry ...
While the question of Turkish EU membership is expected to become a major issue in the European Parliament election campaign in Germany, a new German report says that Turkey is far from being politically ready to join the EU. A study published on Monday (1 March) by the Osteuropa-Institut, a Munich-based research institute, says it is "not very likely" that Ankara will meet the European Union’s democratic and human rights criteria before the end of this year.

Next December, the EU member states are set to decide whether accession negotiations with Turkey will be opened. Technically, Ankara needs to fully achieve the political criteria before it can enter membership talks. The European Commission will publish a crucial assessment on the issue next autumn. The Munich institute says that although "remarkable efforts" towards political reform have been made by Turkish governments in the last few years, reforms remain essentially bound to the formal legal sphere. However, the practical effect of the reforms remains limited, the report states, "Despite formal judicial progress, citizens’ rights are not yet fully guaranteed".

Among other issues, the report mentions the practice of torture and the limited freedom of speech and religion as examples of continuing violation of human rights in the country. The Munich researchers conclude that Turkey will need "considerable time" to meet the EU’s political criteria. The study by the think-tank is set to be used by German and other opponents of the Turkish bid to enter the EU, as it also predicts that Turkish membership could cost the Union up to 14 billion euro a year. In this scenario, based on the assumption that current EU agricultural and other funding policies remain unchanged, Germany alone would have to contribute 2.5 billion euro to each year.
sounds like this is one major reason the Turks will be kept out
The report further predicts "considerable migration pressure" of Turks to Germany if Turkey joins the EU. The "migration potential" is estimated between 0.5 and 4.4 million people. Moreover, the paper projects a major shift of power within the EU.
and this is the second and even bigger one
Not only would Turkey become the second largest EU member state, having an influence "similar to that of Germany", but the balance of power would also largely favour the poorer EU countries. In the event of Turkish accession, 15 countries, accounting for only 9% of the wealth [GDP] of the EU, would together hold 41% of the European Parliament seats and 43% of the votes in the European Council.
Posted by: anon || 03/03/2004 11:56:13 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  15 countries, accounting for only 9% of the wealth [GDP] of the EU, would together hold 41% of the European Parliament seats

Only slightly worse than the US Senate.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:13 Comments || Top||

#2  turkey once again bitch slapped by eurotrash.....turkey risked alot trying to please the euros...it's all a charade...old europe was-is-and will be racist....now you little countries you should learn to keep your mouth shut...
Posted by: Dan || 03/03/2004 13:29 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm not certain which of the three is most ridiculous -- 1) thinking that Turkey's choices in Iraq all had to do with the eeevil EU, 2) calling "old Europe" racist because of her attitude towards Turkey (is it Muslims or Turks that you are calling a race now? I thought we weren't allowed to call anti-Islam attitudes "racist" since Islam is not a race?), or 3) even more obviously the fact that you called Turkey, which would be the second largest country in Europe, a "little country".

Compared to what? China? Yeah, compared to China, Turkey is a little country. Compared to most European nations, Turkey is a frigging large country, population-wise.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 03/03/2004 14:49 Comments || Top||

#4  Aris:

So Turkey didn't get scammed by the French? Sure seems like it did to me.
Posted by: Secret Master || 03/03/2004 15:16 Comments || Top||

#5  Dan can speak for his own comment, but I think you're offbase Aris.

Dan is referencing Chirac's outburst towards other EU countries when he says "little" - he is suggesting that the German report treats Turkey as badly as Chirac treated Poland, Czechoslovakia etc.

My own opinion is that the European attitude towards Turkey is complex and rests on multiple factors. Religion plays a part, so does race to some degree; certainly historic events play a part, as any Greek knows.

Re: Turkey's choices wrt Iraq, it certainly is the case that de Villepin in particular, and the Greek president of the EU at the time, threatened Ankara with slowing down consideration of Turkish EU entry if they did allow the US 4th ID to enter from the north. No doubt there were other factos at work - including factors that would tend towards having Turkey approve that move. In the end, the French / EU pressure was a significant part of the decision, as senior Turkish leaders admitted at the time.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 15:19 Comments || Top||

#6  First of all, the Osteuropa-Institut is an independent institution in Munich. Their reports don't follow government orders. And the report says that Turkey is not ready YET, not THIS YEAR, which is obvious to everyone. Turkey has made significant progress but it doesn't fulfill the political and economical standards of an EU member yet. I think the Turks know that very well themselves.
Schroeder has actually sent the message to Turkey that the door remains open... and so it should. Turkey's importance will grow over the years.
As for the "small countries": You bet that those who will benefit most from joining the EU now will be those who will be keener than others to keep the even poorer Turks out.
Personally I believe that Turkey will join the EU in the end, if they stay on track.
Posted by: True German Ally || 03/03/2004 16:07 Comments || Top||

#7  TGA, I agree with two of your points, but note the reference to "considerable time". Turkey was enticed with the strong suggestion that accession talks would begin this year and that's almost certainly not going to happen.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 16:27 Comments || Top||

#8  wow! I actually agree with Aris on her first point. Jeesh...that's scary. I better reevaluate my belief that the Turks just downright screwed us because they thought they could.. and the shiny EU object was just icing for their cake.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 16:28 Comments || Top||

#9  B> "his" first point. 'Aris' is my preferred transcribing of the name that's in English-speaking countries usually spelled 'Ares', and the god of war will be pissed-off if you consider him female. :-)

It's also short for 'Aristotelis', the Greek form of 'Aristotle'.

rkb> Even in the most optimistic for it scenario, Turkey knew full-well that it wouldn't enter the Union sooner than Bulgaria and Romania did -- and that's in 2007, if all goes well.

And if the Union doesn't solve efficiently its own voting and vetoing conflicts, I wouldn't be that sure of even Bulgaria and Romania entering yet.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 03/03/2004 16:56 Comments || Top||

#10  I wouldn't exclude some EU-pressure (or rather French pressure) on Turkey but no, I don't think that this influenced Turkey's decision a lot. Hell, they had 15bn dollars on the table to weigh against possible EU subsidies in the future.
No, Turkey's obstruction did not have much to do with the EU. Rather with the fact that the war was extremely unpopular in Turkey (more than 90% opposed it) and that, of course, Turkey is playing its own not so little game with Northern Iraq. The ultimate goal for Turkey is Kirkuk. And thats worth so much more than 15bn dollars.
What Turkey wants is a deeply destabilized Iraq which will lead to a break away Kurdish state. The Turks will then "wipe out" Kurdish terrorists, "stop ethnic cleansing" in Kirkuk and Mosul (Kurds throwing out the Arabs) and install themselves permanently while the U.S. (busy with Sunni and Shiite terrorism and civil war) will look away. That's the Turkish strategy. May not work. But I think that's what they have in mind.
Posted by: True German Ally || 03/03/2004 17:19 Comments || Top||

#11  Again, I agree with most of your points TGA, but I think you also discount the influence of the military on the public. Incirlik has played an important role in Turkey's defense and the US were the primary voice urging NATO to affirm its obligations to Turkey in the event of reprisals.

I'm not saying the Turks would have been HAPPY about the 4th ID going in through the north, but I think it's conceivable it would have agreed if France and Germany - and in particular, Germany - had backed that move.

And that, I think, would have saved many lives.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 19:49 Comments || Top||

#12  rkb - I'm no expert, but I think talk of the Turkish Military stepping in to control things is highly overrated. Everyone says that - and maybe at one time that was true. But I have seen nothing lately to support the claim. It's always, "if things go badly, they will step in". Well their Military sat back as Turkey completely screwed us and either didn't care or were impotent to stop it.

AQ said the Americans couldn't handle blood and all they had to do was kill Americans and put it on TV and we'd go home. That was true when pre 9-11, but it's not true today.

Military members get old and retire. I just question if that wisdom is still true anymore.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 23:03 Comments || Top||


AQ blames Uncle Sam for booms
Give me a fucking break. Hat tip LGF.
A letter purporting to come from Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network denied any role in Tuesday’s anti-Shi’ite Muslim explosions in Iraq and blamed the attacks that killed 185 people on the United States.
"Wudn’t us, it wud dem ajitaders."
The letter, signed by the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades with "al Qaeda" in parenthesis, was sent to the London-based al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper. A copy of the letter was obtained by Reuters Wednesday. The newspaper has previously received similar letters from the same brigade in which they claimed responsibility for a November bombing of two synagogues in Turkey and the August bombing of the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad. "U.S. troops have committed a massacre against the innocent Shi’ite people to set sectarianism ablaze among Iraq’s Muslims," the letter said.
"But I need their music businesses; my harp just broke a string."
"We, and with God as our witness, say we are innocent of this act and of anything that will drive the Shi’ites away. Our mujahideen (holy warriors) love God and his prophet and will not do anything that will harm the Iraqi people."
"Sorry about the bloodstains; my lips fell off when I said that."
Suicide bombers, mortars and concealed explosives killed at least 185 people and wounded more than 435 in Baghdad and Kerbala during the holy Shi’ite mourning period of Ashura. The attacks on the mass gatherings made Tuesday the bloodiest day since U.S. troops toppled Saddam Hussein in April. Iraq’s U.S.-appointed Governing Council blamed the blasts on Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian who Washington says works for al Qaeda and whom it accuses of trying to fuel chaos in Iraq. Some Shi’ite clerics said the attacks were the work of Sunni Muslim extremists who want to foment a civil war in Iraq, where Shi’ites are a majority. But in the letter, the Abu Hafs brigades said they only target "Crusader Americans and their lackeys, the Iraqi police."
"I can’t go boom because my legs just shrank."
"We also strike at the agents of America in the Council of Infidels (Governing Council) and all the other allies it uses to hit at the mujahideen," it added. The letter also called on the people of Iraq to wage war against their U.S. occupiers and urged them to keep away from areas frequented by the "infidels and apostates."
Posted by: Steve from Relto & Steve || 03/03/2004 11:53:33 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Well, at least I was beaten by another Steve.
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 11:58 Comments || Top||

#2  ha ha as if anyone believes AQ's word, oh wait some do, conspiricy theorists and leftys will lap this shit up eagerly.
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 12:16 Comments || Top||

#3  Kerry will blame this on American armed forces using forged evidence in 5...4....3...


(Hey! He did it before....).
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 12:28 Comments || Top||

#4  so when is kerry testifying.....it's a quagmire and i would of done it diff...i would of depended on the french..oops sorry i mean frogs
Posted by: Dan || 03/03/2004 13:26 Comments || Top||

#5  The US dunnit? What, was Mossad on backlog or something?
Posted by: BH || 03/03/2004 13:31 Comments || Top||

#6  U.S. troops have committed a massacre against the innocent Shi’ite people to set sectarianism ablaze among Iraq’s Muslims


so now the sunni dominated trash at aq stand with the shia heritics.........did kerry join aq...sure is diff than prev policies...
Posted by: Dan || 03/03/2004 13:31 Comments || Top||

#7  ""We, and with God as our witness, say we are innocent of this act and of anything that will drive the Shi’ites away."

Hey pal, if you're gonna lie, lie. No need to drag God in on the job. Blasphemy is a no-no.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 13:42 Comments || Top||

#8  Kerry's hatchetman on H&C could not outline the 'plan' the Senator had for dealing with Iraq (before or after the invasion). He could only read the clift notes: Bush Bad, Kerry Good. Hey if JF Kerry has a 'magic plan' to fix Iraq, Haiti, and the world let's hear it. Fact is he has NOTHING to offer except opposition.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) || 03/03/2004 13:45 Comments || Top||

#9  Monsoor Ijaz (or whatever his name is) was on Fox saying that he thinks that this was definitely a state sponsored event and that it was Iran and that they were doing a "dry run" to test out weapons. He also think they have WMD's that they intend to use.

I'm not sure I understand what he's saying....that Iran is going to war against the new Democratic Iraqi people?? Anyone get it?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 14:12 Comments || Top||

#10  sounds like this could get real heated between the the Iran/Syria alliance and America and its allies. If Iran?syria are planning a WMD boom in Iraq then theres surly a good chance were already on to it. If its true we have 15 captive wanna-be suicide bombers then surly they can help us back to the source of this be it AQ, the Iranian/syrian alliance or a mix of both. I'm bettin both and if they keep these stunts up thier gonna surly (read hopefully) get smashed for it.
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:20 Comments || Top||

#11  If its true we have 15 captive wanna-be suicide bombers then surly they can help us back to the source of this

The ones with bombs strapped to them are mules, not brains. They know nearly nothing -- a smattering of "theology", the place they were dispatched from, and maybe a pseudonym for their handler(s).
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 03/03/2004 15:28 Comments || Top||

#12  We, and with God as our witness, say we are innocent of this act
When will God testify as your witness? And when can we cross-examine Him about His testimony?
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 03/03/2004 18:38 Comments || Top||


Palis on women and minorities
Hat tip LGF
Introduction
A poll of Palestinian high school students’ attitudes towards women and minorities has revealed "alarming" opinions, according to the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam.The poll revealed a strong rejection of equality for women in society, with as many as 73 per cent of the students feeling that women should be limited to "traditional occupations."Opinions regarding political involvement are also problematic. A full 52 per cent reject a woman’s right to "have position on a Municipal Local Council," while 23 per cent would deny women the right to vote in elections.Limiting women’s freedom is likewise seen as acceptable by significant numbers of children. A third of Palestinian children surveyed believe that hitting a woman is "permissible under specified circumstances," and 23 per cent reject a woman’s right to chose a husband "freely."Attitudes to minorities are also discriminatory. Sixty per cent of the students polled are unwilling to have a friend from a different religion, while 24 per cent do not want a friend with a different skin color.The poll was conducted by the ALPHA Institute for Research and Statistics, and was distributed by the Center for Women’s Affairs in Gaza.

The following are the results of the poll: [Al-Ayyam, Feb. 19, 2004]
Palestinian Children’s attitudes to women and minorities:

Limiting Women’s Occupations:
"73% [Grades 9 and 12] agree to limit women’s work to traditional occupations."
"16% [Grade 12] support women’s right to work as taxi drivers."

Limiting Women’s Freedom
"33% [Grade 12] believe that hitting a woman is permissible under specified circumstances."
"23% [Grade 9] do not accept a woman has the right to chose a life companion freely."
"32% [Grade 9] do not accept a woman’s right to chose her own clothes."

Limiting Women’s Political Involvement:
"52% [Grade 9] do not accept that women can have positions on a Municipal Local Council."
"37% [Grade 9] do not accept women’s right to vote in elections."

Children’s attitudes to different races, religion, sex and handicapped
"60% [Grade 12] expressed unwillingness to choose a friend who is not of their religion."
"24% [Grade 12] do not welcome the idea of friendship with others, who have a different skin color."
"51% [Grade 12] are not willing to choose a friend who is not of their sex."
"9% [Grade 12] do not welcome the idea of friendship with people from other countries."
"No more than 60% [Grade 9 and 12] favor handicapped rights in the areas of occupation, education, and presenting candidacy for elections."
Posted by: Steve from Relto || 03/03/2004 11:46:13 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "16% [Grade 12] support women’s right to work as taxi drivers."

driving a privilage not a right!
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 12:33 Comments || Top||

#2  51% [Grade 12] are not willing to choose a friend who is not of their sex

Stuck in the second grade for life.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:38 Comments || Top||

#3  Ye reap what thou sow.
Posted by: Bill || 03/03/2004 13:11 Comments || Top||

#4  Let's see:

Israel supports women's rights. Palis clearly don't.

Israel let's gays live freely. Palis would prefer to stone them to death.

Israel promotes rights for the handicapped. 40% of palis would limit handicapped peoples' rights.

Israel allows all religions to practice freely. Palis do not.

Israel chooses democracy (messy as any democracy is). Palis would rather follow a corrupt dictator.

And the left chooses (drumroll please)......

The group they'd hate most.
Posted by: PlanetDan || 03/03/2004 14:22 Comments || Top||

#5  Israel needs to get off the West Bank so as not to become overrun by these morons.
Posted by: Hiryu || 03/03/2004 14:41 Comments || Top||

#6  PD -- LMAO.

These numbers are actually pretty good, for the tenth century.
Posted by: Matt || 03/03/2004 15:12 Comments || Top||


Wicked Witch endorses Kerry
Senator Hillary Clinton gave Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry her endorsement Tuesday, as the Massachusetts senator rode his way to a sweeping victory in several Democratic primaries.
Then the Gale residence landed on her.
This is going to be a year, I believe, for Senator Kerry who will be our nominee and I will do everything I can to get him elected. So I hope that next year we will have a Democrat in the White House," she told Japan’s Nippon Television Network Corporation.
"We need infanticide. We need perversion. We need dictated thought. We need dhimmitude."
Kerry has all but sealed the Democratic nomination in the Super Tuesday primaries by winning nine of ten states including New York and driving his rival John Edwards from the race.
"WHOOOAAAAAAAAAAA!"
NTV said it was the first time that Clinton had openly declared her support for a candidate. She declined to speculate on who might be selected to be his vice presidential running mate.
That would be a nightmare.
The interview was conducted at Clinton’s Washington, D.C. office on Tuesday and broadcast Wednesday morning in Japan.
Posted by: Steve from Relto || 03/03/2004 11:41:25 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Oops. I misread the part and thought Pilloried would be his running mate. :ph34r:
Posted by: Steve from Relto || 03/03/2004 11:42 Comments || Top||

#2  I thought this post was about one of Kerry's daughters. All I can say is "why the long face?"
Posted by: Tibor || 03/03/2004 11:49 Comments || Top||

#3  Ok, no jokes about the "Lollipop League"...
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 12:22 Comments || Top||

#4  Wicked Witch?

First of all you misspelled 'Bitch'....

Billary has to endorse Kerry or be seen as 'ineffectual'.....
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 16:06 Comments || Top||

#5  This means, according to the political pundits (with whom I have to agree - just this once) that this proves the Clintons believe Bush will win in 2004. If you think about it in the sense that they don't want a Donk incumbent in 2008 to muddy Billary's chances, well...
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:58 Comments || Top||

#6  Well, he's safe as long as algore doesen't endorse him.
Posted by: Michael || 03/03/2004 17:45 Comments || Top||

#7  Witch, Bitch... so what...

I am waiting for the all-important Batboy Endorsement.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 23:56 Comments || Top||


’Cannabis switch hits food crop’
The UN drugs watchdog has warned that food shortages in Africa are becoming more serious because of a shift from growing crops to cultivating cannabis. In its annual report, the International Narcotics Control Board says the main producers of the drug are southern countries like South Africa and Malawi. But, it says, farmers in east Africa and Sudan have also switched.
It also explains the crazed killers running around, they’re stoned out of their minds.
The report says profits from cannabis and other illegal drugs have been used to finance some of Africa’s conflicts. The UN says drug money was used to buy weapons for wars in Ivory Coast, Liberia and the Central African Republic. Hard drug use was also increasing, but cannabis remained the most widely grown, traded and consumed drug on the continent, the report said. Although farmers earn more money from growing cannabis than traditional food crops, the switch means there is less food available in local markets, the INCB’s Beate Hammond told BBC News Online.
Plus, all those stoned dudes have the munchies.
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 11:28:05 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Jeez this is basically selling your Cheetos to buy grass... a death spiral for sure.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:05 Comments || Top||

#2  how amusing, can't say i blame them for growin it :)
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 12:10 Comments || Top||

#3  It also explains the crazed killers running around, they’re stoned out of their minds.

The only thing they're gonna kill is a bag of Fritos.
Posted by: KerryIsSoVery || 03/03/2004 12:24 Comments || Top||

#4  me and halfull going to have plabn trip over their.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 13:36 Comments || Top||

#5  me and halfull going to have plabn trip over their.

By the looks of things, you don't need any narcotics in your system. It's already toasted as it is.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 14:02 Comments || Top||

#6  There's not really a food shortage, its just that Ed gets stoned and eats everything in sight...
Posted by: flash91 || 03/03/2004 14:20 Comments || Top||

#7  #4 me and halfull going to have plabn trip over their.

And with these mortal words,the Quest for the bong of bongs, royalty among bongs,the bong god and Allah battled over for possesion, in the proces creating the universe (by accident), sets of to-wards new challenges, exciting adventures and mentally unhealthy sexual encounters.
Posted by: Evert Visser || 03/03/2004 15:57 Comments || Top||

#8  There's not really a food shortage, its just that Ed gets stoned and eats everything in sight...

HEY! I may eat everything in sight, but I'm NOT stoned! ^_^

Ed Becerra.

(Hmm.. somehow I'm reminded of the Harvard Lampoon's Bored of the Rings, with Frito and Spam getting seriously demented on mushrooms...)
Posted by: Ed Becerra || 03/03/2004 16:32 Comments || Top||

#9  LOL Evert! Don't encourage 'em. Quest for the Bongs indeed. Now ROFLMAO. This will be trouble.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:09 Comments || Top||

#10  Still LOL, I'm working with M4D and HalfEmpty on a quest... actually I'm working with the idea of M4D and HalfEmpty on an airplane.

I know... peshwar, bad,bad. Still a funny thought.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 19:28 Comments || Top||

#11  There is no food shortage. They know that they can get free food from us. They had a chronic shortage of the chronic that they have now solved. The market works again. Why grow food when it will be delivered to the house. Should work out for all concerned. At least none of them want to live in my garage or basement.
Posted by: Super Hose || 03/03/2004 22:23 Comments || Top||


Iraq delays constitution after day of carnage
wish this didn’t send the wrong message ....
Iraq’s Governing Council on Wednesday declared three days of mourning and announced it was postponing the signing of its interim constitution after a day of carnage in which at least 170 people were killed. A series of co-ordinated attacks on Tuesday targeted two sites in Iraq sacred to Shia Muslims. Three bombs hit Kadhimiya, a northern suburb of Baghdad. A shrine at Karbala, 70km south of the Iraqi capital, was hit by at least five devices.

Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain’s senior envoy in Iraq, said on Wednesday the interim constitution was a vital step towards a democratic state. Tuesday’s attacks were part of "the last desperate struggle of the violent people to try to destroy this before we hand over power," Sir Jeremy told BBC radio’s Today programme. Predicting "bloody" days in the run-up to the handover of sovereignty to local authorities at the beginning of July, he said the upsurge in violence was expected and would be very difficult to stop. "This is a crunch period for the future of Iraq. Iraqi society has got to realise that they have got to unite against it," he said. Asked how long British troops would be in Iraq, he responded: "My prediction is at least another two years, maybe more than that."
yeah.
Both of the sites attacked on Tuesday were packed with Shia Muslims from Iraq and overseas celebrating the climax of the mourning period of Ashura. Fakher Jabir, a civil servant in Baghdad, said: "I was coming out of the Iranian school when the first bomb went off about 70 metres away and everyone ducked. Then they started running. The police were trying to calm them down so that vehicles could get through." He added: "At least 35 people were killed in front of me, including women and children. I was loading them on to trucks. I was picking limbs off the street. Am I supposed to be picking arms and hands off the street?"

No group claimed responsibility for Tuesday’s violence but the attacks raise the spectre of a civil war in Iraq pitting Sunni against Shia Muslim. Members of Iraq’s Governing Council condemned those responsible for the country’s bloodiest day since the fall of Saddam Hussein as "the forces of evil intent on sowing the seeds of havoc and civil war". Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the leading Shia cleric, blamed occupation forces for failing to provide security and or to control Iraq’s borders adequately. He urged Iraqis to unite and speed up "regaining the injured country’s sovereignty, independence and stability".

The US military said suicide bombers and mortars had been used in the Karbala attack. "This was a very sophisticated attack, well co-ordinated," said Brigadier-General Mark Kimmitt, US military spokesman. He said at least 58 were killed at Kadhimiya and at least 112 at Karbala, making a total of 170 deaths. Tuesday’s toll surpassed that of August 19, when Sergio Vieira de Mello, UN special envoy, and 21 others died in Baghdad; that of August 29, when Muhammed Baqir al-Hakim, the head of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, and at least 84 others were killed in Najaf; and that of February 1, when two suicide bombers killed 105 people, including many senior Kurdish leaders, in Arbil. So great was the carnage that Kadhmiya hospital ran short of blood. Thousands of people swarmed to medical centres in and around Kadhmiya in response to radio appeal for donors. "We are boiling with rage but we will be patient," said eye-witness Ahmed Abbas, as he surveyed hundreds of shoes of the dead and injured in Kadhimiya. "Sunnis have nothing to do with this crime, they were Wahhabis," he added, referring to the puritanical Saudi-based sect which denounces the Shia practice of visiting shrines as pagan.
interesting distinction - not all Iraqi Sunnis are willing to sign up to Wahabism
Others blamed the Americans for dissolving the country’s security forces. A spokseman for the Governing Council said on Wednesday that although no new date had been set for signing the interim constitution, the document was ready and it was only because of the attacks that the law had been postoned.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 11:21:45 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Hey eye-witness Ahmed Abbas. Those wahhabis are just accros the border in SA. Time for some payback?
Posted by: Lucky || 03/03/2004 12:23 Comments || Top||

#2  Sunnis have nothing to do with this crime, they were Wahhabis

ooohhh..not good for the Jihadi's that this Wahhabi distinction has been pounded home in such a vivid way. Looks like the Wahhabi's just sucked the wind out of their "Muslim's against the West" global war. Now it's World against Wahhabi's.

I'm guessing this big Sunni/Shia group hug was not quite the response the jihadi's were hoping for.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 12:55 Comments || Top||

#3  this in nothing new--in 1801 the wahabbis sacked karbala and the shrine of hussain and massacred thousands--these people know the drill--same old same old
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI || 03/04/2004 4:50 Comments || Top||


Three Hamas Members Killed in Israeli Missile Strike
Three members of the Hamas militant movement were killed today in the Gaza Strip after the car they were driving in near a Jewish settlement was hit by an Israeli missile. The group called for retaliation against Israeli forces, according to statements on its Web site.
Hot-keyed for Dire Revenge™
The Israeli Army said that its air force had attacked the vehicle transporting "senior Hamas terrorists" who were recently involved in attacks against Israeli targets and who were planning further attacks. An army spokeswoman reached by telephone in Tel Aviv did not give their names.
"a Mr. Splatter, a Mr. Gore, and a Mr. Giblets"
Palestinian security officials quoted by Reuters said the three men were Hamas members. Hamas identified one of them as Ibrahim al-Deiri, and said one of his relatives and another Palestinian in the car were also killed. Explosions shook the area around Netzarim, a Jewish settlement near Gaza City, followed by the screeching of ambulances after the missile strike, it said. Israel says Hamas is the main group behind the persistent mortar and rocket fire at Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and communities just outside Gaza’s boundary fence. Hamas has said that it is retaliating against the Israeli occupation. It is officially committed to Israel’s destruction, and has launched scores of suicide bombings and other attacks during the Palestinian uprising.
Cause => Effect, anyone? Stayed tuned for the obligatory car swarm and battling to handle the smoking bloody remains
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 11:17:17 AM || Comments || Link || [10 views] Top|| File under:

#1  excellent, when this came on the radio at work we all new it was time for a car swarming,body part flailing carnival with plenty of gun sex thrown in for good measure...
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 11:51 Comments || Top||

#2  they should just give the palasnians and israelians the chance to have a midnite basketball program. that has stop people from killing each other in high crime cities with gang problem in america and could work there to. it have been very successful in the past. they not kill each other if they have game to play that night. the palasnians can be the moons and the israelians the stars. just make sure chainey not around to take their ball away.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 12:13 Comments || Top||

#3  i'm thinking the palo's would fill the ball with C-4 and boom it
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 12:20 Comments || Top||

#4  Way to go, IDF, baby!!

Now, could we see about getting Yassin?
Posted by: badanov || 03/03/2004 12:30 Comments || Top||

#5  M4D Are you recycling your comments? Seems like I remember that from a previous thread.
(Not that I have anything against recycling... I just don't do it)
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:40 Comments || Top||

#6  recycle good for the envirement and should be done by everybody. you can piss off chainey by recycle your oil.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 12:50 Comments || Top||

#7  Are you recycling your comments?

I would think that it's more due to a personal problem. A fixation on chaineys would tend to be rather limiting, to say the least.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 13:56 Comments || Top||

#8  Actually I dump my used oil in virgin forests whenever I can.
Posted by: dataman1 || 03/03/2004 14:12 Comments || Top||

#9  muck4doo. You're really Puce right?
Puce - "Statue fallens from Sadam, put Chucky Cheeze rastorant with cola in locate!"
muck4doo - "they not kill each other if they have game to play that night"

You have to admit you both have the same language skills.
Posted by: Scott || 03/03/2004 14:53 Comments || Top||

#10  that'd be "lingage skils", Scott
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 17:17 Comments || Top||

#11  I pity the fool-troll that tries to compete with M4D.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:37 Comments || Top||

#12  LOL! Mucky sure injects a certain something into the dialog. High in nitrates, methinks.

I'm with Bad. I want to see Yassin (Has anyone here seen anyone more perverse and stylized in persona, with the exception of the cosmic phreak Sistani, than Yassin?) and RantSissy (His name alone is worth a couple of Zunis...) aced. That would be a carswarm pic to keep, IMHO.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 17:37 Comments || Top||

#13  You would think that the Hamas leaders would get a clue and stop travelling by car. Its getting to be a very unhealthy mode of transportation. I recomend motorcycles as this will increase the difficulty level for the IDF helicopters. Hitting cars is just too easy for them, and wheres' the fun in that.
Posted by: phil_b || 03/03/2004 20:34 Comments || Top||

#14  "wheres' the fun in that?"

phil_b: I guess I'm wrong, cuz I've been getting a semi-woody every time they hellfire another P.O.S. to the warm forever.....but hey, that's just me, and I'm sure my ex would disagree ;-)~
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 20:43 Comments || Top||

#15  Car swarms need followup hellfires. Pretty soon, all burned out hulks will get a wide berth. And they will serve as warnings to others not to do what the hellfire-ees did.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 03/03/2004 22:28 Comments || Top||


US attacked by Venezuela as opposition grows - Chavez to break ties?
things are heating up ...
Hugo Chávez, Venezuela’s president, is searching for an external enemy to his government, according to diplomats, as opposition protests mount against what appears to be an increasingly militarised regime. In a move that could result in a break in diplomatic relations with the US, Mr Chávez lashed out at George W. Bush, the US president, on Sunday, branding him an "illegitimate" president. Mr Chávez, who is resisting an opposition bid for a recall referendum on his rule, also warned he would sever oil exports to the US if Washington sought to invade Venezuela or establish a trade embargo or blockade. Venezuela, the world’s fifth-largest oil exporter, is a key supplier to the US. Diplomats said Mr Chávez is attempting to fan nationalist sentiment at home and set up an external distraction to domestic political troubles. The US State Department did not comment on Monday. "Chávez is playing the rebel, using the old Latin American mythology of the tough comandante fighting US imperialism," a diplomat in Caracas said. Analysts said Mr Chávez has long been planning to break ties with the US. "This was inevitable and Chávez has unilaterally decided to break political, but not yet commercial, relations with the US," said Alberto Garrido, a local analyst.
he and his buddy Castro can trade with one another - although, he couls hurt the US economy in the short run re: oil
But there were signs at the weekend that Mr Chávez could soon face some form of diplomatic isolation from other countries. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil’s president, whom Mr Chávez has courted as a diplomatic "counterweight" to the US, departed on Friday from a summit of G-15 developing countries in Caracas only hours after arriving.
interesting. Lula has some sanity.
The move came after Mr Chávez praised Robert Mugabe, the president of Zimbabwe, as "a true defender of freedom". Washington is backing an opposition effort to win a recall referendum as a method to help resolve Venezuela’s simmering political crisis. Opponents of Mr Chávez, a populist who they see as a dictator-in-waiting, in December submitted a petition with about 3.5m signatures, more than the 2.4m required to trigger a recall vote. But Mr Chávez alleges that the petition was a "mega-fraud" and part of a US-backed plot to oust him. Venezuela’s National Electoral Council (CNE) on Sunday delayed until Monday night a scheduled announcement on the validity of the petition but it is widely expected to say that only about 1.9m signatures are valid. There is a possibility that opponents may accept a last-ditch plan that would allow signatories to verify their signatures to keep alive the referendum drive, but the chances appear to be slim. Ezequiel Zamora, the CNE’s vice-president, said the verification procedure was "unviable". Meanwhile, since Friday hundreds of national guard troops have been locked in fierce running battles with opposition protesters that have taken to the streets and erected barricades in Caracas and other cities. On Monday, Maracaibo, Venezuela’s second largest city, was in effect militarised to contain protests. Dozens of people have been injured, many with gunshot wounds.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 11:12:35 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Mr. Chavez ought to know something about illegitimacy.
Posted by: Hiryu || 03/03/2004 11:21 Comments || Top||

#2  So he's going to suspend oil shipments if we were to enforce a trade embargo...is it me, or is that an empty threat? Wouldn't the US, by definition, not be trading w. Venezuela anyway?
Posted by: mjh || 03/03/2004 11:32 Comments || Top||

#3  mjh, he's not targetting us with that message. It's all about vilifing us to build support for himself... the nazis were really good at that re the jews. The only problem is the US is not a weak minority in his country he has control over. He better be careful how far he wants to push us...

It's amazing that this moron can watch what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan and still continue down this path.
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American || 03/03/2004 11:57 Comments || Top||

#4  DPA, It's election year. Looks like Kimmie, Black Hats, and Chavez are all selling Bush short. Has anyone got the Vegas odds?

Misunderestimating the Bush appears to be a normal opposition failing.
Posted by: john || 03/03/2004 12:46 Comments || Top||

#5  Hey, Hugo...I seem to remember an instance a while back where another local Jefe decided to blame all his problems on a foreign leader he didn't like.
The dumb s**t ended up attacking the Falklands. Went real well for him, didn't it?...

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 03/03/2004 12:55 Comments || Top||

#6  Not to worry! President Kerry will clean all this up when he is elected. he send VP Dean down there and viola! As is well. Maybe he can get that nazi Ashcroft to give me back my bong too!
Posted by: Halffull || 03/03/2004 13:28 Comments || Top||

#7  Last time I saw the numbers (within the last year), the US was getting 15% of its oil from Venezuela. They were the major beneficiary (in % increase), in fact, of a decade of US preference for oil contracts with non-ME / non-OPEC suppliers.

Chavez, if allowed by the Venezuelan citizens, will set them back 50 yrs -- at least.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:00 Comments || Top||

#8  They were the major beneficiary (in % increase), in fact, of a decade of US preference for oil contracts with non-ME / non-OPEC suppliers.

I think Venezuela is an OPEC member.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 17:20 Comments || Top||

#9  Yep, BaR, first pref was for non-ME contracts. Second pref was non-OPEC - sorry if not clear. It was also supposed to help US with South American image & improve business contacts. Those evil oil companies often assist US in foreign policy efforts. :-)
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 17:28 Comments || Top||


Virus warning
I received multiple copies of the following in my inbox this morning:
Dear user of "Rantburg.com" mailing system,

Our main mailing server will be temporary unavaible for next two days,
to continue receiving mail in these days you have to configure our free
auto-forwarding service.

Pay attention on attached file.

For security reasons attached file is password protected. The password is "11108".

Sincerely,
The Rantburg.com team
Since I'm the "Rantburg.com team," I know it's not so. Naturally, there was a virus (or worm) attached. When you receive a similar message from your ISP, I'd suggest you don't click on it. I'd guess this is going to be a pretty quick spreader.
Posted by: Fred || 03/03/2004 11:01 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I got the same message from the simmins.org team. My virus software got the attachment, but I wasn't dumb enough to try to open it anyway.

I hope I'm not paying the other members of the simmins.org team. They never show up for work.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 11:17 Comments || Top||

#2  I got it also. I doubt it will go far because it looks like it only goes to people with their own domain name. As I control the users in my domain I knew there was not support@davis.org so immediately smelled a virus as the ISP confirmed.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 11:21 Comments || Top||

#3  Earthlink users beware. I got suckered by sender 'noreply@earthlink.net' saying my mail had been disabled due to unauthorized access.
McAfee killed it as soon as I opened it, fortunately.
Posted by: Pamela || 03/03/2004 11:43 Comments || Top||

#4  This one's really hot today. I got one too, and the other members of my team of one never show up for work either. Norton AntiVirus took care of it.
Posted by: Tom || 03/03/2004 14:11 Comments || Top||

#5  Ok, first of all, what "security" is supposed to be provided by including the password along with the "protected" attachment?

But I guess logic isn't most e-mail user's long suit, huh? This is somewhat better (in a technical sense) at looking like a real mail than most, but still a huge chunk of obvious bogosity, dudes.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 14:15 Comments || Top||

#6  A similar message came to me, seemingly from otenet.gr.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 03/03/2004 15:17 Comments || Top||

#7  I've got several .org and .com domains and I can assure you those teams are complete slackers. The whole show wants outsourcing to Bangalore.

The intersection of spammers, virulent email worms and hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of compromised PCs has got potential to be a serious national security problem. I'll look for an opportunity to post something on this.
Posted by: Classic_Liberal || 03/03/2004 16:06 Comments || Top||

#8  It's Bagle.K:
The new version of Bagle, Bagle.K, is also spreading, in part because of its convincing e-mail message. The text of a Bagle.K-infected e-mail indicates the recipient has a virus -- and it appears to come from the support staff of the recipient's company. The text can read: "Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content) outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer safe, follow the instructions." Recipients are then urged to click on a link to clean up their infected computer -- and if they do, they are duped into infecting themselves with Bagle.K.
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 16:24 Comments || Top||

#9  Nuked one domain level above me. Excellent. It allows me more RB time.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 16:53 Comments || Top||

#10  The "password protection" on the attachment is actually security for the WORM. The password-protected zip file is inaccessible to virus protection systems so they would ostensibly pass the file along to the OS. (The major AV companies have updated their definitions with the signature of the zip file though, so if you're updated, the virus will be trapped. People who aren't updated though, are probably still posting on Democratic Underground.)
Posted by: Bennett Reddin || 03/03/2004 17:05 Comments || Top||

#11  Some of those who got this email were probably included because spidering RB provided their email addresses. Sorry, folks, but every time you provide it on a web page or send an e-card or any of a dozen other actions, you become fair game for the jerks. The only defenses are putting some anti-spam (so you never see it in the first place) and anti-viral software (kept up to date so it can prevent those emails that slip through from infecting your system) on your machine.

Sigh. If only these people directed their energies to something substantive and positive.
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 18:28 Comments || Top||

#12  It's not just those with their own domain names. I got one with my local service provider's name. I was just over there an hour or so ago, talking about a locked-up modem (it hung, and hung up my system until I rebooted), so I knew the message was bogus. Besides, our local service rep always uses his Christian name, which is not a common one, on real messages.

I have this dream of catching one of these bas$$$$$ who perpetuate viruses or worms, or a major spammer, and make him sit on a high bar stool, deleting tens of thousands of emails one at a time by hand, on a desk-top keyboard, where they'll have to bend over and put a strain on their back. Every once in awhile, I'd come in and pour icewater down their back, while yelling for them to work faster.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 03/03/2004 19:49 Comments || Top||

#13  Old Patriot:

The worst spam operators are well known and the list is relatively small. Check out ROSKO on Spamhaus for example. These people are all violating numerous laws--we don't need any new ones to go after them.

When Justice went after Tommy Chong rather than someone on the ROSKO list, I thought perhaps there had been a failure of communication. Ashcroft said something like, "Bring me the head of a spammer!" which was misinterpreted as "Bring me a pot head!".
Posted by: Classic_Liberal || 03/04/2004 0:30 Comments || Top||


Kerry wins Dummycratic nomination
EFL. Hat tip LGF
John Kerry captured the Democratic nomination to challenge President Bush in November, scoring a string of coast-to-coast wins on Tuesday that knocked rival John Edwards out of the race.
"See yuh
"
Kerry, who received a call of congratulations from Bush, quickly turned his focus to the general election and said he was "a fighter" who would challenge the president on a range of issues.
"Why couldn’t you just let more attacks happen!? Did I just say that!?"
"Tonight the message could not be clearer, all across our country, change is coming to America," Kerry told supporters in Washington. "With one united Democratic Party, we can and we will win this election."
In your dreams, beauzeau.
The Massachusetts senator continued his domination of the Democratic race on its biggest night of voting, scoring wins in nine states including victories in Georgia, Minnesota and Ohio, which had been targeted by Edwards. The wins capped a spectacular political resurrection for Kerry, whose campaign was considered dead just two months ago but charged back to life as Democrats began to evaluate which candidate stood the best chance to beat Bush in November. Kerry and Bush now embark on what promises to be a hard-fought, eight-month general election campaign. Bush, who trails Kerry in some opinion polls, launches his first television ads in 17 battleground states on Thursday as he starts to spend a more than $100 million campaign war chest.
Mostly from special interests.
Edwards had hoped to slow Kerry’s march to the nomination, but narrowly lost Georgia and was swamped by Kerry in most of the other states voting on "Super Tuesday." He canceled a planned campaign trip to Texas to return home to North Carolina, where aides said he will end his White House bid in a speech at the Raleigh high school attended by two of his children. "We have been the little engine that could, and I am proud of what we have done together, you and I," Edwards told supporters in Atlanta, claiming his campaign had put issues like poverty, civil rights and race back at the front of the Democratic agenda.
You forgot dhimmitude and trying to make sure the Israelis recant "Never Again"
Posted by: Steve from Relto || 03/03/2004 10:21:27 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  great article on frontpagemag.com today http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=12446
about his "100 million dollar" war chest. According to this story, he's already a million and counting in the hole.

Apparently a recent ruling in Feb from the FEC limits Mr. Soros contributions to $37,XXX total. Bwahhaaahahahaaa!

March madness has begun - cue the mud.
Posted by: Anon || 03/03/2004 10:31 Comments || Top||

#2  Kerry and Bush now embark on what promises to be a hard-fought, eight-month general election campaign. Bush, who trails Kerry in some opinion polls, launches his first television ads in 17 battleground states on Thursday as he starts to spend a more than $100 million campaign war chest.

Who wants roast leftist?
Posted by: badanov || 03/03/2004 11:12 Comments || Top||

#3  Bush is launching the ads with the $100 million... Kerry is temporarily in the hole.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:21 Comments || Top||

#4  Howard Stern who is no friend of Bush at the moment calls Kerry "Herman Munster"

Bush, Kerry, & Nader. Vote for Larry, Curly, or Mo.
Posted by: john || 03/03/2004 12:39 Comments || Top||

#5  I hope that the Feds watch Sowos money vewy vewy closely. He suffews fwom the delusion that he's an Amewican, sometimes...
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 17:03 Comments || Top||


Kerry: Bush lied about water on Mars
Whe else but ScrappleFace?
(2004-03-03) -- John Forbes Kerry, the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee, today said President George Bush lied about the presence of water on Mars.

The charge comes a day after NASA announced that its Mars rovers had found evidence that there may have been water on Mars in the past.

"Evidence of previous water is not the same as the presence of actual water now," said Mr. Kerry. "No one doubts that Mars once had a ’water program’, if you will. But Mr. Bush spent $800 million on his unilateral Martian adventure. That money could have provided affordable health care for poor children of minimum-wage-earning same-sex domestic partners who were wounded by assault weapons on underfunded public school playgrounds."

Mr. Kerry added that when he supported increased funding for NASA, he didn’t know that "Bush would...uh...foul it up as badly as he did."
Posted by: Steve from Relto || 03/03/2004 10:13:09 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I posted this late last night in a Kerry thread, but wanted to see what people think of it, so I am reposting it here. (BTW, I know that some of these issues were previously raised by George Will, Mark Steyn and others.)

I sent this e-mail to John Loftus, an intelligence/national security guy who comments on a NYC-based radio show every night. He is a Democrat who is in favor of killing (or at least maiming) radical muslims, and has generally been complimentary of the Bush Administration's prosecution of the WoT. Tonight, he was discussing domestic politics and said the failure of the gun bill in the Senate (at the NRA's behest) is one reason this [Bush] Administration has to go. I was caught off-guard by the comment, so I sent him this e-mail:

I enjoy your nightly commentary on the John Batchelor Show and understand that you are a Democrat, but I am curious as to who you think al Qaeda, the Iranian mullahs, Arafat, Assad, et al., would prefer in the US Presidential election -- Bush or Kerry? Do you think Qaddaffi would have thrown in the towel on his WMD program with John Kerry in office? If John Kerry (or Al Gore) were in office, would Saddam Hussein still be in office too? How about Mullah Omar?

As someone who knows a lot about terrorism, terrorists and the dangers facing the US, do you think that a vote for John Kerry would be responsible? To me, Joe Lieberman was the only Democratic candidate that took the threats to the US seriously, and look where that got him. Kerry has not, to my mind, shown the judgment, strength or courage of his convictions (assuming he has any real convictions) to deal with the threats facing America, and his voting record shows a lack of seriousness about the threats and challenges facing the US and our military.

What is his plan for defending America beyond adding 100,000 cops and 100,000 firefighters? I know he talked about temporarily increasing troop strength by 40,000, but with recent Bush Defense Department moves (delaying most discharges and temporarily upping recruitment), that is happening anyway. He also speaks of President Bush's failure to deal with Iran or North Korea. What would he do differently? Would his approach to North Korea be unilateral or multilateral (the approach followed by the Bush Administration)? On Iran, he seems to have shown his cards a bit by suggesting that he would open a dialogue with the mullahs. To me, they are a bunch of thugs that will recognize only the application of American might and Presidential will. On al Qaeda, he has been critical of the failure to get bin Laden in Tora Bora. Would there have even been a Tora Bora if Al Gore (or John Kerry) was President?

To me, national security/defense is the only issue in this election, and John Kerry hasn't shown me anything to suggest that he would be up to the task of leading this country's defense as president. I will vote for President Bush this fall because I think he thinks and acts and leads like the defense of the US and the destruction of our enemies is the most important thing he will ever do. I fear that he will lose the election because people in the country want a "jobs president" or a "healthcare president" as John Kerry promised to be. Perhaps during the '90s being a "jobs president" was appropriate (I would argue that President Clinton should have done more to COMBAT al Qaeda during his tenure in office), but this is the 21st century, and I think the country needs serious, determined leadership in the War we are fighting, not someone who is going to hire more firefighters and cops to respond to attacks after they occur.

Thanks for letting me vent. Take care.
Posted by: Tibor || 03/03/2004 10:31 Comments || Top||

#2  good post Tibor. It basically comes down to that, doesn't it? Do we want planes blowing up here in the USA everyday, or not?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 10:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Fine post, Tibor, but I might state the point differently. We know the Bush's general approach to the WOT not because of what Bush has been saying, but because of what Bush has been doing (although in my mind the two have been pretty close.) I would be somewhat reassured if Kerry were to make a firm statement about the WOT, but we all know that what politicans say during a campaign is a less-than-infallible indicator of what they will do in office. This seems doubly true of Kerry, who as far as I can tell is prone to different things to different people. (Campaign Slogan: Vote for Kerry -- He's on Your Side of the Issue.) So why should I put my trust in Kerry's electioneering as opposed to Bush's actual record?
Posted by: Matt || 03/03/2004 11:12 Comments || Top||

#4  Bush Lied, Martians Died.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 11:22 Comments || Top||

#5  lol very good - dead martians
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 12:13 Comments || Top||

#6  If John Kerry wants to be a "jobs" president there is only two ways that a president can seriously affect employment. The first is tax policy, and I think we know where JK will go with that. Face it nobody wants to pay taxes themselves they just want some other sucker to pay them. The second is get the Congress to fund some type of massive Federal Works program. It doesn't matter if its rebuildng the nations infrastructure or send men to Mars. If any president tells you he is going to "create" jobs in the private sector hes trying to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn
Posted by: Cheddarhead || 03/03/2004 17:03 Comments || Top||


Smells like Bin Laden.
More Bin hiding merchandise for your viewing "pleasure" here
Posted by: Evert Visser || 03/03/2004 9:58:47 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  smells like binny, looks like piss
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 12:14 Comments || Top||

#2  how bout look like benny smells like piss.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 12:54 Comments || Top||

#3  Examining a flat round ash tray...

"Look like cookie."

"Sound like cookie."

"Yummmmmmmm!!!!"

-Cookie Monster
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 16:52 Comments || Top||

#4  After being dead for well over a year - I imagine Binny must be quite fragrant.
Posted by: A Jackson || 03/03/2004 19:06 Comments || Top||


Shootout at the Kashmiri Korral
A suspected militant with explosives on his body grabbed a guard’s rifle and opened fire in a jail courtyard in India-controlled Kashmir on Wednesday, sparking a shootout that killed five people as well as himself, police said.
Jumped Deputy Dog, took his gun away and cut loose.
The gunman was overpowered by other guards and killed, but not before three policemen and two civilians were fatally injured, said P.L. Gupta, inspector-general of police in Jammu, the winter capital of India’s Jammu-Kashmir state.
Just another day in beautiful Kashmir.
He said officers investigating the attack believe the attacker fired toward a jail bus preparing to take 13 suspects to court in order to create panic so he could free an associate on board. The man who allegedly was to be freed was injured in the firing and hospitalized. Gupta did not explain why the gunman would fire on a bus containing a man he wanted to free.
Either he was shooting at the guards on the bus and displayed typical islamic marksmanship, or he was trying to kill the guy instead of freeing him.
’This was a militant attack,’ Gupta said. ’He wanted to free one of the militants on the bus.’ He said explosives were found on the man’s body.
Killed him before he could push the button. Looks like the "You’ll never take me alive" bomb vest is becoming standard issue for gunnies.
Why wear a boom vest if you're going to spring Mr. Big from the clutches of the cops? Why shoot up the bus if Mr. Big's on it? Even if you were going to shoot up the bus, why not bring your own gun? It sound a lot more like if Mr. Big was involved as an objective at all, he was a target. He knows too much, so he's suddenly become expendable.
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 9:06:06 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Update, this makes more sense:
At least six people have been killed and 12 injured during an attempted suicide attack in Indian-administered Kashmir, police say.
They say a militant fired on a police vehicle parked outside a jail but was shot dead by prison guards. The vehicle was due to take a group of prisoners to court in the state's winter capital, Jammu. A senior police official in Jammu, PL Gupta, said the man who attacked the jail on Wednesday was a militant with grenades strapped around his body. He wanted to free one of the prisoners being taken to the court, police said.
Three policemen, one of the prisoners and a civilian were among those killed along with the militant.


Not a bomb belt, but grenades.
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 11:35 Comments || Top||


Why progress is unlikely in North Korea nuclear talks
By Mark Magnier, Los Angeles Times. EFL
North Korea has never had a real election, doesn’t believe in democracy and wouldn’t dream of putting the political fate of "Dear Leader" Kim Jong Il in the hands of ballot-wielding commoners. But it does have an election strategy — as far as the United States is concerned. The regime in Pyongyang, analysts say, is rooting for virtually anyone other than George W. Bush to be the next U.S. president.
[, such as a certain haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat who once served in Vietnam]
That’s why many observers are expecting little progress at the six-party talks aimed at halting North Korea’s nuclear program that started yesterday in Beijing.
I guess they don’t call it the "Democratic People’s Republic" for nothing.
"North Korea is waiting for its own regime change — in D.C.," said Pang Zhongying, professor of international relations at China’s Nankai University.
I can see it now: "Rodong Sinmun today in an editorial calls for fully demonstrating the might of single-hearted unity in hearty response to the calls of the Democratic National Committee to elect John F. Kerry the next President of the United States. ’Senator Kerry fully represents the noble Juche idea and the American people shall advance in its spirit and emerge victorious with its might if he is elected. . . .’"
In return for shutting down its weapons program,
(NOT!)
the North wants to get something to eat the most generous possible trade terms, aid and security guarantees. Pyongyang is betting that by stalling, it can achieve a better deal with a new administration, analysts say. Nor does it want to grace President Bush with a diplomatic victory that might help re-elect him. . . .
On the other hand...
Bush will be in a stronger position to make demands on North Korea after November — assuming he’s re-elected and the United States has restored sovereignty in Iraq to Iraqis. At that point, a U.S. threat of unilateral action against Pyongyang also would become more credible.
Therefore, expect lots of talk, and no action, in the near term.
Posted by: Mike || 03/03/2004 8:38:12 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  hmmm... I wonder if Kerry has been sending letters and perhaps having his own private deals talks with kimmie-boy like he has the terrorists mullah's of Iran...

I mean it isn't as if he hasn't given hope to our enemies before...
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 9:20 Comments || Top||

#2  And in other breaking news, the ocean is rumored to be wet.
Posted by: KerryIsSoVery || 03/03/2004 10:57 Comments || Top||


4th Infantry Division and Task Force Ironhorse
Task Force Ironhorse soldiers from the 2nd Brigade Combat Team conducting a patrol Monday at Baqubah located an IED. As an explosive ordnance disposal team disarmed the IED, an explosion went off in the area, damaging two vehicles. The patrol searched two individuals with a donkey cart suspected of detonating a second IED. The individuals are being detained for questioning.

3rd Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment soldiers from 4th Infantry Division had an informant report a possible weapons cache north east of Riqqah Monday. Upon inspection of the location, they found two RPG launchers, 16 RPG rounds and 1,000 heavy-machine-gun rounds.

Soldiers from the 4th Infantry Division’s 1st Battalion, 68th Armor Regiment conducted reconnaissance operations Monday northwest of Balad. They captured one individual who is thought to be an individual wanted for attacks against coalition forces. He is being held for questioning.

Soldiers from Task Force Ironhorse had a walkup source give the location of an RPG cache northwest of Ad Dawr Monday. 4th ID soldiers from the 4th Battalion, 42nd Field Artillery Regiment went to investigate and discovered four SA-7 missiles partially buried and wrapped in plastic. The soldiers secured the missiles and brought them back to the base to be destroyed.

Soldiers from 4th ID’s 3rd Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment conducted a raid targeting two terrorist suspects Monday southwest of Abu Sayda. They captured both of the individuals during the raid and are holding them for questioning.

Task Force Ironhorse soldiers from the 2nd Battalion, 11th Field Artillery Regiment discovered a prewar cache northwest of Kirkuk Monday. The cache contained 300 to 400 125 mm tank rounds buried approximately four feet deep. The cache was assessed as being prewar and undisturbed. EOD will destroy the rounds at the site.

Task Force Ironhorse soldiers from 2nd Battalion, 8th Infantry Regiment conducted a raid at Muqdadiyah Monday. The soldiers captured two individuals suspected of harboring terrorists. They also confiscated one 9 mm pistol. The individuals are being detained for questioning.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 8:36:07 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Fox Teams Bring Versatility to 1st Armored
The 13 soldiers assigned to operate the Army’s M 93A1 NBC Reconnaissance System, commonly known as the Fox, have been busy supporting the 1st Armored Division Artillery, or "DIVARTY," Combat Team in ways that are not always expected. From operating temporary checkpoints, traveling on reconnaissance patrols to providing convoy security, the Fox teams have been operating 24 hours a day supporting missions in DIVARTY’s southern Baghdad sector. "Flexibility means being able to adapt and change at a moment’s notice," said Sgt. Tanya Jackson, a squad leader assigned to operate the large six-wheel light-armored vehicle. "The recon platoon and its Foxes have been more than flexible throughout this deployment. We have done everything from zone patrols to route improvised explosive device clearance."

Weighing more than 19 tons, the German-made vehicle demands attention on the crowded highways and in Baghdad’s densely populated neighborhoods. The Fox is a prime platform for supporting numerous DIVARTY Combat Team missions because of its size, armor and agility, which Staff Sgt. Kristine Chewning knows from experience. Because of the vehicle’s distinctive design and armor, her three-soldier crew was able to survive a direct hit from a rocket-propelled grenade. Although the gunner was injured from shrapnel from the initial impact of the round hitting the armor, the Fox crew was able to regain control of the situation -- but the crew and Chewning will never be the same, she said. "It quickly changed my idea about terrorism, security and patrol operations we do and the training for combat operations," she said. Although the vehicle’s minor damage has been repaired and her soldier’s wounds have healed, Chewning said she is, now more than ever, focused on the mission. EFL
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 03/03/2004 8:34:45 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Terror Group Threatens French Railways (breaking)
A previously unknown terror group is threatening to blow up French railway tracks unless it is paid millions of dollars, authorities said Wednesday.
"This is S.P.E.C.T.R.E. speaking! Unless you pay millions of dollars in small, unmarked bills, we will begin blowing up French railroads! Helmut, speaking for... ummm... S.P.E.C.T.R.E. — out!"
Information from the group led to the recovery on Feb. 21 of an explosive device buried in the bed of a railway line near Limoges in central France, the government said. The bomb would have been powerful enough to break a track, it said. The government had earlier urged French and international media not to report the blackmail effort to protect efforts to establish contacts with the group. But the Interior Ministry released details about the threats in a statement Wednesday after the story leaked. The group ``has sent several letters demanding an important sum of money in exchange for neutralizing several bombs it says it has laid, notably under rail lines,’’ the ministry’s statement said.
"The bombs are in place now! Unless we receive your tribute, we will begin setting them off! No one can oppose S.P.E.C.T.R.E.! Mwaahaahahahahaha!"
Police said the group threatened attacks unless it receives $4 million and euro1 million - worth $1.2 million - within days. Police do not believe the group has any connection to Islamic terror networks. Anti-terror magistrates are investigating. The Interior Ministry said the group identifies itself as AZF - the same initials as a chemical factory that exploded, killing 30 people, in southwestern France in 2001. Investigators believe that explosion was accidental. AZF ``presents itself as a ’pressure group with terrorist characteristics,’’’ the ministry’s statement said.
But we know that it's an international criminal cartel, headed with ruthless efficiency by Ernst Stavro Blofeld, aka The BFG! Blofeld reports to Helmut, who speaks for Boskone...
Police are working the case, but ``hope to do it with discretion to give themselves the maximum of chances’’ for success, the ministry said, without elaborating on the investigation.
"M. Bond, you are familiar with the operations of S.P.E.C.T.R.E.?"
"Why, yes. I've had run-ins with them in the past."
Posted by: Evert Visser || 03/03/2004 7:45:19 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  probably just a bunch of kids working out of a garage who figured out the easist way to get millions was to demand it from the French.

Or maybe the state-sanctioned French channels to provide terrorists their badly needed cash have become limited and now they need to get more creative.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 8:09 Comments || Top||

#2  The Interior Ministry said the group identifies itself as AZF - the same initials as a chemical factory that exploded, killing 30 people, in southwestern France in 2001. Investigators believe that explosion was accidental.

I remember this case being a pretty obvious example of terrorism.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 03/03/2004 8:15 Comments || Top||

#3  http://www.spectrezine.org/resist/toulouse.htm

The court enquiry has just ended with very clear conclusions: it has swept away the idea that the cause was supposed errors in the working practices of AZF workers, a theory which would have satisfied some. It is now established that it was a matter of poor stocking conditions: humidity and decay had transformed the fertiliser into a chemical bomb.
Posted by: ed || 03/03/2004 8:38 Comments || Top||

#4  I wonder if this group has any ties to the Basque ETA, given that the Basque nationalists span both sides of the France/Spain border.
Posted by: rkb || 03/03/2004 10:04 Comments || Top||

#5  The "Express" (center) mag, NOT a conspiracy mag, featured a long investigation about the shadowy areas of the AZF explosion, and two others serious periodicals, "Valeurs actuelles" (right) and "Le Figaro" (center right) also presented some troubling facts, including numerous witnesses of a double explosion, the first one being at the SNPE explosive factory 60 m away, unexplored leads, suspicions of cover-ups,... something very fishy.
You must understand this was an HUGE explosion, 10 days after 9/11, that there was a presidential election next year, that everybody was (and is) scared shitless of social unrest (socialist PM's firts words after the WTC collapse were something like "let's not attack the muslim community, please, no race riots" I clearly remember this)
IMHO, there is a real doubt about the AZF chemical plant explosion, which was officially deemed an "accident at 99%" minutes after it happened ; I wouldn't be surprized by a cover-up, really. After all, french authorities have a long history of denial, think about the comical Chernobyl cloud that stopped right at the french borders...
7 reasons to doubt?
- The explosion was claimed by various organizations, including one through a fax machine hacked from the UK.
- The RG "secret police" investigated the background of one victim of tunisian origin, Hassan J., found with several layers of underwears, as per israeli suicide bombers, and discovered he was involved with "afghan" islamists. The day before the explosion, he had an argument with a trucker because of an american flag on his truck. This rapport was not exploited.
- Two autopsy results about Hassan J.
and Abder T., another arab victim, are missing, and other evidences seem to have been altered.
- Two too many, unidentified bodies found near the crater.
- No investigation about the hours before the explosion regarding Hassan J.
- The profile of Samir A., who left the plant 30 mn before the explosion on a false pretext, has a background in chemestry (but was hired 2 days ago as a janitor), and received money from a NYC bank.
- The missing 21 kg of chrome 6, which can be used an an explosive primer, and produce a white flash similar to the firts explosion described by some witnesses.

A majority of toulouse inahbitant are said to be conviced this was not an accident.

Sources : (Use babelfish or any other online translation for theses articles)
http://www.valeursactuelles.com/azf/azf.php

http://www.lexpress.fr/express/info/sciences/dossier/azf/dossier.asp?ida=370971

http://www.lexpress.fr/express/info/sciences/dossier/azf/dossier.asp?ida=374923

http://www.lexpress.fr/express/info/sciences/dossier/azf/dossier.asp?id=404644
Posted by: Anonymous coward || 03/03/2004 10:12 Comments || Top||

#6  Look out, kiddies. Picking up the boodle is the dangerous part.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 10:55 Comments || Top||

#7  If they're French terrorists, shouldn't they just go on strike?
Posted by: Dar || 03/03/2004 10:59 Comments || Top||

#8  Actually, you don't have to blow up a railroad to do considerable damage to property and life. Anyone with access to a spanner and points (switches) along the high speed line from Paris to Lille could easily get the same results as blowing it up which would a lot more tricky.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 03/03/2004 12:15 Comments || Top||

#9  Very cool A-Coward.
Posted by: Lucky || 03/03/2004 12:30 Comments || Top||

#10  What I find interesting is the group demanded over 75% of money in US DOLLARS!That's not saying there's much faith in the Euro when even terrorists don't want it.
Posted by: Stephen || 03/03/2004 15:16 Comments || Top||

#11  One of the best things to do with terrorists [other than blowing them to flinders]] is to ridicule them. They are so desperate to be taken seriously - despite their ridiculuous pronouncements!

BTW, It has been 35 years since I read of 'Helmut Who Speaks for Boskone' and the Grey Lensman who brought him down.
Posted by: van Buskirk || 03/03/2004 19:42 Comments || Top||


Man identified as bomber aboard Philippines ferry
A man — listed by the Muslim extremist group Abu Sayyaf as one of its suicide bombers — was aboard a ferry carrying 899 people that caught fire last week after an explosion, the coast guard chief said Tuesday. But Vice Adm. Arturo Gosingan said there was no indication so far that a bomb caused the blaze that gutted the Superferry 14 shortly after it left Manila on Friday. Police dogs checked the ferry before it departed.
Other than the passenger manifest, the known terrorist identified by Abu Sayyaf as their boomer, and the fact that Filipino ferries were previously announced as a target, nope, nope, no evidence whatsoever. And Lassie needs retraining.
Abu Sayyaf, an al-Qaeda-linked group, claimed responsibility for the incident and identified the "suicide bomber" as Arnulfo Alvarado, 33, the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper reported. Police intelligence reports have cited the ferries, one of the main forms of travel in the sprawling archipelago, as a potential target for Abu Sayyaf. A spokeswoman for the ship's owner, WG&A, initially said the name of the alleged suicide bomber was not on the passenger manifest. But coast guard spokesman Arman Balilo said Tuesday that Alvarado was on the list of those who boarded the ferry. He also is classified as being missing. "There is still an investigation going on, but the position of the coast guard is that ... anybody can make (such) a statement," Balilo said, referring to the Abu Sayyaf's claim of responsibility.
'cept these boys have a habit of backing up their claims.
Witnesses said a powerful explosion triggered the inferno.
You mean, like a bomb?
The fire occurred the same day that two alleged Abu Sayyaf members were convicted of kidnapping an American in 2000 and another was arraigned for participating in a separate mass abduction.
Posted by: Steve White & Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 02:02 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Defectors Tell of Cannibalism, Torture, Lost Families
Gruesome testimony follows. Thanks to the Marmot.
The "5th International Conference on North Korean Human Rights & Refugees," held from Feb. 29 to March 2 in Warsaw, Poland, has drawn the attention of international media. At this conference, five defectors discussed their tragic conditions in which family members have been lost or scattered about. Three are young people in their 20s who either lost their parents early or were forced to separate from them at an early age.
  • 27-year-old Han Bong-hee, who came to South Korea in August 2001, escaped North Korea by crossing the Tumen River into China together with her family. Chinese police, however, caught her mother and father and forcefully repatriated them to North Korea. She has yet to hear from them since. Fighting back tears as she recalled his family's history, Han said, "I was moved when I came to Poland and saw that foreigners are paying attention to the human rights situation in North Korea," and, "I ask the international community to show even more interest so that North Koreans can quickly find freedom."

  • 22-year-old Kim Hyeok, who was born in Cheongjin, North Hamgyeong Province, lost his parents at an early age and was raised in an orphanage. When he was teenager, he began crossing back and forth across the Chinese border in order to make a living. At the age of 16, he was caught and forced to spend time in prison. While he was in prison, he saw an engineer -- a university graduate -- brought in on charges of eating children. "At first, I thought, 'How can a person eat other people?' But as I starved, I began to experience hallucinations in which people appeared as beasts, too. I became extremely frightened of myself." When Kim was released from prison, he crossed over the Chinese border once again, and with the help of locals, reached South Korea in 2001.

  • 23-year-old Byeon Nan-i's older brother was publicly executed, and even though she crossed over into China together with her family, circumstances separated them. Bursting into tears, she said, "I went to China to get word of my parents who returned to North Korea, and I heard that because of my older brother who was publicly executed, the state took away their home. They put up a plastic tent in the mountains, and live by picking and eating grass. They're now bedridden."

  • Foreign media attention has been particularly focused on 41-year-old Lee Yeong-guk, who in 1978 was selected as a bodyguard for Kim Jong-il at the tender age of 16. He served in that capacity until 1989. Lee attempted to defect in October 1993, but was arrested by North Korean authorities and subjected to extreme torture. Afterward, he spent four years at Yodeok Political Prison Camp. Discussing life at the camp, Lee said, "We ate an average of 120g of corn gruel a day and had to endure 15 or 16 hours of forced labor. Men and women had to lay face down, wearing only their underwear, and were beaten with ash tree branches until 10 [branches] snapped." He told of how starving inmates would catch snakes, frogs, and mice, and eat them in their entirety -- snake skin, mice fur, guts and all. He testified that while he was at Yodeok, there was a prisoner who was charged with having salt in his pocket. The guards killed the man by chaining his ankles to a car and dragging him until the flesh from his head and back had been stripped off. Now and then, guards would kill prisoners by beating them with rifle butts or kicking them with their boots until their heads cracked open.

  • Of the five defectors, the oldest was 59-year-old Kim Hee-suk, who lost to starvation her mother-in-law, husband, and son -- in that order. Kim came to South Korea following her daughter, who had defected previously. Fighting tears, she said, "Coming to South Korea, every time I eat my fill, I think of my only son who starved to death, and I can't eat."
Co-organizer Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (HFHR) played a vital role [in this conference. In the opening ceremony, National Remembrance Institute president Leon Kieres said in his keynote address, "Even though I've never been to the Far East, when I look at the situation as a Pole, a people who have experienced things like the Nazi Holocaust, there are clearly things in common between the North Korean prison camps and those of the Nazis and Soviets."
What will we say to the innocents in North Korea when the day comes they're finally freed?
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 01:57 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  What will we say to the innocents in North korea when the day comes they're finally freed?

Tell them Ammnesty International really wanted to help but was overwhelmed with some 500 gigs agains't the USA for real violations concerning Gitmo inmates. The bastards were gaining weight which was unhealthy, or some such bullshit. Just didn't have time for the North Koreans

NK is such a sad situation. I'm a Yank who lives in China and works throughout Asia for a major US oil company and often travel thru Korea. They're good people and why this situation is allow to go on is beyond my understanding. Chiner

Posted by: Chiner || 03/03/2004 4:32 Comments || Top||

#2  Be a shame if one 'o these here dastardly Islamist Terrorists snuck into Pyongyang with a suitcase nuke, now, wouldn't it?
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 11:04 Comments || Top||

#3  How about them S Kors. They have promised to ABSTAIN on any UN resolution regarding human rights in North Korea.
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200403/200403030012.html
Posted by: Michael || 03/03/2004 13:18 Comments || Top||

#4  my futur daughter will also be name bong.
Posted by: muck4doo || 03/03/2004 13:34 Comments || Top||

#5  This has been known and ignored by the media and organizations like AI for years.

What is not mentioned here is how Kimmie-boy-the-baby-killer has newborn babies killed in front of their mothers for 'racial purity' if they (the mothers) are returned to NKOR from China while pregnant. His government will either 1) force an abortion or 2) induce delivery and kill the baby as soon as it is born (often in front of the mother) if it is full term.


Source: The hidden Gulag
Posted by: CrazyFool || 03/03/2004 14:29 Comments || Top||


US training Algeria to fight GSPC
U.S. military experts are training Algerian forces to fight the threat posed by rebels in the vast Sahara desert as part of the global war on terror, a U.S. official said on Tuesday. The unprecedented training, an indication of warming U.S.-Algerian ties, follows a separate U.S. initiative to help four nations on the southern edge of the Sahara combat security threats -- Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Chad. "U.S.-Algerian cooperation, including military, is expanding in many areas. Last year we increased our military education and training programmes," a U.S. embassy spokesperson in Algiers said. The official declined to elaborate on the training.
"I can say no more!"
Military experts say the cooperation is a major step for Algeria’s powerful military, which has been shunned in the past partly due of its involvement in national politics. Officials would not elaborate on the sort of training involved.
They can say no more, either...
Foreign Minister Abdelaziz Belkhadem declined to comment on U.S.-Algeria training but told Reuters: "There is normal (anti-terrorism) cooperation between all countries, including the United States."
Hmmm... He can say no more, too...
"Counter-terrorism is a key area of U.S.-Algerian cooperation; Algeria’s cooperation in the fight against terrorism has been outstanding," the embassy spokesperson said.
Pablum, anyone?
The official dismissed newspaper reports that Washington planned to build a base in the Algerian desert.
Fort Zinderneuf, he we come!
"The United States has no military bases and is not seeking bases in Algeria or the Sahel countries," the official said, referring to Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Chad. The Ministry of Defence declined to comment.
They can... Oh, hell. You know.
Prime Minister Ahmed Ouyahia said recently that rebels fighting for a Taliban-style state were no longer a threat to Algeria but that they might try to strike on the eve of presidential elections on April 8. GSPC chief Abu Ibrahim Mustafa warned last month that the war on the authorities was far from over.
I think Abu Ibrahim was the only person who could say anything in the entire article.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:32:55 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  No comment.
Posted by: Abu Ibrahim || 03/03/2004 15:07 Comments || Top||

#2  What he said.
Posted by: Abdelaziz Belkhadem || 03/03/2004 22:30 Comments || Top||


Just 5 LRA groups left
Defence minister Amama Mbabazi leaves for Sudan this week to meet Khartoum security officials to draw up the final strategies for the destruction of Kony’s bases in southern Sudan. "We are meeting next week in Khartoum to make the final arrangement to rout Kony out of his bases in Sudan," Mbabazi said last week.
I think we've seen this routine before. I'm not holding my breath...
"When Kony entered Uganda from Sudan, when Operation Iron Fist began in 2002, he had 15 fighting groups. The UPDF’s successes demonstrate a positive turn in the struggle against those terrorists," he said. He said Kony now has five fighting groups. "Kony commands one group and it is based in Sudan. Vincent Otti, who fled back to Sudan recently commands another. The other three groups are the ones terrorising people in northern Uganda", he said. Mbabazi said, "One group is under a killer called Odhiambo. This is the one that massacred people at Abia and Barlonyo. Another one is under a terrorist called Ocan Bunia. This one has been trying to enter Gulu without success. A thug called Raska Okuya commands the third group. This one operates in Pader and Lango. We are all out for them. Inspite of last week’s security lapse in which those thugs killed our people, we have deployed adequately. They are not capable at all. The fact that they succeeded in killing people at Barlonyo does not mean they are strong or it does not mean that the UPDF is weak."
It just means a bunch of people are dead...
On Kony’s order to depopulate Acholi and Lango, Mbabazi said, "It was not the first time Kony issued those types of orders. They attacked Pabbo, Lokum and other places. He even ordered his commanders to ambush buses and other public transport so that they could raise money. This was after we tightened the noose around their necks. We have no doubt that we shall finally wipe them out. It is very important to acknowledge the fact that the UPDF is registering a lot of success against these terrorists. We killed 21 of those who killed people at Barlonyo in Ogur sub-county."
I'd still call their success less than blinding, but maybe I'm wrong...
Explaining the LRA’s February 22, 2004 massacre at Barlonyo in which at least 200 people were massacred, Mbabazi said, "They were only successful because that was not an established camp. The local commander, Lt. Col. Mulindwa had deployed 60 Amuka militia at that point because he had received intelligence reports that that was a route between Pader and Lango. So it was supposed to be an observation post. But when wanainchi saw the armed Amuka, they began gathering around them. In fact the numbers grew to between 4,000 and 5,000 civilians. It was a grave error because it was not well protected. The bandits got intelligence that the place was not properly protected so they attacked."
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:30:06 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Sudan sez top Darfur rebels killed
Government troops fighting rebels in Sudan’s western Darfur region have killed several of their field commanders, captured others and seized 20 of their vehicles, a state governor was quoted as saying Tuesday. Osman Yusuf Kibir, the governor of North Darfur State, told the official newspaper Al-Anbaa that government troops repelled rebels attacking his home village of Al-Twaishah and the nearby village of Taweelah on Saturday and Sunday. The troops killed between six and seven field commanders, captured others, and seized more than 20 vehicles while destroying others before the remaining rebels fled, he said. The governor said he believed that Khatir Toar al-Khala, a prominent rebel leader, was among the dead. He said the rebels destroyed nine houses of his relatives, the local police and water utility offices and the Al-Twaishah hospital but there were no casualties among the villagers. "All parts of Darfur are now free of the rebels except for some pockets," said Kibir, adding that the rebels resorted to "hit-and-run methods of fighting". He said he believed that a radical solution to the Darfur problem "will be found only with reinforcing the armed forces and intensifying the military pressure to reach dialogue."
"To do that, it's necessary to kill all the women and children and old folks. That way lies peace."
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:28:08 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


5 dead, 2 kidnapped in Philippines festivities
Three policemen, a soldier and a civilian were killed while two civilians were abducted in scattered guerrilla attacks in the central and southern Philippines, official reports said Tuesday. New People’s Army (NPA) gunmen waylaid three traffic policemen on the outskirts of the southern city of Butuan late Monday as the officers responded to a call for help from residents being harassed by armed men. All three officers were shot dead as they approached the neighborhood. An army corporal was shot dead and six pro-government militia members were wounded in a firefight with another NPA unit near the central town of Tinambac in the Bicol region, it said. Meanwhile, Abu Sayyaf guerrillas killed a man and abducted his wife and son in the village of Buan in the Tawi-tawi island group in the extreme southern Philippines on Sunday.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:23:21 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Ramzi Yousef’s bro-in-law responsible for Quetta attack
At least 41 people were killed and more than 150 injured in the south-west Pakistan city of Quetta yesterday when three men raked a procession of Shia worshippers with machine-gun fire and lobbed grenades, then blew themselves up. Hundreds of members of Quetta’s sizeable Shia minority were processing through the city when the attacks took place. They provoked a rampage by Shia youths, who set on fire a mosque, a television network office and several Sunni-owned shops.

The mayor, Abdul Rahim Kakar, said the three unidentified assailants threw grenades at the worshippers and raked them with machine gun fire. They then walked into the crowd and blew themselves up, he said. Two of the raiders died, the third was in a critical condition. Government officials blamed the attack on Sunni fundamentalist groups which have traditionally attacked the Shia in Pakistan. Witnesses said the attackers’ guns were painted with the name of the outlawed Sunni group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, which has carried out many sectarian attacks in the past. "We suspect this is the work of the usual suspects, like Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, but it’s not clear what their objective was," a Shia leader, Abdul Jalil Naqvi, said.
My guess would be that the objective was to kill a large number of Shiites. My question is whether it was an activity coordinated with the festivities in Iraq. My suspicion is that it was.
The information minister, Sheikh Rashid Ahmed, said: "Obviously, the purpose was to create unrest. This a sad incident, and we condemn it." The city was under an emergency curfew last night as officials tried to prevent the sectarian reprisals spiralling. Announcing the curfew, the mayor said the security situation was under control. But a police officer, Khyzar Hayyat, said gunshots continued to be heard nearly an hour after the killings. "The situation is very bad," he said. Riaz Khan,the Quetta police chief, said a Sunni mosque was set alight and partially destroyed, and there had been an exchange of fire between Shia gunmen and unidentified rivals.
That's what was supposed to happen...
Ijaz Khan, a reporter for the private television network GEO, said that six unidentified people entered the its office in Quetta and set it on fire. The office was empty and no one was injured. Last week the network ran a talkshow which is alleged to have included offensive comments against Shia worshippers. The police said a leading suspect for the July attack was the brother-in-law of a terrorist belonging to al-Qaida, Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted for the bombing of the World Trade Centre in New York in 1993.
Several accounts have labeled Ramzi Yousef as being a member of the Sunni sectarian group SeS during his time in Pakistan, where he allegedly married the daughter of one of the SeS’s leaders.
In another incidence of sectarian violence in Pakistan yesterday, two people - one Shia and one Sunni - were killed and 40 people wounded in clashes in Phalia, 100 miles east of the capital, Islamabad. That too began with men opening fire on a Shia procession through the town. Allama Hassan Turabi, a senior Shia leader, called on the president, Pervez Musharraf, to sack members of the government, including the interior minister, for failing to prevent the Quetta attack. "This is not the first attack against us," he said. "Our people are not safe at homes. They are not safe in mosques."
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:14:43 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  They are not safe in mosques

Ah..at last they begin to get a clue.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 1:44 Comments || Top||

#2  I read in The New Jackals that Ramzi Yousef was involved in the bombing of a Shi'ite shrine in Iran back in the mid 90's too.
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 3:55 Comments || Top||

#3  but it’s not clear what their objective was,

Obviously, they don't read rantburg.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 8:17 Comments || Top||

#4  somewhat off topic for this post, but as long as we've got the Paki experts here

what to y'all (dan and paul in particular) think of the new Seymour Hersh piece in the New Yorker - havent read it but heard him on NPR this AM - he says we let Perv off the hook for letting A Qhan go, in return for Perv letting US troops into NWFP to get Bin Laden. He says Qhan would have been very desirable to interrogate, and this is huge tradeoff. also says Perv is in deep yoghurt - days numbered.
Posted by: liberalhawk || 03/03/2004 13:42 Comments || Top||

#5  I haven't read the article, but those conclusions seem plausible enough. It's obvious that AQ Khan wasn't operating without the assistance of the Pakistani Army, so for Washington to accept the charade of Khan's confession, they must have gotten something in return.
Back home Perv has pretty much zero support. The fundo part of the population are against him, the middle class and elite are against him, and the secular parties; the PPP and PML-N are against him. He managed to contruct a majority in parliament by buying off various defectors and minor parties and combining them together, but even they don't particularly like him.
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 17:55 Comments || Top||


Kyrgyzstan struggles to keep out al-Qaeda
This Central Asian nation hosting U.S. troops is a preferred sanctuary for an al-Qaida-linked terrorist group because of loose border controls and widespread corruption, convicted terrorists said in interrogation records. "Kyrgyzstan has the most favorable conditions to carry out terrorist attacks and for former members of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan to settle down," Azizbek Karimov said in court documents.

Last year, the Kyrgyz National Security Service arrested three Kyrgyz nationals allegedly preparing a terrorist attack against the base, and their trial starts Tuesday. An earlier pair of bombing attacks at a Bishkek market in 2002 and a bank in the southern city of Osh in 2003 were tied to the IMU. Along with Karimov, two Uzbek nationals -- Ilkhom Izatulloyev and Assadullo Abdullayev -- were tried in Kyrgyzstan for the bombings and sentenced to death last month. The attackers told authorities they chose those targets because of the high security around their preferred objectives, the U.S. Embassy in Bishkek and a Turkish-owned hotel. Karimov and Izatulloyev were active members of the IMU and allegedly under the direct command of the group’s leaders, Kyrgyz officials say. Both lived in Afghanistan and were trained in camps there between 1999 and 2001, until the U.S.-led war on terror began. Karimov also trained in Chechnya, where the Russian government has been fighting separatists since the 1990s. "In our first days in Chechnya, we studied weapons, tactics and topography. We didn’t have any special instructions on explosives, but we always asked our instructors about how we could make an explosive," Karimov said in his interrogation, conducted in May by Uzbek authorities, who handed over the transcripts to Kyrgyzstan. The two countries cooperated closely in the investigation, and the documents are signed by Karimov. However, the United Nations has complained of "systematic" torture in Uzbek jails, and the judicial system is closely controlled by the government, which could cast doubts on the veracity of the documents.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:09:48 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Jeesh. BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan. Where the heck is that?? Ok, Ok, I've got google, but I've been reading Rantburg for over a year and this is the first I've heard about this country's involvement...not that that means much. But now I'm told it's the "preferred sanctuary" for al Qaida. What's up with that?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 1:17 Comments || Top||

#2  loose border controls and widespread corruption

Heh, that's like 95% of the world.
Posted by: RW || 03/03/2004 2:15 Comments || Top||

#3  doesn't mr. mxylplyx from superman comics live in kyrgyzstan?
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI || 03/03/2004 2:29 Comments || Top||

#4  When the article says "preferred sanctuary for al Qaida" it really means preferred sanctuary for the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, a Central Asian group allied to Al Qaeda.
So you shouldn't expect to see Binny of Zawahiri caught there anytime soon
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 3:49 Comments || Top||

#5  SOT I've always wondered do you pronounce it Mix-el-plix or Mex-al-plex?
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 12:09 Comments || Top||

#6  Shipman, I think it's mxy-lp-lyx (mixey lup licks)
Posted by: Lucky || 03/03/2004 12:42 Comments || Top||

#7  Actually, it's Mxyzptlk.
More info here...
Posted by: Scooter McGruder || 03/03/2004 13:15 Comments || Top||

#8  is this part of the reason American forces are there,to serve as a hub/base from which to carry out the hunt for AQ? good that it must piss thne russkies off too
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:27 Comments || Top||

#9  Shipman, how could you even get "mex-al-plex" from that?

Lucky..."mixey lup licks"? Come on. Haven't any of you ppl ever heard of DC Comics in the first place? Ever watched even 1 episode of the Superfriends? The guy's name is Mr. Mxyzptlk and it is pronounced miks-yeez-pit'l-ik.
Posted by: Anonymous5161 || 06/08/2004 9:21 Comments || Top||

#10  *slaps forehead* Of course! Now I see! *snicker*
Posted by: .com || 06/08/2004 9:25 Comments || Top||

#11  Better brush up on your atlases guys LOL.

Seriously, the 'Stans have been a quietly important part of our presence in Afghanistan and in all of Central Asia. We need access there, and it's a delicate situation in each of the countries.
Posted by: rkb || 06/08/2004 9:45 Comments || Top||


Will things go Bouteflika’s way?
It is the richest Arab country in terms of cash held by its government. And yet, in terms of disposable income, its people remain among the poorest. We are talking of Algeria where the government, having collected over $300 billion from oil and gas exports since 1990, holds liquid assets of over $25 billion. And, yet, this is a country where unemployment stands at over 40 percent, forcing tens of thousands of young people to immigrate to Europe each year, often through illegal channels. The capital Algiers, a sprawling metropolis of four million people, is subject to daily brownouts and shortage of water not seen even in post-liberation Baghdad. “Our country is rich but our people are poor,” runs the refrain of a current popular song.

But Algeria is also one of few Arab nations where the democratic ideal enjoys genuine popular support. The period of freedom that opened between 1988 and 1992 saw the emergence of dozens of political parties, covering the entire political spectrum. Despite a government campaign to curb it in the past four years, the Algerian press, much of which is privately owned, remains one of the liveliest in the Arab world.

In 1965, three years after an eight-year war of independence against France, Algeria fell under the control of a military elite that had emerged from the defunct French colonial army. The generals and their lower-rank minions in the army and security services formed a clan resembling a royal family. It imposed a one-party system, muzzled the media, and, in close association with a network of French business tycoons, claimed the lion’s share in the nation’s oil and gas income. In 1991 the generals intervened to stop the second round of a general election in which Islamist parties appeared set for a big victory. And in 1999 the generals forced the elected President Liamine Zeroual to retire before the end of his term. They then organized a snap election in which Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who had spent almost 20 years in exile, was the sole candidate and won with a big majority. Putting himself at the head of the National Liberation Front (FLN), the party that had monopolized power for three decades, Bouteflika proceeded to form an objective alliance of Islamists and sections of the military against the emerging democratic movement.

Last year, however, the coalition that Bouteflika had constructed began to fall apart. He first lost control of the FLN that, trying to reorganize itself as a modern left-of-center party, opposed Bouteflika’s autocratic style. Next it was the turn of Islamists to distance themselves from the president after they realized that he was using them for his own purposes. But possibly the biggest blow to Bouteflika came late last year when the army high command publicly announced it would no longer interfere in national politics. The generals’ decision was taken under pressure from Washington and during negotiations with Gen. Muhammad Lamari, Algeria’s most senior commander. By the year 2000 Lamari and other Algerian generals had realized that, with the disintegration of the Soviet Union which had provided 90 percent of Algeria’s weapons and materiel, they would need new sources of supplies. That led them into talks with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and eventually the United States.

A year later, the United States, shaken by the Sept. 11 attacks, began to see Algeria as an ally in the war against terrorism. Bouteflika and Lamari were invited to Washington where discussions focused on some form of a link between NATO and Algeria. At the end of last year the idea matured into a grander plan under which Algeria would be one of five Arab states to sign a memorandum of association with NATO. (The others are Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt and Jordan). The scheme is scheduled to receive approval next May at the NATO summit, to be held in Istanbul. One key condition that NATO has demanded of all the Arab states in question is that their military should stay out of politics. Thus Lamari’s recent declaration of “neutrality” must be taken seriously.

With the army stepping aside, Bouteflika, who lacks a popular base, looks to the civilian administration, led by Prime Minister Ahmed Ouyahya, to ensure his victory. Although the Algerian government, like governments in other “developing nations”, has a long experience of arranging election results, Bouteflika cannot be certain of an easy ride. The former ruling party, which has numerous supporters within the bureaucracy, is fielding its own candidate in the person of former Prime Minister Ali Benflis. Several ministers in the present coalition government are also hostile to Bouteflika as are many younger civil servants who believe the president belongs to a generation whose time has passed. Also, with at least five other candidates already in the field, Bouteflika is unlikely to be the only choice as in 1999.

His hope is that he would collect enough votes in the first round of voting in April to be able to contest the second and final round in which only the two candidates with the highest numbers of votes remain in the field. Bouteflika also hopes that the man to face him in the second round would be Abdallah Jaballah, an Islamist firebrand who was once close to the Al-Qaeda mastermind Osama Bin Laden and the Sudanese leader Hassan Al-Turabi. In such a situation, so goes Bouteflika’s analysis, most Algerians would have no choice but to hold their noses and vote for him. Bouteflika would thus repeat Jacques Chirac’s experience in the French presidential election of 2002 when he won 80 percent of the votes because the man who faced him in the second round was the neo-fascist Jean-Marie Le Pen.

Will things work out as Bouteflika has imagined? Nothing is less certain. Despite its many setbacks in the past four years, the Algerian democratic movement remains deep-rooted and could still put up a good fight with a single candidate of unity against both Bouteflika and the Islamists. It is in the long-term interest of the Western democracies, including the United States, to encourage the emergence of a genuine democratic choice in Algeria where political oppression and elite corruption are among the causes of a violence that, in its worst form, translates into terrorism.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:06:58 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The capital Algiers, a sprawling metropolis of four million people, is subject to daily brownouts and shortage of water not seen even in post-liberation Baghdad. snicker

in close association with a network of French business tycoons, claimed the lion’s share in the nation’s oil and gas income. It's all about the oiiiillll.

But possibly the biggest blow to Bouteflika came late last year when the army high command publicly announced it would no longer interfere in national politics. We want power and you can't give it to us.

The generals’ decision was taken under pressure from Washington and during negotiations with Gen. Muhammad Lamari, Algeria’s most senior commander. gigs up, pal

Bouteflika and Lamari were invited to Washington where discussions focused on some form of a link between NATO and Algeria. Huh? I thought Buttafuco Boy was the tyrant here and the generals were our allies ...I'm confused. What did Washington say to him? "Our way or the highway", or maybe, "Bouteflika, Bouteflika, fly away home??"

Bouteflika.. repeat[s] Jacques Chirac’s experience in the French presidential election ..when he won ..because the man who faced him in the second round was the neo-fascist Jean-Marie Le Pen. It's an old trick..but it works every time.

Krgystan and Bouteflika all in one night. A lot's has been going on under the radar here.
Darn..I need some sleep.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 1:42 Comments || Top||

#2  But possibly the biggest blow to Bouteflika came late last year when the army high command publicly announced it would no longer interfere in national politics.
IMO dogs will stop chasing cats & pigs will be menacing airliners before Algerian Generals stop interfering in politics. What's Khalid Nezzar up to these days?
Posted by: Dave || 03/03/2004 19:11 Comments || Top||


Shi’ite mosque fire kills 13 in Parachinar
A fire broke out late Tuesday at a Shiite Muslim mosque crowded with worshippers in northwestern Pakistan, killing at least 13 people and injuring 48 others, officials said. The blaze was called accidental. Eight women and five children were killed. Some died from burns while others fell to their deaths from a staircase in a stampede to escape the fire, Ahmed Khan Orakzai, a government administrator in Parachinar, said Wednesday. Most of the injured were women. The fire was apparently caused by an electrical short circuit on the upper floor of the mosque reserved for women in Parachinar, a town near the Afghan border, said Ali Hussain, a local Shiite leader.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:03:41 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Zarqawi’s profile is worrying the US
It’s by Walter Pincus, so it’s time to break out a jolly can of fisk ...
The Jordanian-born jihadist who quickly became a suspect in yesterday’s bombings in Iraq also wants to assume a leading, independent role in future terrorist operations in other countries, according to senior intelligence officials.
I think he's already done that: Jordan, Europe, Afghanistan, probably a few others as well...
Abu Musab Zarqawi has claimed responsibility for two dozen bombings in recent months and was on record threatening new attacks against Iraqi Shiites before yesterday’s attacks. But U.S. officials are also increasingly concerned about Zarqawi’s ambitions beyond Iraq. Although Zarqawi has worked with al Qaeda in the past, officials say it is increasingly clear he operates independently of Osama bin Laden’s organization and has developed his own network of operatives.
Except that he gets his marching orders from Saif al-Adel and praises Binny and Ayman in his love letters. As for running his own mob, al-Qaeda’s a decentralized beast. Hambali ran his own outfit down in Southeast Asia too, we call it JI.
"He is a thinker" and "a good organizer" who "sees Iraq as a springboard into broader and more jihadist actions in the region," said one senior intelligence official. The focus on Zarqawi, his network and his longer-term plans had intensified before yesterday’s attacks. It comes as U.S. intelligence officials recalibrate their tactics in the fight against terrorists, paying particular attention to the emergence of such smaller, largely autonomous groups. CIA Director George J. Tenet told a Senate panel Feb. 24 that the battering of al Qaeda’s leadership has "transformed the organization into a loose collection of regional networks" that pursue shared, though not always identical, goals. The groups "pick their own targets, they plan their own attacks," he said.
That's what we're seeing here, too, but somehow we're seeing it differently. What're we missing? Or is the press missing something? Is Tenet? (I doubt it. I also doubt he's spilling everything...)
Although al Qaeda may have been wounded, one senior intelligence analyst said, "there has been no comparable weakening in the wider Islamic jihadist movement." U.S. intelligence officials consider Zarqawi’s most immediate threat to be in Iraq, "which he is using as a recruitment poster," said the senior analyst. Bin Laden and his top al Qaeda deputy, Ayman Zawahiri, are believed to be on the run somewhere along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, leaving Zarqawi to become what one U.S. official described as the unofficial "umbrella leader" of Islamic resistance groups in Iraq. Zarqawi has used foreign fighters and former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Party, and claims to have carried out a series of bombings there.
Thank God we know that Baathists would never ally themselves with religious fundamentalists!
In early January, Zarqawi met with Hassan Ghul, a trusted bin Laden emissary, to discuss whether al Qaeda would participate in future Iraq operations, according to the senior intelligence officials. Ghul’s mission was to determine whether the tide was already turning against the jihadists in Iraq, or whether al Qaeda should join the fight as an opportunity to reassert its leadership role in the region, officials said.
Yet they’ve been sending Euro jihadis to Iraq for months now. That’s pretty much the limit of the actual news in this story, the rest just rehashes the tired old meme that Zarqawi isn’t really an al-Qaeda leader that we’ve seen floating around for the last several months. But then, it’s Pincus so this is to be expected.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 1:00:12 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Abu!"

"Yes my lord."

"Take these orders and proceed to sector two. You will then blow up."

"Blow up?"

"Yes Abu. You need to blow up good. Here take this, it is a number you can call after your mission is complete".

"Ya sure."
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 1:16 Comments || Top||

#2  Bin Laden and his top al Qaeda deputy, Ayman Zawahiri, are believed to be on the run somewhere along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border,
leaving Zarqawi to become what one U.S. official described as the unofficial "umbrella leader" of Islamic resistance groups in Iraq.


Ever the optimist, this makes me wonder if we have found bin Laden - it still hasn't been denied (other than the pentagon saying, "we didn't find him "a long time ago").

Why do I wonder, you ask???? Because perhaps this article shows that the useless idiots are prepping Zarqawai to become the next big boogey man to take Binny's place.

Or perhaps I'm just wishful thinking. Take your pick.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 10:52 Comments || Top||


Death toll from Ashura Massacre at 182
I figure Ashura Massacre’s as a good name as any to call what happened in the last 24 hours.
More than 182 people were killed and hundreds wounded in simultaneous bomb attacks in two Iraqi cities on the holiest day of the Shiite Muslim calender, with some blaming US forces for lax security. Messages poured in from around the world condemming the Tuesday attacks, the worst carnage since the fall of former dicator Saddam Hussein. Iraq’s leaders declared three days of mourning and postponed the signing of a temporary constitution, scheduled for Wednesday, possibly to Friday. Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish members of Iraq’s Governing Council pointed the finger at Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, a wanted Jordanian suspected of ties to the Al-Qaeda terror group. "These sick people with guns are seeking to start sectarian strife so they can consolidate their positions," said Adel Abdel Mehdi of the main Shiite party, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI). "Their aim is to stop Iraqis from winning their sovereignty."

US Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, who described the attacks as "very sophisticated," said they were closely coordinated by a "transnational organisation" and also named Zarqawi as a prime suspect. The attacks were blamed variously on suicide bombers, rockets or mortars, or, in Karbala, concealed bombs. In Karbala, where hundreds of thousands of Shiites, including Iranians, were taking part in the Ashura mourning ritual, at least 112 people were killed and 235 wounded in several coordinated blasts. A reporter at Karbala’s main hospital saw dozens of bodies piled inside and outside while ambulances and private vehicles streamed in with casualties covered in blood-stained blankets. "I saw a man running into a group of Iranian pilgrims and exploding himself," Karbala police Captain Mahdi Ghanami told a news agency. "The bomb claimed 25 victims." A spokesman for Polish coalition forces, meanwhile, said two suspects were caught as they prepared to fire mortars on the city.

In Baghdad, at least 70 people were killed and 321 wounded in coordinated suicide attack on the Kazimyah mosque in a Shiite district in the northwest of the capital. Three suicide bombers detonated explosives and a fourth wearing an explosive vest was apprehended, Kimmitt told reporters. He refused to give the nationality of the suspect.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 12:52:12 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This is what must be done! THIS MUST BE DONE! SOONER RATHER THAN LATER!

HOW TO STOP ISLAMIC TERRORISTS . . . it worked once in our History . . .
Once in US history an episode of Islamic terrorism was very quickly stopped.
It happened in the Philippines about 1911, when Gen. John J. Pershing was in
command of the garrison. There had been numerous Islamic terrorist attacks,
so "Black Jack" told his boys to catch the perps and teach them a lesson.

Forced to dig their own graves, the terrorists were all tied to posts,
execution style. The US soldiers then brought in pigs and slaughtered them,
rubbing their bullets in the blood and fat. Thus, the terrorists were
terrorized; they saw that they would be contaminated with hogs' blood. This
would mean that they could not enter Heaven, even if they died as terrorist
martyrs.

All but one was shot, their bodies dumped into the grave, and the hog guts
dumped atop the bodies. The lone survivor was allowed to escape back to the
terrorist camp and tell his brethren what happened to the others. This
brought a stop to terrorism in the Philippines for the next 50 years.

Pointing a gun into the face of Islamic terrorists won't make them flinch.
They welcome the chance to die for Allah. Like Gen. Pershing, we must show
them that they won't get to Muslim heaven (which they believe has an endless
supply of virgins) but instead will die with the hated pigs of the devil.
Posted by: Danny || 03/03/2004 1:11 Comments || Top||

#2  I'm not sure if the Moro resistance against the US colonialists in the Philipines deserves to be labelled as 'terrorism', but even if it is, and assuming this chain e-mail isn't just an urban legend, it doesn't really mean anything.
Muslims who commit suicide aren't supposed to be able Paradise either, but enough Fatwas have been issued by enough high profile clerics that the suicide bombing is now considered by them as 'martyrdom'.
BTW, I have yet so see this supposed barrier to the entry of heaven mentioned in any Muslim source, only by non-Muslims. And since Muslims believe they go straight to Paradise after they die, what would it matter to them what their bodies are buried with?
If the Moros did react in this way a hundred years ago, it was probably because they were an extremely isolated people in South East Asia, far away from the rest of the Islamic world, and thus practicing many unIslamic superstitions.
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 4:03 Comments || Top||

#3  Didn't the top Sunni cleric in the Sunni Triangle issue a fatwa calling all killings of Iraqis "against Islam" and a sin? I get the impression the Sunnis don't want any part of this. Which is pretty bad for the bombers and terrorists.
Posted by: Ben || 03/03/2004 5:11 Comments || Top||

#4  It's a semantics thing - in English they're called "suicide bombers". The Muslims refer to them as martyrs. Suicides don't have automatic admission to Heaven; martyrs do.
Posted by: gromky || 03/03/2004 7:10 Comments || Top||

#5  What a pity we can't get the imams to issue fatwas to say that anyone attacking the US is, in fact, committing suicide. Thus, anyone who attacks the US is damned for all eternity.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 03/03/2004 8:26 Comments || Top||

#6  Danny I suggest you do a net search on Pershing in the Phillipines. The story is probably a myth. Beside we do know that 911 hijackers drank alcohol.

To Robert Crawford there are many such imams
http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/amislam/margolis.htm
Posted by: Bernardz || 03/03/2004 8:41 Comments || Top||

#7  described the attacks as "very sophisticated

"Ok guys, here's the plan. Step one, synchronize your watches. Step two, go to a Shiite mosque and mingle. Step three, blow yourself up at 2PM."

"Damm, that's sophisticated, boss."

"That's why I'm in charge."
Posted by: Steve || 03/03/2004 8:50 Comments || Top||

#8  Danny - one of my instructors at Pendleton informed us the story was a myth but, added - "BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED!!"
Posted by: Doc8404 || 03/03/2004 9:44 Comments || Top||

#9  Steve: You hit the nail right on the head. It drives me nuts whenever I hear newsies call any successful operation "sophisticated." One, they're usually wrong. Successful tactical operation are usually simple and violently executed. Two, it never fails to get the black helicopter crowd going. Once it appears in print that an operation was "sophisticated" every tin foil beanie wearing nut case immediately weaves it into his conspiracy theories that no mere mortal could pull off such a stunt; therefore, it must be the CIA or Mossad.
Posted by: 11A5S || 03/03/2004 12:09 Comments || Top||

#10  it involved synchronized operations in two different cities, and in Baghdad apparently first one splodeydope boomed, then, when everyone went running for the exits, two more dopes boomed at the exits.

It may not take the Mossad to do it, but its definitely the mark of AQ. Has Hamas or Al aqsa Martyrs Brigade ever managed synchronized booms like this (of course they have to move boomers in from the territories, while AQ typically is operating from a base in the same city as the target)
Posted by: liberalhawk || 03/03/2004 15:04 Comments || Top||

#11  pardon - i do recall Hamas occasionally using the second boom to get the rescuers trick, but never at the exits to an enclosed place, and not in the context of two booms in one day in seperate cities.
Posted by: liberalhawk || 03/03/2004 15:05 Comments || Top||


New Zealand bans Islamic group, 25 individuals
New Zealand has formally outlawed as terrorists an organisation and 25 individuals with alleged links to Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda network, including Indian gangster Dawood Ibrahim. While neither the group nor the individuals had current links to New Zealand, Prime Minister Helen Clark says the move "will serve to deter New Zealanders from becoming inadvertently involved in their activities". The organisation named was Djamat Houmat Daawa Salafia, which Ms Clark described as a splinter group from the Armed Islamic Group with links to Al Qaeda.
GSPC in drag?
She said it was "well organised and equipped with military material, having engaged in terrorist activity in Algeria and internationally, and having been responsible for numerous killings since the mid-1990s". The individuals named included six people who were members of the German cell of Al-Tawhid, also linked to Al Qaeda. Fifteen individuals were said to be members of Al Qaeda cells in Milan, Cremona, and Parma, Italy. Most were already in the custody of Italian authorities. Others cited included Dawood Ibrahim, "one of the pre-eminent criminals in the Indian underworld linked to the Al Qaeda network", and Mokhtar Belmokhtar and Nasri Ait El Hadi Mustapha, both involved in the Salafist Group for Call and Combat (GSPC) which, conducts operations aimed at government and military targets in Algeria.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 12:47:53 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I understand Djamat Houmat Daawa Salafia to meaan Group Something Preaching Salafist, so it is almost certainly the GSPC, although it would be simpler for them to use it's French acronym like everyone else.
It's interesting that Dawood Ibrahim is also coming under increasing scrutiny. I'm not sure if any of his gangsters would be present in New Zealand, but D Company does seem to be active in most countries bordering the Indian Ocean.
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 1:07 Comments || Top||

#2  Djamat Houmat Daawa Salafia, as far as I know, means Group of the Defenders of Salafi Preaching and is somehow different from GSPC.
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 3:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Maybe you're right, I tried googling for it, but all I got was it's inclusion in a list of names designated as terrorist related, no other details.
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 03/03/2004 3:53 Comments || Top||

#4  Salafiyah is different from Djamat Houmat Daawa Salafia. True salafis condemn terrorism. check wwww.salaf.com and see what the salfi scholars say!
Posted by: Anonymous1424 || 07/13/2004 5:37 Comments || Top||


2 dead in Venezuelan protests
Two opposition protesters were killed in clashes with Venezuelan troops on Tuesday as electoral officials ruled foes of President Hugo Chavez had initially failed to collect enough signatures for a recall vote against him. At least six people have been shot dead and dozens wounded in five days of violence in the world’s fifth-largest oil exporter as Chavez opponents press for a vote against a leftist president they accuse of dictatorial rule. National Electoral Council President Francisco Carrasquero said first results showed the opposition had collected only 1.83 million valid pro-referendum signatures -- short of the minimum 2.4 million required to trigger a referendum. But officials said opposition voters would have a chance to reconfirm an additional 1.1 million disputed signatures. The referendum could still go ahead if at least 600,000 of the questioned signatures are validated in a complex process criticized by the opposition as a tactic to scuttle the vote. "There is no other way but to accept this decision," Carrasquero said. "If someone does not accept it they will be acting outside the law."
"I have spoke! Now, shut yer fudge up and do as yer told!"
A final decision on the referendum could be made at the end of March after the reconfirmation checks. Troops firing tear gas and plastic bullets skirmished with anti-government protesters in the capital and several other cities. One demonstrator was killed in clashes in Valencia, about 120 miles (190 km) from Caracas and another man was shot dead in the capital, hospital officials said.
I guess one way of restoring order is to kill everybody in sight...
Authorities said three people and a soldier were injured in confused gunfights in wealthier eastern Caracas after students joined housewives and office workers to set up burning barricades to block highways in the capital and other states.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 12:45:15 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It's Kent State! How long is our looney left going to sit quietly as the Revolution of the people is shot down? Never a tyrant they didn't love - no?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 1:46 Comments || Top||


Gelayev’s still dead
Authorities said Tuesday that they have confirmed that a man killed in Dagestan over the weekend was Ruslan Gelayev, one of Chechnya’s most powerful rebel warlords. In Moscow, an official at the Federal Security Service, or FSB, said authorities had determined that the body of a man who appeared to have been killed in a clash with border guards was that of Gelayev. The official would not say whether the identification had been confirmed by an autopsy. In comments broadcast on Rossia television, chief FSB spokesman Sergei Ignatchenko said there were several "indirect indications" that it was Gelayev, including a leg wound and personal belongings "that he never went without," such as a dagger.
... usually held between his teeth as he rolled his eyes.
Rossia showed footage of the corpse in a morgue examination room. The deputy chief of investigations in the Dagestani prosecutor’s office, Seifudin Kaziakhmedov, said eight suspected rebels who are under investigation had identified the body as Gelayev’s. "The FSB considers Gelayev one of the key figures among leaders of extremists active in the Chechen Republic and emphasizes the importance of his liquidation," Ignatchenko was quoted by Itar-Tass as saying. The FSB believes Gelayev set up bases and led training of militants in the Pankisi Gorge. Russia had repeatedly accused Gelayev of using the gorge as a launch-pad for attacks in Russia and urged Georgian authorities to capture and extradite him. However, Kremlin-backed Chechen President Akhmad Kadyrov said that "the shooting in Chechnya and terrorist acts will not stop" because of Gelayev’s death and that he was not part of a group of leading warlords including Shamil Basayev, Itar-Tass reported. The body authorities said was Gelayev’s was found near the bodies of two border guards outside a village in the same region in southwestern Dagestan where the December foray took place. An FSB official said Gelayev, who also was known as Khamzat, died Saturday.
I thought that Khamzat was dead last week. Or do all of these jihadis come with extra lives?
Salambek Maigov, a former rebel envoy to Moscow, said Gelayev will be mourned in Chechnya. "He saw this war as a war against the Chechen people. Because of this he had great respect among Chechens," he said on Ekho Moskvy radio.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 03/03/2004 12:42:44 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I think they get a bonus life at 10,000 points. I fully expect this guy to pop up again alive and well in a few months.
Posted by: gromky || 03/03/2004 2:43 Comments || Top||

#2  gromky -haha!
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 8:11 Comments || Top||

#3  Someone has to say it.... "Ruslan Gelayev is still valiantly holding on in his fight to remain dead..."
Posted by: Phil Fraering || 03/03/2004 17:20 Comments || Top||


Venezuela Rioting Spreads on Chavez News
Protests intensified across Venezuela Tuesday after the elections council ruled that government opponents lacked enough signatures to force a recall referendum against President Hugo Chavez. Television news footage showed troops firing at anti-Chavez protesters, who fought back with rocks and Molotov cocktails in Caracas. Rioting - which began earlier Tuesday as the opposition anticipated the ruling - was also reported in several of Venezuela's most important cities in the hours after the council's decision.
Beginning of the end?
Chavez opponents say they submitted more than 3.4 million signatures. Some 2.4 million are needed for a recall election. But council President Francisco Carrasquero announced Tuesday evening that just 1.83 million signatures were valid. Another 876,016 signatures may be valid - if citizens confirm that they indeed signed the petition, Carrasquero said. Many opposition leaders had said they would not accept a decision requiring voters to confirm their signatures. The council said that voters would have between March 18 and March 22 to confirm their signatures.
"What do you want?"
"Um, um, el jefe, I'm here to .. to confirm my signature."
"Do ya see your signature on the end of this rifle butt?"
"Um, no, el jefe."
"Then you didn't sign. Now beat it."
Venezuela's opposition claims that such a monumental task, involving hundreds of thousands of citizens, would postpone the referendum or derail it entirely. Besides Caracas, the capital, protests hit Merida, Puerto La Cruz, Maracay, San Felipe, the industrial centers of Valencia and Barquisimeto and the western oil city of Maracaibo. National guard troops in armored personnel carriers rolled through several of the cities as demonstrators burned tires and hurled rocks and gasoline bombs at soldiers. Sporadic gunfire was heard for a second straight night in Caracas. At least one person has been killed and 60 wounded since Friday. Dozens have been arrested.
"My people love me. That's why I rule with an iron hand."
The petitions were delivered in December. But electoral authorities continue to delay an announcement on whether the recall effort can go ahead. If Chavez loses in a referendum held before mid-August, the midway point for his term, new presidential elections must be held. But if he loses in a vote held after mid-August, Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel would take over for the rest of his term. Opponents fear if that happens, Chavez would merely rule behind his right-hand man for the rest of his term, which ends in January 2007. The opposition charges the elections council belatedly changed the rules to disqualify hundreds of thousands of signatures. Government opponents claim three of the five election council's directors are pro-Chavez, but ruling party members deny the body is biased toward the president.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
After Tuesday's decision, the OAS and Jemmauh Carter Center - which have said they saw no evidence of fraud - insisted they would stay involved in the electoral process to ensure everyone who signed for the referendum will have their signature count. Defense Minister Gen. Jorge Carneiro insisted his troops will restore order if necessary in areas where protests have been strongest - especially eastern Caracas, an anti-Chavez stronghold. The government published full-page newspaper ads Tuesday declaring that "violence is the shortest path to losing everything." Opposition labor leader Manuel Cova countered: "Today they might steal our signatures. Tomorrow they might steal our votes."
And the day after that, everything else.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:41 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The left better start their save chavez rallies soon, their man is in trouble!
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American || 03/03/2004 1:31 Comments || Top||

#2  Do ya see your signature on the end of this rifle butt?"

maybe all 3.4 million of them should go down together to verify their signatures.
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 8:55 Comments || Top||

#3  Do you think there is any room in the hotel where we sent Aristide? Looks like another dictator needs to be relocated, courtesy of the Red, White and Blue!
Posted by: AllahHateMe || 03/03/2004 13:53 Comments || Top||

#4  Venezuela will not eject Chavez very easily. He certainly has at least 10,000 Cuban bullies to back him up and another group of Venezuelans training in Cuba as well. He is probably rigging the oil fields with dynamite at this very minute - unless he has farmed that out to Fidel.
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 22:59 Comments || Top||


21 Soldiers Killed in Nepal Rebel Fight
Leftist rebels killed at least 21 soldiers in fighting Wednesday at a telecommunications tower, the state-run Radio Nepal said. The rebels attacked soldiers guarding the tower about midnight and fighting continued until morning, the report said. One rebel also was killed in the fighting at Bhojpur, about 250 miles east of Nepal's capital, Katmandu. Officials in the area could not be contacted on the phone.
Either dead or fighting to stay alive.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:34 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Russian Navy Squadrons to Go on Voyages
MOSCOW (AP) - The Russian navy plans to sail to the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean this year - voyages apparently aimed at demonstrating a revival of the nation's military power. Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov would not say when the voyages will take place or how many ships will be involved. "We aren't going to send armadas that we don't have and can't maintain," the Interfax-Military News Agency quoted Ivanov as saying after talks with his Portuguese counterpart, Paulo Portas. Russia's military presence in world oceans has dropped sharply since the Soviet collapse, with most warships languishing in port because of a lack of fuel and spare parts. The navy has scrapped some relatively new warships simply because it lacked money to maintain them. Under President Vladimir Putin, the military has tried to reassert its power, but is still plagued with troubles. "Recently, the Russian navy has become more active and started going out into the sea," Ivanov said.
That is what navies are supposed to do.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:30 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Will they pay a visit to Tsushima?
Posted by: El Id || 03/03/2004 8:35 Comments || Top||

#2  A navy that actually ventures out into open waters? What a concept...
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 03/03/2004 9:44 Comments || Top||

#3  I wonder if there will be any "disasters" at sea since they have a whole generation that has not ventured out into blue water.
Posted by: Yosemite Sam || 03/03/2004 10:41 Comments || Top||

#4  Wow--At this rate, Russia's naval resurgence will soon leapfrog them past the Swiss navy and almost put them on par with the Austrian navy.
Posted by: Dar || 03/03/2004 11:04 Comments || Top||

#5  Will they go back?
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 11:14 Comments || Top||

#6  if they do go they may not be able to get back --- but the us navy is out there and can lend a hand if needed..
Posted by: Dan || 03/03/2004 11:46 Comments || Top||

#7  the frank spencer of the worlds navys sets out to sea once more, gonna be a hoot this one is! What disasters await the brave crews of these steel beasts, could it be American subs, British destroyers, Chinese aircraft or maybe just the rusting hulks thier riding in? How amusing
Posted by: Jon Shep U.K || 03/03/2004 14:55 Comments || Top||

#8  Sounds like Navy is making last ditch effort to show it's important and should be funded.After missile fiascos earlier and reports deep water is Navy is about to be scrapped,I'm sure the Admirals want to generate some good publicity w/photos of Russian ships showing flag at various countries around world.And anyone wish to bet against the ships having picked crews,especially heavy on officers?
Posted by: Stephen || 03/03/2004 15:06 Comments || Top||

#9  Are our SAR assets up for this?
Posted by: Matt || 03/03/2004 15:41 Comments || Top||

#10  So, what's the over/under on ships sinking during this "voyage"?
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats || 03/03/2004 15:50 Comments || Top||

#11  This does sound something like a deathride. The navy's desperate for dough.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:23 Comments || Top||


No Evidence Navy Pilot Was in Iraqi Hands
Investigations in Iraq since the fall of Baghdad have found no evidence that missing Navy pilot Michael Scott Speicher was held in captivity after being shot down on the first night of the 1991 Gulf War, the Navy's top admiral said Tuesday. U.S. officials have been interrogating Iraqis and searching throughout the country for evidence of Speicher's fate since the regime of Saddam Hussein was toppled by U.S. forces in early April last year. Despite having found no evidence that the Iraqis captured Speicher, the Navy is sticking to its position, declared publicly in October 2002, that Speicher is "missing-captured," Clark said. "We have not found out new specific intelligence revelations that have changed our fundamental conclusion," Adm. Vern Clark, the chief of naval operations, told reporters at a breakfast interview.

The Iraqi government under President Saddam Hussein maintained from the start that Speicher died in the crash on Jan. 17, 1991, although his body was not recovered. Asked directly whether evidence had emerged to reinforce the theory that Speicher had been taken captive by the Iraqis, Clark said no. He said there is no evidence either for or against it. Other officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Tuesday that prewar assertions by informants that Speicher had been seen in a prison in Baghdad have been discredited. In October 2002 the Navy changed Speicher's status from missing in action to "missing-captured," although it has never said what evidence it has that he was in captivity. In announcing that decision, Navy Secretary Gordon England wrote at the time, "I have no evidence to conclude that Captain Speicher is dead. He also wrote, "While the information available to me now does not prove definitively that Captain Speicher is alive and in Iraqi custody, I am personally convinced the Iraqis seized him sometime after his plane went down."

Hours after his plane when down, the Pentagon had declared Speicher killed in action, with no body recovered. But 10 years later, in January 2001, the Navy changed his status to MIA, citing an absence of evidence that he had died. Clark said in the interview Tuesday that resolving the fate of Speicher is a high priority for the Navy. "We do not have new intelligence that adds clarity and definition to what happened to him" after he was shot down, Clark said. "If you think about what I just told you, that tells you something about the discovery or lack of discovery." Speicher was 33 when he was shot down. He held the rank of lieutenant commander at the time; he has since been promoted to captain.
God rest his soul.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:25 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  They still worry about the fate of a guy who crashed and burned more than a decade ago. What about all the soldiers right now sitting in Iraq watching death looming overhead?
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 9:45 Comments || Top||

#2  They still worry about the fate of a guy who crashed and burned more than a decade ago. What about all the soldiers right now sitting in Iraq watching death looming overhead?
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 9:45 Comments || Top||

#3  Anon - allow me to enlighten you. Much of the reason a man will live like an animal and fight like hell is because he knows that, God forbid, should he fall, he won't be left behind. It doesn't matter if it's ten years later and the only remains are a fragment of bone. You are still going home.

RE the active troops in Iraq (and, Afganistan, Pak, etc., etc.) - as odd as it may seem, good unit commanders worry over each and every one of their men - all day every day.
Posted by: Doc8404 || 03/03/2004 10:17 Comments || Top||

#4  Anonymous - we worry about them too. Do I even need to point out that the death looming overhead has the US flag painted on the wings?
Posted by: BH || 03/03/2004 10:20 Comments || Top||

#5  Anon-
I'm probably feeding a troll here, but keep in mind that for twenty years before CAPT Speicher went down - dead or alive, most likely dead from a MiG-25/AA-6 combination - there was a great deal of flat out suspicion on the part of many military members (myself included) that if we suddenly went MIA, the government would NOT do everything in its power to get us back. The decision was made very early in the runup to Operations Desert Shield/Storm that MIAs happened again, there would be NO effort spared to either get our people back or find out what happened to them.
In the event, the first part didn't go so well. IIRC, not a single downed pilot or aviator was recovered during the war. Bravery or desire wasn't the problem - the fact was that SAR ops and equipment now came under Special Ops, and since there was no longer enough equipment to stand by for rescue and do special ops at the same time, HQ very reluctantly decided to hold the stuff for special ops use...which in the event never happened, because CINCCENTCOM wasn't real fond of special ops.
Okay, Speicher went down. Contrary to most of what you've read, the USAF and the USN knew exactly where CAPT Speicher's plane went in and when it happened. Afterwards, DOD made every possible effort to get in and get to the crash site. The only reason things dragged on as long as they did was that DOD wanted to go the absolute last mile for him...and as far as I'm concerned, they did.
Were it YOUR father, or brother, or son - would you not want to know that every last possible lead had been tracked down?
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 03/03/2004 10:38 Comments || Top||

#6  Mike, regardless of whether Anonymous' question was serious or not, I and probably many others appreciate the behind-the-secnes information you provided.

Thanks.


Posted by: Carl in N.H || 03/03/2004 12:53 Comments || Top||

#7  Thanks. Responding to annon. We follow, not because of where we are going. But because we know we'll come back. From professional leadership throughout, to brave medics, to loggies carrying the fallen, to searchers in our forgotten wars. We know we'll come back.
I always think of Chief Roberts. And those who died to bring him back.
You can forgive. But, please, never forget.
Posted by: gimpy || 03/03/2004 15:54 Comments || Top||


Congressional Black Caucus: Bush helped rebels oust Aristide
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) yesterday accused the Bush administration of deliberately exacerbating the violence in Haiti to hasten the ouster of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. They charged that the White House misled lawmakers about its intentions as it undermined Aristide — who was restored to power in 1994 by the Clinton administration following a coup — and forced him to flee to the Central African Republic. Black lawmakers said the White House must prove that Aristide was not kidnapped. Rep. Donald Payne (D-N.J.): “It seems like the administration just wanted Aristide out.”
Bright guy! Got there all by himself.
They demanded conclusive evidence that the Haitian leader — whose 2000 election victory was internationally condemned as fraudulent — was not forced out at gunpoint.
We could have left him there; he would have faced a gunpoint for sure.
“What makes this not a coup?” Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) asked at the United Nations after meetings with Secretary General Kofi Annan and U.S. Ambassador John D. Negroponte. Rep. Major Owens (D-N.Y.) added: “We are very troubled that this [Aristide’s ouster] was a terrorist takeover.”
Gangs of thugs on one side, gangs of thugs on the other side, a duly-elected President-for-Life™ deposed... I don't think I'd call it a terrorist takeover, just a continuation of quaint Haitian native traditions. No skin off our collective fore either way, but maybe a little better for the Haitians if they try a fresh batch of thugs for awhile — there's always a chance, y'know.
CBC criticism of the exiled leader was muted, despite long-standing international concern about his regime’s engaging in fraud, thug rule and the repression of opponents.
Since he's anti-Bush, it's okay to be engaged in fraud, thug rule and repression.
Rep. Donald Payne (D-N.J.), a leading voice on international affairs in the CBC, told The Hill, “Aristide made mistakes, but President Bush made mistakes, President Clinton made mistakes, but we don’t run them out of office.”
You might want to listen to your own party.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan called any suggesting that Aristide was kidnapped “complete nonsense,” adding: “Conspiracy theories do nothing to help the Haitian people move forward to a better, more free and more prosperous future.” Democratic lawmakers say the Bush administration’s policy on Haiti reflects a failure to respect democratic virtues there as much as elsewhere around the globe.
Which democratic virtues did Jean-Berty's bully boyz represent?
Reacting to the decision to send U.S. and French peacekeepers, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “Had peacekeepers been sent earlier, a political settlement that better respected the results of the last democratic election with less bloodshed and chaos could have been achieved.”
Since the last election wasn't so democratic, what was there to respect?
Just last Wednesday, Bush and 18 members of the CBC appeared to have found common ground on the need for U.S. intervention. After meeting with President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, black lawmakers said they felt that the White House understood the urgency of the situation. Bush admitted fault for not acting sooner to stem the crisis on the impoverished Caribbean island. “The president told us that he ‘did not speak out loudly enough and soon enough’ on the humanitarian tragedy and political crisis in Haiti,” CBC chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) told The Hill last week. “That acknowledgment helped us move forward,” said Cummings, in what he described as an emotional meeting as lawmakers tearfully described the human suffering.
"He felt our pain!"
Wednesday’s accord evaporated over the weekend. CBC members said Bush and his team intentionally allowed the situation to deteriorate to put Aristide and his family in physical danger. “We could have nipped this in the bud, but it seems like the administration just wanted Aristide out,” said Payne. “It was a self-fulfilling prophecy.”
"Big Boy! Should he stay or go?" Looks like the pee-pul have spoken. We'll be back again in ten years or so to throw this new batch of bad boyz out, and the CBC will be hooting and hollering about that one, too...
Payne argued that Aristide’s widely criticized tenure as Haiti’s first democratically elected president did not justify what he regarded as the Bush administration’s anti-democratic actions and quasi-support for the opposition. “The opposition is a bunch of thugs and drug runners,” said Payne.
And notice we aren't supporting them.
Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.), said, “We were misled about their plan to force out Aristide. I don’t think any member of Congress can trust what this administration now tells us.” Meek has the highest concentration of Haitians of any congressional district. He said they are deeply divided about Aristide, but noted that Aristide loyalists protested in the streets yesterday, demanding assurances that he is safe. “Everyone has said that they don’t agree with what President Aristide did in terms of treating the opposition, but the way [he was removed] is severely troubling.”
The fact that he wasn't going to leave any other way was severely troubling, too. And this very predictable fault-finding by the CBC, regardless of what Bush did — you know they'd be flinging much the same charges if the Marines had gone in and tromped the rebels to prop up Jean-Berty — is also severely troubling.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:17 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Way to cut your constituency off at the knees guys. Hope the tin foil hats help your re-election chances.
Posted by: Mr. Davis || 03/03/2004 0:29 Comments || Top||

#2  What a bunch of fuck@#s.

"Hey Bertrand, there's an open seat on a return flight to Port of Piss. Chicken entrails sez come on!
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 0:44 Comments || Top||

#3  I don't understand. I admit to knowing little about Haiti. Why was the CBC so attached to Aristide? How does the Haitian population feel about this? I saw quite a bit of rejoicing on the news.

I suspect more than ideological attachment from the CBC. I suspect corruption and payments.
Posted by: Tokyo Taro || 03/03/2004 1:28 Comments || Top||

#4  Tokyo Taro, because they were convinced that the autocrat was telling them the truth when he said he was a good person and then they ignored when he became a thug. So now they have to support him or they'll look stupid. Plus it's an opportunity to be on the opposite side of bush.

Pretty much the answer is the CBC is run by a combination of morons and scum.
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American || 03/03/2004 1:33 Comments || Top||

#5  Tokyo Taro, because they were convinced that the autocrat was telling them the truth when he said he was a good person and then they ignored when he became a thug. So now they have to support him or they'll look stupid. Plus it's an opportunity to be on the opposite side of bush.

Pretty much the answer is the CBC is run by a combination of morons and scum.
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American || 03/03/2004 1:33 Comments || Top||

#6  OK...WTF! This just shows the rediculous blind hatred the Donks have for Bush. It's so bad, they concoct conspiracy theories in order to justify their empty, pathetic attacks on the president. And not just the CBC, and Rangel mind you...Pelosi got in the act and sucked on her foot also. I always suspected she was a "shrimper". (shudder)
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 03/03/2004 1:35 Comments || Top||

#7  Thanks Rex, for that mental image. It'll take at least a week to get rid of it.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 1:50 Comments || Top||

#8  jba was heard to mumble as he was rushed on the plane--pieds,ne me faisez pas echouer maintenant
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI || 03/03/2004 2:34 Comments || Top||

#9  “Everyone has said that they don’t agree with what President Aristide did in terms of treating the opposition, but the way [he was removed] is severely troubling.”

So basically, he was a bad guy, but should have stayed in power? With the rebels coming for his head, I don't think that is much an option.

I have a little sympathy for the process argument, but sometimes when the situation is as bad as it is in Haiti, flying Aristide out seems to have been the best of a bad situation. The best option available. Otherwise, he and his family would be dead.

The CBC can whine all they like, but I doubt Aristide will be hopping a flight home soon.
Posted by: Ben || 03/03/2004 5:01 Comments || Top||

#10  #3 Tokyo Taro: I don't understand. I admit to knowing little about Haiti. Why was the CBC so attached to Aristide?

Start off with the understanding that Aristide is a Socialist. Then one might expect support from Socialists in this country. There is an organization called The Democratic Socialists of America which is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. DSA's members are building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics. One of these progressive movements is called the Progressive Caucus.

All the members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) quoted in the article, with the exception of CBC chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), are also members of the Progressive Caucus. Those known socialists voicing concern over the fate of the Socialist, Aristide: Rep. Donald Payne (D-N.J.), Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), Rep. Major Owens (D-N.Y.), Rep. Donald Payne (D-N, Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)are all members of the Progressive Caucus. (As mentioned in an earlier rant, Corrine Brown is also a member of the PC.)

So the reason why the CBC is so attached to Aristide, Tokyo, is that socialists must stick together. (It's for the children, ya know.)



Posted by: GK || 03/03/2004 7:39 Comments || Top||

#11  Aristide was a NUTCASE and everyone knew it. No doubt that when he left he saw a vast army in black fatigues and helicopters circling overhead. The CBC has shown its true ?color? with their latest rants about Aristide. The progressive caucus loves Aristide beause he is a socialists and a defrocked priest. If he was gay that would be the trifecta!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 03/03/2004 8:49 Comments || Top||

#12  They demanded conclusive evidence that the Haitian leader — whose 2000 election victory was internationally condemned as fraudulent — was not forced out at gunpoint.

Ah, yes. Their favorite tactic of the last few years -- demanding that sane people prove a negative.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 03/03/2004 8:51 Comments || Top||

#13  Let's see if I have this right. If you intervene in another country ruled by a homicidal despot (say, Iraq), the the intervention is criminal. But if you don't intervene in a country ruled by a homicidal despot (say, Haiti), then the non-intervention is criminal. But it you do intervene so as not to be labled a criminal (say, Haiti), then you're a criminal. Oh, I get it. It was the logic that, for a moment, escaped me.
Posted by: Highlander || 03/03/2004 10:10 Comments || Top||

#14  The CBC has proven (yet again) that they will take the word of almost any nut job over the word of the President, Colin Powell, Condi Rice, etc. The CBC and most of the Dems will oppose any action taken by President Bush, regardless of whether or not the action was the right thing to do. It is reflexive, unthinking, discriminatory behavior (just like racism).
Posted by: Tibor || 03/03/2004 10:13 Comments || Top||

#15  Don't look now but Kerry (and his kids) are bellowing about poor Aristide. And I thought the election would be boring!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) || 03/03/2004 10:30 Comments || Top||

#16  "...prove that Aristide was not kidnapped."

C'mon, guys, all ya gotta do is prove a negative. What's the matter?

Schmucks.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 10:52 Comments || Top||

#17  Tokyo Taro: Leon Podesta, who was a one time Chief of Staff to Clinton and other upper echelon Clinton cronies have extensive investments in companies that are affiliated with Aristide and his cronies. For example, I once read that when Haitians either call home to Haiti from America, or when Haitians call their friends/relatives in America that they pay really inflated prices because there is supposedly only one carrier in Haiti that handles international calls and that Leon Podesta and other Clinton cronies are or were major stockholders in this phone carrier which price gouges. There are supposedly other such scams going on in which Clinton cronies are scandously reaping millions from business deals that are dependent on upper-level Haitian governmental decisions. I don't think it was a Clinton plan/conspiracy, but I think things sort of fell into place this way as time went by. The CBC is obviously beholden to Clinton and they probably are invested in Aristide remaining in power. Probably the majority of the Haitian population doesn't know anything about all of this, and they probably don't care. Some realize that Aristide is a thug and they know that the Democrats are his supporters here in the U.S.A. and they probably don't give a rat's ass about the CBC. Obviously some Haitians are in Aristide's camp and they probably welcome the CBC's pro-Aristide gestures.
Posted by: Geoffrey M. LaMear || 03/03/2004 12:19 Comments || Top||

#18  And the CBC wonders why the majority of America does not take them seriously. This group of buffoons, clowns, and bottlewashers make Traficant look like a saint.

The most amazing thing to me is that these idiots keep getting elected. Says a lot about those who vote for them
Posted by: alaskasoldier || 03/03/2004 12:27 Comments || Top||

#19  Let me get this straight. First France says they want Aristide out. Then France is protecting Aristide in French Africa. And somehow the US is too blame? Baffoons, clowns and bottlewashers is right.
Posted by: ruprecht || 03/03/2004 13:47 Comments || Top||

#20  All right then, here's what to do: bring Aristide back to Haiti, evacuate all U.S. diplomatic and military personnel, and then announce that this is what the CBC wanted, so this is what they get. Anything that happens afterward is not the fault of the U.S., nor will it be the U.S.' concern, and any Haitians attempting to flee to the U.S. mainland will be sent back immediately, no questions asked.

Problem solved.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 03/03/2004 14:11 Comments || Top||

#21  Face it, the CBC is for affirmative action and the french language. And probably racist
Posted by: Drano || 03/03/2004 14:58 Comments || Top||

#22  Aristide was:
1. A radical leftist.
2. A hater of America.
3. Corrupt.

The CBC was just looking after their own.
Posted by: Jackal || 03/03/2004 16:28 Comments || Top||

#23  Jackal, now that was Cold.
Posted by: Shipman || 03/03/2004 17:15 Comments || Top||

#24  Jackel may be cold, but he's (she's?) right on the money.

Ever notice how black "leaders" always want something that is good for other black "leaders" but really bad for regular black people? You'd think they were racist or something.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 03/03/2004 18:08 Comments || Top||

#25  Just imagine what the CBC would say if someone founded the CWC...
Posted by: .com || 03/03/2004 18:18 Comments || Top||

#26  I just loved seeing Danny Glover in the background of this meeting. What a socialist jack ass that tin hat is. I saw him in Lethal Weapon 3 last night and wanted to hurl.
Posted by: remote man || 03/03/2004 19:01 Comments || Top||

#27  Next time this happens in some third world shithole, which will probably be next week, Bush should just sit back and let the blood flow neck deep in the street. Why interfere and piss off the Congressional Black Caucus.
I'd love to see Aristide tossed on a plane and flown back to Haiti just to see how they'd spin that.
Posted by: tu3031 || 03/03/2004 22:54 Comments || Top||

#28  The disengagement from Aristide started Earlier than GW. Evidently, somewhere along the line Aristide got sick of trying to improve things and became part of the problem. How early he went bad is open to debate; my belief is that he was bad from the beginning. In 2000, he fudged the election that he would have won anyway because all despots want to appear to be ruling with near unanimous backing. Anyway Aristide was done soon thereafter as all other countries withheld aid from his regime. If we had intervened and put him back on his throne, we would have had to restore the aid for his corrupt administration to skim to keep him there.

Note - On CSPAN, I saw a Democratic congressman and Noriega get into it today about whether voter turnout was 10% or 60%. The congressman had been an election observer in Haiti and read his personal account of how perfectly fair the elections were into the record. He was an older white haired gentleman that appeared to be restricting Noriega's answers and using the ambassador's testimony as a way to testify himself - probably a common practice among blowhards.
Posted by: Super Hose || 03/03/2004 23:07 Comments || Top||


Clinton, Gore Set to Face 9/11 Commission
The federal panel reviewing the Sept. 11 attacks has scheduled interviews with former President Clinton and former Vice President Al Gore this month but is struggling to get similar cooperation from President Bush and administration officials. Members of the bipartisan commission said they were considering a subpoena to force the public testimony of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice. She has declined to appear at the panel's two-day hearing later this month. "The commission wants to go back in the court of public opinion and appeal to the administration for them to reconsider their first stand," said commissioner Timothy Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. "If we don't get that kind of cooperation, compelling Dr. Rice to come before us is an option." The White House said Tuesday that Rice's testimony was a constitutional issue of separation of powers. "As a matter of law and practice, White House staff have not testified before legislative bodies," National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack said. "This is not a matter of Dr. Rice's preferences."
Okay, legal beagles, help me out here.
The 10-member commission also requested private meetings with Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney about what the administration knew before the attacks, potentially a sensitive subject in an election year. While Clinton and Gore have consented to private questioning without a time constraint, Bush and Cheney have agreed only to private, separate, one-hour meetings with the commission's chairman and vice chairman, instead of the full panel. The commission was meeting Tuesday to discuss options as it seeks to hold private interviews with the four officials before its next hearing. The interviews with Clinton and Gore were scheduled for "the next couple of weeks," the commission said.
It'd be a smart move politically for Cheney, at least, to match Clinton and Gore with access to the Commission.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:09 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "I don't recall" said Winky with a snarkey smile!

"Thank You Mr president. Is there anything else you could add to this commission?"

"No, other than I almost had this solved."

Winkey was splendid in a dark blue suit, cream shirt and a set of diamond cufflinks that twinkled as the glaring lights danced of their gleaming, multifaceted, surface.
Posted by: Anonymous || 03/03/2004 0:53 Comments || Top||

#2  Cheney to match Clinton and Gore:

Cheney to Commission:
I suppose, Senator, it all depends on what you mean when you say, 'is'.

Rice to Comission:
What part of no, do you not understand, Sir?
Posted by: B || 03/03/2004 2:07 Comments || Top||

#3  Let's ignore the Congressional Summons. I always wanted to see who the Federal Marshalls would obey.
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 10:59 Comments || Top||

#4  Fed Marshals are an executive branch service. I guess they could send the congressional sargeant at arms. I'd hope W and Cheney and Rice would be as forthcoming as separation of powers would allow, especially since there shouldn't be anything to hide. I'm more interested in the bureaucrats in the FBI/CIA/NSC who F&*KED up their responsibilities, particularly in the name of "cultural sensitivity". Will the commission look at this, or is it a blame game for the November elections? Clinton/Gore will rewrite history if the past is an indicator
Posted by: Frank G || 03/03/2004 11:52 Comments || Top||

#5  Yeah, that'll work:

Morning, the White House:
Ding-dong...

"Who is it?..."

"It's the Congressional Sargeant at Arms."

"Sorry, he's not here..."

"No, I'M the Sargent at Arms..."

"Sorry, he's not heeeee-re..."
Posted by: mojo || 03/03/2004 14:23 Comments || Top||


Philippe Says He's Haiti's Military Chief
Rebel leader Guy Philippe declared himself the new chief of Haiti's military, which was disbanded by ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, and pledged Tuesday that rebel forces will disarm. Philippe then said he would arrest Prime Minister Yvon Neptune on corruption charges. "The country is in my hands!" Philippe announced on Radio Signal FM.
"I built it with me own hands, I tells yas!"
Philippe, flanked by other rebel leaders and senior officers of Haiti's police force, told reporters, "I am the chief," then clarified that he meant "the military chief." He said he was "not interested in politics" and was ready to follow the orders of interim President Boniface Alexandre, chief justice of the Supreme Court, who was installed Sunday. Asked whether he would disarm if requested to, he said, "We will."
"I am the military chief! I can disarm myself, and hold my disarmed arms in case I need to re-arm ... or summin like that."
He then summoned 20 police commanders to meet with him Tuesday and warned that if they failed to appear he would arrest them.
Sure, military chiefs do that all the time.
U.S. Marines guarded Neptune's office in the Petionville suburb, where Philippe was headed with hundreds of supporters in a convoy impeded by adoring and cheering crowds. Neptune's whereabouts were not immediately known. Local radio reported that he was evacuated by helicopter. It was also unclear whether American or French marines — who arrived in recent days to secure diplomatic missions and other sites — would try to protect him. Neptune is a top member of Aristide's Lavalas party and his former presidential spokesman.
You have your choices, Neptune -- Panama, South Africa, Costa Rica or the deep blue sea. Don't wait too long.
In a phone call to The Associated Press, Philippe said Neptune would face corruption charges. The rebels appear to be taking advantage of a power vacuum in the wake of Aristide's abrupt departure Sunday. In Washington, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State Roger Noriega said Philippe "is not in control of anything but a ragtag band of people."
Is there any other kind in Haiti?
The international military buildup in Haiti will make Philippe's role "less and less central in Haitian life. And I think he will probably want to make himself scarce," Noriega told the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "We have sent that message to him. He obviously hasn't received it."
"We might have to deliver it on the butt end of a rifle, Senators."
Philippe, who arrived in Port-au-Prince in a rebel convoy Monday, apparently plans to transform his fighters into a reconstituted Haitian army. The army ousted Aristide in 1991 but then was disbanded by him in 1995, a year after he was returned to power by 20,000 American troops. Some 300 U.S. Marines and 140 French troops were in Haiti on Tuesday. In Washington, U.S. defense officials said the Marines would not act to stop looting or other crimes, but would return fire if fired upon. Commanders of both forces said they also had no orders to disarm Haiti's armed factions and instead planned to secure key sites and protect their countries' citizens and government property. "We are not a police force," U.S. Marine Col. Dave Berger said. His forces were expected to reach 500 by Tuesday night, U.S. defense officials said. Chile also said it was sending 120 special forces to Haiti on Wednesday as part of a 300-soldier contingent that will join an international security force authorized by the U.N. Security Council.
Posted by: Steve White || 03/03/2004 00:06 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Countdown to pro-Aristide death spike...3...2...
Posted by: Dragon Fly || 03/03/2004 6:39 Comments || Top||

#2  Philippe sounds like a piece of work, just like every other Haitian "leader". Let's let the UN handle it and take the blame this time for the inevitable failure.
Posted by: Spot || 03/03/2004 9:04 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
63[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Wed 2004-03-03
  3 Hamas helizapped
Tue 2004-03-02
  200+ dead in attacks on Shiites
Mon 2004-03-01
  Spain seizes ETA boom truck
Sun 2004-02-29
  Jean-Bertrand hangs it up
Sat 2004-02-28
  Binny rumored captured
Fri 2004-02-27
  Sudanese paramilitaries attack aid workers
Thu 2004-02-26
  Darfur rebellion spreads
Wed 2004-02-25
  Riyadh and Cairo Reject Imposed Reforms
Tue 2004-02-24
  Another Zawahiri tape
Mon 2004-02-23
  Masood Azhar escapes!
Sun 2004-02-22
  Conservatives sweep Iranian elections
Sat 2004-02-21
  Binny surrounded?
Fri 2004-02-20
  Pak to Hizb: Stop Kashmir jihad
Thu 2004-02-19
  Janjaweed raid into Chad
Wed 2004-02-18
  200 300 deaders in Iran train boom


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.191.223.123
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
(0)    (0)    (0)    (0)    (0)