You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Bandwagon
Beer: The staff of life, the stuff of happiness
Santa Claus groping a comely young maiden
Swine in love
Why is this man laughing?
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Home Front: Politix
Trump wants to upend 230 years of constitutional principle
2017-11-19
John Podesta's "You better not go after Hillary." thought piece.

Excerpt: 'Whataboutism' is reliably useful for triggering breathless speculation by the president’s allies on Fox News, in the alt-right media and among Russian trolls.
Sounds objective to me!
Posted by:Anomalous Sources

#12  Why should I believe anything Podesta or WAPO says?
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-19 18:05  

#11  How about installing some anti-phishing software instead, Johnny boy?
Posted by: Raj   2017-11-19 13:12  

#10  Trump et. al. soft pedaled the many investigations (election voter fraud, dossier, immigration, uranium, Benghazi, Raper Bill, Crapper, Huma, Valerie, ...) long enough to allow Podesta to form yet another attack strategy. Almost a year into it and this would be done if they had focused on one thread at a time and indicted the 'Deep State' players for obstruction.

How they can ignore pursuing legal recourse for the defamation, I don't know.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-11-19 10:59  

#9  Talk is cheap, JQC
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-11-19 10:51  

#8  Saw a vid of Sessons giving a speech re restoring the Constitution and the rule of law. Getting rid of two systems of justice. Replacing Obama bought judges with Constutionalists. Getting back to liberty. A good speech. Might have misjudged Sessons before.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-11-19 10:46  

#7  Has he started appointing Czars?
Posted by: AlanC   2017-11-19 08:44  

#6  Gee, Hillary has no use for the 230 year Constitutional principle of graciously accepting defeat. Well, she and Aaron Burr. Too bad dueling has been outlawed, she could call Comey out rather then 'bitch' about it.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-11-19 08:32  

#5  it is amazing to see how Podesta can argue the exact opposite of the truth

Only if you just came from Mars.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-11-19 03:28  

#4  Podesta is projecting. The previous administration often ignored the constitution and behaved in a lawless fashion.
On the other hand, Trump has tried hard, with considerable success, to restore constitutional government.
There is much more for him to do, but it is amazing to see how Podesta can argue the exact opposite of the truth without the slightest apparent sense of shame.
Posted by: Daniel   2017-11-19 01:43  

#3  Yeah, that's what slays me. With Trump, suddenly these Constitution-hating Leftists love the Constitution. Fucking asswipes.

We wouldn't be having a column like this unless they were scared.
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309   2017-11-19 01:00  

#2  More like 8 years of unconstitutional principal...

Besides Podesta wouldn't know a principal if it kicked him in the ass - hard!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-11-19 00:44  

#1  I thought the Constitution was a "living, breathing document", etc.
Posted by: charger   2017-11-19 00:33