You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

This is a chicken. What are you?
Sock Puppet, though not of Doom
Drunken hussy in a shopping cart
A cat. It is not in a hat.
The Hindenberg, though not its finest hour
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia carving out a fortress for Assad, say experts
2015-10-06
[Express] PARIS: The contours of Russia's strategy in Syria are emerging as it tries to carve out a rebel-free zone for Bashar al-Assad's regime and shut out Western forces from his air space.

Although the stated aim of Russia's mission was to target the Islamic State (IS) group, most analysts have dismissed these claims as window-dressing for a campaign that primarily seeks to prop up Assad's embattled regime against a much broader group of rebels.

"The priority for the Russians is to protect 'useful Syria'," said Michel Goya, a military historian at Sciences Po university in Paris, referring to the densely-populated western and coastal parts of the country where Syrian industry and agriculture are concentrated.

He said the Russians' first priority was attacking al Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra, who are a more immediate threat in those areas than IS.

The few Russian strikes against IS targets are only to "justify their campaign but it's not really their priority," he added.

"The strategic objective is to secure an Alawite 'safe zone'... leaving the eastern, desert part of the country to (IS)," wrote Igor Sutyagin, of the Royal United Services Institute, in a recent analysis note.

Assad and much of the leadership come from the Alawite ethnic group based along the western coast, who fear they will be wiped out if extremists take over the country.

Since the Alawites make up only 12 per cent of the population, "control of the whole country is politically impossible and perhaps not even considered necessary for Damascus anymore," wrote Sutyagin.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Nope. It's Tartus. Reason? Location.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-10-06 21:15  

#5  I thought the Russians were in Latakia, not Tartus. Neither have a lot of room, but Latakia is larger and has more docking space. It's also closer to the airfield in Latakia province.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2015-10-06 20:17  

#4  Yes, at some point the Russians had to go 'all in' in order to save their Navy base at Tartus. All in all, quite predictable as EU has indicated.

Link
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-10-06 16:28  

#3  They report this news as if it's some kind of a surprise.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-10-06 16:22  

#2  At least the Russian's have a strategic vision which is more than you can say for current US Administration.
Posted by: Sven the pelter   2015-10-06 11:16  

#1  Why is this bothering the west so bad? They weren't going to do anything about this conflict, and I would rather Russia be the big man in there than Iran.
Posted by: chris   2015-10-06 09:24