You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Fluffy bunnies
A rose, possibly the Rose of San Antone but not the Yellow Rose of Texas
Recruiting poster for the WACs
The Hindenberg, though not its finest hour
This is a chicken. What are you?
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Benghazi panel to interview more of Clinton's inner circle
2015-09-04
WASHINGTON (AP) - The chairman of a congressional panel investigating the deadly Benghazi attacks said Friday that a member of Hillary Rodham Clinton's inner circle could provide key insight into how the State Department maintained its presence in Libya prior to the 2012 attack.

Jake Sullivan, a former policy director and deputy chief of staff under Clinton at the State Department, arrived early Friday for what is expected to be a daylong session of testimony.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the committee's chairman, said Sullivan was in a "unique position" to talk about how U.S. policy in Libya required the State Department to have a physical presence in the country. Sullivan is currently a top policy aide on Clinton's presidential campaign.

Mike Morrell, the CIA's former deputy director, likely will be the next witness to appear before the panel, Gowdy told reporters.

Clinton, the Democratic front-runner for the 2016 nomination, has been dogged by criticism about her use of a private email server for government business during her tenure as secretary of state, and she has struggled to explain her decision.

The panel that was established to investigate Benghazi has gotten immersed, as well, in the controversy surrounding Clinton's email proclivities.

Cheryl Mills, Clinton's former chief of staff, answered questions for the panel for 9½ hours on Thursday. Few details were released, but knowledgeable officials said lawmakers asked Mills about her role in preparing "talking points" for administration officials following the 2012 attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

Gowdy said Friday that Mills answered all of their questions in a professional manner and that inquiries which focused on a private email server Clinton used while serving as secretary of state, including its set-up, came only later in the session.

"Our committee is the committee on Benghazi. It's not the committee on emails," Gowdy said.

Democrats called on Republicans to disband the committee. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a member of the panel, wrote in an op-ed in The New York Times that it had become "little more than a partisan tool to influence the presidential race, a dangerous precedent that will haunt Congress for decades."

"Whatever their original purpose, the Select Committee's leaders appear no longer to have any interest in Benghazi, except as the tragic events of that day may be used as a cudgel against the likely Democratic nominee for president," he said.

Mills, a lawyer who has worked for former President Bill Clinton, said after Thursday's meeting that she was treated with professional courtesy and respect.

"Ultimately the tragedy in Benghazi was about the loss of (four) individuals dear to the State Department and dear to this country," Mills said. "We honor them by remembering what happened and doing our best to make sure it doesn't happen again."

Gowdy said Mills' session would be treated as classified and declined to answer any specific questions.

Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the senior Democrat on the committee, called for Gowdy and committee Republicans to release a transcript of Mills' testimony as soon as possible, so the public can learn what questions were asked and how they were answered.

The request to release the transcript was unlikely to be granted, Gowdy said, noting that much of what was discussed related to national security.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  I forget the rule exactly, but I believe so-called "impeachment" doesn't apply to current or former Fed-level Agency heads, only to the PRESIDENCY???

SecState Hillary had no formal authority to send in, or NOT send in, any Benghazi relief force widout the Bammer's consent.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-09-04 21:14  

#5  It's possible that Obama and Hilarity both believe in Soros "No Borders" OWG and they extend this concept to security and emails as well. Maybe that is why she was so sloppy.

Never attribute to conspiracy theory what can be explained by sheer venality.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-09-04 14:40  

#4  It's not so much a "so what' as "check off another milestone requirement" All is proceeding according to plan.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2015-09-04 13:35  

#3  Four good people died is the difference.

Sorry to tell you this JQC but to the members of this regime this makes no difference whatsoever.

Unless there is some direct immediate personal effect on them there attitude is "So what?"

Iran gets the bomb? So what.
Israel gets nuked? So what.
Russia captures the Ukraine, the Baltics and Finland? So what.
China takes Taiwan and moves on Japan? So what.
They get brought into court? OMG THIS IS A REVOLUTION CALL OUT THE ARMY!!!
Posted by: AlanC   2015-09-04 13:02  

#2  Mills also sanitized recommended "changes" in the "independent" ARB Benghazi Report :


But raising alarms on the right, Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff at the State Department, also told the House Select Committee on Benghazi that she reviewed and made suggestions for changes to the government’s official, final report on what happened in Benghazi, according to a separate, GOP source familiar with what she said.

The source said it “call[s] into question the ‘independence’” of the report’s conclusions. …

One of the biggest surprises to the right was that she said she made suggestions to change state’s accountability review board report. The report was supposed to be independent from state officials that may be involved, and the GOP argues top officials should not have had input, long questioning how independent the findings were.

It doesn’t call it into question; Mills’ testimony debunks the claim of independence altogether. That should have been disregarded from the beginning. Let’s not forget that Ambassador Thomas Pickering decided early on to focus on those below the political-appointment rank in the ARB’s investigation, never bothering to interview people like Patrick Kennedy, the undersecretary of State whose responsibilities included facility security. Now we find out that Pickering apparently ran the report by Mills for her approval and editing, which a truly independent investigation would hardly do. It’s yet another reason for a Congressional investigation into Benghazi, and the Libya policies that led up to it.
Posted by: Frank G   2015-09-04 11:28  

#1  The Canada Free Press has a fairly good summary of this security debacle. Canada Free Press. It's possible that Obama and Hilarity both believe in Soros "No Borders" OWG and they extend this concept to security and emails as well. Maybe that is why she was so sloppy. As the candidate said about Benghazi: "What difference does it make?" Well the difference is that Russians, Chinese, and radical Islamics may have hacked her unencrypted personal server. Four good people died is the difference.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-09-04 11:22