You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Santa Claus groping a comely young maiden
A rose, possibly the Rose of San Antone but not the Yellow Rose of Texas
Hippy bus
Bandwagon
Sock Puppet, though not of Doom
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Terror Networks
Killing Top IS Leaders Not Enough to Cripple Group, Say Experts
2014-12-20
[AnNahar] The Pentagon has hailed the deaths of several top leaders of the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
group, but experts say this is far from enough to cripple what has proven to be a resilient organization.

U.S. officials say air strikes have killed several senior and mid-level jihadists including Abu Moslem al-Turkmani, the right hand man of IS chief His Supreme Immensity, Caliph of the Faithful and Galactic Overlord, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
...formerly merely the head of ISIL and a veteran of the Bagram jailhouse. Looks like a new messiah to bajillions of Moslems, like just another dead-eyed mass murder to the rest of us...
, dealing a serious blow to the group's operations.

But analysts warn that disruptions of this type are often fleeting and that the U.S.-led coalition needs to look beyond their military campaign to weaken the group that has become the world's most feared jihadist organization since proclaiming a "caliphate" straddling Syria and Iraq six months ago.

"Eliminating key leaders is a means to disrupt plots and degrade capabilities. But they do not defeat or destroy terrorist organizations," said Bruce Riedel, a former CIA agent and adviser to U.S. President Barack Obama
I inhaled. That was the point...
who is now a leading terrorism expert.

"Al-Qaeda in Iraq lost its top leadership twice but still thrived sufficiently to give birth to the Islamic State."

Pentagon front man Rear Admiral John Kirby said strikes against the group's leadership were disrupting the jihadists' "ability to command and control current operations against" Iraqi federal and Kurdish forces.

But the real impact is hard to quantify, especially as the command structure of the Islamic State group is largely a mystery to intelligence services, with its members masters at disguising themselves through a multitude of false identities, nicknames and noms de guerre.

And the Western view of a pyramid-like command structure with a supreme leader, deputies and cascading line of subordinates does not take into account a reality where tribal, regional, cultural and historical ties often take precedence.

Even if jihadist supremo Baghdadi was killed, this would not see the ideology that spurred the creation of the so-called caliphate crumble overnight.

"If Baghdadi is out of the picture before his caliphate is firmly established, the Islamic State group will be seriously challenged, but with resourceful lieutenants in charge, it will not be finished without a further fight," said Michael Ryan of the Washington-based Jamestown Foundation.

U.S. officials have been open about the limits of the military operation and have warned the West will have to dig in for the long haul to combat IS.

Military chief General Martin Dempsey recently told the U.S. Senate that IS would "ultimately be defeated when their cloak of religious legitimacy is stripped away and the population on which they have imposed themselves reject them.

"Our actions are intended to move in that direction. This will require a sustained effort over an extended period of time. It is a generational problem, and we should expect that our enemies will adapt their tactics as we adjust our approach."
Posted by:trailing wife

#2  We cannot capture or interrogate so killing appears to be the right thing to do.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-12-20 18:36  

#1  Our opponents are collectively not very smart. If they were brilliant tacticians, they would be killing people in droves in the US. Mostly they are successful only through their ruthlessness and the total corruption of the previous regimes. Killing the higher ups which are likely to be the smarter and more charismatic psychos will leave the reins for their movement in increasingly less competent hands. Killing even snuffies helps as long as they are killed in large volumes under horrific circumstances where there are burnt alive or exploded into small chunks.
Posted by: Super Hose   2014-12-20 18:22