You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Why is this man laughing?
Beer: The staff of life, the stuff of happiness
Fluffy bunnies
A cat. It is not in a hat.
A rose, possibly the Rose of San Antone but not the Yellow Rose of Texas
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Kerry: No need for Congress vote on Iran
2014-10-23
[Iran Press TV] US Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat, conqueror of Cambodia, and current Secretary of State...
says the White House does not need congressional approval to suspend sanctions against Iran.

The B.O. regime is reportedly planning to suspend sanctions against the Islamic Theocratic Republic without an immediate vote in Congress, but it says politicians will have the final word on whether to permanently terminate the sanctions.

"On sanctions, what we've merely said to people is that -- and we've said this in public testimony as well as in private conversations -- that in the first instance, we would look to suspend sanctions, which the president can do, simply because that's the necessary way to proceed with respect to the negotiations themselves," Kerry said Wednesday at a presser in Berlin.

The plan, first revealed by The New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
on Sunday, does not suggest that the US Congress will be sidestepped on any nuclear deal with Iran, Kerry said.

"I have too much respect for the process of the Congress, the rights of the Congress, and the importance of the relationship between the Executive and the Congress, the Legislative Branch, to ever suggest that there would be any credibility to this notion there's some thought of going around it," he stated.

The top US diplomat said that administration officials were engaged in "a regular series of briefings" with politicians on the issue, emphasizing that "Congress has an extremely important role to play in this."
Posted by:Fred

#5  Ignore the Constitution....one side ignores it, so can the other side. Not a good idea, Jawn.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2014-10-23 19:11  

#4  Since when did you ever know anything about how Our Government is supposed to run?

You don't

So shut your ugly, useless gob.
Posted by: newc   2014-10-23 13:30  

#3  No need for Congress, for that matter. Huh, Jawn? And we sure don't need no stinkin' Constitution, now do we? You bastard, how long is this "suspension" going to be? Long enough for the Mad Mullahs to get their bomb?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2014-10-23 11:37  

#2  We still have a congress? I thought champ just took everything under "executive privilege" too the way he wanted it too go anyway.
Posted by: chris   2014-10-23 09:22  

#1  Espec given ... ...

* IIRC TOPIX, WORLD NEWS > IRAN REGIONAL HEGEMONY THREATENED BY WAR/RISE OF ISLAMIC STATE.

Ditto for alleged "Neo-Ottoman" Turkey, Nuclear? Saudis, + Egypt.

Although to be fair, Turkey is not mandated by God + Madonna + Ancestors + Texas-sized Asteroids to devol into a de facto world threat until sometime after 2030-2050.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-10-23 01:23