You have commented 0 times on Rantburg.

We're sorry, but only human beings are allowed to comment on Rantburg. If you're a human being, please take this simple test to prove it. If you're not, get lost.

Why is this man laughing?
Fluffy bunnies
Sock Puppet, though not of Doom
Some wine is red, some wine is white. Some people drink wine most every night
Caveman
Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama 's Team Could Not Agree on a Syria Strategy
2014-08-30
After a week of talk of eliminating the "cancer" of ISIS, President B.O. said Thursday that he was not planning to significantly expand the war against the Islamic bad boy movement anytime soon. His remarks came after days of heated debate inside the top levels of his own national security bureaucracy about how, where, and whether to strike ISIS in Syria. But those deliberations, which included a bleak intelligence assessment of America's potential allies in Syria -- failed to produce a consensus battle plan.

There were deep divisions inside the administration's deliberations over Syria. One set of officials advocated for a campaign to decimate ISIS in both countries by striking ISIS targets across Syria. This camp pushed for hitting near Aleppo where they are advancing, and with at least some coordination with the moderate Syrian rebels. The group, which included officials from State Department, intelligence community and some parts of the military, came up with extensive targeting options for the president that included not only ISIS military assets, but their infrastructure, command and control, and their financial capabilities. Even the oil pipelines they use to export crude for cash were on the target list.

Another group of officials -- led by White House and National Security staffers but also including some intelligence and military officials -- favored a more cautious approach that spurned any cooperation with the Free Syrian Army
... the more palatable version of the Syrian insurgency, heavily influenced by the Moslem Brüderbund...
and focused strikes inside Syria on targets near the Iraqi border. The objective: cut off ISIS supply lines to Iraq. That strategy would fall more squarely within the existing limited missions that Obama has already outlined for his war.

Inside the intelligence community, there is a dispute about whether the Free Syrian Army, which has been fighting ISIS in Syria all year with little international support, can be a reliable partner for any military mission inside Syria. Concerns about working with the FSA in part stem from worries that elements of the opposition have in the past joined forces with Jihadist forces like al-Nusra, al Qaeda's affiliate in Syria. Obama himself has expressed concern
...meaning the brow was mildly wrinkled, the eyebrows drawn slightly together, and a thoughtful expression assumed, not that anything was actually done or indeed that any thought was actually expended...
about this as well, telling New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
columnist Tom Friedman earlier this month that arming the moderate Syrian opposition would have made no difference in the civil war there and the idea that moderate rebels could defeat the Assad regime was a “fantasy.”

Obama addressed the White House press corps Thursday afternoon just before personally chairing a meeting of his National Security Council, his top cabinet members and national security staffers. The meeting was the culmination of an intense week-long process that included series of lower level meetings and at last one Principals' Committee that officials described as an effort to convince Obama to expand his air war against ISIS in Iraq to Syria as well. But before the meeting even started, the president seemed to have made up his mind.
Posted by:Pappy

#3  Don't try to be a hero, use the pitching wedge and take the stroke.
Posted by: Shipman   2014-08-30 13:47  

#2  Some decisions are tough like when to use an 8 iron or 9 iron.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-08-30 06:39  

#1  "Any successful strategy ... needs strong regional partners," Obama told reporters Thursday.

His "strategy" is to find a way out and he's found it. Besides, a defeated ISIS [and global jihad] could result in victory for a U.S. led force, the benefits of which, would likely not come during his watch. Besides, he does not see U.S. dominance of anything as a positive.

BLUF: There's nothing in any of this for him or his entitlement constituency, therefore it will not happen. He's off raising campaign funding for a lagging political party which he hopes can defeat 'the man.' He has no interest in building a coalition of the willing against jihad.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-08-30 06:23