| Are they not required by the hudna principle to attack the to-be-conquered unbelievers as soon as they’re able? They were able, so they jumped the Iranian gun, and are now paying the price. Just like last time. |
...the well-beloved offspring of the Moslem Brotherhood,...bad boy group said Sunday its October 7 attack on Israel was a "necessary step" against Israeli occupation of the Paleostinian territories.
In its 16-page report, the Paleostinian resistance group said the attacks were "a necessary step and a normal response to confront all Israeli conspiracies against the Paleostinian people".
Urging an "immediate halt of the Israeli aggression on Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with an iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about
oppressionand
disproportionate response...
, the crimes and ethnic cleansing committed against the entire Gaza population," the group has rejected any international and Israeli efforts to decide the territory's post-war future.
"We stress that the Paleostinian people have the capacity to decide their future and to arrange their internal affairs," the statement said, adding that "no party in the world" had the right to decide on their behalf.
| The Times of Israel reports on more Hamas bluntness: |
Mashaal rejected the notion of a future Paleostinian state existing within the framework of the two-state solution, saying that Hamas
...not a terrorist organization, even though it kidnaps people, holds hostages, and tries to negotiate by executing them,...rejects the idea, "because it means we would get a promise for a Paleostinian state, yet would be required to recognize the legitimacy of the other state — the Zionist entity."
"This is unacceptable," he continued. "We demand to be liberated, to get rid of the occupation and to have our independent state. Israel is my enemy, it is not my concern."
The Hamas official explained that although the terror group’s official policy is to seek a singular Paleostinian state that would replace Israel inside of the borders established in 1948, it chooses to fall in line with other Paleostinian entities, including the Paleostinian Authority, in seeking a Paleostinian state within the 1967 borders — for the time being.
"We will not give up our right to Paleostine in its entirety," he said, "but in order to establish a common ground and a joint Paleostinian plan with the other Paleostinian forces, and in line with the Arab position, Hamas agreed to a completely independent state within the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital, with the right of return [for refugees and their descendants] included, without recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist entity."
This, he explained, would lay the groundwork for a future Paleostinian state established within the 1967 borders to then expand, "without relinquishing any of our rights or any part of our land."
"I believe that October 7 has enhanced this conviction, has narrowed the disagreements and has turned the idea of liberating Paleostine from the river to the sea into a realistic idea that has already begun," he added.