You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Judge rejects Hunter Biden plea deal
2023-07-26
[NYPOST] First son Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty
"Wudn't me."
to federal tax and gun charges Wednesday, a dramatic about-face after his wrist-slap, probation-only plea deal fell apart Wednesday over his demand for blanket immunity from accountability for all criminal conduct — including alleged illegal foreign lobbying.

The stunning turn of events came more than 90 minutes into the hearing at the federal courthouse in Wilmington, Del., where Hunter was expected to plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to pay taxes and enter a diversion program on a felony federal weapons charge.

Prosecutors admitted under questioning from US District Judge Maryellen Noreika that President Biden’s 53-year-old son still could be charged with offenses including failing to register as a foreign agent for lucrative dealings in countries such as China and Ukraine that allegedly involved his father.

"As far as I’m concerned, the plea agreement is null and void," defense attorney Chris Clark reportedly told the court in response a little before noon.

Both sides then tried to move forward with a revised plea deal that specified Hunter would face no additional charges linked to tax crimes from 2014 to 2019 — or any counts involving his drug use and associated gun ownership crimes. However,
it's easy to be generous with someone else's money...
Noreika indicated she needed more information about the new deal, forcing the first son to enter a pro forma plea of not guilty before the hearing was adjourned.

Courtesy of Deacon Blues:
You Can't Hide Your Lyin' Eyes

[PJMedia] Well, well, well, if it isn’t another day in the life of Hunter Biden, the son of President Biden, where even his legal team seems to have caught the ’Biden Bug’ of bending the rules when it suits them. This time, they’re facing possible sanctions over accusations of lying in a criminal tax case. Just wonderful.

The Delaware judge presiding over the case, Maryellen Noreika, has threatened Biden’s legal team with sanctions over allegations of lying to the clerk’s office. Apparently, they’ve been accused of avoiding proper court procedures to get information about IRS whistleblowers removed from the docket. But hey, who needs proper court procedure when you can just pick up the phone and ask the clerk to seal the information, right?

Specifically, a lawyer from Hunter’s legal team, Jessica Bengels, is accused of misrepresenting who she was when asking to remove amicus materials from the docket. Now, I’m no lawyer, but I’m pretty sure that’s not how it’s supposed to work. But then again, when you’re part of the Biden entourage, who knows what the rules are?

The judge’s order read, "It appears that the caller misrepresented her identity and who she worked for in an attempt to improperly convince the clerk’s office to remove the amicus materials from the docket." But, of course, Biden’s legal team insists it was all just an "unfortunate and unintentional miscommunication." Ah, the old "miscommunication" excuse. Classic.

In a correspondence that Fox News managed to acquire, Biden’s legal representatives assured the judge that the attorney who had contacted the clerk had truthfully stated her association with her legal firm. They wrote, "We have no idea how the misunderstanding occurred, but our understanding is there was no misrepresentation." Well, that clears it up then, doesn’t it? Bengels certainly didn’t lie to get her way — of course not! Why would she do that?! It’s not as if Hunter and his friends are used to getting away with lies, deceit, and blatant corruption. Or is it?

Meanwhile, on Wednesday (today), Hunter Biden will plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to pay federal income tax going back to 2017 and 2018. He "forgot" to pay more than $100,000 in taxes those two years. But hey, who hasn’t forgotten to pay a hundred grand in taxes? I’m sure it was truly an innocent mistake. Twice.
Posted by:Fred

#15  He’s going to need an explanation of what that involves.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-07-26 22:43  

#14  Judge also stipulates new Plea Deal must require Hunter to "Get a Job"...
Posted by: Jeremiah Jomosing7109   2023-07-26 22:31  

#13  Never underestimate Hunter's ability to fuck things up.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-07-26 21:00  

#12  Stupidest thing in the deal was if Hunter messed up his probation, the Judge would have to bring charges which in the US only law enforcement and prosecutors in the US bring charges, not Judges. That is why the Judge said the deal was unconstitutional and the defense attorneys quickly withdrew the deal. The idiots were caught hoping the Judge was stupid.
Posted by: Jeremiah Jomosing7109   2023-07-26 17:56  

#11  The Judge and Prosecutor are Trump appointees.
Posted by: Jeremiah Jomosing7109   2023-07-26 17:47  

#10  Oh, I'm sure he'll have a "body man" for the pee duties...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-26 17:40  

#9  I can proudly say that, unlike the President's son, I've never had to pee in a cup for law enforcement.
Posted by: jpal   2023-07-26 17:37  

#8  New Conditions of Release-This should be interesting!



Hunter must also, "if directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer," participate in a "program of inpatient or outpatient substance abuse therapy or counseling."

That means Hunter Biden is now, potentially, subject to random testing to ensure compliance with his conditions of release which, again, prohibit any consumption of alcohol or use of illicit drugs.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-07-26 17:23  

#7  I think their polls are telling them Kamala-lala-ding-dong would be beaten in 2024 by PeeWee Herman.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-26 15:14  

#6  This was the avenue to clear Hunter without a pardon. The pardon will make the actual impeachment vote interesting. What would Romney and Murkowski do?
The idea of the plea deal was to clear Hunter in a way that was acceptable to the CNN hosts. This adds full to the heat under Joes chair. He now has to pardon himself, Hunter and Archer. Archer is not going to want to do a long time in jail before he is sprung.
This leads to an interests set of questions that they are likely war gaming. How soon to resign? Who else needs pardons? Does he pardon the foreigners? Will a Republican president charge the CCP operatives rather than sanction them?
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-07-26 15:10  

#5  Maybe some DoJ people are starting to grasp there will come a day when Bidet is not prexident anymore.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-07-26 14:48  

#4  These are all federal charges, right? So the president has the power to pardon Hunter on all charges, present and future. So why doesn't he just do that and tell the DOJ to concentrate on Trump like they were told to do?

Yeah, yeah. I know. People will be upset because Hunter got a REAL sweetheart deal. No time, no record, not even probation. So what?
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2023-07-26 14:40  

#3  I think the DOJ realized that this was not going to wash with the American people.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-07-26 14:21  

#2  Stunning details of how corrupt the deal was in a tweet by Sol Weisenberg:

Sol Wisenberg
@WisenbergSol
This just in: The judge won't accept the proposed plea deal at least for now.
Some thoughts: Now we know why DOJ didn’t show us the plea agreement terms. What didn't they want us to know ahead of time? A) a global immunity deal for Hunter; B) A binding plea (that is, the judge must accept the specific terms if she accepts the agreement); C) Misdemeanor probation; D) Other unusual plea terms.
1. A global immunity deal for Hunter while the overall investigation is “ongoing”, is stunning—a super-sweetheart deal.
2. A binding plea is extremely unusual in the vast majority of federal jurisdictions. It means for example, that if the agreement calls for probation the judge must give Hunter probation. It is binding.
3. That the prosecution and defense would disagree about the terms of the agreement in open court is a joke. Ambiguous terms in a plea agreements are construed against the government! There should be no room for disagreement on the key terms of the agreement. So, this was either astounding incompetence or corruption on DOJ’s part. I think it is corruption. This looks like a wink and a nod deal (as
@shipwreckedcrew
has noted) where DOJ would have plausible deniability if the judge asked no questions and accepted the deal. The scope of immunity is the most important feature of a plea deal. It is inconceivable that the prosecutors were incompetent here. Leo Wise has an excellent reputation for competence.
4. Think about this. DOJ was about to sanction a plea deal where Hunter would get misdemeanor probation on serious tax charges plus pretrial diversion (no time served or criminal record) on the felony gun charge. Hunter would also get complete immunity on all other charges. And he would not have to cooperate with the government’s ongoing investigation. Totally disgraceful. Merrick Garland and David Weiss should be ashamed. And where is Lisa Monaco? Why hasn't she been called to testify?
Last edited
10:44 AM · Jul 26, 2023
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-07-26 14:15  

#1  While Hunter was in court Joe Biden was attending a methane gas emissions party....the first ever at the White House.
Posted by: crazyhorse   2023-07-26 14:14  

00:00