You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Afghans ‘fleeing the Taliban’ allowed into South Africa as asylum seekers
2023-03-05
[TimesLiveZA] A Pretoria high court order to grant 22 Afghans fleeing the Taliban
...Arabic for students...
access to South Africa on asylum transit visas will stand.

The department of home affairs (DHA) has confirmed that Tuesday's judgment is final.

Home affairs refused the Afghans entry into South Africa despite a court order that the government should grant them permission to seek asylum. It was issued after a US NGO argued the group might be victimised by the Taliban.

The department, which said it was notified of the pending court proceedings after the fact, challenged the order.

Qoza said on February 15, home affairs received a letter from attorneys representing the people. It demanded asylum transit visas be issued to them at the Beitbridge port of entry.

"While DHA was preparing a response to the letter, on February 16, a group of 22 Afghanistan nationals in the company of American citizens arrived at the Beitbridge port of entry and requested to be issued with asylum transit visas in order for them to enter the Republic of South Africa to apply for asylum. The immigration officer refused to do so as they were all issued with multiple-entry tourist visas by the government of the Republic of Zim-bob-we on January 20," he said.

The lawyers representing the Afghans approached the court on an urgent basis (in the absence of the DHA) and the court granted the interim order allowing them to be issued with asylum transit visas, Qoza said.

"The court, however, allowed the DHA to anticipate the interim order within 24 hours. The DHA did exactly that and the court refused to confirm the interim order to allow the DHA to file answering papers. The matter was heard by the court on February 20 2023. Judgment was reserved."
Posted by:trailing wife

#7  No doubt hip-waders were involved at some point, Skidmark. Or perhaps airplane tickets.
Posted by: trailing wife   2023-03-05 23:38  

#6  Exactly how does one get from central Asia to the southern tip of Africa?
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-03-05 23:03  

#5  It is like escaping The Scream only to be painted into Guernica.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-03-05 13:16  

#4  I don't know about you, but I am getting tired of the legacy media constantly reporting on the crimes perpetrated on white farmers in RSA (are any even left?). /sarc
Posted by: DooDahMan   2023-03-05 10:21  

#3  'It is't Kansas' Supe. Hasn't been for a number of years. Pockets of sanity here and there. Mostly elderly folks without a means to escape.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-03-05 09:58  

#2  Wait until those refugees decide that they want to convert SA to Islam.
Posted by: Too Old To Work   2023-03-05 09:29  

#1  If they intend to reside in SA, I would stay away from purchasing land for the purpose of farming.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-03-05 09:07  

00:00