| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government Corruption |
| Tucker Carlson Reveals Email that Raises Questions About Hunter Biden's Access to Classified Docs |
| 2023-01-25 |
| [Redstate] Tucker Carlson and New York Post columnist Miranda Devine are raising new questions in the wake of now five different tranches of classified documents being found in Joe Biden’s home and at the Penn-Biden Center. Part of the problem is what’s in those documents — if those documents pertain to Ukraine and things that involved Joe Biden’s family, that could be a big problem if he was taking documents to cover up things related to his family. We do know that some of the documents found at the Penn Biden Center were documents related to Ukraine, dated between 2013 and 2016 at the time Hunter Biden was most active in Burisma and Joe Biden was the point man on Ukraine. Tucker Carlson highlighted a new email that had been found by Miranda Devine on the infamous laptop which they both believed was an indication of the use of classified information. As Carlson notes, it reads like it’s written by someone from the State Department with what the U.S. position would be laid out, for example, predicting an escalation of Russia’s “destabilization campaign, which could lead to a full-scale takeover of the eastern region, most critically Donetsk.” |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #7 It will be in a DC court. He will be found innocent. They will argue that he may have sat in on a classified briefing with his dad because he planned to travel with the VP. The fact that the briefing would be illegal will not be brought up. Neither will the fact that transmitting the contents of a classified briefing to a Buddy via regular email would also be illegal. Joy Behar will declare victory. Legally Blonde will prove to be a closer approximation of real juris prudence as compared whatever DC court that hosts this debacle of justice. In a real court of law the prosecutor’s investigators would search the database of classified documents and find the document that Hunter cribbed. There would be a plea deal. Joe would then pardon Hunter. The end state is pretty much the same. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2023-01-25 22:29 |
| #6 I woukd argue that outside of a DC Courtroom, the email matched up with the source classified document Would convince a jury of guilt. The Tucker presentation of the specific email was perfectly presented. The text style and form were so alien to everything else Hunter wrote, it was clear it was lifted from an analysis document from the government. For me, it is the smoking gun to use to rip this festering mess wide open, or demonstrate that there is only law for the plebs, especially the white, conservative ones! |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2023-01-25 12:52 |
| #5 In a court of law the email is not proof. In a court of reality the email and all of the accompanying circumstances mean that the Bidens are guilty. The probability that Joe was/is not engaged in trading on his office in general and leveraging classified information in particular is infinitesimally small. It approaches zero and/or the value of the odds that Nancy Pelosi is not using Congressional info for stock trading. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2023-01-25 12:25 |
| #4 His senate documents at the University of Delaware need to be looked at too. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2023-01-25 11:49 |
| #3 With the same ramifications as Hillary--ZERO. |
| Posted by: DooDahMan 2023-01-25 06:42 |
| #2 "Shut up" they explained |
| Posted by: Frank G 2023-01-25 05:52 |
| #1 Little wonder the FBI sat on the 'smoking gun' laptop for over two years, denying it's existence. * Did the FBI courier the classified documents to the Delaware residence? Did some other gov't agency (OGA) conduct the courier duties ? * Had classified documents been downloaded to the laptop? Had classified documents or classified information been forwarded on the laptop. * Did Hunter transmit email from the Delaware residence? Did he use a USG account or web service provider, Gmail, Yahoo, etc. ? * Were topical or 'drop site' or 'personal meet (PM)' instructions found on the laptop? * Were banking transactions or monetary transfers conducted on the laptop? Were narcotics transactions, banking and or accounting data, or other potential criminal activity conducted on the laptop? * Were email messages to or from foreign contacts and overseas internet providers found on the laptop? * Was the 'big guy' info copied (CC or BCC) on any email from the laptop? * If the laptop contained foreign contacts, was the 'big guy' info-copied? Was anyone else (foreign or US Person) info-copied (CC or BCC) ? So many questions. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2023-01-25 00:30 |