You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Nixon Threatened to Reveal the Deep State Involvement in the Kennedy Assassination
2023-01-14
[Roger Stone] A stunning, long-overlooked Nixon Watergate-era tape shows Richard Nixon warning CIA Director Richard Helms that he knows of CIA involvement in the murder of John F. Kennedy- "I know who shot John."

This shocking new tape depicts Nixon increasingly besieged by Watergate but unaware that at least four of the Watergate burglars were still on the CIA payroll at the time of the break-in, and that the CIA had thus infiltrated the burglary team. Recently declassified documents reveal that Watergate Special Prosecutor Nick Akerman was aware of both the CIA’s advance knowledge and involvement in the break-in — but said and did nothing.

Senator Howard Baker, the Republican Leader on the Senate Watergate Committee and his counsel Fred Thompson himself, a future U.S. Senator from Tennessee, like Baker, stumbled on the CIA's deep advanced knowledge and direct involvement in the Watergate break-in. Baker and Thompson both knew that at least four of the Watergate burglars were on the CIA payroll at the time of the break-in and that through CREEP Security Director James McCord, had infiltrated the burglary team. Senate Watergate Committee Chairman Sam Ervin stoutly refused to allow Baker and the Committee Republicans including Edward J. Gurney of Florida the right to publish a Minority Report which noted this stunning information regarding the CIA.

Nixon deeply distrusted the CIA because he knew that President Eisenhower had ordered the agency to give top secret briefings to both Nixon and Kennedy after both were the certain nominees of their parties. Nixon was sore that Kennedy utilized the information in their debates, attacking Nixon for being "soft" on communist Cuba, knowing full well that Nixon had chaired a working group as Vice President overseeing preparations for the "Bay of Pigs" invasion. Nixon, of course, could not reveal this upcoming attempt to topple Castro in the details.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  And just like that, we know what Watergate was really all about
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom    2023-01-14 14:14  

#7  #1 Akerman is still alive: "[He]began his job as a federal prosecutor after graduating. He was also a part of the Watergate prosecution team. Following that, he worked as an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York. During his tenure, he prosecuted several white-collar crimes, including bank fraud, stock fraud, financial fraud, and tax evasion. Furthermore, while in the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, he served as Assistant Special Watergate Prosecutor under Archibald Cox and Leon Jaworski.
He is currently a specialist in both criminal and civil applications.... Because of his fame, he appears on MSNBC on a regular basis, providing his thoughts and ideas on current national topics, many of which are delicate in nature.
Posted by: Slavising Unineting5672   2023-01-14 09:47  

#6  IIRC :the only indication JFK wanted out of Viet Nam is self-serving crap from Robert McNamara, post assassination
Posted by: Frank G   2023-01-14 09:00  

#5  Ref #3: Don't know about the Federal Reserve or MIC, but I'd be willing to bet our intelligence services knew considerably more about Oswald than has been released.

I'd offer the 9/11 bombers, Nadal Hasan, Tsarnaev bros, Clinton 'Home Brew' servers, Trump Towers signals monitoring, Fang Fang, 6 Jan, and the graphic in this comment as potential supporting evidence.
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-01-14 08:05  

#4  The Kennedy Assassination: Where Occam's Razor goes to die.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-01-14 07:46  

#3  Yes, it's most likely that the CIA assassinated Kennedy, because he wanted to issue United States Notes instead of having the Federal Reserve sell us our own money, and withdraw from Vietnam. Both of these were far, far too profitable to consider giving up.

Vietnam made a mint for the military-industrial complex and the Federal Reserve continues to rip us off today.
Posted by: Herman Hapsburg8987   2023-01-14 07:03  

#2  Given it will be 60 years this coming Nov. and we, the people, have yet to see ALL of the JFK Assassination evidence. Despite a mandatory public release date of many years ago.

Who wouldn't suspect there is DC SWAMP Treasonous incriminating evidence is being hidden from the public.

Heck, we know the Vietnam War, which JFK did not support, made certain people and companies $$ billions.
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-01-14 06:47  

#1  Nixon's departure from office is important today for what reason? Could it be the same reason that Biden appears to face removal of office today ?

Joe Biden and the 'Crime Family' know far too much, and they have a classified document paper trail to back it up.

The project is being terminated. Trump is gone. The Bidens have outlived their usefulness to the Deep State and must now go.

“History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme.”
~ Mark Twain

Posted by: Besoeker   2023-01-14 01:27  

00:00