| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Great Cultural Revolution |
| Protesters Allowed Outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Home After Assassination Threat |
| 2022-06-10 |
| [Breitbart] The Justice Department appears to still be allowing protesters to gather outside of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home even after police arrested a man who allegedly intended to assassinate him. Video on Wednesday showed protesters marching in front of the justice’s home shouting pro-abortion slogans. The protesters also made their way over to Chief Justice John Roberts’ home as well. Police arrested California resident Nicholas John Roske, 26, near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s house in Maryland on Wednesday after he had allegedly traveled there to murder the sitting judge to protect Roe v. Wade. “A California man carrying at least one weapon near Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Maryland home has been taken into custody by police after telling officers he wanted to kill the Supreme Court justice,” reported the Washington Post. On Wednesday, the Democrat-led U.S. House stalled a bipartisan bill that would increase security for sitting U.S. Supreme Court justices. “If these reports are correct, an assassination attempt against a sitting justice, or something close to it,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said on the floor. “This is exactly the kind of event that many feared that terrible breach of the Court’s rules and norms could fuel.” |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #9 I see what you did there, Canuckistan sniper. ;-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2022-06-10 20:53 |
| #8 Protesters everywhere!!! I can think of at least 308 ways of getting rid of them. |
| Posted by: Canuckistan sniper 2022-06-10 19:02 |
| #7 ^Correct. Not surprising given that this Junta was born in illegality beginning with the election. Nothing about is legitimate. We will see what the midterms hold. |
| Posted by: Rex Mundi 2022-06-10 14:32 |
| #6 I think federal law makes it illegal to protest in from of a Judges home ( 18 U.S.C. § 1507 ), and makes it a crime by law enforcement to fail to protect the rights of those to be protected, (18 U.S.C. § 242). If I read these statues correctly, failure to act to enforce the law it itself a criminal? |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2022-06-10 12:23 |
| #5 ^ What? Be consistent? Surely you jest? |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-06-10 09:40 |
| #4 Shouldn't they stay as far away as they wanted anti-abortionist to stay away from their clinics? /rhet question |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-06-10 09:28 |
| #3 It is time to start treating the establishment pukes who allow this as domestic enemies. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2022-06-10 09:20 |
| #2 If Republicans do the same thing, the DOF, FBI and other LEOs will throw the book at them, while they do nothing against the liberals. Our justice system is seriously screwed. These guys sworn to defend the constitutions against all enemies of the USA, both foreign and domestic. But they are aiding and abetting the enemies instead. |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2022-06-10 07:02 |
| #1 If Republicans don't do the same they will loose. |
| Posted by: Kofi Panda2845 2022-06-10 00:45 |