You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Bottomless pit
2022-04-29
[AirForceMag] The manned fighter aircraft that will form the centerpiece of the Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance program will cost hundreds of millions of dollars per plane, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall told members of Congress on April 27—but the service can reduce costs in development and sustainment.

Speaking before the House Armed Services Committee on the fiscal 2023 budget request, Kendall specified that the main NGAD fighter would cost "multiple hundreds of millions of dollars ... on an individual basis," acknowledging that such a price tag "is a number that’s going to get your attention."
And, that's before the cost overruns start...
By comparison, the F-22 cost roughly $135 million per tail, making it the most expensive fighter the U.S. Air Force has ever developed. The F-35A, meanwhile, costs around $80 million per jet, but that number could rise.

NGAD, according to Kendall’s estimate, will dwarf those costs, at least when it comes to price per plane. But the sixth-generation platform will fulfill a key air dominance role, Kendall noted.

"It’s going to be an expensive airplane; F-22 was an expensive airplane. It was one of my aircraft in one of my earlier positions, but it’s also an incredibly effective aircraft. It’s been dominant in the air for decades now. And we expect NGAD to be the same," Kendall said.

With such a massive cost per plane, though, work will have to be done in other areas to keep the program’s overall cost down.
Posted by:M. Murcek

#4  Chuck Yeager had an opinion on such things. My opinion is drone swarms will become a thing. Countermeasure for swarms is to attack command and control. Countermeasure to that is drone autonomy. That begets the singularity. Sky Net wins in the end.
Posted by: Lowspark   2022-04-29 14:08  

#3  ...Some years ago, there was a novel - the name escapes me - that featured a future war in 2020. One of the stars was a combat plane called BLUE LIGHT.

It was so expensive - and nobody knew HOW expensive, because everything about it was classified, including its budget - that the military could only afford 12. On the other hand, they were invisible and invincible.

NGAD had better be both of those things.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2022-04-29 13:24  

#2  drones w laser that can kill a tank or a missile

each

probably $5M by 2030

making them stealthy probably quintuple the cost but still relatively cheap

range would still be an issue however
Posted by: Lord Garth   2022-04-29 12:02  

#1  Somehow, having ten really qualitative aircraft against 400 lesser ones still seems foolish.

Somewhere in my WWII history recollection, I recall the quote from Stalin. "Quantity has a quality of its own". Stalin was really fond of this bit of Hegelian wisdom, somewhat bastardized by Engels and completely watered down by Lenin.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2022-04-29 11:49  

00:00