[ZeroHedge] At this point, it probably shouldn't come as a surprise that the Biden Administration plan to provide COVID-19 booster shots before the FDA even has a chance to sign off isn't actually based on any actual "science". And some of the mainstream scientists are starting to speak up about it, opening themselves up to the possibility that their posts might be purged by Big Tech "misinformation" censors.
Just as new data show that young people are at heightened risk for rare side effects like heart inflammation (with the Moderna jab carrying a higher risk), scientists are claiming that the push for boosters represents a rush to judgment, since it's still unclear whether the waning protection against 'breakthrough' infection also leaves patients more vulnerable to severe illness. While one might be tempted to assume that more infections means more hospitalizations and deaths, 'breakthrough' infections tend to be far milder, and only the most vulnerable patients are likely to be impacted severely.
Almost as surprisingly, a report about scientists' objections was published by Reuters, a mainstream media organization with a massive reach.
The frenetic push for vaccination betrays a sense of urgency. They can't keep this cat in the bag forever.
|