You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Stacey Abrams, Michelle Obama Push for Federal Election Takeover Legislation
2021-08-07
[Breitbart] Failed Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and former first lady Michelle Obama have teamed up to push for legislation to advance the federal takeover of elections, eliminating voter ID laws.

A new video from Abrams’ Fair Fight Action and Obama’s When We All Vote, a group created in 2018, was released Thursday and features Abrams and Obama pushing for legislation that would allow for the federal takeover of elections, saying "We’re working to change the future of this nation."

"Our democracy and our vote — the very foundation of this nation and the most powerful tools we have as citizens are under attack," Abrams said in the video, which runs nearly two minutes.

"Right now, dangerous legislation is being proposed across the country that limits the freedom to vote, cast our ballots, and have our votes counted," Obama said.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Using some Liberal Logic to make a point.

If you must have a Covid-19 Vaccine passport to roam semi-freely in far left control areas. Given to get a Covid-19 Vaccine injection you must have a State Approved ID. In order to verify you are the one getting the vaccine, so the correct name is listed on the Covid-19 Vaccine passport.

But since Liberals tell us with 100% certainty, Voter ID discriminates against only Black Americans which can't find an ID to vote.

Then aren't the liberals racially discriminating against Black Americans and hindering their ability to get vaccinated?
Posted by: Elmineque Bumble2550   2021-08-07 15:00  

#5  Is the reason for banning voter ID that it could require prohibited self-incrimination by criminals trying to vote? (And be blocked as racist under disparate impact doctrine?
Posted by: Glenmore    2021-08-07 11:56  

#4  Is the reason for banning voter ID that it could require prohibited self-incrimination by criminals trying to vote? (And be blocked as racist under disparate impact doctrine?
Posted by: Glenmore    2021-08-07 11:40  

#3  It would be a huge mistake to try Federalize election laws--in other words an institutionalization of rigging and cheating.

It's going to take a Constitutional change to bring that about.
Posted by: JohnQC   2021-08-07 11:10  

#2  

Are they dating now?
Posted by: NN2N1   2021-08-07 05:58  

#1  but WAIT! I thought there was nothing wrong with the 2020 election ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-08-07 05:19  

00:00