You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan Won’t Take Military Action against Afghan Taliban: Khan
2021-06-27
[ToloNews] Pakistain’s Prime Minister Imran Khan
...aka The Great Khan, who isn't your heaviest-duty thinker, maybe not even among the top five...
said on Friday that his country will not take military action against the Taliban
...Arabic for students...
if the group takes over Afghanistan by force.

Quoted in an article by The New York Times

...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...

, Khan said that "Pakistain will only recognize a government which is chosen by the people of Afghanistan, whichever government they choose."

"Let me assure you, we will do everything except use military action against the Taliban," Khan replied when asked what Pakistain would do if the Taliban took over Afghanistan by force. "I mean, we will do everything up to that. All sections of our society have decided that Pakistain will take no military action."

"Now, we are fencing it, and almost 90 percent of the border, we’ve fenced now," Khan said. "What if [the] Taliban try to take over Afghanistan through [the] military? Then we will seal the border because now we can, because we have fenced our border, which was previously [open], because Pakistain does not want to get into, number one, conflict, secondly, we do not want another influx of refugees."

Khan said that after the US withdrawal, he wished that Pakistain and the US could fix their "lopsided" equation of the past.

The remarks come as violence remains high in the country following a sharp rise in the Taliban’s offensives against government forces. Afghan forces retook the control of seven districts from the Taliban in three provinces in the last 24 hours.

The districts include Andkhoi and Khan Chahar Bagh in Faryab, Khinjan and Doshi in Baghlan, and Ahmad Aba, Mirzaka and Sayed Karam in Paktia, according to the Defense Ministry.

At the same time, sources said that three districts -- Khost Firing and Guzargah-e-Noor in Baghlan and Dolina in Ghor -- have fallen to the Taliban on Thursday and Friday.

Heavy fighting
... as opposed to the more usual name-calling or slapsy...
is underway between government forces and the Taliban in several areas in the country, particularly in the northern provinces of Baghlan, Kunduz, Faryab, and Sar-e-Pul
...a city and eponymous province in northern Afghanistan, population about 500,000. Demographically it is majority Tadjik and Uzbek. There are small Pashtun, Arab, and Hazara communities, of which the Hazaras mostly don't bother anyone...
where hundreds of locals have taken up arms to fight against the group in support of Afghan troops.
Related:
Imran Khan: 2021-06-24 Paris attacker linked to Mumbai 26/11 strikes reveals new documentary
Imran Khan: 2021-06-22 PM Imran Khan speaks over rising rape cases in country
Imran Khan: 2021-06-04 Pakistan to include APHC leaders in its global campaign on Kashmir
Posted by:trailing wife

#7  Taliban just wants Americans gone so they don't have to rely on ISI hospitality and can begin to consolidate political control, but ISI plants in the western think tanks and the fools at the â­” can't let that happen 'lest those horrible attacks be launched on America from Afghanistan'.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-06-27 13:27  

#6  While we know the ISI owns many on the shura council, and some Durranis in the government, the dynamic between Pak-Punjabis [most of the ISI bureaucracy] and pashtuns is marred by a linguistic-classist divide, distrust and disrespect. To them a pashtun is like a dog, best leashed and fed only a minimum.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-06-27 13:24  

#5  Afghan Taliban will sooner or later be independent of ISI control. Pakistan not only feeds the beast, it keeps it chained too; as many believe the shura or elder council and their families are actually hostages as well as guests in Quetta. That's because as long as there's a conflict, they have nowhere else to hide and the â­” won't transgress against beloved Islamabad. So the ISI wants there to remain a threat to taliban in Afghanistan. Also, without a visible threat of gunnies and turbans there remains no excuse to beg for aid, without which the jihad will be dependent on OIC largesse only.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-06-27 13:23  

#4  I have personally watched overhead footage of the TB walking the trails to and from Paki Frontier Corps Durand Line checkpoints and lodgements. Paki complicity, not exactly the world's best kept secret.

The US and the Paki's have a common friend, the Communist Chinese. So we take no action against the Paks.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-06-27 10:20  

#3  #1 Why? they're just a para-military extension of the Pak military. Professional courtesy.
Posted by Procopius2k


In a counter to the ISI version ... there also exists a Taliban that is a para-professional extension of the Afghan military that returns the favor to Pakistan.
Posted by: Tennessee   2021-06-27 10:13  

#2  Difficult to gain a victory in a conflict when a cross-border sanctuary harbors enemy combatants with impunity.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-06-27 08:30  

#1  Why? they're just a para-military extension of the Pak military. Professional courtesy.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-06-27 07:32  

00:01