#4 The Black Lives Matter thingy has actually given justification to theories of some of us who were always of the opinion that 'some lives matter more than others'. It drives home a point, with it's ill-advised caption. Make no mistake, it doesn't mean that 'black lives matter too!' It was always supposed to mean 'only black lives should matter!' In fact, across the world, minorities trapped in their recidivist cultures have blamed the rest of society for vilifying them and played race, color and caste cards to carve out dominions of primitive tribal control for themselves. Leeching increasingly considerate socialist states and reserving the right to submit to or reject the constitutions, these people thrive in the midst of otherwise modern societies; shitholes and body dumps next to residentials and malls. So do not think for a second this problem is known only to America, or about only skin color. It is about cultures featuring criminality and corruption assaulting cultures featuring civility and cooperation as standards.
The world is divided apparently into too diverse a menagerie of fauna to categorize each group accurately, but one thing is as obvious as the screen in your face. There are only two basic types. The ones on the side of civilization, and the ones standing in its way. Also evident, although denied by everyone, is the fact that not every life matters. If anyone says differently they are bloody liars. The Kurds, fighting alongside US troops against the daesh for instance, cease to matter when a NATO member slays them. Jews in Europe, valued by one administration, de-valued and targeted by goons of the next, in the same society. Christians, the bane of the progressive anime doll humpers and body modification aficionados, paid lip service to by rich charismatics, cheated by everyone and still hopeful. Bubba, the taxpaying 9 to 5er, with his bills and kids and urgent need of type B octagonal premium garden hose socket. To some, these are all expendable, even adversaries. When the time comes for cultures to clash so violently that some seek to supplant and exterminate or enslave others, it falls on the State to violently deter their progress.
Just whose life does matter then? Everyone will claim they deserve to survive over others. For example, to the criminal, only his/her life matters. To the muslim, only muslim lives matter. To every narrow minded, supremacist bastard in the world, only certain lives matter. Even to me, lives of servicemen and soldiers matter just a little bit more than the average ingrate yuppie. If the jihad, the intifads, ISIS, BLM, Antifa... have taught people something, it should be this: Some cultures espouse a pressing need to violently replace others. And the State that choose to not wipe them out completely, is failing the citizen, failing civilization itself.
In my view, the task of a responsible State is a) to correctly estimate just which citizens in the population are of a quality that is positively valued, b) to secure their lives, their dignity and progress, and c) to identify 'negatively valued' individuals and eliminate them.
Some societies have tried things like a merit point system to segregate society into groups, albeit with skewed criteria, which are then awarded a deservability based on their value. It can be modified further, by smarter men. Even those who choose to live secluded and non-committal existences not having much to do with society, need not be harassed for value. It must not be about extracting value from people, or rewarding some faux-patriotic poseurs, like communism demands. It must only be confined to identifying which are the ones taking away from shared value, the negatives. And exterminating as many as possible, for the betterment of humanity and for the sake of deterring de-civilizers. I'd like to mention again that race or color has nothing to do with it, only culture. The more modern the State, the more liberal and progressive, the more it is failing to deliver on its core responsibilities in treating all possible cultures with fairness. Unfair cultures deserve prejudiced treatment.
The world is actually going to come to an understanding sooner or later about this, and societies shall probably re-segregate, to hell with what Soros and his ilk want. The majorities of other nations will not let 'diversity' be officially raped into them. People will learn from America and emerge yet aggressively recalcitrant to empower their own 'minorities'. It may not be 'just', but it will be a natural reaction. Civilization always finds a way to survive, circumnavigating and even violently opposing idiots of the sort who think technology and legislation can conquer humanity and make it perform suicidally stupid actions. I believe that polite rationality and civility of the masses too will give way in the near future, after much economic harm and misery has been caused by the de-civilizers, the ones lobbying and struggling for chaos. If not America, then other societies will finally demonstrate the meaning of 'survival of the fittest' as against 'survival of the represented'. Only those lives will matter then, which majorities approves of.
Dron, you ass... go to sleep, you need it.
|