You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
When Trump Takes On the Military-Industrial Complex, He Echoes This Beloved American President
2020-09-10
[PJ] In a stunning and brave demonstration that he is just like everybody else in the establishment media, and a reliable company man in the nation’s foremost anti-Trump propaganda machine, CNN National Security Reporter Ryan Browne tweeted Monday: "In an unprecedented public attack by a sitting US president on the leadership of the US military, President Trump has accused US military leaders of seeking to start wars to boost the profits of defense contractors."

Coming on the heels of the media outrage over the false claim that Trump termed American troops "losers," this is just another manifestation of a quadrennial spectacle: Leftists who loathe the military claiming to love and respect it. But Browne’s central claim was wrong: Trump’s remarks were not unprecedented, and indeed were following one of the most enduringly important statements by a president in modern times.

Trump said at a press conference Monday: "I’m not saying the military’s in love with me, but the soldiers are. The top people in the Pentagon probably aren’t, because they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy. But we’re getting out of the endless wars, you know how we’re doing."

In response to Ryan Browne’s tweet, many commenters pointed out that Trump’s words were hardly "unprecedented," as he was merely echoing an important warning from one of his predecessors, a man who was a general before he was a president: Dwight D. Eisenhower. As Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster discusses, in his farewell address on January 17, 1961, Eisenhower warned against the "military-industrial complex" — a warning that has too often been ignored.

Stung by this criticism, CNN’s Browne huffily responded: "Some folks really ought to read what President Eisenhower actually said in his farewell address. While they are both critical of the military industrial complex, nowhere does Eisenhower actually accuse military leaders of engaging in shooting wars to boost profits for firms."
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Call it what it is: The Swamp. And yes, Generals live in it too, especially flag rank awarded during 8 years of Obama and 8 years of Bush.
Posted by: Theager Borgia1057   2020-09-10 22:46  

#6  Yo, dat pic be rayciss..
Burn it!
Posted by: Daqueesha LaPercy Forkbeard4500   2020-09-10 12:58  

#5  Thanks, P2K. It's always good to be reminded of classic quotes like that.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-09-10 12:21  

#4  Thanks P2K, I was on the verge of posting your quote myself, but you beat me to it.

It's funny how that later part of Ike's statement is almost never mentioned.
Posted by: charger   2020-09-10 11:41  

#3  Well yeah. How else do they plan on getting jobs with defense contractors after they retire from the military?

Without the constant wars, our defense contractors would experience poverty and ruin. They need wars to create demand for their products. Imagine a BBQ grill manufacturer that had the power to make it summer all year long, how good that would be for sales. Same thing, basically.
Posted by: Muggsy Hapsburg5230   2020-09-10 11:15  

#2  Hey, Keith B., are you listening? (Well, in a way, yes, you are, lol.)
Posted by: Clem   2020-09-10 08:27  

#1  Don't forget what lines immediately followed in Eisenhower's address -

"Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite."
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-09-10 08:03  

00:00