Submit your comments on this article |
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather- |
Lancet formallly retracts HCQ study |
2020-06-05 |
[NBCNews] "It's not that the analysis itself was done wrong," Culver said. "It's just they don't have the data in that database to account for what they need to account for." "A first-year statistics major could tell you about major flaws in the design of the analysis." India's Study of HCQ:works very well as a prophylaxsis for health care workers from the abstract: [Indian Journal of Medical Research] Consumption of four or more maintenance doses of HCQ was associated with a significant decline in the odds of getting infected. IMO - a few minor flaws in the study but the significance of the findings outweigh them by far |
Posted by:lord garth |
#10 New England J of Medicine has retracted its hcq study. The study used as a data source the same sketchy company that the lancet study used but no formal statement from the NE J of M is available yet. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007621 |
Posted by: lord garth 2020-06-05 16:22 |
#9 the Oxford study on HCQ was for people already hospitalized other studies have also found hcq isn't the right treatment for those people hcq is, per the Yale study, the right treatment for outpatients, that is people who are positive and have mild symptoms - the point is to keep people from being hospitalized |
Posted by: lord garth 2020-06-05 15:13 |
#8 "It's just they don't have the data in that database to account for what they need to account for." I got yer data right here - lemme pull it outta my ass... |
Posted by: Raj 2020-06-05 12:57 |
#7 ^ Another hit job. Results were not due until July. They rushed this to coincide with the Lancet pulling its fraudulent paper. |
Posted by: Iblis 2020-06-05 12:26 |
#5 CDC boss apologizes for 'inadequate' race-based coronavirus data |
Posted by: Skidmark 2020-06-05 12:16 |
#4 Network newscasts skip major hydroxychloroquine report retractions, org says |
Posted by: Skidmark 2020-06-05 12:02 |
#3 Politicization of science and medicine? Can one not count on anything to be truthful> |
Posted by: JohnQC 2020-06-05 08:41 |
#2 There's an awful lot of fake-science used to make fake-news. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2020-06-05 03:18 |
#1 a dose-response relationship existed between frequency of exposure to HCQ and such reductions. The thing to look for when establishment fakes clinical trials. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-06-05 02:27 |