You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
EPA Looks At Suspending Ethanol Blending Requirement
2020-04-21
[Hot Air] I’m not sure how much this will matter now that we’re basically out of places to store all of the oil that we’re pumping, but it’s still worth looking this proposal over.

Last week we discussed the possible opportunity available to us if the EPA would agree to at least suspend the mandates of the Renewable Fuel Standard until the worst of the pandemic is behind us. Getting rid of it entirely would be preferable, but that would require congressional action that the Democrats would never agree to and it’s unclear if the President could be convinced to support the idea even if they did.

The good news (possibly) is that I wasn’t the only person suggesting the idea and the EPA seems to at least be willing to consider it. This could go a long way toward saving a lot of oil and gas industry jobs that are otherwise threatened if the refineries start shutting down to avoid bankruptcy. (The Hill)
Posted by:Besoeker

#16  Another argument, IIRC, was the amount of energy req'd to make ethanol...more than the ethanol itself would produce.

Yeah, that was simply to buy off the farm belt gang...probably Mansanto, too.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-21 16:46  

#15  Converting foodstuff to ethanol needs a better justification than buying votes in the Corn Belt.
Posted by: magpie   2020-04-21 16:19  

#14  EPA Looks At Suspending Ethanol Blending Requirement

It may will cost a bit more, but we have to do it.
Unleaded Snark O'The Day
Posted by: gorb   2020-04-21 14:48  

#13  Nope
Posted by: Frank G   2020-04-21 14:24  

#12  "Who needs oil? I ride the bus!"

(too obscure?)
Posted by: Raj   2020-04-21 13:51  

#11  Repurpose as hand cleaner.
Posted by: KBK   2020-04-21 12:59  

#10  /\ "...like converting coal."
Posted by: magpie   2020-04-21 12:36  

#9  The original purpose was part of the Energy Independence Programs of the 1970s as a result of the Oil Embargo and the fact that we were still heavily engaged in the Cold War. They were also looking into programs like converting goal...

Why we kept it? Corruption...
Posted by: magpie   2020-04-21 12:35  

#8  I think the original purpose of the ethanol mandate was to get votes in Iowa.

However, we have just finished the Iowa caucuses and won't have them again for four years...so now is the time.
Posted by: Tom   2020-04-21 11:37  

#7  That will help tortilla prices south of the border.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-21 11:16  

#6  Glad I have a Diesel.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2020-04-21 11:12  

#5  Call me when they actually do it.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2020-04-21 09:34  

#4  Please. Ruins engines and there is no need for this shit.
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-04-21 09:17  

#3  Huge for the farmers around here. Maybe they'd go back to sweetcorn or field (feed) corn.

The latter would lower meat prices a bit.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2020-04-21 08:22  

#2  the real purposes of the ethanol requirement included virtue signaling but to the ag community this was always just a back door subsidy to corn producers
Posted by: lord garth   2020-04-21 07:25  

#1  Remind me again, what was the original purpose of the ethanol additive, and how many years have we now led the world in oil production ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-21 07:18  

00:00