You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
‘Frozen by paralysis of analysis': Obama administration botched response to election meddling from Russia, senators say
2020-02-07
[Washington Examiner] The Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report on Thursday, criticizing the Obama administration for being unprepared to combat Russia’s election interference in 2016 and for fumbling the response.

The committee’s 54-page heavily redacted report, the third installment in the committee’s investigation into the Kremlin’s foreign influence campaign in 2016, "found the U.S. government was not well-postured to counter Russian election interference activity with a full range of readily-available policy options."

The report said that, while high-level warnings were delivered to Russian officials, "those warnings may or may not have tempered Moscow’s activity" and "Russia continued disseminating stolen emails, conducting social media-based influence operations, and working to access state voting infrastructure through Election Day 2016."

Republican Chairman Richard Burr of North Carolina said, "After discovering the existence, if not the full scope, of Russia’s election interference efforts in late-2016, the Obama administration struggled to determine the appropriate response. Frozen by ’paralysis of analysis,’ hamstrung by constraints both real and perceived, Obama officials debated courses of action without truly taking one."

Added Democratic Vice Chairman Mark Warner of Virginia: "There were many flaws with the U.S. response to the 2016 attack, but it’s worth noting that many of those were due to problems with our own system ‐ problems that can and should be corrected."
"Systems problems and errors"...Non unlike the DOJ inspector general finding 17 'significant errors or omissions' in Carter Page FISA applications Ok, I get it now.
The report found that the Obama administration "was constrained in its response by a number of external and internal concerns," including that "public warnings would themselves undermine confidence in the election."

The Obama administration treated cyber and geopolitical aspects of the Russian active measures campaign as separate issues, the committee said. "This bifurcated approach may have prevented the Administration from understanding the full extent of the threat Russia posed, limiting its ability to respond."
Posted by:Besoeker

#10  ^Boy, am I glad to live in a country where you have to show an I.D. before you can vote - with a paper ballot.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-07 12:23  

#9  Let me see if I got it right.
Several hundred facebook posts originating in Russia - massive election interference.
Several million illegals and dead people voting - business as usual.


Yes, g(r)omgoru, I understand your confusion. But with Democrats, it is indeed business as usual.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-02-07 11:37  

#8  Never let a crisis go to waste.

I'm not saying that Zero and his scum started the Russian "interference" but they sure as hell loved it and tried to make use of it.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-02-07 08:35  

#7  criticizing the Obama administration for being unprepared unwilling to combat Russia’s election interference in 2016 and for fumbling the response.

Far more accurate, yes?
Posted by: Raj   2020-02-07 08:27  

#6  Having worked with Russians several times, I consider all this Russian bashing - Racist!
Posted by: 3dc   2020-02-07 07:01  

#5  sorry, change to 500 MILLION DOLLARS on ads.

The 1:1,000 ratio is still correct.

Russia's influence on any US election outcome is non-existent. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Nichego.
Posted by: Lex   2020-02-07 01:37  

#4  Complete, total, utter, Shitshow, grom.

Russia spent - what, $600,000 on FB ads?

And our own home-grown biznessman/oligarch is spending -- get this -- 500 BILLION DOLLARS on ads! And we're not even talking about the general election! This is just for the primaries.

And these sh!theads are telling us that Russia's little bucket of ad spend, in the ocean of money that is FB ad spend-- these maroons are telling us that this sum which is ONE ONE-THOUSANDTH of what ONE US CANDIDATE is going to spend on THE PRIMARIES ALONE -- that this trivial effort somehow swung the election?

Are these people retarded?
Posted by: Lex   2020-02-07 01:35  

#3  Let me see if I got it right.
Several hundred facebook posts originating in Russia - massive election interference.
Several million illegals and dead people voting - business as usual.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-02-07 01:30  

#2  the problem with Obama admin acting to stop Russian interference was that it interfered with their 'there are no problems with illegal voting' narrative
Posted by: lord garth   2020-02-07 00:45  

#1  Frozen by ’paralysis of analysis,’ hamstrung by constraints both real and perceived, Obama officials debated courses of action without truly taking one."

"Debated courses of action" ....whilst skillfully integrating the existing Russian threat into Christopher Steele's 'Trump-Russian hoax' scenario.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-02-07 00:30  

00:00