You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Warren submits question to chief justice asking about his 'legitimacy'
2020-01-31
Sen. Elizabeth Warren questioned the legitimacy of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts presiding over President Trump's Senate impeachment trial.

Roberts read the Massachusetts Democrat's question, which asked, "At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial In which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

[Video HERE]

The Senate is fighting over whether to call witnesses, and some Senate Democrats argue that Roberts could step in and be the final arbiter in case of a tie vote. Most senators, however, do not want him to break a tie, and there is no modern precedent for him to do so.

Lead House impeachment manager Adam Schiff disagreed with Warren's contention about Roberts, responding in part, "I would not say that it contributes to a loss of confidence in the chief justice. I think the chief justice has presided admirably."

He added, "This trial is part of our constitutional heritage, that we were given a power to impeach the president. I don't think a trial without witnesses reflects adversely on the chief justice. I do think it reflects adversely on us. I think it diminishes the power of this example to the rest of the world."


Posted by:Anomalous Sources

#9  Warren submits question to chief justice asking about his 'legitimacy'

well, to be fair, ever since his ACA contorsions, many have questioned his parentage
Posted by: Mercutio   2020-01-31 13:51  

#8  My already low opinion of Roberts was lowered further when I saw this. He was obviously screening Republican questions but read this one out loud without looking at it first. What a maroon.

Aside: to answer g(r)om's confusion, I think #2 was meant to read "...more than me..." Preview is your friend.
Posted by: PBMcL   2020-01-31 13:19  

#7  In other news: Babylon Bee goes out of existence, can't compete with Elizabeth Warren.
Posted by: Tom   2020-01-31 12:38  

#6  #2 ?????
Posted by: g(r)omgoru PB   2020-01-31 11:30  

#5  ^ That's the Shitshow, Jake
Posted by: Lex   2020-01-31 11:16  

#4  Fake Cherokee Indian questions Supreme Court Justice's 'legitimacy?'

This really has become some sort of parallel universe.

Posted by: Besoeker   2020-01-31 11:10  

#3  Roberts has no balls whatsoever - I would've hit her on the spot with a contempt / censure motion at the very least.
Posted by: Raj   2020-01-31 10:28  

#2  you believe me than me then grom
Posted by: Chris   2020-01-31 09:56  

#1  I believe 1/1024 of everything Warren says.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-01-31 02:53  

00:00