You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Moving to Chicago sure upped Boeing's game...
2019-12-21
[SpaceDaily] Cape Canaveral - "We do have an off-nominal orbit insertion," says Steve Siceloff, a Boeing spokesperson at mission control has reported on NASA TV from in Houston. "We have spacecraft control. Guidance and control teams are assessing their next maneuvers. Spacecraft batteries are good, and the spacecraft is in a stable orbit."

Boeing had launched its Starliner capsule successfully on Friday onboard a ULA Atlas 5 for a crewless eight-day journey to the International Space Station and back as a dry run for NASA's plans to end US dependence on Russia for space rides
Posted by:M. Murcek

#14  As I said in the other thread. They are an engineering company or a company that wants to be where Bath House runs. It really can't be both.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 17:17  

#13  The boost by the Atlas was near perfect. It was the Starliner thruster onboard sequencing that STB.

Once again, bad code from Boeing.
Posted by: The peanut gallery   2019-12-21 17:09  

#12  And I'm sure everyone is in a hurry to ride this...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 15:32  

#11  The "insertion burns" were handled by the clock on the "payload" #2, so it wasn't the "Atlas rocket" that failed. K?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 13:33  

#10  Apollo guidance computer
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 12:42  

#9  Or they could do a software retro-fit. Like with the 737 MAX.
Oh wait
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-21 12:40  

#8  Of course, Boeing is still trying to wring money out of F-15(X) so their corporate culture sort of makes a tell there.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 12:13  

#7  Much as some people hate it, SLS and Vulcan will make or break Boeing and ULA.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 12:11  

#6  BTW a side point. Boeing designed the capsule to be able to be launched on an Atlas, Vulcan or F9. So if they need to do a bunch of cheap testing they could use end of life F9 boosters.
Posted by: 3dc   2019-12-21 11:55  

#5  Ah, but how is their diversity program? That's the important bit.
Posted by: James   2019-12-21 11:29  

#4  The notion that corporate culture at the head office has no effect on product is peculiar.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-12-21 11:11  

#3  ...their 'new' commercial airlines certainly is crashing the market, so to speak.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-21 09:32  

#2  So the Atlas rocket failed and the payload is at fault because Boeing moved some offices to Chicago? OK, I get it.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2019-12-21 07:45  

#1  Sort of in the Signs and Portents region of management malfeasance failures.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-21 07:33  

00:00