Submit your comments on this article |
Government |
Army Publishes 16-Year Modernization Plan to Outpace China With New Battle Concept |
2019-11-06 |
[Epoch Times] As the U.S. Army hunkered down for the war on terror, phrases such as "counter-insurgency" and "IEDs" became familiar to most Americans, along with the "shock and awe" introduced during the earlier Gulf War. But now, if Army modernizers have read the runes right, two new phrases are set to dominate the future of U.S. warfare: "Multi-Domain Operations" and "Great Power Competition." Those ideas lie at the heart of the 16-year Army Modernization Strategy recently published by the newly-minted Army Futures Command. As the U.S. Army mastered the art of counter-insurgency in the dusty plains of Helmand Province and the streets of Baghdad’s Green Zone, and the world entered the age of the iPhone, China and Russia were working on ambitious strategies that harnessed the latest technology from the ground up. In the past 15 years, China quietly tripled its annual military spending to an estimated $200 billion, with a clear focus on leveraging the latest developments such as artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and hypersonic missiles to unbalance the U.S. military. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#20 I agree 100% we must cut China off at the knees. Kitai delenda est. |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-06 22:49 |
#19 Ah ok my apologies Albemarle! Rant on! Best, L. |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-06 22:47 |
#18 Are you commenting on my spelling error? |
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543 2019-11-06 22:23 |
#17 OMG. You are Lex. We have spoken before about Syria. I am surprised that you would think I am a bot. Or what? What are you suggesting? |
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543 2019-11-06 22:22 |
#16 I was commenting on Lex's post. I am a supporter of president Trump. I recall that he said he wanted to improve relations with Russia during the campaign. It was one of the reasons I voted for him. Do you still think I am a bot? Will you start calling me comrade? This Russia mania is ridiculous. We need to patch it up with Russia, as our brilliant POTUS suggested. We need to cut China off at the knees, economically. It is my fondest hope that he will do so. That will avoid a devastating conflict they are building to. Trump, much maligned, for world peace. |
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543 2019-11-06 22:17 |
#15 #11 Albemarle Gray: And our dear and beloved POTUS said reproachment with Russia during the campaign What's a "reproachment"? Are you a bot, or an ironic human, or...? |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-06 21:31 |
#14 Army could use an upgrade. Maybe Trump is the one who can pull it off. Or maybe we could just focus on war fighting skills even if that means less transgender sensitivity training? |
Posted by: Iblis 2019-11-06 20:15 |
#13 Will the debt hit us first, or China? As they say, if I owe the bank $100K - I have a problem. If I owe the bank $100M - the bank has a problem. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2019-11-06 12:04 |
#12 I don't see anything in the 16 year plan to deal with our real enemy climate change. |
Posted by: jpal 2019-11-06 12:00 |
#11 And our dear and beloved POTUS said reproachment with Russia during the campaign. Stable genius he is. Definitely a plan. Meanwhile we should limit or discontinue trade with China, to include parts sourced there and assembled elsewhere, until the trade imbalance is rectified. |
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543 2019-11-06 11:56 |
#10 Send our Global Grifter class to China. Keep our technology and supply chains out of Chinese hands. And find a rapprochement with Russia that enlists them in containing and suppressing China's rise. |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-06 11:38 |
#9 Cause 3 x 5-year-plan+1 is going to work so well... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2019-11-06 11:31 |
#8 And when that debt hits, there won't be money for 'modernization'. Will the debt hit us first, or China? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2019-11-06 11:27 |
#7 Step 1: Don't send $500 billion/year to China. Step 2: Don't send all US tech to China. Step 3: Don't leak all aspects of US tech and government to China. Step 3: Don't educate Chinese nationals on cutting edge US technology. Steps 5-NN become much easier. |
Posted by: Titus Pelosi2569 2019-11-06 11:00 |
#6 Is it wise to publish long range plans for your enemies to read? If it pushes them to Reaganize, then yes. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2019-11-06 10:09 |
#5 Is it wise to publish long range plans for your enemies to read? |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2019-11-06 10:01 |
#4 Time to play the Russia card vs China. |
Posted by: Lex 2019-11-06 09:55 |
#3 Army Modernization Strategy |
Posted by: Skidmark 2019-11-06 09:31 |
#2 There are always the cult of "World War II", the good war. Don't forget that about one third of millennials have been And when that debt hits, there won't be money for 'modernization'. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-11-06 08:10 |
#1 Forget the laborious POM (Program Operating Memorandum) process, simply send all the money you have or hope to have. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2019-11-06 07:59 |