You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Germany moved to deploy troops to Syria, proving US troops were never needed in the first place
2019-10-30
Why spend ourselves to death and risk the lives of our soldiers when others will step in? We were never needed in the first place.
Utter and total nonsense. The German soldiery does what it can with a will, but there is only so much that can be done when one lacks bullets, spare parts for vehicles, and adequate manpower. Then there are the work hours: unlike peace keeping, peace making is a 24/7 activity — the team cannot be required to only work 9-5, M-F with regular rest and meal breaks. Much as we respect them, there is no way the Germans could have done what we did... and the situation is not anywhere near ready for peace keeping like on the Israeli-Lebanese border.
[VoltaireNet] The German Defense Minister and President of the CDU, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, caught her partners and allies off-guard when, on 21 October 2019, she announced her intention to deploy an international military force in Syria. Her mentor, Chancellor Angela Merkel, was the only one in the loop and voiced immediate support.

Her tossed-off announcement gave rise to a flurry of questions: What would be its legal basis? Would it be an initiative of the European Union, NATO or the UN? Would it intercede between Turks and Kurds or between Turks and Syrians?

It would seem that after the Franco-German Defense and Security Council meeting of 16 October 2019, Germany decided to rekindle the old project outlined in the book New Power, New Responsibility. Elements of a German foreign and security policy for a changing world. As prescribed therein, NATO would entrust the management of Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa to the European Union under German leadership. This strategy was quietly embedded by Ursula von der Leyen in the 2016 White Paper on German Security Policy issued by the Bundeswehr. Closely associated with Angela Merkel, Ms. von der Leyen became president of the European Commission where her staff is heavily sprinkled with German nationals.

The proposal for military deployment in Syria was automatically rendered obsolete on the following day, 22 October 2019, with the sealing of the Russian-Turkish agreement. However, it denotes the will of some European elites to seize the imperial role which Washington is backing away from.
They're welcome to it. I look forward to protesting them the way they did to us.
Imperial role?? Someone is playing with funny chemicals again.

Related:
Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer: 2019-10-25 Germany to end anti-'Islamic State' mission in March
Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer: 2019-10-23 Angela Merkel backs plan for a 'safe zone' for migrants in northern Syria which could be enforced by German troops
Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer: 2019-01-13 Police in western Germany launch massive raids against criminal clans
Posted by:Herb McCoy

#12  Remember to always bring flowers when invading a country.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-10-30 16:19  

#11  Voltairenet started out with posting the wildest conspiracy theories about 9/11 ("no plane hit the Pentagon").

Btw I hope that Kramp-Karrenbauer won't be Merkel's successor. She's not up to the job.
Posted by: European Conservative   2019-10-30 14:37  

#10  Voltaire Network is run by that Anti-American lefty nutbag Thierry Meyssan.

And European Conservative, who not only served in the German military but has a son wearing the uniform, as I recall, agrees that it is nonsense. Please don’t submit pieces from this site anymore, Herb.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-10-30 13:45  

#9  Agree. Utter BS.
Posted by: European Conservative   2019-10-30 12:50  

#8  As prescribed therein, NATO would entrust the management of Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa to the European Union under German leadership

Sure. Sure, why the fuck not ?
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-10-30 12:38  

#7  Only the United States and Israel cause Middle East problems when troops cross borders. Got it.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2019-10-30 12:36  

#6  Maybe having troops in Syria will help with repatriation operations?

That'd be nice but I think we all know better.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2019-10-30 12:34  

#5  journalistic nonsense, YOU KNOW BULLSH&T!
Posted by: ranture   2019-10-30 12:21  

#4  Are the Germans up for this? I've heard that the Germany Army of today ranks around the same as the French Army of WWII.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2019-10-30 09:40  

#3  The Germans have a lot of Syrian "refugees" that don't appear to pass muster to stay. Maybe having troops in Syria will help with repatriation operations?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-10-30 08:15  

#2  surprising that anti-American nutbag sites are posted by UltraPatriotâ„¢ Herb McCoy
Posted by: Frank G   2019-10-30 05:26  

#1  Imperial role??

Voltaire Network is run by that Anti-American lefty nutbag Thierry Meyssan.
Posted by: Pancho Flerens6518   2019-10-30 02:52  

00:00