You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Mass Shootings: The Elephant in the Room
2019-08-07
[American Thinker] America desperately needs to have a conversation, and it’s very different than the one we have been having when reflecting on mass murders. Despite the hysteria that these events cause, there is no significant upwards trend. These crimes have been a part of the public sphere in the U.S. since the country’s inception. While most studies reflect the better-recorded data in the latter half of the 20th century, mass killings were just as prevalent in the 1920s and 30s, although the use of a firearm was less common.

Sometime in the last few decades, Americans have lost to ability to think rationally about mass killings. We are collectively trying to blame some other factor besides the individuals themselves. However, access to guns has never been cited as a reason for a mass shooting and mass killings share no correlation in ideology. No one political party, no one race or ethnicity, no one religion, etc. is a constant factor, but there are specific commonalities between mass shooters that are never widely discussed over the calls for gun control and party reform.

There are five stages that culminate in a perfect storm that leads to individuals committing these massacres (also known as the Levin & Madfis model). This is gravely important for our society to know, as identifying these factors can lead to prevention of these atrocities.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  We used to have serial killers: Son of Sam, the Night Stalker, John Wayne Gacy. Remember those guys? They aspired to get away with it. They were a lot more cunning and subtle but every bit as deadly.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2019-08-07 10:03  

#2  Early reporting is often inaccurate, and is overall plain harmful.

This is because "reporting" in the modern sense is not about documenting objective facts on the ground, it is about pushing "the narrative." If facts don't line up with the narrative, the facts are memory holed and the narrative is doubled down upon.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-08-07 09:43  

#1  Solid and useful thinking.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-08-07 08:02  

00:00