You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Folly of the Mueller Investigation
2019-04-09
[NR] A hysteria without a cause; a report without a point

The pointlessness of it all. That is the major takeaway from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s much-anticipated final report on the Trump/Russia probe.

After an exhaustive 22-month investigation, Mueller found that there was no criminal collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. This was already manifest to anyone who had closely followed the investigation ‐ anyone, that is, who had taken note that no predicate crime was specified when Mueller was appointed (the special-counsel regulations require one), or anyone who had read the indictments Mueller filed, which demonstrated that Russia’s operations predated Trump’s entry into the 2016 campaign, that some of them were actually anti-Trump in nature, and that Russia (which is notoriously adept at espionage) neither needed nor sought American collaborators. "There is no allegation," observed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in announcing charges against Russian operatives brought by the special counsel he had appointed, "that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity." Never was such an allegation even hinted at against the president, nor against any of his associates, a handful of whom were charged either with crimes that had nothing to do with the 2016 campaign or with process crimes (mostly lying to investigators) that were not committed until after the campaign was over.

Mueller was even arguably needed to answer only one question: Did President Trump obstruct justice? On that, Mueller abdicated, refusing to render a prosecutorial judgment. This dereliction of duty in his final act further elucidated that there was neither a legal basis nor a practical need for the appointment of a special counsel.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  He TWEETED!!! how can anyone say that isn't obstruction!!!
Posted by: Lefty Brady   2019-04-09 15:21  

#5  Why did neither Mueller nor Rosenstein issue an interim report? That would have enabled Trump to govern without a cloud of suspicion that he might be a clandestine agent of Russia,

HA! Even after the report, there is still a coven of Dems and Trump-haters who still want to cloud the POTUS ability to govern.
Posted by: Bobby   2019-04-09 15:09  

#4  Ref #2: Yes, he along with the crooked media,'ran out the clock' on the election, the Hildebeest, Obama, and Brennan. They knew all along there was no picking Christopher Steele up from the clean end. Same goes for Bruce and Nellie Ohr and the numerous upper echelon crooks at the Bureau.

Mueller loaded his staff with democrats. That was the early tip off.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-04-09 14:34  

#3  bury him up to his neck in a fire ant mound
Posted by: 746   2019-04-09 14:30  

#2  He dragged it out long enough to give ammo for the Socialists to take over the House. He could have wrapped this all up last September. No folly. Not the most effective tool to take out the winner of the 2016 presidential election, but enough to hinder his work.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-04-09 14:15  

#1  To obstruct an investigation, there has to be an underlying crime. Ipso facto, if there was no conclusion, there was no obstruction.

If on the other hand, they found collusion, they would have grounds for obstruction.

No crime no obstruction.

Everyone in Washington on both sides of the aisle wanted Comey fired. It as recommended by the DOJ IG and Rosenstein himself (no fan of Trump as we know.

So where's the beef...the entire democratic party needs a prescription for Chlorpromazine.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2019-04-09 14:13  

00:00