You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Self-Driving Cars Are Racist
2019-03-11
[Moonbattery] Some people have a hard time finding racism against persons of politically preferred pigmentation. Others see it everywhere. Even pollen is racist. Even self-driving cars. From the Independent:
Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology found that state-of-the-art detection systems, such as the sensors and cameras used in self-driving cars, are better at detecting people with lighter skin tones.
The researchers say this could make self-driving cars more likely to run over black people.
Tests on eight image-recognition systems found this bias held true, with their accuracy proving five per cent less accurate on average for people with darker skin.
Good thing every corner of our culture is obsessed with finding evidence that blacks really are oppressed. Otherwise, such a study might not have been undertaken.

A company that can correct its image-recognition system so that cars are more likely to run over white people might find a ready customer in Volvo, which is prone to using technology for virtue-signaling.

On tips from Varla and Lyle.
Posted by:Besoeker

#14  #12 RJ has it!
Posted by: Frank G   2019-03-11 21:23  

#13  They should smile more.
Posted by: Voldemort Jase6572   2019-03-11 20:02  

#12  They are simply building the case to get rid of cars and the freedom they represent. In the future it will be trains and bicycles to get you were your socialist masters allow you to go.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2019-03-11 17:20  

#11  How Automated Tools Discriminate Against Black Language
Posted by: Skidmark   2019-03-11 16:26  

#10  Use lidar and they'll say that the cars are against thin people or ghosts.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2019-03-11 16:17  

#9  Sorry, somehow posted to the wrong thread.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2019-03-11 15:06  

#8  I agree. Any living person the once owned slaves themselves should pay reparations to and living former slaves.
Their descendants? no.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2019-03-11 14:59  

#7  Since crossing the road can be hard
When you're careless or dark or ill-starred,
New law: Stop and ferry
Across all who carry
This high-visibility card!
Posted by: Slavish Clomogum8311   2019-03-11 14:35  

#6  And doesn't this issue shade nicely into the traditional lower compliance of less-beige folks with pedestrian traffic laws? Gotta be a whole lotta lawyers out there mumbling, "Shaddup, shaddup, shaddup already!"
Posted by: Grampaw Thrang7829   2019-03-11 13:57  

#5  ".... Because it's racist, because it's racist, everything's going to be racist bye and bye..."
Posted by: Snavimble Bucket1794   2019-03-11 12:15  

#4  You could put pedestrian overpasses at every intersection. Making Jevarius and Keesha climb steps is rayciss though, so that won't work...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-03-11 12:02  

#3  the sensors and cameras used in self-driving cars, are better at detecting people with lighter skin tones high contrast objects.

An obvious technical fix to to genetically modify dark-skinned people to glow in the dark.
Posted by: SteveS   2019-03-11 11:56  

#2  Okay, the current method for doing AI is by doing a lot of training sets (it's why China caches all the conversations and texts of its citizens, and why Google/Alphabet keeps Alexa active, even if you tell it to shut up: doing so generates huge amounts of training sets).

If the researchers only had to use one data set to figure out there was an issue with detecting "people of darker hue", then the training sets need to be expanded.

Bug found. Bug needs to be solved.
Posted by: Ptah   2019-03-11 11:49  

#1  
Posted by: DarthVader   2019-03-11 11:09  

00:00