| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| "Managing Russia's dissolution" - neocons want to destroy Russia and break it up |
| 2019-01-20 |
| [TheHill] Russia has failed to develop into a nation state with a strong ethnic or civic identity. It remains an imperial construct due to its Tsarist and Soviet heritage. The unwieldy Russian Federation consists of 85 "federal subjects," of which 22 are republics representing non-Russian ethnicities, including the North Caucasus and Middle Volga, and numerous regions with distinct identities that feel increasingly estranged from Moscow. Instead of pursuing decentralization to accommodate regional aspirations, the Kremlin is downgrading their autonomy. This is evident in the new language law designed to promote "Russification" and plans to merge and eliminate several regions. Pressure is mounting across the country, with growing anger at local governors appointed by the Kremlin and resentment that Moscow appropriates their resources. Indeed, regions such as Sakha and Magadan in the far east, with their substantial mineral wealth, could be successful states without Moscow’s exploitation. Given Russia’s ailments, an assertive Western approach would be more effective than reactive defense. Washington needs to return to core principles that accompanied the collapse of the Soviet Union by supporting democratization, pluralism, minority rights, genuine federalism, decentralization and regional self-determination among Russia’s disparate regions and ethnic groups. Isn't that what they accuse Russia of doing to us? The rationale for dissolution should be logically framed: In order to survive, Russia needs a federal democracy and a robust economy; with no democratization on the horizon and economic conditions deteriorating, the federal structure will become increasingly ungovernable. To manage the process of dissolution and lessen the likelihood of conflict that spills over state borders, the West needs to establish links with Russia’s diverse regions and promote their peaceful transition toward statehood. NATO should prepare contingencies for both the dangers and the opportunities that Russia’s fragmentation will present. In particular, Moscow’s European neighbors must be provided with sufficient security to shield themselves from the most destabilizing scenarios while preparations are made for engaging with emerging post-Russia entities. Some regions could join countries such as Finland, Ukraine, China and Japan, from whom Moscow has forcefully appropriated territories in the past. Other republics in the North Caucasus, Middle Volga, Siberia and the far east could become fully independent states and forge relations with China, Japan, the U.S. and Europe. Neglecting Russia’s dissolution may prove more damaging to Western interests than making preparations to manage its international repercussions. To avoid sudden geopolitical jolts and possible military confrontations, Washington needs to monitor and encourage a peaceful rupture and establish links with emerging entities. |
| Posted by: Herb McCoy |
| #7 Nah, but let's do this to California, New York and Illinois. |
| Posted by: charger 2019-01-20 18:58 |
| #6 The rational could easily be applied to a few western states. |
| Posted by: ruprecht 2019-01-20 11:53 |
| #5 The dream of the globalist neo-cons. It is much easier to divide and conquer for their purposes. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2019-01-20 10:42 |
| #4 They'll collapse economically and demographically. Let them |
| Posted by: Frank G 2019-01-20 09:24 |
| #3 The Neo-Cons never miss an opportunity to attack the wrong enemy. |
| Posted by: BrujoTejano 2019-01-20 09:10 |
| #2 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? - Matthew 7:3 |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-01-20 08:33 |
| #1 Making friends & influencing people. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-01-20 05:41 |