You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Survey Reveals US Forces’ Thoughts On Current Military Policies
2019-01-06
[ToloNews] A survey by a US magazine shows that a big majority of US service members and veterans believe the "occupations" of Afghanistan and Iraq have lasted long enough, but they still support the ongoing war on terror raging since October 2001.

Smithsonian Magazine conducted a survey of 922 veterans and 109 active duty military personnel last Veteran’s Days with the help of the Stars and Stripes newspaper and George Mason University.

Analysts asked the troops and veterans to respond to questions about national security and the military.

Smithsonian Magazine reports that after more than 17 years of the war on terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, 84 percent of the 1,031 service members and veterans surveyed agreed that the "occupations" have "been going on too long."

"As far as we know, this survey was the first one to pose that question to current and former service members," the magazine notes in its January edition.

"Their frustration is significant because they also voiced strong support for the war on terror generally, with 83 percent saying it should continue," it adds.

The results echo the Afghanistan war weariness expressed by overall Americans in a survey published by the Pew Research Center last October.

Smithsonian Magazine also reports that nearly a third of US troops and veterans believe rival powers (36 percent) and terrorist organizations (38 percent) are a major national security threat. The rest believe rogue nations (18 percent) and criminal groups (8 percent) are the top menaces facing the American homeland.

A recent study by Brown University’s Costs of War Project reveals that the war on terror has killed between 479,858 and 507,236 people in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistain, including at least 6,951 American troops.

There have been an estimated 147,124 deaths in Afghanistan, 64,942 in Pakistain, as well as between 267,792 and 295,170 in Iraq, the study shows.

According to the report, the post-9/11 wars have imposed a profound human cost on Americans: "Nearly 7,000 US" military fatalities and "more than 53,700" injuries."

The war in Afghanistan has reportedly killed an estimated 2,272 American troops and left 20,412 maimed while the conflict in Iraq has resulted in the death of at least 4,483 others and injury of 32,253, the most recent Pentagon figures show.

In 2017, the Brown University study found that by the end of 2018, the United States was scheduled to have spent nearly $6 trillion on government-wide costs of the war on terror since 2001.

The estimated cost amounts to about $23,386 per individual American taxpayer, which is more than three times the amount ($7,740) calculated by the Pentagon.

US President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
’s administration has intensified efforts to convince the Taliban
...Arabic for students...
to engage in peace negotiations with the Afghan government, making the "political reconciliation" between the two parties the primary goal of its strategy to end the more than 17-year-old war.

In Iraq, however, there are no plans to withdraw the nearly 5,000 American troops fighting ISIS. The Trump administration has announced plans to pull out from Syria.

The Trump administration has denied reports of a US military withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The report was originally published on www.breitbart.com. Changes have been brought to this copy for style purposes.
Posted by:trailing wife

#3  As satisfying as the "glass parking lot" scenario is to contemplate, it's impossible to kill an idea. Better them that get too big for their britches get mad an example of early. From a great distance. Thinking TLAM or such...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-01-06 07:15  

#2  Churchill wrote these words in 1897:

To Churchill’s mind, these Talibs were, together with other local priestly figures such as the mullahs and fakirs, primarily responsible for the wretched condition of the local Afghan tribesfolk and their violent indisposition to foreign rule. Churchill viewed them “as degraded a race as any on the fringe of humanity: fierce as a tiger, but less cleanly; as dangerous, not so graceful”. He blamed the Talibs for the Afghans’ lamentable absence of civilised development, keeping them in the “grip of miserable superstition”. Churchill was particularly repelled by the Talibs’ loose moral conduct. They lived free at the expense of the people and, “more than this, they enjoy a sort of “droit du seigneur,” and no man’s wife or daughter is safe from them. Of some of their manners and morals it is impossible to write.”
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-01-06 02:59  

#1  Time to pull back.

18 YEARS.

If the job has not been completed in 18 years, then the job will never be completed.

So declare victory and start pulling out. God knows we have massive unmet needs at home.
Posted by: Lex   2019-01-06 01:39  

00:00