You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
On Mattis
2018-12-26
[CDRSalamander] First of all, this Christmas Eve, regardless of your confession I wish all peace and happiness.

As we are all busy, I'll just cut to the chase.

Last Thursday I offered a few points on Syria, and I guess I should make a few points about Secretary Mattis's departure as well.

Slightly modified from some comments I made SEPCOR, here is the Executive Summary:

We're all going to be just fine. I've been a Mattis guy since 2001, but SECDEF is a position for a politician, not a Field Marshall. Even though I have 100% trust in him for any position he may find himself in, Mattis was never quite well suited for the position of SECDEF as it was designed. He had to get a waiver for a reason. I am still a Mattis guy and I wish him well.

As for who should replace him, anyone who can get a nod from the Senate and will continue to promote what Trump has been doing and I have been honking about since Bush43:

(1) decouple from being the world's policeman,

(2) get our NATO allies to pull their fair share of the load. 2% isn't exactly asking for a lot.



Again, we're fine.

- We are mostly in the Middle East due to strategic inertia and to tidy up problems generally of our own creation. We don't need their oil anymore.

- While our debt issues are huge, we are in better shape than any other major nation on the planet. When the music stops, the world will groan, but we will hurt less than almost anyone else.

- We feed ourselves.

- Our entire hemisphere is of zero threat to us.

- The only real global challenger we have will be China and we have absolutely ZERO reason to have a land dispute with them on mainland Asia. Any conflict will - if we are smart about it - be mostly an air and sea conflict for us, with any land force hopefully limited to islands.

What we don't need is an expanded universe of nations and regions we are garrisoning in order to secure their peace at the cost of increasing the threat of possible war for us over things that are none of our business.

Specifically WRT Syria, I've said it a hundred and I'll say it a million times; if it were so important to secure - the area of the West most negatively impacted by the Syrian civil war would have a string of divisions lining the eastern banks of the Euphrates - the Europeans. You see a sprinkling of French there (the former colonial power), but that is about it.

It is only our circus and our monkeys
So, it appears the good O-5/6 knows a little about Polish aphorisms.
if we stay long enough. Time to go. If we need to come back and break more things and kill more people for a few months, then fine - we'll do it.

I can argue the other side of the argument as well ... but I frankly don't care to any more. I save that energy for IRQ and AFG.
Posted by:Anomalous Sources

#7  The only reason we are in Syria is because the empty suit had to save face after weenying out of his red line.

That and kill Baghdadi

The Middle East is the Middle East and a tar baby of apocalyptic proportions. We should just stay the hell out and just trim up our balance of payments by selling them anything and everything they need to kill each other.

The best way to stop all of the ME nonsense is to knock the spot price of oil to about $45 a barrel and all of the will go broke and back to living in tents and camel racing. You would see a lot of ME economies just collapse.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2018-12-26 18:21  

#6  There is an existential threat at our porous southern border of terrorists, human smuggling and drugs.
That threat originated from within, from the large fraction of the electorate willing to abandon national sovereignty for stupid reasons, led by the globalists. In addition the Postal Service subsidizes the mailing of fentanyl and carfentanil from China. Who's to blame for that?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2018-12-26 16:13  

#5  Amen Lex.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-12-26 14:31  

#4  The only real global challenger we have will be China and we have absolutely ZERO reason to have a land dispute with them on mainland Asia. Any conflict will - if we are smart about it - be mostly an air and sea conflict for us, with any land force hopefully limited to islands.

Bingo. All problems unrelated to China - Syria, Iraq/Afg, Ukraine etc - need to be viewed as REGIONAL disputes that require regional solutions involving local or regional powers. Our involvement in these solutions needs to be first and foremost diplomatic, with occasional insertions of air power and other forms of "offshore balancing."

Time to listen to realists arguing for offshore balancing such as Barry Posen of MIT and John Mearsheimer of U Chicago.

Posted by: Lex   2018-12-26 13:47  

#3  Our entire hemisphere is of zero threat to us.

There is an existential threat at our porous southern border of terrorists, human smuggling and drugs.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-12-26 13:05  

#2  Or some idiot insists we convert all our foodstuff to biofuel.
Posted by: Black Charlie Noodleman4774   2018-12-26 04:54  

#1  We feed ourselves.

We do until some politicians accept bribes of fractions of a penny on the dollar to give that away, too. Like medications or strategic industries.
Posted by: gorb   2018-12-26 03:29  

00:00