You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
DOJ Defines Bump Stocks as ‘Machineguns,' Gives Public 90 Days to Hand Them Over
2018-12-19
[Breitbart] The Department of Justice announced Tuesday the finalized form of the bump stock ban, achieved by amending ATF regulation so as to define bump stocks as "machineguns."

Breitbart News possesses a copy of the DOJ’s summary of the ban, which states:
The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to clarify that bump-stock-type devices-meaning "bump fire" stocks, slide-fire devices, and devices with certain similar characteristics-are "machineguns" as defined by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 because such devices allow a shooter of a semiautomatic firearm to initiate a continuous firing cycle with a single pull of the trigger.

The summary says a bump stock allows the trigger of a semiautomatic firearm to reset between the firing of each round, but describes the bump stock-equipped "semiautomatic firearm" as "self-acting or self-regulating," and therefore a "machinegun."

The DOJ’s summary explains that there will be no grandfathering of pre-owned bump stocks. Rather, all bump stocks must be destroyed or handed over the ATF within 90 days of the ban’s effective date:
With limited exceptions, the Gun Control Act, as amended, makes it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun unless it was lawfully possessed prior to the effective date of the statute. The bumpstock-type devices covered by this final rule were not in existence prior to the effective date of the statute, and therefore will be prohibited when this rule becomes effective. Consequently, under the final rule, current possessors of these devices will be required to destroy the devices or abandon them at an ATF office prior to the effective date of the rule.

The push for a bump stock ban begin in Congress following the October 1, 2017, Las Vegas attack. But public support for such a ban was scant and the Congressional push for a ban waned.

At President Trump’s behest the ATF began seeking public comment on a regulatory ban of bump stocks in December 2017. In February 2018 Trump made clear he had directed the DOJ to ban the firearm accessories.

The bump stock ban is expected to appear in the federal register this Friday, thereafter giving owners 90 days to destroy them or turn them in. The 90 days ends March 21, 2019.

On December 18, 2018, a senior DOJ official told Breitbart News there are no plans to compensate bump stock owners for the financial value of their legally purchased bump stock accessories. The official also said the DOJ expects a legal challenge against the bump stock ban and is prepared to fight any suit that is filed.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  I could not afford a bump stock. Blowing through ammo is not a good choice in auto for an individual. Fire discipline and well placed shots are more effective than spray and pray.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2018-12-19 18:16  

#8  When is a bump stock not a bump stock? When you take the guts out of it? Haven't read the law yet.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2018-12-19 18:08  

#7  I've found that one should not underestimate the power of authorities covering their asses. In this case possibly multiple agencies.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-12-19 15:27  

#6  did we ever find out more about the Vegas shooter who kicked this whole thing off?

Yesterday's news. But did you hear about Trump's latest outrageous tweet?

Goofing aside, that story had a whole lot of fishy-smelling bits. The way it disappeared suggests something deeper was going on.
Posted by: SteveS   2018-12-19 13:05  

#5  DOJ Defines Bump Stocks as ‘Machineguns,' Gives Public 90 Days to Hand Them Over

...public ignores demand.
Posted by: Hellfish   2018-12-19 13:00  

#4  Great minds think alike, rj?
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-12-19 12:30  

#3  Seems to me that if they want to save lives they should encourage bump stocks rather than banning them - increase in firing rate should be more than offset by decrease in accuracy.
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-12-19 12:28  

#2  If an object (a) causes you to use up your ammo very fast (b) decreases accuracy shouldn't we be giving them away with every gun purchase to stop school shooters and such?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-12-19 12:26  

#1  Heckuva job, Donnie.

BTW, did we ever find out more about the Vegas shooter who kicked this whole thing off?
Posted by: charger   2018-12-19 09:46  

00:00