| Submit your comments on this article |
| Africa Subsaharan |
| U.S. Military's Worst-Case Scenario: Large Parts of Africa Seized By ISIS, Al Queda, and Boko Haram |
| 2018-09-15 |
| [Intercept] WHAT KEEPS U.S. Africa Command chief Gen. Thomas Waldhauser up at night? That remains unknown, but the analysts under his command are worried about terrorist organizations like the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, and Boko Haram combining forces and destabilizing large swaths of the African continent. Planning documents issued in October 2017 and classified by Waldhauser detail the worst-case scenarios imagined by the command. The forecasts, which are an update to AFRICOM’s Theater Campaign Plan and were obtained by The Intercept via a Freedom of Information Act request, center around potential gains by terrorist organizations in the north and west of the continent, specifically Libya, the Sahel, and the Lake Chad basin. They offer a nightmare vision of a destabilized, crisis-ridden region that could ‐ if the worst happens ‐ fall increasingly under the control of Al Qaeda, ISIS, and Boko Haram. North and West Africa have seen intense U.S. military engagement over the last decade. America has, as The Intercept reported earlier this year, conducted approximately 550 drone strikes in Libya since 2011 ‐ more than in Somalia, Yemen, or Pakistan. In July, Politico disclosed that for at least five years, Green Berets, Navy SEALs, and other commandos ‐ operating under a little-understood budgetary authority known as Section 127e ‐ have been involved in reconnaissance and "direct action" combat raids with local forces in Cameroon, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, and Tunisia. Between 2015 and 2017, there were also at least 10 previously unreported attacks on American troops in West Africa, the New York Times revealed in March. Last October, four U.S. troops were killed in an ISIS ambush in Niger. Two months later, Green Berets fighting alongside local forces in that same country reportedly killed 11 ISIS militants. The disclosure comes as Waldhauser has submitted a proposal, in response to the Trump administration’s strategy to increasingly focus on threats from China and Russia, to drastically cut the number of U.S. commandos on the continent and shutter several bases, according to a recent report by the New York Times. AFRICOM did not respond to requests to interview Waldhauser. The AFRICOM documents imagine a future in which the Islamic State consolidates control over eastern Libya ‐ a region destabilized by a 2011 NATO military intervention that overthrew autocrat Muammar Gaddafi. ISIS, in this scenario, would dominate major cities and develop close ties with local militias and "tribal elements." According to the files, ISIS could then use oil revenues to finance a wide-ranging terror campaign. "ISIS and their associated branches might then begin to plan and conduct large scale, high-impact attacks against Western targets in North Africa and Europe," according to the files. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #6 I have worked with many Africans in the oilfield. They are happy to get away from there, tired of the unending and constant corruption. They say they cannot trust anyone, even family many times. If Africa is as great as everyone keeps saying, then we should let Africa alone so it can be so awesome without any help from us. |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2018-09-15 13:40 |
| #5 There are large patches of civilization in Africa worth preserving. and Africa should. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2018-09-15 12:11 |
| #4 It wasn't that long ago posters on this forum expressed concern about the spread of the wahhabi into the African continent. For many reasons, the whahabi have morphed into IS, BH, and Al-Q. They are a force that has a nasty habit of killing Christians and nativists. There are large patches of civilization in Africa worth preserving. The African continent is not the place to let this scum take control. While I am not ready to put a standing army in Africa, I would support a decapitation campaign to make life tough for the bad guys. |
| Posted by: jvalentour 2018-09-15 09:46 |
| #3 Of course, I would rather see Abdullah the Big Turban thrash around in Equatorial Africa with the associated Ebola, Malaria, Denge Fever, etc., not to mention a bizzillion venomous snakes than I would have them in Detroit or Fargo. Trust me on this one, except for the mineral wealth of the region, they can have that fever swamp. |
| Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2018-09-15 09:08 |
| #2 Failed western foreign policy coming home to roost. The once preeminent military powers of the region (trained on the western model) have been transformed into obese kraal swine. Or perhaps western foreign policy wasn't 'failed' at all. 'Containment' permits the threat to survive. The threat permits the military-industrial complex to flourish. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2018-09-15 08:57 |
| #1 containment. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-15 08:43 |