Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Peter Strzok Refused to Testify About Any Talks with Fusion GPS |
2018-06-30 |
[Breitbart] NEW YORK ‐ House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) revealed that during his closed session interview with the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, former FBI official Peter Strzok refused to answer multiple questions, including whether he communicated with the author of the discredited anti-Trump dossier or with the firm paid by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to produce the infamous dossier. Goodlatte made those revelations during the televised portion of Wednesday’s hearing. At that section of the hearing, Goodlatte stated (emphasis added): We went through a lot of questions about a lot of things for which we got answers, but we were also stymied time and time and time again because the FBI counsel instructed him not to answer because it was, as she called it, an ongoing investigation. Now we have an ongoing investigation here as well. Simpson, a former journalist with the Wall Street Journal, is the co-founder of Fusion GPS, the controversial firm that hired former British spy Christopher Steele to produce the dossier. Simpson’s Fusion GPS was paid for its anti-Trump work by Trump’s primary political opponents, namely Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via the Perkins Coie law firm. After the hearing, Goodlatte appeared on Fox News to further comment on the FBI counsel’s refusal to allow Strzok to answer certain questions. The Congressman said that some of Strzok’s testimony was "not believable" when it came to the "hateful nature" of his anti-Trump text messages. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#4 Something about the prior FBI relationship with some of the people he was asked about.... |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2018-06-30 19:35 |
#3 So he plead the 5th, but not being under oath he didn't actually have to plead the 5th, he just said he won't answer that. If they haven't started the groundwork for the prosecution of this skunk they should now. |
Posted by: ruprecht 2018-06-30 11:34 |
#2 The answer lies in the motive of the FBI counsel to refuse to answer. Smart former agents might best explain. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2018-06-30 10:13 |
#1 I am gobsmacked! What could this possibly mean ? |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-06-30 08:18 |