You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
DHS Chief Hits Back at 'Offensive' Questions at WH Briefing
2018-06-19
[Townhall] The hottest topic at Monday's White House press briefing was, expectedly, the Trump administration's policy of separating children from parents who are attempting to enter the country illegally. DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen took the press's pointed questions, and she did not hide her emotions when answering them.

She denied accounts that the policy amounted to "child abuse" or was comparable to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War Two.

She was especially offended by the following exchange.
"Are you intending for parents to be separated from their children?" one reporter asked. "Are you intending to send a message?"

"I find that offensive," Nielsen shot back. "Why would I ever create a policy that purposely does that?"

At an earlier event Monday, Nielsen said the White House would not apologize for the policy.
"To a select few in the media, Congress and the advocacy community, I'd like to start with a message for you," she said. "This Department will not longer stand by and watch you attack law enforcement for enforcing the laws passed by Congress. We will not apologize for the job we do."

If Congress closes the loopholes that allows adult migrants to take advantage of the undocumented children's policy, then the families will be able to stay together throughout the proceedings, she agreed at the briefing.

That was the message from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders too, who followed Nielsen to the podium. The president, she said, is trying to work with Congress to find a solution.

If you walk into a bank with your minor daughter, hold it up (break the law), and are subsequently arrested, you go to jail. Your daughter goes to an Office of Children and Family Services, not jail. What about this process does the media and this petulant WH press corps not understand ?
Posted by:Besoeker

#24  "Trump Says Democrats Want Immigrants to ‘Infest’ the U.S."

Out of respect for this board I won't mention where I've heard these words before.


I searched “Trump immigrants”and got the following headline from Yahoo among others:

Trump says immigrants will 'infest our country' in Twitter tirade, as US border row rages on

Then I read the article, as one does, and discovered that Yahoo had included the tweet in question:

Donald J. Trump✔
@realDonaldTrump
Democrats are the problem. They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13. They can’t win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!
9:52 AM - Jun 19, 2018


Emphasis is mine. European Conservative, there is a big difference between legal and illegal immigrants, as there is a different big difference between immigrants, whether legal or illegal, and refugees and asylum seekers.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-06-19 22:40  

#23  
Out of respect for this board I won't mention where I've heard these words before.


Because foreign citizens are the same as citizens who are members of a minority? Because "stay home" is the same as "exterminate them"?

It's not America's fault Europe got together and tried real hard to kill all the Jews, then in bizarre misplaced guilt have since been trying to either finish the job via proxy or import the most rabid Jew-haters alive. Take your guilty feelings, fold them so they're all corners, and stuff them up Brussels.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2018-06-19 21:40  

#22  ...you spelled Socialist wrong.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-06-19 21:35  

#21  "Trump Says Democrats Want Immigrants to ‘Infest’ the U.S."

Democrats want poor, illiterate people because those people are reliable voters for the Democrat Party. Poor, illiterate people want free health care, welfare, rent control and $15 an hour for flipping hamburgers. Democrats are more than willing to provide these things for the poor, illiterate people at the expense of people who work and pay taxes. It's no secret.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2018-06-19 20:27  

#20  ...why it has been so bad for decades generations, and what could done about it.

FIFY!

We're not trying to ship them out, EC. We just want them to stay home.

No, we definitely want to ship them back and for the rest of them to stay home.
Posted by: Lampedusa Uluter1671   2018-06-19 20:14  

#19  "Trump Says Democrats Want Immigrants to ‘Infest’ the U.S."

Since 1994 unchecked immigration has resulted in immigrant swarming of Johannesburg, Pretoria, Bloemfontain, and other South African cities and towns. The result:

a. A ready pool of very cheap labor.
b. Instant government dependency.
c. Huge expansion of government funded police and security services.
d. The flight of whites.
e. Huge numbers of new African National Congress (ANC) members.

Anyone spot any similarities ?

Posted by: Besoeker   2018-06-19 17:20  

#18  We're not trying to ship them out, EC. We just want them to stay home.
Posted by: Bobby   2018-06-19 17:11  

#17  "Trump Says Democrats Want Immigrants to ‘Infest’ the U.S."

Out of respect for this board I won't mention where I've heard these words before. But maybe I don't have to.
Posted by: European Conservative   2018-06-19 17:07  

#16  I read that something like 10k of the 12k kids were not separated from but arrived without their parents.

If this is true the discussion should be about the morality of returning a child to such an unfit parent or not. Or about what kind of culture produces a parent willing to do that.

We should also talk about why south of the border is so bad that folks risk death in the desert to escape, why it has been so bad for decades, and what could done about it.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2018-06-19 15:44  

#15  What about the kids weeping for their parents in Trenton? What about the parents, weeping for their children in Chicago? Do the progressives prefer Central Americans to American urban dwellers?

You'll notice I cleverly avoided a hot-button issue by not distinguishing between groups of urban dwellers?
Posted by: Bobby   2018-06-19 15:23  

#14  This is not original with me; but it's been pointed out that these families can all stay united by staying south of the border.
Posted by: Tom   2018-06-19 13:45  

#13  Weak example, EC, but spoken like a true EU Brussels "patriot".
Posted by: Clem   2018-06-19 13:33  

#12  we don't want foreigners telling us we shouldn't defend our country

Or how fast we can drive.
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-06-19 13:11  

#11  Parents who go 75mph on the interstate are also breaking the law. That doesn't mean their daughter in the backseat is taken away from them.

Can you say moral relativism? Around here, 75 mph isn't considered all that bad. At most the driver would have to pay a fine. But if the driver is found to be under the influence that is another matter altogether. The parent would go to jail and the cops would be left with the task of figuring out what to do with the child. Hopefully the drunkard's spouse or some other close relative would be available but that is not always the case.

But the question you raise is how should we compare a minor traffic violation to the invasion of a foreign country. You can take Merkel's position that all borders should be left wide open. But the people of this country elected Donald Trump because we don't believe that. We don't want to speak Spanish, we don't want to bow down to Mecca and we don't want foreigners telling us we shouldn't defend our country.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2018-06-19 11:53  

#10  Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen gave a good accounting of herself in the presser.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-06-19 09:28  

#9  In my part of the country the adult charge with speeding is likely to get a second charge of child endangerment with a complementary visit from Child and Youth Services. Of which the later, could indeed result in the child pulled from the home. CYS dropped a couple of high profile cases and is more than a bit defensive in the "child's" welfare.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-06-19 06:54  

#8  EC, invading a country isn't speeding.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2018-06-19 06:34  

#7  Poor Pedro was feeling dejected.
His family, it seems, were ejected.
He'd swerved on the pike --
Dodged himself on a bike! --
And the parts are still being collected.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2018-06-19 06:30  

#6  Parents who go 75mph on the interstate are also breaking the law. That doesn't mean their daughter in the backseat is taken away from them.

This ain't Bavaria.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-06-19 05:52  

#5  "We're leaving, mi hija," sez Pedro.
"I'm tired of Tijuana. Yo migro,
And the gringos won't mind
If I bypass that line
To explore, at high speed, San Ysidro."
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2018-06-19 04:02  

#4  Ann Coulter Smears Immigrant Children as ‘Child Actors’
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-06-19 03:28  

#3  Texas interstates are generally 85mph.
But you gotta wear seatbelts, EC.
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-06-19 03:27  

#2  Besoeker

Parents who go 75mph on the interstate are also breaking the law. That doesn't mean their daughter in the backseat is taken away from them.
Posted by: European Conservative   2018-06-19 03:25  

#1  What the other side sees:
Trump And His Allies Are Lying Through Their Teeth About Family Separations
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-06-19 03:06  

00:00